• GMCPhotographics
    I can only imagine the reach this RF 300-600mm f5.6 will have on the rumoured R7II. An effective 500-1000mm! Lets assume this lens will...
  • DocInfoSci
    Woah, Dude — I didn't say I was expecting. I said it would be nice. To quote the article: And I stated: But then again, isn't a...
  • mimbu
    It's not going to be less than the 100-300/2.8L. I suspect if you place a "1" in front of the 2.5 you have there (ie $12.5k), you'll...
  • Zadak
    Paragraphs....
  • neuroanatomist
    You're expecting an RF 300-600mm f/5.6L lens for a lower cost than the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L?!? :ROFLMAO: If I was the sort of...
  • T
    I always only purchased Canon lenses.... until a couple years ago. The Sigma 105mm 1.4 and 135mm 1.4 are great lenses. Rented them...
  • DocInfoSci
    I think it would be a great addition to the line, especially if it had a price point closer to $2.5k. I find that 600mm is barely...
  • D
    "People on the internet" are always upset! :p Just like some CanonRumors posters...
  • mimbu
    I hope we never see an ugly thing like this from Canon again. I never imagined I would see the day that Canon would pull such shenanigans.
  • A
    R1+RF600/4, Accipiter nisus
    • R1__6631.jpg
    • R1__6769.jpg
    • R1__7219.jpg
  • dolina
    RF 300mm f/2.0L IS USM for approx $9,719.36 or 1,528,200 JPY would be what I'd want
  • A
    The simplest way would be to simply add TC2.0 inside. Just like they did with the RF800/5.6 and RF1200/8. Of course, this wouldn't make...
  • mimbu
    I said the same thing in an earlier threads when many were predicting prices that were a fraction of the 100-300. Ultimately it's...
    • 1774367817559.png
  • danfaz
    danfaz replied to the thread Show your Bird Portraits.
    Thank you, it was definitely a challenge! 🙂 Animal tracking was not working at all, so had to use spot AF. Aside from those amazing...
  • roby17269
    Not as long as the 35 1.2 :cry:
  • neuroanatomist
    What a novel suggestion, @mimbu! Thanks for sharing.
  • mimbu
    It's almost impossible to imagine how a 300-600/5.6L would come in cheaper than the 100-300/2.8L. If anything I would expect it to be...
  • neuroanatomist
    I don't think DO will make the lens cheaper, if that's what you're suggesting. It's really the size of the entrance pupil that matters...
  • EricN
    There was the suggestion about Diffractive Optics, even with that, do you think would be more likely to be 7 or or 8k? If so, why?
  • Zadak
    I just want a good, sub $8k super tele lens, with internal zoom
  • S
    SteelLynx replied to the thread Show your Bird Portraits.
    With all the stuff around that guy, these shots are excellent danfaz. I would have anything in focus, but not those big eyes :)
  • neuroanatomist
    I have a very good RF 200-600mm f/5.6L IS with dual nano USM when I put the RF 2x behind my RF 100-300/2.8. As @john1970 suggests, I...
  • J
    It will be interesting to see what this lens specifications are once it is released. Frankly, I am not a fan of development...
  • fox40phil
    hmm I don’t know about the idea of this lens. I have the 300 2.8ii… with TCs 420mm 4.0 - 600mm 5.6. This is what a nice modern tele zoom...
  • mimbu
    So, what will arrive first, the Canon 300-600/5.6L or the Sony 100-400/4GM...
  • Filter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    37,420
    Messages
    972,859
    Members
    24,778
    Latest member
    miujiu

    Gallery statistics

    Categories
    1
    Albums
    29
    Uploaded media
    372
    Embedded media
    1
    Comments
    25
    Disk usage
    1 GB