Lovely colours. Nicely done, dpc.

cannonfodder said:

Price 3 129 € (inc VAT) in Estonia Because we like to think we are rich now

Click to expand...

Wow And I thought here in Slovakia the 3019 € would be the most expensive

Look like this will ship just in time for the holidays! I feel bad for anybody waiting on the Sony a7V because the holiday window is closing fast and there is no announcement scheduled, let alone shipping date. Not to mention the rumor mill is looking a bit sparse. I think its safe to say Canon is on top in this category right now.

P-visie said:

Price in the Netherlands is 2949€ (incl. VAT).

Click to expand...

Price 3 129 € (inc VAT) in Estonia Because we like to think we are rich now

Del Paso said:

Additional gouda tax...

Click to expand...

That is the price at 3 large retailers. At canon.nl you pay 2949,99€, so 99 cents more. What tax is that?

Does the R6iii have cross type AF? I can't find it anywhere so I´m guessing no.

fotodj said:

This is ridiculous, You can't even log in into B &H website, I've been trying for twenty minutes... Common B&H you don't make enough money o have decent servers??? Pathetic.

Click to expand...

I woke up at 4 AM, grabbed my laptop, placed my order at B&H, and then went back to sleep for a couple more hours.

Snapster said:

Digital Picture already has the RF 45mm 1.2 STM in their catalogue

Click to expand...

I saw that - looked it over. I put it at a point somewhere between the EF 50/1.4 (a good copy) and EF 50/1.2L (though the Digital Picture site has a screwed up copy of the 50/1.2L as mine doesn't have that excessive purple fringing issue). I think the MTF is fairly accurate.

I'm taking a chance and getting one. It'll serve for those rare occasions when I actually use a wide aperture 50, and will also make a reasonably nice portrait lens on the R7.

One thing I'm noticing on my 50/1.2L (EF version) is that the DOF is so razor thin that you just about need to use a tripod to nail focus just where you want it. I took a picture of 3 darts in my dartboard, and it focused on the edge of the double-cork ring, throwing the dart's point shaft (1/4 inch behind the focus plane) out of focus. I hadn't pulled that lens out in a while, so I'm sure I could improve my technique. But 1/4 inch of movement makes a huge difference at reasonably close objects and f/1.2.

Rural sunrise, November 5th, 2025...

For Milky Way photography a 10x Magnified Image Display would be disappointing. Hope they bumped that to at least 15x.

3.000 € in South Africa. But at least today 75€ cheaper than the Mii (the price will drop tomorrow to 1750€).

Now just need further confirmation if the 40fps electronic shutter is 14bit RAW. All the Sony fanboys I know IRL keep nagging me about this. I need facts to shut them up

Del Paso said:

Additional gouda tax...

Click to expand...

Worse still in the UK, as we say over here "hard cheddar". Exchange rate equivalent is ~€3200, the usual mark up of about 10% by Canon EU. So, unless we are desperate wait until the grey market reliable sellers have it, usually 20-30% below UK list price.

Pre-ordered... Its MSRP is 420USD equivalent in HK with no tax. I can put my EF 50mm f1.4 to rest now.

What about other news (24-70 II, 28-70 II, 14 TSE)?

blackcoffee17 said:

Slightly disappointing, i wasn't expecting RF 50 1.2 performance but was hoping for a little surprise in image quality.

Click to expand...

Image quality is indeed a surprise no matter how you dice it. For me it is pleasantly surprised. To get an EF 50mm 1.2 equivalent in a lighter modern mirrorless package, awesome. Add to that the low price...omg! The EF 50L was a legendary performer for $1599 msrp back in 2006, equivalent to $2500 in today's dollars. That makes this value of the decade.

Given this precedent, if you can wait for it, Canon may introduce a RF 50 1.2 equivalent lens in 2037 weighing 1lb for $700.

For me, it is the flare outdoor that decides whether a buy or not. I will wait for Chris's review. If flare is better controlled than the 50 1.8, it would be a no brainer for me.

Canon in front of Sony:

mic drop

I expected near zero distortion, like the RF 50 1.8, and maybe a little extra resolution specifically when stopped down to f/2.8 or beyond. Nothing else to complain.

The promised similar optical performance to the EF 50mm f/1.2 L seems to be delivered, with very slightly more centre sharpness, exactly as I expected.

Size, weight and ergonomics seem great. Poor man's internal focusing is very highly appreciated, all these cheap lenses should be like this!

I'm happy it's not the 48.5mm patent we saw, because this probably has a wider field of view, so it's not a 50 labeled as a 45.

