I am sorry to hear that your lens is not working as desired. Perhaps you received a defective unit. I would have it checked by Canon Service.That's great news, then it works for what you need in stills photography. That's fortunate as it wont work for everyone who uses that focal length, depend on what you use it for. Enjoy your new lens. From the early reviews the RF 85mm VCM looks really decent and one of the least compromised by the uniform size video form factor.![]()
It makes it a lot easier for beginners buying their first camera, my first 700D came with the EF-S 18-55mm and EF-S 55-250mm. At the time I didn't even know the difference between EF-S and EF lenses.I still don't understand why the f Canon still sells bodies with kits such as 24-105 f4. The total price is the same as if I bought them separately.
IBIS and the wheel are the only things holding me back from the R8.
That is an interesting idea, but I'm not sure where you heard that.Or it could be that companies err on the side of underproduction, because they are "terrified" of having excess inventory. Canon always discusses inventory in the quarterly financial documents.
Or it could be that companies err on the side of underproduction, because they are "terrified" of having excess inventory. Canon always discusses inventory in the quarterly financial documents.The 'supply woes' press releases are just marketing scams to psychologically manipulate gullible consumers.
In the context of my previous posts, this is a great time to tell us all about your Leica lol!Blah, blah, blah...
Since you asked almost politely, and fairly respectfully, I acknowledge your reasonable request and I'm happy to oblige.Now I ask you "Just stop already?", okay?
Maybe check out Alistair's posts of dpreview, he has been called out countless times for jumping to Canon's defense at the slightest hint of criticism of a product. His modus operandi is the basic Argument from Ignorance logical fallacy - "I can't see any problem with it, so there are no problems, so nobody should say anything negative about it". People on that forum have also said to him after looking at how bad his photos are, that he shouldn't be advising anyone about anything. Just a pre-emptive post to stop him polluting this forum in the way he does over there, best to call it out. You need to understand, when someone has very low photography skills it is easy for the gear to far exceed their abilities, so naturally, everything looks good to them, and so they tell everyone that gear is good for EVERYONE, and nobody should complain. No mind reading needed, just a simple logical inference (drawing conclusions based on evidence and reasoning), exaggerated with a little hyperbole for amusement, to sum up Alistair's typical posts and behavior on the other forum - if you don't believe me look it up. Anyway, enjoy your day!Thanks. I needed a condescending diatribe to read today. The mind reading trick was nice, too.
That's great news, then it works for what you need in stills photography. That's fortunate as it wont work for everyone who uses that focal length, depend on what you use it for. Enjoy your new lens. From the early reviews the RF 85mm VCM looks really decent and one of the least compromised by the uniform size video form factor.I use a RF 24mm 1.4 L VCM only for stills. It is ideal for me in every respect. Price is slightly higher than the EF 24mm L II version was years ago.
I never had a better 24mm from any manufacturer. I have no need for another 24mm lens from Canon for stills only.
My EF 85mm will be replaced by the VCM version also.
Yes, indeed, Europe is different!Do a lot of business with MPB and also with KEH. Prices for used Canon gear has gone up in the past few months - but also the amount they give you for selling or trading your gear. Sold some gear recently that got me more money than when I first got my quote a year ago. They are still much better to deal with than B&H used or most brick and mortar stores who offer you far less. They, unlike most, post actual photos of the gear they sell, and give a far better description than KEH or other sellers, pointing out issues such as moisture or fungus in a lens. Maybe Europe is different. All my experience is with MPB in the USA, and they continue to be my #1 choice for used.
Do a lot of business with MPB and also with KEH. Prices for used Canon gear has gone up in the past few months - but also the amount they give you for selling or trading your gear. Sold some gear recently that got me more money than when I first got my quote a year ago. They are still much better to deal with than B&H used or most brick and mortar stores who offer you far less. They, unlike most, post actual photos of the gear they sell, and give a far better description than KEH or other sellers, pointing out issues such as moisture or fungus in a lens. Maybe Europe is different. All my experience is with MPB in the USA, and they continue to be my #1 choice for used.I used to buy a lot from (and also sell to) MPB, somewhere between 2017-2021. Since then, I noticed they raised their prices more or less drastically and also their resell offers went downhill. Atm, if I don't sell on Kleinanzeigen (or eBay) I sell to wirkaufens . de because they offer the most money and they've changed my estimate. I get what I signed up for. Sometimes the difference between those is several hundred €...
Buying gear from mpb is even worse: Canon Ra (astronomy) had a RRP of 2.500 € and MPB sold it for 3.000 €! The R6ii has basically lived at the 2.199 € price point for the last year, yet the "like new" was still above 2.200 € for a very long time. Buying a used camera at MPB would've cost more than buying a new. one.
I recently noticed though, that prices have come down a little bit... maybe their sale numbers went because they were/ are so greedy.
Thanks. I needed a condescending diatribe to read today. The mind reading trick was nice, too.Hi Alistair, you seem to praise anything Canon does and take it personally when anyone has a criticism of their products, a self-proclaimed Canon online spokesman. If Canon released a toilet roll tube with cling wrap on the end and an RF mount at the end you will be pre-ordering it and singing its praises from the rooftops. Your bias is so off the charts you're a perpetual source of bad guidance and advice to readers! I've seen your antics on dpreview, especially in the old days when you used to intentionally try to fill any thread critical of Canon with dozens of frivolous nonsense posts to reach the thread post limit prematurely and shut it down so nobody else could comment. Stupid fanboy antics. Did you get banned or reprimanded for that behavior on the old dpreview forum???
Do you even understand what VCM lenses are for? People need to understand that the Canon VCM lenses were designed primarily with video production in mind, not stills photography, and that this focus shapes the compromises inherent in the series. Unlike mid-tier stills lenses, which prioritize optical sharpness, high-resolution performance, and minimal aberrations across individual lenses, VCM lenses are engineered to maintain consistent size, weight, and handling across the entire zoom range to suit professional cinematography workflows. This design emphasis also aims to minimize focus breathing and facilitate smooth rack focusing, which are critical for video but largely irrelevant in stills work. As a result, optical tradeoffs such as slightly lower corner sharpness, chromatic aberration control, or distortion correction may be present—compromises that would not be tolerated in a stills-focused lens at the same price point. The series’ price positioning reflects not just the lens optics but the engineering needed for consistent form factor, video-friendly operation, and reliable performance across the zoom range, meaning that buyers prioritizing stills might encounter characteristics that differ from what they would expect in similarly priced photography lenses.
Just accept that there is a big gap in Canon's mid-tier photography lenses, and even some in its top tier. Where is the 35mm to match the top tier 85's? It's not here yet. The 50mm VCM is correctly compromised for video, and it's not clear what Canon's lens strategy is, as they're wanting to cash in on the increasing interest in videography at all tiers, but leave stills photographers with a mis-mash of varying quality consumer lenses, and really expensive pro-level lenses.