It looks like Canon is serious about the 17-70mm focal range for a new lens design as discovered by Canon News. This isn't the first time we've seen mention of an RF 17-70mm lens, which leads us to believe we are likely to see this introduced at some point.
This would be a nice kit lens for a new entry-level EOS R camera body.
This patent also shows two similar EF designs.
Canon RF 17-70mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
- Focal length: 17.40mm 34.99mm 67.97mm
- F-number: 3.31 4.12 5.88
- Half angle of view: 51.20° 31.73° 17.66°
- Image height: 21.64mm 21.64mm 21.64mm
- Total lens length: 168.41mm 154.99mm 168.39mm
- BF: 8.36mm 52.48mm 81.91mm
Canon EF 17-70mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
- Focal length: 17.40mm 35.00mm 68.00mm
- F-number: 3.33 4.09 5.88
- Half-field angle: 51.19° 31.72° 17.65°
- Image height: 21.64mm 21.64mm 21.64mm
- Total lens length: 168.42mm 153.33mm 168.42mm
- BF: 38.32mm 53.44mm 84.11mm
Canon EF 16-60mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
- Focal length: 16.30mm 35.00mm 60.00 mm
- F-number: 3.31 4.22 5.88
- Half angle of view: 53.01° 31.72° 19.83°
- Image height: 21.64mm 21.64mm 21.64mm
- Total lens length: 68.46mm 153.33mm 168.42mm
- BF: 38.35mm 56.15mm 83.82mm
Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.
Jack
It would also be useful for the 2 R bodies out now, in terms of dealing with the cropped 4K mode.
24-240 was too "extreme" for system-beginners, who are usually looking for a trans-standard zoom.
Good choice, Canon.
I can't be the only one expecting that an APS-C RF body is imminent, right?
Maybe some 20 ... 70 f/4.0 IS L lens will follow which I would prefer: a little bit less on the wide end but constant f/4 and very good correction.
Would make a good travel kit with the maybe upcoming 70-400 and a 2nd body EDIT: and RF 35mm for low light/semi-macro!
I'm glad to see that all patents for RF lenses are full frame so far.
(by the way, is this the radius of the image circle, for a full frame sensor is 36mm wide and 24mm high?)
Canon dropping an RF 17-70 kit lens that hits probably $499; and a 70-300 f/4-5.6 lens that hits a similar price point would make full-frame RP with 17-300 range for <$2k really appealing. And likely with stronger IQ and performance than the RP+24-240 deals they are running right now.
If the title says "RF", wouldn't the chance be zero rather than close to zero?
I am not so sure. Not long ago Canon introduced 2000D and 4000D, a $400 DSLR (with lens) for markets where even 500-600$ is considered too expensive.
I don't see how a full frame will be ever that cheap. And someone who wants a 7D or 90D like camera, a very basic full frame without viewfinder and 3 fps won't be enough.
So i think there is a need for n APS-C line. Maybe the M will stay alive but that system is quite weak in lens department.
The jury is definitely still out regarding if Canon has any intentions on creating an IQ focused smaller format camera system.
As others have mentioned, EF-S is dead for all intents and purposes, and the EFM lenses prioritize portability over IQ (although the 32f1.4 does cast some doubt on this theory).
Very interesting to see if Canon focuses on low cost FF to be the gateway to up-selling existing customers vs the old EF-S to EF upgrade path. It certainly seems that way with the recently released consumer zoom & this rumored lens. And if the M remains the APS-C option.
Either way I think this is all a bit early as we won't know for some years potentially as Canon focuses on the R bodies and RF mount in the near term.