mobile01 a5dec84018ed024d52c8d6a1a3361c93 224x300 - 7D & Lens Pictures [CR3]
7D Poster?
374739 300x150 - 7D & Lens Pictures [CR3]
15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM & 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS
374740 300x234 - 7D & Lens Pictures [CR3]
15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
374743 300x179 - 7D & Lens Pictures [CR3]
15-85 MTF Chart
374748 300x185 - 7D & Lens Pictures [CR3]
18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS
374749 300x186 - 7D & Lens Pictures [CR3]
18-135 MTF Chart

I guess we can call these lenses CR3 now.

Forum: http://www.canonrumorsforum.com/index.php?topic=130.0

thanks to my sources!

cr

Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.
Share.

685 Comments

  1. What if they are using a new type of image sensor, the 18MP 1.6 crop could be quite usable even in low light. See US patent USP 20090008735.

  2. Your statement that all lenses profit from higher sensor resolution makes no sense to me. The issue isn’t the lens or the sensor alone but the combination of the two. If a given lens (say, a cheap zoom) isn’t all that sharp, then increasing the resolution of the sensor beyond the level needed to get all the detail the lens is capable of providing does not make the picture better, it just makes the lens’s lack of sharpness more obvious in a 100% crop.

    As for noise, there is a definite relationship between the color accuracy of an individual sensor site (which is the opposite of the noise level, basically) and the size of that site. The smaller the site (that is, the more MP crammed into a sensor of a given size), the less accurate its color reception, and hence the more noise in the image. This can be quite noticeable in images even without resorting to 100% crops, especially in low-light situations.

Leave A Reply