I don't know, I'll have to try it for myself.
I don't know if this level of image quality will please me. I didn't went with the EF 50mm f/1.2 L, years ago, I bought with the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art instead because it was sharper, but I also don't use R5s so, I have to try it.

I'm looking forward to handle this lens.



I wouldn't buy EF glass at this point, unless I needed something specific that I couldn't afford on RF, like a supertelephoto prime.
EF glass is being discontinued, needs the adapter, and this will be serviceable for much longer.
I bet a lot of EF 50mm f/1.2s will appear now for sale, because owners will probably be able to replace it with this for free or even with some extra cash in their pockets, while removing the adapter.

Regarding previously discussed speed of flash-sync. This is from Canon Europe spec-sheet:

When [Cropping/aspect ratio: Full-frame] is set: 1/200 sec mechanical shutter / 1/250 electronic 1st curtain,
When [Cropping/aspect ratio: 1.6x (crop)] is set: 1/250 sec mechanical shutter / 1/320 electronic 1st curtain.

So the 1/320s sync speed is for 1.6x crop electronic 1st curtain.

As expected for non-stacked sensor, no flash sync using fully electronic shutter.

Aldherrian said:

I'm waiting for actual hands on reviews but on first thought, I don't like the mixed cards.
Never owned CFE cards and SD cards are more than enough for me. I was plenty satisfied with dual SD but I would get used to replace the SD card in place of letting the camera fill the second one when the first comes full

Click to expand...

I agree, getting to play with the raw files in Lightroom will give us all an informed perspective on the R6iii's noise and image quality.
However, the max iso has been reduced from the R6ii by 2/3rd of a stop. thisis uaully an indicator from Canon as to it's expected hit on the increased noise threshold those extra mp cause. If the ios noise between the R6ii to R5 was a whole stop then this increase in rez will affect the noise too. So maybe 1/2 to 2/3rd of a stop is about right.
this morning, I've heared numerous youtube influencers talking about the great features of the R6iii....most of these great features are alredy present in the R6ii....which goes to show how good the R6ii is / was.
Here in the Uk, the launch price is around £2700 GDP...whcih is very high considering I can buy a new R5ii (via grey import) for the same price. A mint used R5 for £1600 and a new R6ii (grey) for on;y £1350....for only a few new fetures...that's a lot of £££ for not a lot of benefits. I can literally buy a pair of R6ii's for the launch price of one R6iii.
I think if I was looking to jump from DSLR to mirrorless, this would be a great camera. I think upgraders from the EOS R and R6mk1 have a lot of milage in this upgrade. but for existing R6ii users....it's more of an expensive side grade. Slightly improved, more of an evolution that definatly builds on the shoulders of it's great predecessor. If Canon continues selling their R6ii alongside the R6iii, then the R6ii may become the true bargain of the canon range.

This seems like a great addition to the RF lens lineup on paper but I'm also a bit disappointed.

If you want the vintage 1.2 look, you can already buy a used EF 50mm 1.2 L for a similar price. You get better build quality, weather sealing and USM on top. In that sense, this new lens doesn't really add much to the table. I would rather get the EF lens, personally.

On the other hand, the RF 35mm 1.8 STM has superior IQ at 1.8 for the same price + IS + semi-macro. It still seems like the better lens overall, unless you only want the extreme soft look and don't want to use an adapter.

Slightly disappointing, i wasn't expecting RF 50 1.2 performance but was hoping for a little surprise in image quality.

Maximilian said:

@Canon Rumors and @Richard CR:
Does this "new" mean, it is indeed a new sensor or the expected re-use of the (still quite new) EOS C50?

Click to expand...

It is effectively Canon's latest and newest sensor.

m4ndr4ke said:

I don't need to read, I have the camera at arms reach, I can touch it. The original R6 features metal on top, metal at the bottom, metal battery door, metal at the rear, metallic rear LCD structure, plastic SD memory card door and, I THINK a plastic cover bellow the R6 logo, near the connectors (I mean the side cover, where the R5 has rubber and the R6 doesn't).

Even the difference in the way the materials are worn after 4.5 years of usage is clearly visible.

Just because someone translated the text differently, it doesn't mean the product isn't the same.

They may have changed the memory cards door, since the R6 III needs it bigger, but the left cover is most likely still plastic, as it still doesn't have rubber, like the R5s.

Click to expand...

Okay, we’ll go with your magic touch rather than Canon’s description.

I have an R6II and R5II. They’re clearly constructed differently

Go lookup the actual tear downs. The R6 line has injection molded plastic everywhere, while the R5 line has painted magnesium. The R6III will likely be more similar to the R5 unless canon copied and pasted the wrong blurb.