Show your Bird Portraits

I can't hear the "cheep" but the plumage is of a fully grown adult: the immature (incl. the first winter birds!) are much more (and boldly!) streaked starting from the throat and going down to the vent. Immature are also (boldly) streaked on the head and neck and they, I think are not suppose to have the white tips on the greater covers of the wing (the tips of the lesser covers are not visible on these photos, otherwise they should be white too for your bird).
I uploaded the photo to ChatGPT and asked: Can you identify whether this Dunnock is a full mature adult or a juvenile?

Answer

This looks like a juvenile / recently fledged Dunnock, not a fully mature adult.

The strongest clues are:

  • Prominent yellow gape flanges at the corners of the bill — adults lose these. They are typical of fledglings and recently independent juveniles.
  • Soft, fluffy plumage texture rather than the cleaner, tighter feathering of an adult.
  • Brownish streaking on the head and mantle. Adult Dunnocks usually show a cleaner slate-grey head and breast with less diffuse facial patterning.
  • The bird is also giving a typical begging or food-soliciting call posture with the open bill.
However, it is not a very young nestling. The plumage is already fairly developed, so this is probably a:

  • late juvenile / fledgling
  • likely a few weeks out of the nest
  • possibly moulting toward more adult-like plumage.
A fully mature adult Dunnock would normally show:

  • a much cleaner grey head and breast,
  • darker, sharper eye,
  • little or no yellow at the gape,
  • and a more refined feather texture overall.
Upvote 0

Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ Specifications

The 20-50 focal length is ideal for street photography. However, the lens is quite large for streetphotography, especially with the lens hood. It would be nice if Canon released a 35mm pancake f/2.8. This, in combination with the R8, seems great for street photography. The 28mm, on the other hand, is just a bit too wide.
I agree. This lens is very appealing to me. I'd like to see more pancakes generally though....

28 is a bit wide for me too and 44 (apsc crop) often a bit narrow. Canon would make me very happy if they would just add a 1.3x crop raw option in camera, as then it would be a 28, 35 and ~44 all in one.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

Show your Bird Portraits

It’s the plumage and chick-like cheep as well that distinguishes from the fully mature adult.
I can't hear the "cheep" but the plumage is of a fully grown adult: the immature (incl. the first winter birds!) are much more (and boldly!) streaked starting from the throat and going down to the vent. Immature are also (boldly) streaked on the head and neck and they, I think are not suppose to have the white tips on the greater covers of the wing (the tips of the lesser covers are not visible on these photos, otherwise they should be white too for your bird).
Upvote 0

Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ Specifications

So it’s a fly-by-wire zoom.

A lens with three nano USM motors (two for zooming) and IS.

1:3 macro at 50mm, updated IS rated at 6 f-stops alone, L-series build quality with weather sealing, internal zooming.

Looks like it’s got the whole package!

Very cute, I just wonder how the power consumption will be, specially with cameras like the R8.

EDIT:
I'm absolutely speculating, but I suppose this lens may feature a new design, without a zooming helicoid. Being nano USM a type of linear motor, I suppose one zooming motor may operate one way, while the other motor does the job the opposite way, with both featuring positioning sensors. I suppose that could allow more combinations of positions for both zooming and focusing groups of lens elements, than traditional helicoid mechanisms.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0

Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ Specifications

It's close to the RF-S 15-60 or 20-60 f/4 I always wanted. 1:3 max magnification is too a great spec.
Would be a standard zoom for my R50 V and a good wide-to-normal for e.g. EOS RP.
Interesting lens - will wait for getting hands on that lens to check if it is really a good alternative ... I it can replace e.g. 2-4 lenses I own, then I will buy one!
Upvote 0

Canon RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ Specifications

The 20-50 focal length is ideal for street photography. However, the lens is quite large for streetphotography, especially with the lens hood. It would be nice if Canon released a 35mm pancake f/2.8. This, in combination with the R8, seems great for street photography. The 28mm, on the other hand, is just a bit too wide.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

Here are the Full Canon EOS R6 V Specifications

If the R6 V has the same readout speed as the R6III (13-13.5 ms), that would support X-sync of around 1/60 s - 1/80 s. I guess Canon decided that was too slow.
The R5II showed me how much I desire ES+flash, so any new bodies I want to purchase need to support that. This likely means that my R8 won't get upgraded by the rumoured R8II, but I don't mind that :)
Upvote 0

Show your Bird Portraits

That's a MUCH better view of the Red-whiskered Bulbul than I was able to get in Vietnam!
That day I made plenty of photos of that birds (par). Unfortunately they were looking usually up for flying insect, not at me. Doing fast take off in the air and trying to get on the same branch before the other bird takes it, sometimes arguing who was first there :D! Not such a good light/background as on Alan's photo (especially the thorns :)...)!

DSC_4607_DxO.jpgDSC_4656_DxO.jpg
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users
Upvote 0

Show your Bird Portraits

A strange looking Dunnock cheeping away this morning. When his beak was open, you can see from the gape it must be a fledgling (R5ii + 200-800).View attachment 229413View attachment 229414
Don't mistake the bare skin for "gape" - in fledglings the gape looks different! What ever the bird is showing the photos are excellent!
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

RRS launches more affordable Core Line

Really Right Stuff has just launched a new line of tripods called Benchmark, the leadoff for a new Core Line that promises 'performance within reach', specifically the famed RRS precision and reliability for (on average) 30% lower prices.


As an example, the Benchmark tripod offers similar specs to the Versa 24L Mk2 in terms of tripod size and weight and having 4 leg sections, and the former costs $945 compared to $1195 for the latter. Having said that, the Benchmark is rated for an 18 kg / 40 lb load compared to 32 kg / 70 lb for the Versa 24L...so it seems you still get what you pay for. Then again, RRS tripods are over-engineered for their support rating, for example my travel tripod is a TQC-14 that's rated for 11 kg / 25 lbs, and yet I can literally hang under the tripod and it supports my weight...which is far greater than 11 kg. So an 18 kg load rating is likely more than sufficient for almost any rig you'd want to mount on the tripod.

I also question the tagline. Yes, $945 is less expensive than $1195...but both are still expensive. Despite that, I think it's a good thing that they're launching a more affordable line, as relative as that term may be in this case.

The other thing I will say is that from a quality standpoint, RRS is hard to beat. I've had the TQC-14 as a travel tripod and the TVC-33 for use with my 600/4 for nearly 14 years, and they're functioning and even looking good as new, as are the ballheads and gimbal head that I bought concurrently.
  • Wow
Reactions: 1 user

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,473
Messages
975,062
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB