EOS 4 Life said:

DSLRs are exactly the same.
Any camera with a CMOS rolling electronic shutter will have the same issue depending on the readout speed.

Click to expand...

Of course! I completely dismissed the fact that some DSLR have ES and was thinking purely mechanical.
Thanks!

EricN said:

I have bad eyesight too and I don't think you need focus peaking with magnification, but that's me. Why don't you rent an R5 from lens rentals (or is there an alternative place?) ?

Click to expand...

That's actually an excellent idea!!

I think I will rent one maybe in the near future and play with it.....

Yep, Lensrentals and Lensprotogo ....they're actually owned by the same company, but they often have different sales/.coupons going so it pays to shop between them.

Sometimes one has items the other does not...and one factors in shipping in the price while the other does not, so, it pays to compare the total pricing between them with whatever coupon(s) are out.

C

definedphotography said:

Looking at the screen on the back of the camera after every shot or almost every shot.

Click to expand...

The EVF makes it easier to hide chimping, just press the playback button with your thumb, look at the picture in the EVF and pretend to be taking pictures

manwithafrotto said:

Is there a higher quality version to download and view on my quest 2? This video looks like absolute garbage in VR, from I am assuming youtubes compression.

Click to expand...

I don't know if there is a higher quality version, but you are right that it looks like garbage, and also that it is from compression. Whether or not it is youtube's compression or something Canon did is hard to say. I definitely occurred to me when watching that it was weird of Canon to use such a poor quality video for a lens advertisement.

unfocused said:

A half dozen is for amateurs. A dozen is the minimum if you are really serious. Still looking for that Tardus bag though, you know, the one that's bigger on the inside than on the outside.

Click to expand...

Indeed, if I was to make a move into manufacturing in the photography world I think cameras and lenses and the like are for dummies, bags are where the big bucks are!

My favourite portrait lenses in the EF mount are the EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM II and the EF 85mm F1.4L IS USM. The quality of the images from the 85mm F1.4L on my Canon 5DS are amazing so without question I would buy a RF version with my R6 and EOS R I’m not interested in the 1.2 both size and cost are too much for me.

Canon USA has restocked some hard-to-find RF mount lenses, as well as RF mount camera bodies. All refurbished gear from Canon USA comes with a full 1-year Canon USA warranty.
Canon EOS R Bodies

Canon EOS RP $899 (Reg $999)
Canon EOS R $1619 (Reg $1799)
Canon EOS R6 $2249 (Reg $2499)
Canon EOS R5 $3509 (Reg $3899)

Canon RF Lenses

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM $2159 (Reg $2299)
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM $319 (Reg $399)
Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM $879 (Reg $1099)
Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM $718 (Reg $899)
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM $399 (Reg $499)
Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM $2069 (Reg $2299)
Canon RF...

Click to expand...

[url=https://www.canonrumors.com/refurbished-canon-rf-camera-and-lens-stock-update-at-canon-usa/]Continue reading...

Alam said:

Question 2: Canon once claimed that EF lenses work as the way the supposed to be adapted in Mirrorless body, even tell all lenses released within 10 years ago capable of shooting 30 fps, unlike competitor that only work for selected lenses

Click to expand...

If they claimed that it would have been relatively recently, since only the R3 is capable of 30 fps. But for the 20 fps on the R5, the majority of EF lenses are as capable as RF lenses at being able to achieve 20 fps (the big caveat is that 20 fps is situation-dependent, so the way Canon phrases is it 'continuous shooting speed of max. approx. 20 fps less likely to decrease' for a list of lenses that includes EF and RF lenses (link). Canon has not shared a similar list for 30 fps on the R3.

Michael Clark said:

Mechanical shutters do not provide perfect geometry, either. If one looks at images from the 1DX Mark III taken using the mechanical shutter just as critically as one looks at images taken with electronic shutter, there's not that much difference between the R3 with ES and the 1D X Mark III with MS.

Click to expand...

