In this patent application, Canon is illustrating some smaller primes. Since these designs are relatively simplistic, they could be good “bang for the buck” lenses as long as you are not expecting pristine resolving power, as they don't optically fill the entire image circle but rely on software stretching.
Canon's entire purpose with this patent application is to create small primes. Something I'm sure we can all get behind. The lenses are around 50mm long, making them quite compact for F2.8 primes.
Canon RF 15mm F2.8
Focal length 15.42 F number 2.91 Half angle of view (degrees) 49.73 Image height 18.20 Lens total length 69.48 BF 15.51
Canon RF 18mm F2.8
Focal length 18.20 F number 2.91 Half angle of view (degrees) 47.70 Image height 20.00 Lens total length 68.27 BF 16.21
Canon RF 19mm F2.8
Focal length 19.10 F number 2.91 Half angle of view (degrees) 43.62 Image height 18.20 Lens total length 69.24 BF 13.36
As with all patent applications, none of these may become actual products, but it's a glance into the research happening at Canon.
Source: Japan Patent Office 2023-183153
Similar thing for the stretching needed on the RF16mm, its corners at f/2.8 are sharper than my 17-40 F/4L.
So far I have no complaints about the stretching or PMO, which I expected to have before using the lenses. I bought them mainly for their size and weight, the image quality has been surprisingly OK.
Let’s see what real world results the 2024 stretchy plastic lenses achieve before a priori pooh-poohing them. I bet the RF-S lenses will likely be very underwhelming, while the RF ones will perform as promised. Canon likes to annoy people that refuse to use RF lenses on APS-C cameras that way.
Would be great if Canon follows through with small, lightweight primes. I think that there is a broad market for such lenses. I know that if the optical quality is good, they will be attractive to me.
I‘d like a 22 to 24 something.
Die APS-C I‘d like a 14 to 18 something.
The patents sound cool