Possible Canon EOS R7 Mark II Specifications
Not stacked with 40fps isn't a good idea. Unless the 15fps mechanical shutter stays(and no shutter shock), I rather take lower MP stacked CMOS.
Upvote
0
Alan's point notwithstanding, there is a difference between quality and quantity. Sounds intensity is measured in decibels (dB), but consider the difference between 40 dB of a stream babbling past you as you sit in quiet contemplation for a couple of hours, versus 40 dB of an infant whimpering for a couple of hours as you sit next to the crib. Same quantity of sound, very different quality. In the latter case, I might be inclined to take a break, perhaps letting Samuel L Jackson read the bedtime story).Can somebody explain how Sony always get these low read noise ratings from PhotonstoPhotos when their images look like that?
I get that, but I am too set in my ways to change now and have been using Billingham since I discovered these pads in 1994.I have the still-in-package neck straps for all my cameras. I don’t mind the Canon ones, I just don’t like neck straps and avoid them if at all possible. In the event that I want to use one, I certainly don’t want it threaded through the lugs. Instead, I connect a Blackrapid strap with the QD connector to the body or lens foot, depending on the lens.
I do have the Canon E1 hand strap threaded through the right-side lug on my R1 (with the bottom attached to the lug on the RRS base plate).
This is the third time I have posted this in the past few days. Read the the first line of the footnote under the photonstophotos chart:Can somebody explain how Sony always get these low read noise ratings from PhotonstoPhotos when their images look like that?
View attachment 227412
I don't get it, digital looking noise, color blotches all over the image and yet the numbers say that Sony allegedly has ~15.5 DN read noise and Canon has ~25.3 DN.
Does Sony somehow deceive the algorithms that measure the noise? Or am I the only one who thinks that Canon's noise looks finer and more film-like?

I'll believe that when I see it. You initially suggested that prices will "tumble" and I doubt that will happen. Come down, yes. Drop precipitously, no.It's a glut in production capacity rather than a glut in actual products.
Right now manufacturers are moving production (and adding production) for enterprise products. When that market crashes, they will move production back to what is still selling (consumer), and prices will come down.
It's a glut in production capacity rather than a glut in actual products.If the reason for the spike in consumer memory/storage prices is that manufacturers have shifted production to enterprise products, will a reset really lead to a glut of memory and storage? Can enterprise memory/storage products just be repurposed?
By not buying cameras without redundant storage slots for anything except fun cameras.How can I use redundant cards on my R8, M-series or PowerShot cameras?
If the reason for the spike in consumer memory/storage prices is that manufacturers have shifted production to enterprise products, will a reset really lead to a glut of memory and storage? Can enterprise memory/storage products just be repurposed?The AI bubble is a nightmare, there is so much circular money going on. There will eventually have to be a reset but when that will be or what it will look like is impossible to predict. When it does happen, there will be a glut of memory & storage in the market and prices should tumble. It could happen next month. It might not happen for a year or more.
How can I use redundant cards on my R8, M-series or PowerShot cameras? I do write RAW to both cards on my R1, and with the single-slot cameras, at the end of the day I copy the photos from the card to my Mac, and put in then format the other SD card of the pair that I have for each camera. But there's still a risk during the shooting day, while the card is in the camera. Fortunately, I've never had a card fail.The real key is to always use redundant cards so that when a card eventually *does* fail, you don't end up losing data.
The AI bubble is a nightmare, there is so much circular money going on. There will eventually have to be a reset but when that will be or what it will look like is impossible to predict. When it does happen, there will be a glut of memory & storage in the market and prices should tumble. It could happen next month. It might not happen for a year or more.I've seen predictions of "The AI Bubble Bursting." Assuming this does happen, wouldn't prices stabilize?
I have a NAS with 64GB, a mini server with 64GB, and my main PC with 64GB. A couple of notebooks with 32GB. I should be good for a while.yeah I have a secondary nuc that I was looking to toss Linux on and then went looking for memory. that was a "welp, nope" moment.
There is nothing wrong with filling an entire card, wiping it, and using it again. This is the best-case scenario for any card as it means the entire card is getting used.if you tend to fill a card, wipe it and use it again, and do this over and over - just realize there are limits - especially with high capacity cards.
not really, also where is the bubble? a lot of AI is satisfying a real need.I've seen predictions of "The AI Bubble Bursting." Assuming this does happen, wouldn't prices stabilize?
You could check the Flickr group for this lens.
The Voigtländer 40mm f/1,2 in RF mount is an excellent alternative, with electronic data transmission, yet no AF.Thanks for sharing, Alan! That's one of my favorites, too.
Pretty much disappointing!
I knew, this would be a budget lens with optical limitations.
But I didn't expect that much for a OEM lens in the 2020ies.
Seems, that my main concern (AF performance) was the least important.
You could check the Flickr group for this lens.Thanks for sharing, Alan! That's one of my favorites, too.
Pretty much disappointing!
I knew, this would be a budget lens with optical limitations.
But I didn't expect that much for a OEM lens in the 2020ies.
Seems, that my main concern (AF performance) was the least important.
Exactly, the 1kg 100-300/4 is what I have in mind. Maybe I'd accept 1.1kg if it can go below 100 and be 70 or 80. 100 is sometimes too much and when travelling, other than the L tele zoom, I only carry non-L 50mm and 28mm.The EF 300mm f4 was 1.2 kg and I bet Canon could make a 100-300mm f4 L at around 1 kg. I would want L for durability, bokeh and the rest.
And while dreaming, a 28-70mm f2.8 L the same dimensions as the VCM lenses. NO IS but the focus on image quality and bokeh.
"Great non L 28mm"?No progress along the lines of the R50 V??? No compact milc whatsoever? That's a very dark future.
It's hard not to be an **** and start dropping whishlists, but whatever...
- The predicted 300-600/5.6 sounds great, I'm in.
- 70-300/4L (80-300 or whatever) optimized for travel (weight and size). The 100-500 is a brilliant lens and a great upgrade after the EF 100-400 II (which was already great), but still too heavy. The 70-200/4 is also brilliant but 200mm is often not enough. The 70-200/2.8 does not accept 1.4X.
- _Great_, non-L 28mm and 50mm lens. (No, the 45/1.2 does not qualify, having the usual STM motor...and I'd also choose 55mm instead of 45mm if not 50mm)
- The predicted 28-70/2 mk2. I'm in! Just make it lighter and better balanced.
- Actually, a non-L 28-70/2 (or 28-55/2 or actually anything between 28-70/2 and 30-50/2) would kick ass. For me at least.
- An awesome macro lens. Let's say 150/2 with 1.5x max magnification.
- An awesome tele zoom to match the (hopefully mk2) 28-70 and to answer Sony's 50-150/2.
- Fullframe compact milc. Come ooooon!
*In general, better AF for non-L lenses. Make that STM better or invent something new, or introduce mid-tier lenses which are non-L but incorporate nano-USM. Just do something
I promise to buy each and every piece of the above, should Canon come up with any of them.![]()