This is what I consider too much for the intended audience. I can understand why they saw this as a marked improvement, however, I don't see it as terribly good. Let's just say a global shutter has a real value in this type of shooting.

Looks like an improved Stitz or a Loreo stereo module, only direct mount instead of mounting on the front of a lens.

I'll have to dig mine out and try it.

The annual 5DayDeal Giveaway is now live! The giveaway is free to enter, but only USA citizens can win the physical prizes. The digital products are open to anyone, anywhere!
Enter the 5DayDeal Giveaway Here
TOTAL PRIZE VALUE: $10,000+

Sponsor:
Prize
Value
Available
VALUE


SlickPic
BESPOKE annual Memberships
$599.40
10
$5,994.00


Westcott
FJ200 Strobe
$399.90
3
$1,199.70


PeakDesign
Everyday Backpack 30L v2 // Black
$289.95
2
$579.90


Westcott
Rapid Box Switch 1×4
$269.90
1
$269.90


Greg Benz
Web Sharp Pro licenses + 2 Hr zoom
session w/Greg Benz
$250.00
2
$500.00


Westcott
Rapid Box Switch Octa-M
$244.90
2
$489.80


5DayDeal
Oben Photography Tripod
$220.00
1
$220.00


Westcott
Illuminator Collapsible 6-in-1 Reflector (52”)
$139.90
2
$279.80


5DayDeal
MeFoto Backpacker Tripod...

Click to expand...

Continue reading...

entoman said:

Back in the days of film, when we were generally limited to ISO 100 slide films, most people used flash to enable a usable combination of small aperture and freezing movement, but from my observations, the vast majority of people nowadays prefer to shoot by ambient lighting, unless they are working indoors or in the darkness of a rainforest interior.

Click to expand...

…or shooting at high magnification. For example, shooting with the MP-E 65 at a diffraction-friendly f/11, the effective aperture at 5x is f/66. That’s why I use the twin-flash.

kaihp said:

Did they ELI5 why?

Inquiring minds wants to be enlightened.

Click to expand...

They didn't go into detail, just stated that the currently available
AF-implementations can't work on a global shutter.

Chaitanya said:

CFexpress type a adoption is still too slow and other than handful of Sony Cameras no one is adopting that standard so let's see how SD 7.0 is adopted.

Click to expand...

My impression is

1. UHS II cards will take a performance hit in SDXC 7.0 slots, so some customers would upgrade cards. Unless SD 7.0 comes in at a much lower price, customers wouldn't prefer SD to CFExpress. On the contrary, owners of such cameras as the R5 would rather buy more of the CFExpress cards they already have.

2. Given a device can dissipate the heat (with similar size, I don't see a reason why just one of the two would create a problem), CFExpress type A vs type B is a matter of designing different plastics.

3. There already are CFExpress slots and card readers on the market and manufacturers are already working out the problems. Another standard is another headache, which I don't see how they would justify.

4. Micro SD is loosing market with some smartphone manufacturers dropping it, and nobody making A2 compatible slots*. At some point laptop manufacturers will probably follow suit and drop the slot as well.

* I know there are A2 micro SD cards on the market, I haven't heard of any gadgets with slots that benefit from it.

Distinctly Average said:

I’ve learnt so much over the years from @Dalantech tutorials and blog as well as lots of great advice on other forums. I started macro in the film era and gave up as I just couldn’t afford it. Also the slow feedback didn’t make learning easy. So when I tried again a few years ago the superb advice from many really got me hooked. When forums work well they are a wonderful resource.

As for your gallery, I have really enjoyed looking through, particularly your bird shots. The mono heron is superb.

Click to expand...

Happy to help! When I first got into macro there were very few resources, but a few people took the time to help me and the tutorials and blog are my way of paying it forward.

You can now preorder the brand new Canon RF 5.2mm f/2.8L Dual Fisheye Lens at our exclusive affiliate partner Adorama.
Canon RF 5.2mm f/2.8L Dual Fisheye Lens Key Features

Capture stereoscopic 3D with an interpupillary distance of 60mm for natural parallax and with a 190deg FOV
Compact, lightweight, and portable – Dust and water-resistant
EOS VR System – this lens combined with a compatible Canon camera equipped with firmware optimized for VR shooting
Immersive 3D experience with compatible head mount displays such as the
Oculus Quest 2 and more
Impressive flare control in backlit conditions from use of SWC (subwavelength structure coating)
Optimized for a folded optical path with two optical systems featuring 2 UD lenses
Streamlined VR workflow – by recording left and right fisheye images to a single Full-frame image sensor,
Versatility for your scenes lighting with a maximum aperture of f/2.8 to a deep depth of field f/16

Preorder: Canon RF 5.2mm f/2.8L Dual Fisheye Lens

Click to expand...

Continue reading...

Not that I've seen, but I have money in the bank waiting for it. Definitely the lens I am most interested in.

kaihp said:

I guess that they don't see the R6 as having enough resolution, when you project 2 images to the 36x24 sensor. I didn't bother to check the image circle, but I would ass-u-me that it's a full circle for each "eye" so that would bring us down to - at the most - two 18mm circular images. If it's two perfect 18mm diameter circles, you'd use 58.9% of the image sensor so 26.5Mpixels in total or 13.25Mpixels/image path for the 45Mpixel R5.

Click to expand...

That is almost 4k per side, which is a nice marketing checkbox to tick.

LogicExtremist said:

New title, "Sigma wont be producing any RF lenses in 2021, maybe never", and the other third party companies have stopped in 2021, because Canon and their legal teams put an end to it. They don't want any competition for its overpriced lenses, especially outside the US where prices are sky high, and third-party lenses would have lots more appeal!

Canon is offering very expensive L-series glass for a lot more money than before, or entry level budget lenses, many of which are a stop darker than their predecessors, for higher prices. The justification that the R5 and R6 can handle higher ISO is a moot point because these aren't the cameras that people would use budget lenses on...

Hang on to your EF lenses people, and buy an adapter, they work perfectly fine on the RF platform.

Click to expand...

and also don't buy an R5 or R6 if they are suffering from lock up.

YuengLinger said:

Looks like the Spot Metering area. Check your metering modes and try some others, such as Evaluative, and see if you like that better. Spot Metering is good in some situations, tricky in others, especially if you aren't used to it. I like Spot for portraits, Evaluative for landscapes.

Have fun!

Click to expand...

Thanks/ it was partial metering. spot circle is smaller

mkamelg said:

Taking a photo of the electronic viewfinder with a smartphone is pointless in my opinion, because its lens (which is usually a wide-angle lens) is not free from distortion, and you will never be able to get a perfectly flat image of this electronic viewfinder. In the case of the optical viewfinder, it is clearly different.

I tried to take a photo of the electronic viewfinder of my EOS R with my smartphone (iPhone 7 Plus), and I also registered the image distortion. The camera was perfectly level, and on my smartphone I used the ProCamera application with the Tiltmeter turned on perfectly level. I took the photo "from hand":



If the EVF image is recorded directly with an external video recorder, no distortion can be seen.

Click to expand...

Great point about distortion caused by using a smartphone to photograph and EVF! No way we can tell what's happening with the image posted. Thank you for chiming in!

Maybe, just maybe, OP and friends got a batch of counterfeits.

Or...Could eyeglasses be causing perceived distortion, which is then "confirmed" by a smartphone shot?

The anomalies should be reported lickety-split to Canon!

I was disappointed by the EVF of my R until I altered the picture style in camera. I set the User Def 1 style to set sharpness to the second lowest settings and contrast to the lowest setting. The difference was noticeable and I'm much happier. I don't use DPP, and don't notice any impact on RAW processing in LR.

I cannot get A E lock to work with any of the three preset memories on the R6