mangobutter said:

I don't want it tack sharp in the corners. this is (hopefully) going to be a character lens. i want field curvature, i want smearing, i want isolation (wide open and at large apertures) This is for placing subjects in the general central area and not the corners. that's what i want. we've had enough of the clinical robot g master era where everything is perfectly sharp everywhere. time to get back to the roots of art.

Click to expand...

Btw one of my next purchases will be a good RF-Leica M39 thread mount adapter. The 20mm flange focal distance of the RF mount allows to adapt M39 lenses and keep infinity focusing, since that classic Leica mount has a flange focal distance of 28.8mm. I'd like to try some of my vintage M39 lenses on my R5 II, like my 1.4/50mm and 1.8/85mm from Canon (late lenses from Canon's rangefinder era). Adds a bit of radioactivity to my images since the highly refractive lens parts were made of thoriated glass...

I was initially dissapointed in hearing that the R6iii is retaining the same EVF unit found in the R6ii, however when I compare the EVF between my R5 and R6ii, I don't percieve much difference. I think a 3.7million dot EVF is a great threshold. I found the 2.3 mil dot EVF of the R8 and R7 to be quite poor and pixelated.
The four standout specs for the R6iii are the increased sensor resolution, a viable pre-capture and a doubled buffer size. If you put the R6iii in cRAW, ES at HS (20fps) the buffer never runs out. pop it in HS+ (40fps) then the buffer is twice that of the R6ii and should be good for about 10 seconds depending on ISO noise. The new card slots with the CF Express b card, will greatly improve the buffer to card write down speeds.
The other area that isn't really talked about is the subtle AF advancements between the R6ii and R6iii. As well as the slightly re-worked menu and button assignments.
I was suprised how better the R6ii's low light / iso and AF ability are over the R5 and I'd be interested if there is a similar jump between the R6ii and R6iii.

mangobutter said:

I don't want it tack sharp in the corners. this is (hopefully) going to be a character lens.

Click to expand...

That's exactly the reason why I did not yet upgrade my EF 85mm f/1.2, I love its non-perfect slightly vintage character very much (don't use it in settings with a lot of contrast!). But coming from that lens I first was disappointed about the EF 50mm f/1.2 that I got later, because that one doesn't deliver that special, visually "punchy" look wide open with which I fell in love with the 85mm. The tele lens offers wide open a great combination of a visually (not lab wise, in the lab this lens is a mediocre performer) very sharp rendering in the center and a gorgeously soft fall-off into a creamy bokeh in the background, typically in the edges when one shoots portraits. The EF 50mm isn't visually that "crisp" wide open, but that comes basically with the fact that it isn't a tele design lens, and features a relatively simple design (Gauss-like, no floating elements). The advantage of that design is that the 50mm is so beautifully compact for such a superfast lens, and that's the reason why I still like to use it. Plus, its color rendering is superb and the bokeh great. A little bit stopped down, you soon hit a sweet spot with a sufficiently sharp center.

Considering how small and compact the R8 is, I would say that it is the most versatile compact camera. It's full size 35mm sensor and amazing image quality...I'd give the R8 my vote.

SvO2 said:

Read the description more carefully

The previous R6 bodies were described as “Magnesium Alloy chassis, outer panels are polycarbonate resin with glass fiber.” The R6 III has a “Magnesium alloy body and chassis with some components consisting of polycarbonate with glass fiber.” — same description used for the 5 series cameras.

Click to expand...

I don't need to read, I have the camera at arms reach, I can touch it. The original R6 features metal on top, metal at the bottom, metal battery door, metal at the rear, metallic rear LCD structure, plastic SD memory card door and, I THINK a plastic cover bellow the R6 logo, near the connectors (I mean the side cover, where the R5 has rubber and the R6 doesn't).

Even the difference in the way the materials are worn after 4.5 years of usage is clearly visible.

Just because someone translated the text differently, it doesn't mean the product isn't the same.

