This was another unanimous selection between Craig and myself, and I think even though there's a limited amount of actual field testing so far with this lens, it is going to be easily one of the best super telephoto zooms that Canon has made in terms of raw sales.
What lens did we choose? The title should have given it away, but it's the fantastic RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM.
From the MTF analysis we did here, we can certainly see that by all measures this should rank up as an excellent reach lens for Canon users. Birders combined with a 32MP APS-C camera will have a field day (literally!) with this lens.
This article took longer to get out for a few reasons. We had system-related issues in the new year and also Craig is now in these 5* accommodations.
Craig may drop in and give his commentary once he warms up a bit. But right now, you are just going to get my quick summary and I have a flurry of catching up to do since it's already January 6th!
This will be THE favorite sports and birding lens for Canon users. For years Canon users were jealous of the super telephoto zooms from Tamron and Sigma, now Canon decides that 600mm just is too average and pushes the envelope to 800mm. Granted you can get away with using another lens with a teleconverter, but you can't mess with a teleconverter in the field in all instances. I think this lens will be hard to get for years.
Make sure to get on a preorder list for the RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM as soon as you can.
I pre-ordered the 200-800 two days after it got announced. I can't wait to get it and go nuts with reach
pro level:
1. RF 100-300mm F2.8
2. RF 24-105mm F2.8 Z
3. RF 10-20mm F4 STM
consumer:
1. RF 200-800mm
2. Canon R8
3. RF-S 10-18mm
Worst product:
RF-s 18-45mm F4.5-6.3
I have only tested the R8, the RF 10-18mm and the RF-s 18-45mm so far. So a lot of it is just based on reading up and how it fits the line-up.
My personal top additions (although they were both not released in 2023)
1. RF 85mm F2
2. RF 100-400mm F5.6-8
Not because it is the best lens optically that Canon has released in 2023 (it is not). But because it is something new, unique and extremely interesting, and all reactions so far sounds (and looks) like it also optically performs very well for a consumer lens. And great AF-performance too. So also my choice for #1 Canon product of 2023.
But where in the World is Graig?!?
But, at least to my eye, the rankings would be 1) 24-105 f/2.8....2) 100-300 f/2.8; 3) likely the 10-20.
Even on the consumer level, the R50 looks to be amazing, then the R8, I'd probably rank the 200-800....but just above the EFS 10-18.
I say this with a RF 200-800 sitting behind me (arrived Friday). I am still forming my impressions, but the RF 24-105 f/2.8 wowed me instantly. The 200-800, I am debating. It is a good capable lens, but does it fit in my kit? How often will I want to take it out? I am not even 100% sure the numbers you talk about are there. The RF 100-400 is a very capable lens to pair with a general zoom. You really have to want the 200-800. I expect the 200-800 to displace a number of 100-400s and 100-500s among birders, but pair those with a 1.4tc, and you are talking about something more portable, more flexible, better at their native range, etc. So, popular yes, but I do not expect it to displace all the 100-500s even among birders.
a combination of price, and usability. this is a lens that Canon hasn't had and needed for ages. How many people have wanted Canon to do a Super tele zoom going to at least 600mm?
also that combination you mention is around $3100 versus $1900. At times the best, isn't the most technologically superior or the most breathtaking, but one that ticks the boxes between price, performance, usability, size or weight.
For the R50: I chose the R8 because it has the FF sensor and AF of the Canon R6mkii in an insanely well priced body. (In Germany, until January 15th, you can get it for 1.099 €) and the upgrade from the RP is extraordinary imo..
RF 100-500mm with an extender is ok, but being limited to starting at 420mm (or 600mm) really bothered me.
I chose to build up a collection of telezoom lenses because this part of photography will always be dominated by cameras and not SP. I will only have a lens in the mid-tele range between 24-100mm since I can take a lot of shots with my iPhone here. But since having four telezoom lenses comes with a hefty price tag, I decided to wait patiently for good deals. I could do with 100-500mm as my only lens and therefore see no need to pay full retail price to be amongst the first to have the lens.
Good lens, great that we can get such a lens from Canon.
Maybe top 5 or top 10 sure.
But for me, e.g. the R8 is to be set higher.
But as usual: YMMV ;)
The 24-105/2.8 finally resolves the conundrum of choosing between range and speed for a standard zoom, and is simply a brilliant lens.
The 100-300/2.8 is also stellar and pair perfectly with the 24-105/2.8 for event shooting. It also takes extenders very well.
I was not very interested in the 10-20/4 at launch. But thinking about the size/weight from the 11-24, I became more interested. I just packed the 11-24/4 for a trip, that clinched it for me – I’ll order the 10-20/4 in the near future.
And I’ve owned many cameras from Sony a1 to Nikon z9. I’m not saying that the r8 is objectively better in all dimensions. I’m saying that it’s at least as good for autofocus, most features but obviously not with MP.
But at the price that the r8 is, i absolutely love it. I can throw that 28mm pancake on it and throw it in my coat pocket. What a time to be alive!
The lower price is probably comparable to the resale of a used 100-500 so no economic advantage.
Optical quality should be close enough not to be a factor.