• P-visie
    The EF 180mm is a very sharp lens, ideal for when you need more distance to the subject (e.g. insects). A 200mm f4 macro would be fine...
  • bluezurich
    How many years did it take for the EF lineup to be mature? Many more years than the RF has been with us. I guess if I were many years...
  • I
    Fingers crossed for a 15-60/85 RF-S lens, whether bright or not. Zoom lenses starting at 17 or 18mm on Canon APS-C just aren't quite...
  • K
    A replacement for the old 180mm Macro would be very welcome, perhaps 180mm or 200mm. But I'm not going to hold my breath. Higher end...
  • Ian K
    I can’t see why it wouldn’t work. Obviously I haven’t tried with the RF 14mm f/1.4L VCM but I used it with the RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM...
  • Stig Nygaard
    Not next from Canon, but probably next to Canon.... Sigma RF-S 15mm f/1.4 DC DN (to replace their current RF-S 16mm f/1.4) The...
    • 1771784129340.png
    • 1771784749284.png
  • neuroanatomist
    Why? Meaning, what is the business justification for filling in what you believe is a gap vs. releasing more lenses for full frame? I...
  • Uneternal
    Canon has a big gap in their APS-C lineup, which they treat like a stepchild. Before they release more lenses for full frame, they...
  • L
    Like Nikon did with the ZF, this is the only release I wish from Canon in 2026, Is this realistic?
  • Click
    Beautiful shots, danfaz. You should crop closer to the bird in the 4th one to eliminate the mass at the bottom. Well done, Sir!
  • E
    I do not take "never" rumors very seriously. Canon never planned to make full-frame mirrorless cameras, but now they are the only...
  • danfaz
    Hi guys, a few wintry Northern Harrier shots from yesterday.
    • 1000061675.jpg
    • 1000061671.jpg
    • 1000061673.jpg
    • 1000061674.jpg
    • 1000061673.jpg
    • 1000061670.jpg
  • J
    Rumor has it that there will never be one.
  • R
    Oh boy oh boy, this is surely another opportunity to whine about a - proper 50mm lens in the $400-600 range - proper 28mm lens in the...
  • S
    Fwiw I essentially never* stopped down my 500, for me the gain of more of the subject being in focus was never worth making the...
  • benperrin
    Yeah it's just another thing to take around however it's probably worth it for perfect focus. Do you have a filter/plate system that...
  • Ian K
    More complicated compared with what? There is no simpler method, it takes about 30 seconds. You don’t even have to attach the mask to...
  • Sporgon
    Yes. Regarding their original purpose on film it’s pretty clear that the significantly increased film area’s effect of reducing grain...
  • D
    Yes, assuming that we can actually use both options and have an appropriate budget to suit. Canon would clearly prefer that users only...
  • D
    This is the point of anamorphic lenses - right? Has there been any empirical data for end quality of the result?
  • D
    We have to debate about something - right? Bad enough for keyboard brand warriors but worse in cases (like distortion correction) to...
  • D
    Just as MP3 players replaced discmans, users preferred convenience vs quality. Same is today with photos except smart phones have...
  • neuroanatomist
    Depends on what you're shooting, the subject size and distance, and how much of that subject you want in focus. Here's a shot with the...
    • SnowyEgret.jpg
  • D
    I don't think that we can compare directly at all now. Materials cost/technologies, exchange rates/tariffs, manufacturing techniques...
  • C
    I'm headed to Kenya on safari this spring, particularly looking for migratory birds that should be really plentiful in the rainy season...
    • 461A7324-Enhanced-NR.jpg
  • Filter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    37,420
    Messages
    972,801
    Members
    24,777
    Latest member
    EJFUDD

    Gallery statistics

    Categories
    1
    Albums
    29
    Uploaded media
    372
    Embedded media
    1
    Comments
    25
    Disk usage
    1 GB