The FE 24-50mm f/2.8 G is designed for Sony Alpha full-frame E-mount mirrorless cameras, but it also works with APS-C sensor cameras (with an effective focal length of 36-75mm due to the 1.5x crop factor). Here’s what you need to know about this lens:

  1. Compact and Lightweight: Weighing in at just 440g (15.5 oz) and measuring 9.23cm in length, this lens is remarkably light and compact for a standard zoom. It strikes a balance between portability and performance.
  2. Aperture: The constant f/2.8 aperture throughout the zoom range ensures excellent low-light performance and allows for creative depth of field control.
  3. Optical Design: The lens features 16 elements in 13 groups, including two ED (extra-low dispersion) elements and four standard aspherical elements. This construction contributes to high image quality, reduced aberrations, and improved sharpness.
  4. Bokeh: With its 11-blade diaphragm, the lens produces smooth and attractive bokeh in out-of-focus areas.
  5. Close Focusing: The lens offers a minimum focusing distance of 19cm (0.62ft) and a maximum magnification of 0.33x, making it versatile for close-up shots.
  6. Autofocus: The linear motor ensures fast and quiet autofocusing, even when shooting at up to 120 fps using burst modes.
  7. Video Capabilities: Videographers will appreciate smooth tracking in slow-motion 4K 120p and Full HD 240p. Focus breathing compensation is also available.
  8. Build Quality: The lens is dust- and moisture-resistant, making it suitable for various shooting conditions. The fluorine coating on the front element repels water, oil, and contaminants.
  9. Customizable Focus Hold Button: Like other Sony lenses, the FE 24-50mm f/2.8 G includes a customizable focus hold button for added convenience.
  10. Price and Availability: The lens is expected to be available in April 2024, priced at £1150 / €1300 in the UK and Europe, respectively.

The Sony FE 24-50mm f/2.8 G Lens offers a compelling alternative for photographers seeking a versatile, high-quality standard zoom without the bulk of larger lenses. Whether you’re capturing everyday moments or diving into creative projects, this lens could be exactly what you need.

Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.

Go to discussion...

Share.

5 comments

  1. If Canon goes for a lightweight general purpose zoom, personally, I hope it is more of a RF 20-60 f/4 L (ideally) or RF 24-70 f/4 L (still acceptable). For lightweight, I would prefer a bit more focal length flexibility over a stop faster aperture.

    A lightweight flexible general purpose zoom is something I am waiting on.
  2. If Canon goes for a lightweight general purpose zoom, personally, I hope it is more of a RF 20-60 f/4 L (ideally) or RF 24-70 f/4 L (still acceptable). For lightweight, I would prefer a bit more focal length flexibility over a stop faster aperture.

    A lightweight flexible general purpose zoom is something I am waiting on.
    I recently bought the RF24-105 F/4L as a compromise between aperture and size, the lenses you mention above would have been more to my liking :)

    I’m still very happy with the 24-105, it is exactly what I thought it would be.
  3. I recently bought the RF24-105 F/4L as a compromise between aperture and size, the lenses you mention above would have been more to my liking :)

    I’m still very happy with the 24-105, it is exactly what I thought it would be.
    You must have got a good one, since there seem to be copy variations. Mine was just OK, but definitely not as good as the EF 24-70 F4.
    Guess which one I kept, yet knowing that there are some very good 24-105 around.
    As OpticalLimits often stated, it is far from easy producing an excellent "standard" zoom. Fact is, a standard zoom lags behind similar focal length primes. Not so tele-zooms.
    Therefore, I'd rather see a 24-50 than a 20-60, less extreme is often better, meaning less optical compromises. Sadly, moderate zooms do not sell that well, think of the really great Sigma 24-35 F2.
    But I still expect some good Canon surprises...
  4. You must have got a good one, since there seem to be copy variations. Mine was just OK, but definitely not as good as the EF 24-70 F4.[…]
    The important bit for me that it needed to be better than my EF24-105L, the mark I version. The RF cleared that low bar easily :)

    My copy of the RF is not as sharp as the one I rented years ago, but only slightly. Sharp enough for my uses, if I want better sharpness I’ll use a (non-L) prime.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment