A Look at the RF 45mm f/1.2 STM, it seems compact.

Then I guess the RF45 is far from becoming your tool. This has a different purpose.
Still I hope that the center sharpness is high, even wide open.
We'll know it when we see it, it's just 5 days now, and I'm sure the usual reviewers already had tested it and are just waiting for the ban to be lifted for publish their findings.

I guess if we see reviews immediately, for me it's a sign that the lens is good, and Canon isn't scared of showing them so they can boost immediate sales...but if we don't see reviews for days or weeks, then it probably means that the lens sucks, and Canon wanted to get at least some early orders before people discover how bad the lens is 🙃

I didn't follow the 16-28 STM release, so I don't know how it went with reviews, but having bought it I remember fewer reviews then normal about 28-70 STM, which I felt wasn't really "pushed" by Canon, maybe to somewhat protect the 24-70 L
Also, just by my super domestic and UNSCIENTIFIC test on that lens, I felt my copy is way sharper in the corners, especially at 70mm, then what most of the reviews showed; is there a case where Canon may choose to send reviewers slightly less then perfect copies of such lenses, 45 STM included, just to have them being still very good, but not so good that may impact on their L counterparts sales?
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

Canon EOS R6 Mark III & RF 45 F1.2 STM November 6

Good catch! But honestly I don't see anything interesting on that camera, except that it really seems to be a new one.

But it would be interesting, which white lens is attached to that 2x extender ;)
Could this be a new one? Or is it an already released one?
To be fair, the R6 II specs looked pretty boring compared to the original R6 but the camera was much better in every department.
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0

A Look at the RF 45mm f/1.2 STM, it seems compact.

I'll keep my fingers crossed.
If there aren't any big mechanical or optical flaws and it delivers decently I am sure it'll find its way in my bag.
Not as a first adopter and not at MRSP, but pretty soon when first discounts are given.

The last f/1.2 lens in my families possession was my fathers FD 55mm f/1.2 S.S.C. (not the ASPHERICAL) :LOL:
I have one in my collection. Fun lens to use with obvious vintage characteristics. Would not mind getting the aspherical if I see one pop up for a good price.. interestingly they have halved in price in a couple of years. There was a lot of hype around especially FD lenses that use same glass as the K35 cinema lenses.. the 24mm f1.4, 85mm f1.2 and the 55mm f1.2, but also many others unicorns. I think the market became saturated after a while and those that lusted after them got their fill. The whole slowdown in Hollywood situation might have had something to do with it as well.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

Did Canon See the Writing on the Wall with the RF Mount?

Not every lens is replicated across each manufacturer's lineup.
Of course, I'm not saying the range will be exactly the same for the 3 lenses, but the concept of trinity zoom is so anchored into photography world, is so versatile to different kinds of photographers + can attract people to a brand instead of another one (halo lenses) that I can't see Canon shooting themselves in the foot by not competing against Sony.

We're not speaking about a big very expensive white zoom that Canon could somehow avoid like Sony is avoiding doing a 100-300 f2.8 (for now) to compete against the Canon one.
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

The Canon EOS R7 Mark II May Be a Big Departure From the Original

A "big departure" can be interpreted in many ways. For example, a full-sized body not requiring an extension grip (with a pro battery). A lower-resolution sensor around 22Mp which has better low-light capability, something potentially attractive as a professional small-sensor sports body. Beginning a large-scale changeover to CF-Express across the lineup. Introducing a new flash system with the camera. Focusing the 7-series not as the top APS-C camera, but as a top hybrid vlogger camera (with extra attachment ports). Integrating the R7ii with some third-party hardware (eg: a specialized Atomos?). And so on.

Instead of specific camera features, I suggest considering what might fill a market opportunity. Having a closer-to-pro APS-C body would align with that, but so would pushing it the other direction toward amateur interests: higher resolution, lighter weight, maybe retro-styling. And don't worry about abandonment of a market segment, as Canon can always introduce a new model number to fill any empty shoes (anyone up for an R4 or R14?).

While these vaguely-reported half-rumors about the R7ii suggest it might lean toward a more premium market, I think there's too little specificity and reliability to give these rumors any weight. We're in nothing-burger territory here.
Pushing the R7ii the other direction and downmarket with the ideas you presented would dramatically reduce potential sales of the unit, especially when it's not what the target market for said camera wants. It would push more wildlife and sports photographers towards the R6ii, R6iii, R5ii, and R1 thus reducing any chance of recovery or growth for the APS-C segment as a whole.

The C50 fills the niche as a hybrid vlogging camera with its photo capabilities, along with the R6 lineup including the upcoming R6iii as vlogging is video-centric. Unsure if Canon will make a video-centric unit similar to the R7 or R7ii when it's released for vloggers, it's possible if they see value in such a unit.
Upvote 0

Canon EOS R6 Mark III & RF 45 F1.2 STM November 6

while it won't be tack sharp corner to corner wide open as the 40 Art, it needs to be at least better then the 50 Art at f1.4
Hmm I'm somewhat hoping this 45mm is similar to the 50 Art wide open, but I doubt it'll be better at all. It would be great if I were surprised, though.
Camera bodies are overrated, lenses are 10 times more important
To be honest, I think the transition to mirrorless changed that balance a little. The fact that EF lenses perform much better when adapted to mirrorless cameras is an example of the higher importance camera bodies have now.
hot and sharp) EF 70-200 2.8 L classic (non-IS).
Lucky you. My copy of that lens was crap :confused:
I even sent it to repair once, but it didn't make much of a difference, it just improved slightly. Beyond 100mm mine was crap, unless I shot it at like f/11. I could get better detail by cropping from 70mm to 200mm on the 24-70mm f/2.8 II (yes, I really tested that).
Today if wideangle is really needed I have the 16 STM, small and inexpensive, but it's too wide, even a fixed 18/20mm prime would be enough for me, in Canon there's nothing cheap (20 VCM is overkill and overprice, it's a lens that would shoot no more then 50/100 pics per year, so 300/350€ is the max I would invest in it)
Similar scenario here. A few weeks ago I ran statistics of all my photographs from the last year or so, and the 16mm accounted for approximately 5% of the shots (5 point something).
By the way, I tried the 20 VCM last month, and I LOVED it. I had never tried something between 16 and 24, as I never had an ultra wide zoom lens for full-frame. I found 20mm so easy to use, I just felt it fits perfectly next to the 28mm wider end of the zoom, but I have no justification for such purchase.
I also have, at the moment, the 16-28mm f/2.8 available here for 943€, brand new, and it's tempting, but it still feels like too much money for such few shots.
I think I'd buy an RF 20mm f/2.8, if Canon made such a lens. The 16 sometimes is too wide, although I can usually manage.

Is there a reason why the R6 series does not have the rubber grip material on the front left of the body? As a far as I know the R6 series is the only one missing it.
Is it? I had no idea:LOL:
Upvote 0

Canon EOS R6 Mark III & RF 45 F1.2 STM November 6

There's probably an argument that the R8 also exists to placate those who used to buy the x0D series as well. Maybe it does double duty?
For those using the xxD series, there's the R10, I had one for months, took a wedding with it, it's a war machine, has a joystick, AF is lightning fast and handles like a mini R6; I sold it for the RP as the latter, at VERY high ISO, still has a small advantage due to the FF sensor (and surely R8 is even better), so for my line of work RP/R8 it's a better backup body, even if all the other functions (for RP) are inferior to to R10's.
If I wouldn't shoot over 1600iso and/or don't need ultrawideangles, I don't see why buying a R8 over a R10 that cost nearly half of it.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

A Look at the RF 45mm f/1.2 STM, it seems compact.

Guys, please don't expect wonders from this old and simple optical design basis. Canon hasn't found the philosopher's stone in optical designs.
[..]
And from what I've heard the Sigmas has a busy and not so creamy bokeh.
One can only hope...let's see what's coming with the various reviews and then I'll decide (considering that I want it better or on par with the 50 Art, but I own the 40 Art...so I'm pretty picky about wide open sharpness)

My interest is pure sharpness, AF absolute accuracy, especially in low light (and decent speed, but accuracy comes first), preferably well controlled flare (I don't mind few small ghosts, but contrast has to remain impeccable), close-up image sharpness not falling apart, and light gathering/transmission, which is something, unfortunately, very rarely tested by the reviewers; I'm not interested in buying this lens just for the sake of being f1.2 if the lens is actually closer to T1.8

Bokeh quality, frankly I couldn't care less, can be busy, with horrible onion rings and with cats-eye right in the middle of the frame, and I wouldn't even blink
Upvote 0

Canon EOS R6 Mark III & RF 45 F1.2 STM November 6

This R6 Mark III forum is by far the most popular on Canon Rumors. Well over 500 comments and climbing each day.
I may be wrong but I think that CR previously didn't use one forum thread for all related articles. I'm not saying it's wrong, just saying that that can be the reason why this one got the most comments whereas previously it was spread among more articles (?)
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0

A Look at the RF 45mm f/1.2 STM, it seems compact.

