It seems Yongnuo is throwing down the glove regarding the RF mount and autofocus capability. While Samyang and others have previously created autofocus lenses for the RF mount, they were told to stop by Canon apparently over patent issues.

Now it seems that Yongnuo will soon release the 35mm F2R DF DSM for the RF mount, which is already out for other mounts. This adds to the already available 85mm F1.8R DF DSM that Yongnuo has previously released for the RF mount. This image and information were leaked on weibo with the following image showing the lens on the EOS R camera.

005IlVnfgy1hlu8b4mbdkj33k03k07wi - Yongnuo to release an autofocus Canon RF 35mm f/2R DF DSM soon

The lens is listed on Yonguo's website for $403.00 – slightly pricy for a 35mm F2.0 lens and should also ship to the USA. I can't see this price holding up though, as the E mount version is around $250, and the Canon RF native 35mm F1.8 is only $500. So I suspect that may be a placeholder price for now. The Weibo user suggests around 200 yuan or $275.

B&H Photo carries the 85mm F1.8 for the RF mount, so Canon hasn't filed any injunctions, etc to prevent the sale of Yongnuo RF lenses in the USA. I suspect B&H will carry the 35mm lens as well.

I find it funny that on Yonguo's website, they blur out the fact that the lens is on a Canon R camera.

image 7 728x556 - Yongnuo to release an autofocus Canon RF 35mm f/2R DF DSM soon

The lens itself looks like a pretty standard double-gauss lens, so the quality won't be exceptional, but since the lens will probably be around $250-$400, you do get what you pay for. Keep in mind though that this lens is relatively small, and while it may be bad on a full-frame camera, you could use it on a crop camera as a 50mm equivalent. Especially if the price is around $250, it could end up being a good low-cost option for a crop camera body.

For me though, the more interesting aspect is that it's another auto-focus lens for the RF mount. The more vendors that start making RF auto-focus lenses, the better.

Features include;

  • Fn Button
  • F/2 Large Aperture.
  • Quiet CNC Stepping Motor Integrated, DSM Motor.
  • 9 Optical Lenses in 8 Groups with Nano-multilayer Coating.
  • Aspheric and Low Dispersion Lens.
  • 7 Circular Aperture Blades.
  • USB Firmware Upgrade.
  • Metal Bayonet and Contacts

Specifications

Product ModelYN35mm F2S DF DSM
Lens MountSony E
Focus ModeAuto Focus (AF) and Manual Focus (MF)
Lens FrameFull Frame
Focal Length35mm
Angle of ViewDiagonal: 61.3°
Vertical: 36.74°
Horizontal: 52.91°
Lens Construction8 groups 9 elements
Aperture Blades7 blades
Max Aperturef/2
Min Aperturef/16
Min Focusing Distance0.35m
Max Magnification0.13 times
Filter Diameter52mm
Driving SystemDigital Stepper Motor
Max Diameter and LengthΦ67×72mm
Weight295g

Source: asobinet

Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.

Go to discussion...

Share.

41 comments

  1. "For me though, the more interesting aspect is that it's another auto-focus lens for the RF mount. The more vendors that start making RF auto-focus lenses, the better."

    Agreed - if this goes on sale normally, it would be more evidence that there is a practical change of stance by Canon. AF 3rd party lenses are what (I think) everyone wants, both for 'exotic' specifications, and simply alternatives (generally at a lower cost) to Canon versions.
  2. "For me though, the more interesting aspect is that it's another auto-focus lens for the RF mount. The more vendors that start making RF auto-focus lenses, the better."

    Agreed - if this goes on sale normally, it would be more evidence that there is a practical change of stance by Canon. AF 3rd party lenses are what (I think) everyone wants, both for 'exotic' specifications, and simply alternatives (generally at a lower cost) to Canon versions.
    The Yongnuo 85 f/1.8 has been for sale for years.
    The 85 f/1.8 II is relatively new.
    It does not represent a change of anything except to my knowledge every single 3rd party RF lens has been 85 mm.
    There was one from Samyang/Rokinon and another one from Viltrox.
  3. It does not represent a change of anything except to my knowledge every single 3rd party RF lens has been 85 mm.
    I assume you mean AF-lenses, and then I think you are almost right. But there was at least also a Samyang AF 14mm for RF-mount.

    If you include manual focus lenses, there has been "a lot". The list hasn't been updated since August, and is definitely missing some, but probably includes most:
  4. Maybe Canon will silently tolerate third party AF lenses from now on, without officially allowing them. I guess time will tell.

    But choice is always good imho.
  5. AF 3rd party lenses are what (I think) everyone wants
    Actually many will be really mad in having available on the market lenses that are better then their OEM's and cost half the money; it will be fun.
  6. Actually many will be really mad in having available on the market lenses that are better then their OEM's and cost half the money; it will be fun.
    In this case, it has a smaller aperture, lacks IS, is bigger and costs more than the 1st party alternative. So I'm not sure who the target market for this lens is, maybe it has less focus breathing and is better for video use?
  7. Does anybody realy want to give away money for a lens with questionable and uncertain quality and performance, if you have a good alternative choice? For instance, you can buy a used EF 35/2 IS in good condition for 350€.
  8. Canon denying Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina and giving RF mount to these cheaper made brands with no customer support, or history just seems whack to me. Not saying the current AF 3rd party options are all bad, but they certainly are not the best lenses optically, and certainly not for customer support. Resale value is terrible as well.
  9. Does anybody realy want to give away money for a lens with questionable and uncertain quality and performance, if you have a good alternative choice? For instance, you can buy a used EF 35/2 IS in good condition for 350€.
    Yeah, I wonder if Canon doesn’t bother spending any money to fight these lenses because they aren’t that much of a threat. I wouldn’t necessarily take this as a sign they will roll out the welcome mat for Sigma and Tamron just yet, but who knows.
  10. Actually many will be really mad in having available on the market lenses that are better [than] their OEM's and cost half the money; it will be fun.
    I don't think that will be the case, at least not with Yongnuo. 15% of reviews (what little there are) on B&H and Amazon mention lens was DOA, or had severe issues.
  11. I'm curious why Canon allows 3rd-party companies to manufacture lenses with visually confusing signs. Red ring stands for top level lens series. This chyunese rubbish shouldn't have it because it confuses. Even with glitter — what a bad taste.
  12. Canon denying Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina and giving RF mount to these cheaper made brands with no customer support, or history just seems whack to me. Not saying the current AF 3rd party options are all bad, but they certainly are not the best lenses optically, and certainly not for customer support. Resale value is terrible as well.
    Maybe that's exactly why Canon allows this lens to come out. It is not a threat.
  13. AF 3rd party lenses are what (I think) everyone wants, both for 'exotic' specifications, and simply alternatives (generally at a lower cost)
    Speak for yourself, I could care less about 3rd party lenses for the RF mount, so don't include me in your theory.
  14. This lens has been around for years. My copy is from Oct 2021. Yongnuo just calls it new every few years. There are even reviews for it online from Christopher Frost, etc. As the person above says, it's okay. Autofocus for stills is fine. It is susceptible to chromatic aberration. Continuous autofocus for video is not stellar. It was $325 at the time, and you still see it on sale for under $400 these days.
  15. I don't think that will be the case, at least not with Yongnuo. 15% of reviews (what little there are) on B&H and Amazon mention lens was DOA, or had severe issues.
    Of course I'm not thinking of this lens, but to Sigma Art primes and the Tamron 35-150; this Youngnuo lens is pretty cheap but doesn't offer any quality advantage, there certainly are EF lenses that can be bought for same, or less, being much better quality and reliability.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment