What I would like to see in 2024
- Thread starter Canon Rumors Guy
- Start date
Full-frame lenses are larger which kind of defeats the purpose of having a small camera body.
Upvote
0
Yeah, Canon could get away with not having DPAF on a DSLR.
I am not so sure that they can with mirrorless.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
That's why I specifically referenced the 16, 28, 50 and 24-50 lenses, I haven't seen Canon produce any smaller lenses than those, be it FF or crop. We can quibble about the 24-50, it doesn't taper in like the RF-S zooms do.
Maybe in the future Canon (or 3rd parties) will release small AF lenses specifically for crop, but right now, there is no real size advantage for primes. For zooms, yes, the 10-18 is a lot smaller than the 15-30.
Upvote
0
No. Some designs are larger (and heavier) - one advantage mirrorless can have is they can use smaller designs that cannot be used with SLRs because of the mirror box. A small "retro" body, especially a rangefinder-like one, with large lenses could be really useless. Now, if it comes with smaller, lighter lenses...
Upvote
0
Yes, and a super crispy 4K video output with no odd downsampling ratio or cropping (and the option to output 8K video, though the consumer variety) because it's just a straight 2x2 downsample like what they did with the C100 where it had a 4K sensor but output downsampled 1080p. For a 1080p camera, the C100 had some some the crispest (at the time) 1080 video ever.
If they then pushed out a full frame camera with that same pixel density, they'd easily have DCI 8K super35 video out with a whopping 12K+ full frame out for video. Now that's definitely on the upper end of things.
Stills would just be the icing on the cake.
Upvote
0
The noise/DR hit would be "equivalent" to the A9iii as their implementation of global shutter halves the light as they split the pixel into 2 parts. One to measure and the other to charge ready to read out simultaneously. Unsure how the microlens would assist... if the measuring pixel had double the well depth for photons then in theory there wouldn't be an issue of base ISO for instance. You would assume that Sony tried to do this but wasn't able to. Similarly, having the charge stored behind the pixel (BSI) also didn't seem to be viable for Sony.
Other more knowledgeable forum dwellers may be able to comment in more detail.
Upvote
0
Not going to lie: I'm tepid at best on a retro camera. I have gotten spoiled these last few decades on actually being able to hold my camera. So I am probably not the target market. That being said, I do understand the attraction. But I am going to say this: if they do this and don't make it the third iteration of the RP, I'll be severely disappointed. As folks probably know, the EOS RP was the second camera to bear the RP designation. In 1960, Canon released two variations of its Canonflex SLR, the R2000 with its 1/2000 shutter speed, and the RP, or Reflex Populaire, an economy version of the same. I like that my EOS RP invokes some of that same mystique, as it has been a great camera for me. And let's face it: I'm a bit of an antique myself at this point. But an RP Mark II, or better yet, an RP Flex retro camera would at least invoke a smile from me.
Upvote
0
The RF 200-800 is presumably Canon's equivalent, though obviously it doesn't meet all those criteria.
Upvote
0
A quibble but I personally doubt millennials figure big in this (though obviously the whole named generation thing is intrinsically problematic). Mostly too young to have used such bodies the first time round, but a bit too old to think they're cool (and would that even count as nostalgia?). Gen X maybe.
Upvote
0
I didn't had forgotten about a daily update for used and refurbished items. So, thanks for that!
let's add the refurbished page (I'm not sure if canon will mail out of the country).
Refurbished Canon Camera and Lens Price Comparisons - cpricewatch.com
We can also go to the item page you want and ask the website to send an email when there is a new deal
Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM
Upvote
0
Similar threads
- Contains 15 staff post(s)