• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Underwater Compact that shoots RAW?

ahsanford

Particular Member
Aug 16, 2012
8,656
1,664
57,701
Hello all,

I'm off to do some snorkeling soon, and was considering how I might take pics underwater. I've considered both a sealed-up housing for either my iPhone or my 5D3 and I didn't want to risk either. I've decided that I want to rent a waterproof compact camera instead.

LensRentals offers the Powershot D20, but as you can see, the shots it takes are okay but not so hot:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=%22powershot%20D20%22%20underwater

Given that these shots scream for post-processing (color cast, lack of contrast, etc.), I was wondering if any underwater compacts actually shoot in RAW.

Are you guys aware of any?

- A
 
You could rent the Nikon 1 AW1, its essentially a mirrorless waterproof camera. It'd be the closest thing to your DSLR.

Other options would be to rent something like a G1X or RX100 and an underwater housing for those.

Last resort, I think you can put CHDK on something like a D20; you'll at least get DNG files. But, you'll probably be disappointed with any true underwater camera, they all offer terrible IQ, and I imagine an uncorrected file looks pretty bad (tons of CA, distortion, etc): http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK
 
Upvote 0
I don't think there are RAW capable P&S cameras that are waterproof. But you can get reasonably priced P&S cameras and a housing.
Try searching flickr with: S110 and underwater. You get the idea what can be done with a RAW capable P&S. Try also G12 and underwater. What you need underwater is light. Changed my underwater photos from butt-ugly to well... almost ok.

The link below has some photos with a Sony RX100.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/xanderwater/

J (Using a Canon 550D, hopefully also a 5D3 this year)
 
Upvote 0
here is 2 pictures taken in a fairly murky estuary in mexico, one processed and since printed something like 12x16 and i am very happy with the print. the other straight out of the fuji xp60 (or 90 not sure). happy with the camera considering the low price (paid 190 i think)

i rarely need to take underwater photos, and im not looking to make fine art giant prints with it when i do, so i like it. not sure how much better they would process with raw, maybe the colour cast but i doubt it. you are underwater, the light is blue, you arent going to pull out a lot of red details without coloured flashes, thats what i thought.

have you looked around underwater? there is not much contrast and everything is tinted to blue.

heres a local guy doing some cool underwater work, you need to spend a bit more to get these shots methinks. ;) he uses a ton of lighting, almost every shot is not just natural light.
www.eikojonesphotography.com
 

Attachments

  • 20130420-20130420_3677.jpg
    20130420-20130420_3677.jpg
    875.1 KB · Views: 812
  • 20130420-20130420_3729.jpg
    20130420-20130420_3729.jpg
    757.7 KB · Views: 835
Upvote 0
ZimUW said:
Please report back what you think about the AW1. I'm considering that as a possible backup camera.

J

Glad to, but keep your fingers crossed on my compositions. I am never underwater, so I expect to gather crystal clear shots of my flippers more than any local wildlife. :-P

- A
 
Upvote 0