They may have changed the memory cards door, since the R6 III needs it bigger, but the left cover is most likely still plastic, as it still doesn't have rubber, like the R5s.

P-visie said:

Price in the Netherlands is 2949€ (incl. VAT).

Click to expand...

Additional gouda tax...

Any confirmation if this has the dual base iso from the C50?

I'm waiting for actual hands on reviews but on first thought, I don't like the mixed cards.
Never owned CFE cards and SD cards are more than enough for me. I was plenty satisfied with dual SD but I would get used to replace the SD card in place of letting the camera fill the second one when the first comes full

m4ndr4ke said:

It’s a surprise the Mark III being built the same way as the two previous generations?
The R6s have been using magnesium bodies since their first model.

Exploring the History of Innovation: The Canon EOS 6 Series - Canon Rumors

we explore the Canon EOS 6 Series, including the 6D, 6D Mark II, R6, R6 Mark II and the R6 Mark III. Updated for the EOS R6 Mark III.

www.canonrumors.com

Click to expand...

Read the description more carefully

The previous R6 bodies were described as “Magnesium Alloy chassis, outer panels are polycarbonate resin with glass fiber.” The R6 III has a “Magnesium alloy body and chassis with some components consisting of polycarbonate with glass fiber.” — same description used for the 5 series cameras.

So, the patent is not that 48.5mm f/1.2, after all. This lens shows a few less elements.

PinholeR5 said:

Gordon Laing first-looks review for the RF 45mm

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

Click to expand...

This is $800 NZD here, which is cheaper than used sales of the EF 50mm f/1.2 L. Crazy in the best way.

m4ndr4ke said:

But that could be included anyway, they just needed to make the lenses long enough to cover the movement, and we’d all be happy


We have basic internal focus like the RF 50mm f/1.2, delimited by the filter

As expected, the lens is being shown mostly with the R8, so I wouldn’t expect a lot of quality for you, R5 users.

Click to expand...

Cheers and amen to internal focus!

It's partially a surprise with the price, but also a let down as it is not using the patent that was previously published. From gordon's video that is just posted, it is fake internal focusing with all groups moving inside the barrel, and not a true internal focusing design like the patent. Also the CA and corner image quality is pretty bad. The MTF is also rather "vintage" for lack of a better word. They might be making some changes but it's canon after all.

Pre-ordered! The mtf is similar to the EF 50 1.2L and I liked that lens! (Only sold it as I had to fund half off deal on my RF 85mm 1.2) This will be the lightest AF 1.2 lens on the market, no brainer for every day carry use.

Gordon Laing first-looks review for the RF 45mm

I'm Looking forward to seeing the sensor readout speed compared to the R6 II. The original 6D I have is an amateur full frame body but now the 6 series has truly evolved to a professional body. I wonder if the R6 III will effect R5 II sales going forward?

Price in the Netherlands is 2949€ (incl. VAT).

scyrene said:

Whereas I wouldn't have got the 35 (or maybe even the 16) if they didn't allow reasonably close focus.

Click to expand...

But that could be included anyway, they just needed to make the lenses long enough to cover the movement, and we’d all be happy

mxwphoto said:

I think you are right in that the hood won't move. Just double checked my rf 100-400 and Canon marks it differently for hood alignment if it moves with barrel (unlike the red dot on outer barrel). The EF and RF L both have internal focusing ala filter seal so it could very likely be so for this one.

Click to expand...

We have basic internal focus like the RF 50mm f/1.2, delimited by the filter

As expected, the lens is being shown mostly with the R8, so I wouldn’t expect a lot of quality for you, R5 users.

This is ridiculous, You can't even log in into B &H website, I've been trying for twenty minutes... Common B&H you don't make enough money o have decent servers??? Pathetic.

Ah, the 45mm link appeared!

Pre-order link is live on B&H for the R6 III, but I can't find the RF 45mm F1.2...