From NL
Over at NL they've been told to expect Canon to answer to demand with the upcoming lens announcements.

24-70 f/2.8L IS I predict is the most wanted lens to Canonites.

Or is it?

[poll id=”7″]

cr

Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.
Share.

155 Comments

  1. Grummbeerbauer on

    I had the same feelings about the 100-400 not ranking higher, but I also agree with drummstikk in that I do not really understand why everyone is so much after the 24-70 FL range, but I am no FF user. But I do have the 24-105 on crop and love it — in particular the ability to get pretty close to your subject for unexpected and non-posed across the room portraits.
    I currently have most of my (amateur, APS-C) lens needs covered, all that I still need is a long telezoom (i.e., longer than the 70-200 f4 IS that I have). And since the existing third party alternatives don’t seem to cut it IQ-wise (120-400 OS, 150-500 OS), have okayish IQ but no IS and/or no USM(-equivalent) (Tamron 200-500, Bigma), or are just way to big/heavy and way too pricey for a third-party alternative (the “BigmOS” 50-500, of whose IQ not much is know at this point, BTW), all that is left is the Canon 100-400. But I simply refuse to buy a 10+ years old lens with an ancient IS and a reputation of considerable sample variation, in particular given my luck with lenses. So Canon: Bring an updated 100-400 with 4-stops IS, get you QC up to speed, don’t get to greedy with the pricing, and you will (again) get my money.

  2. Grummbeerbauer on

    A new moderately-priced long tele prime would really make a lot of sense. The 400 f5.6 may be a good lens, but it is in serious need for a modern IS unit. But if I were to choose between an updated 100-400 and the 400 with IS, I would definitely pick the former.

  3. Never gonna happen. EF-S lenses, by the very nature of the bodies they’re designed for, just aren’t playing to the same market as the L lenses.

  4. Grummbeerbauer on

    Yes, that would be a cool lens, but it would also be the ultimate weapon for hand-to-hand combat, given that the 24-70 already weighs a ton (well, “only” 950 grams, but it’s close enough ;-)).
    And I guess such a lens would cost 2000++€.

Leave A Reply