Canon Officially Announces the Canon EOS R6 Mark III
canonrumorsforum = systemkamera-forum/canon-eos-r-forum/l-camera-forum/sonyalphaforum/fuji-x-forum etc. ?
Upvote
0
And Log View Assist as wellIn the last comparison article R6 is said to have NO CLOG, but actually has CLOG 1 and CLOG 3
View attachment 226846
View attachment 226847
I am puzzled. Both the R6 and R6ii have a native ISO range quoted as 100-102,400, whereas the R6iii has a range of 100-64,000, i.e. R6iii's ISO range is actually shorter than both R6 & R6ii, not the other way round.The R6 Mark III’s new 32.5 megapixel sensor seems to be capable in low light, handling up to ISO 64,000, whereas the EOS R6 and R6 Mark II limit you to ISO 51,200.
See full article...
I am sorry to hear that your lens is not working as desired. Perhaps you received a defective unit. I would have it checked by Canon Service.That's great news, then it works for what you need in stills photography. That's fortunate as it wont work for everyone who uses that focal length, depend on what you use it for. Enjoy your new lens. From the early reviews the RF 85mm VCM looks really decent and one of the least compromised by the uniform size video form factor.![]()
It makes it a lot easier for beginners buying their first camera, my first 700D came with the EF-S 18-55mm and EF-S 55-250mm. At the time I didn't even know the difference between EF-S and EF lenses.I still don't understand why the f Canon still sells bodies with kits such as 24-105 f4. The total price is the same as if I bought them separately.
IBIS and the wheel are the only things holding me back from the R8.
That is an interesting idea, but I'm not sure where you heard that.Or it could be that companies err on the side of underproduction, because they are "terrified" of having excess inventory. Canon always discusses inventory in the quarterly financial documents.
Or it could be that companies err on the side of underproduction, because they are "terrified" of having excess inventory. Canon always discusses inventory in the quarterly financial documents.The 'supply woes' press releases are just marketing scams to psychologically manipulate gullible consumers.
In the context of my previous posts, this is a great time to tell us all about your Leica lol!Blah, blah, blah...
Since you asked almost politely, and fairly respectfully, I acknowledge your reasonable request and I'm happy to oblige.Now I ask you "Just stop already?", okay?
Maybe check out Alistair's posts of dpreview, he has been called out countless times for jumping to Canon's defense at the slightest hint of criticism of a product. His modus operandi is the basic Argument from Ignorance logical fallacy - "I can't see any problem with it, so there are no problems, so nobody should say anything negative about it". People on that forum have also said to him after looking at how bad his photos are, that he shouldn't be advising anyone about anything. Just a pre-emptive post to stop him polluting this forum in the way he does over there, best to call it out. You need to understand, when someone has very low photography skills it is easy for the gear to far exceed their abilities, so naturally, everything looks good to them, and so they tell everyone that gear is good for EVERYONE, and nobody should complain. No mind reading needed, just a simple logical inference (drawing conclusions based on evidence and reasoning), exaggerated with a little hyperbole for amusement, to sum up Alistair's typical posts and behavior on the other forum - if you don't believe me look it up. Anyway, enjoy your day!Thanks. I needed a condescending diatribe to read today. The mind reading trick was nice, too.
That's great news, then it works for what you need in stills photography. That's fortunate as it wont work for everyone who uses that focal length, depend on what you use it for. Enjoy your new lens. From the early reviews the RF 85mm VCM looks really decent and one of the least compromised by the uniform size video form factor.I use a RF 24mm 1.4 L VCM only for stills. It is ideal for me in every respect. Price is slightly higher than the EF 24mm L II version was years ago.
I never had a better 24mm from any manufacturer. I have no need for another 24mm lens from Canon for stills only.
My EF 85mm will be replaced by the VCM version also.