tnargs said:All it would take is some decent moderation of the anti-Canon crap from either bitter people or blatant trolls.
tnargs said:A related topic, is there any moderation of the canonrumors forum? There is so much anti-canon stuff that is allowed to proliferate and seems mainly aimed at making canon owners think they make poor decisions and should be filled with regret. Instead, this forum could be a pleasant haven for Canon users where people share, solve and support one another. All it would take is some decent moderation of the anti-Canon crap from either bitter people or blatant trolls.
neuroanatomist said:The issue will be too many whiners complaining about it.![]()
pwp said:cough cough...is there a troll nearby? Or am I missing the humour?
But seriously I think the biggest single issue with the 6D will be the extreme radioactivity coming from the admittedly remarkable, compact nuclear reactor used as a 25 year, never-recharge-it power supply. This could result in excess noise at all iso settings, not to mention hair loss and unwanted security alerts at airports.
-PW
That world does not exist! Try using the 'B' word in an airportGothmoth said:tnargs said:All it would take is some decent moderation of the anti-Canon crap from either bitter people or blatant trolls.
i prefer to live in a free world without censoring.
rpt said:That world does not exist! Try using the 'B' word in an airport![]()
tnargs said:A related topic, is there any moderation of the canonrumors forum? There is so much anti-canon stuff that is allowed to proliferate and seems mainly aimed at making canon owners think they make poor decisions and should be filled with regret. Instead, this forum could be a pleasant haven for Canon users where people share, solve and support one another. All it would take is some decent moderation of the anti-Canon crap from either bitter people or blatant trolls.
bvukich said:tnargs said:A related topic, is there any moderation of the canonrumors forum? There is so much anti-canon stuff that is allowed to proliferate and seems mainly aimed at making canon owners think they make poor decisions and should be filled with regret. Instead, this forum could be a pleasant haven for Canon users where people share, solve and support one another. All it would take is some decent moderation of the anti-Canon crap from either bitter people or blatant trolls.
As long as they don't resort to personal attacks, name calling, or profanity; they shouldn't be moderated. My job isn't to judge peoples personal opinions, they're entitled to them, and I would refuse the job if given it. As long as things are kept civil, most things will work themselves out, and most dedicated trolls will leave out of boredom or banned because of bad behavior. There are some forum members that started off with very trollish behavior and ended up becoming good helpful forum members.
GPS coordinates are 3 km off
verysimplejason said:The issue could be that its IQ (if) is better than 5D3 and the 5D3 owners are whining about it. Somebody(a 5D3 owner) is already whining when some 6D jpeg shots are released by dpreview.
Dylan777 said:verysimplejason said:The issue could be that its IQ (if) is better than 5D3 and the 5D3 owners are whining about it. Somebody(a 5D3 owner) is already whining when some 6D jpeg shots are released by dpreview.
dbreview and DXO are the sites have most B.S reviews ever - to me.
You might as well post another topic with title: "6D + 24-70 f4 IS is out perform 5D III + 24-70 f2.8 II" :![]()
neuroanatomist said:The issue will be too many whiners complaining about it.![]()