For non IS lenses I use a shutter speed double the focal length I'm using, so for a non IS 50mm I'd shoot at 1/100sec or faster, it works for me every time. If you can hold your camera more steady then me then you can try using 1/60sec for a 50mm lens.
While I tend to use the old rule shutter speed roughly equal focal length I have seen that this doesn't apply to modern digital cameras anymore. These are more in the medium format category when it comes to resolution and I think your rule is much better. And it works for "unsteady days" ;)
Upvote 0

A Look at the RF 45mm f/1.2 STM, it seems compact.

I love the compact size and if the weight and price specs are correct it'll sell in dozens. The lens looks quite similar to the RF 35/24mm F1.8. I don´t expect it to have a .5 macro feature, so hopefully the AF motor is faster. If the center is sharp and the bokeh renders nicely, it shouldn't be any issue if the corners are a bit softer.

For me to swap the 50mm VCM it would have to check all boxes, but especially the AF speed. If not, I´m sticking with the VCM.
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0

Canon EOS R6 Mark III & RF 45 F1.2 STM November 6

I guess I am confused by the parallels you are making? :unsure:
And I guess Canon's numbering patterns do not help... :censored:

But to me the 6 lineage would be: 6D -> 6D II -> RP -> R8...
While the 5 lineage has remained more or less linear (the R is a bit of an outlier), the 6 lineage seems to have split into 8 and new 6 (R6 -> R6 II -> R6 III) that slots between the 8 and the 5.

By the way, I sympathize with your some of your considerations, being myself a non-pro prosumer who likes pro features :geek:
Hello! My thinking is this:

At the advent of the R6 / R5 there was no other R camera beyond the R and RP. RP clearly is a 6D2 successor, but I felt that the mantle moved to the R6 when it arrived and the RP simply... remained. So, in my mind, when July 9, 2020 came around the R6 was the natural successor because it had the number 6 and was priced below the R5. It cost more, yes, but so did everything Canon released around that time.

Fast forward to 2025 and I'd agree with your thinking -- or, at least, I wouldn't disagree in many conversation spaces. There's probably an argument that the R8 also exists to placate those who used to buy the x0D series as well. Maybe it does double duty?

Having owned the 80D (well, it was my wife's and now my son's), I felt it was a fun, geeky, and relatively affordable alternative to the much more expensive full frames: it gave the "feel" of an "upscale camera" as seen in the hands of the well-heeled out on holiday, like that stranger who steps onto a float plane in Alaska with their 5Dx amidst the sea of people clutching their Best Buy bodies. Canon kind of lost that feel with the R transition, I think, although cameras like the R8 are probably their attempt to at least slot in a price equivalent. I don't think the R8 spiritually captures what was happening, but it sits at a good price point in the catalog. They'd do well, I feel, to make a mini R5 body in crop form and re-introduce the X0D series as an X0R line -- and that's where the new video functionality they've been pushing for the new gen would fit very, very comfortably for people like my kiddo and his friends. But I agree, it also fills that 6D character as well -- competent, trade-offs, but serves. Someone mentioned earlier here that the R6 is kind of the 5D of yesteryear and the R5 is something new (or maybe the new 5DS/R?), in which case the R8 is now definitely the 6D equivalent.

I'll say this, though, because it's probably not obvious from my limited chatter here: I've had the privilege since 2005 to use a multitude of Canon's digital bodies -- either through ownership or via family and friends. I think they're all great for their time and serve a need or scratch an itch in one way or the other. They all take great photos when used well. I wouldn't turn down the chance to play with any! 600mm of big glass on a Rebel is so much fun, especially if you bring it along with a pal and pretend it's your serious body for the day. :p (And the memories it captures today are just as good as when it first hit my bag.)

And yes, the R6 captured a special place in my heart. Like the Rebel and my Mac 512ke, I'll probably never part with it even though I eventually will move forward with the times.
Upvote 0

A Look at the RF 45mm f/1.2 STM, it seems compact.

How come Canon don't do a RF 50 mm with IS!?
For non IS lenses I use a shutter speed double the focal length I'm using, so for a non IS 50mm I'd shoot at 1/100sec or faster, it works for me every time. If you can hold your camera more steady then me then you can try using 1/60sec for a 50mm lens.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,271
Messages
966,897
Members
24,633
Latest member
EthenJ

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
353
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
982.4 MB