I had my R6 freeze for the first time 2 days ago. In my case the image in the viewfinder just sat there and the shutter didn't work. After a few seconds the camera turned itself off and immediately back on and it was okay for a short time and then started happening again. I have Firmware 1.5.2 and have been told that 1.5.1 was supposed to have fixed thisI have the R6 and had never had any problem. Then I updated when I received the notice from Canon that it was available. Last Thursday was the first I used the R6 since installing the new software and had four times that the screen went black and basically locked. Turning it off and back on did noting so I would turn it off, remove the lens about a quarter of an inch, replace the lens, turn the camera back on and it would work. I did miss some images at the track meet as I stood there (looking dumber than normal) trying to get the camera to turn back on. The first time was the worse - both in the time it took to figure out what to do and that I was standing at the finish line with many people watching.
Here in the US, the EOS R body and 24-105 lens kits (both L and non-L pairings) are $200 off. I just got an email:
View attachment 203610
It’s great to know that Canon thinks I’m due for an upgrade. I’m not sure if they think I should upgrade my EOS R to an EOS R or upgrade my EOS R3 to an EOS R.![]()
Well worth a trip. Just get up before dawn to have the place empty. A great place, good transport , great food.Thanks for the info. I’ve recently purchased a tilt/shift lens. Now I just have to convince my wife I need a trip to Venice and one Hector of a tutor on the trip.
You must have missed it... "We will announce specific ordering website URLs and availability dates second quarter 2021 (i.e. around May 2021!)" - LOLIf they're trying to keep this under-the-radar as you keep repeating, you've probably sunk their first-mover advantage by blabbing about it in a widely-read public forum. I also can't believe they let such a loudmouth near their R&D without signing a non-disclosure form. So now it's a couple years later. Where are the fantastic products?
One advantage might be that the tilt and shift info would be included in metadata and perhaps focus data.I hate to imagine the cost of such a special-purpose beast of a lens!
However, there are lots of interesting possibilities here, too. For example, if the operation of the tilt/shift mechanism (and, of course, focus) are electronically controlled, the camera will also be getting information about these settings and that information could be used to inform image correction. I can imagine things like graduated CA correction that recognized how CA would vary across an image from a TS'ed lens, for example.
But the cost! ;-)
By the way, to add before someone says dont complain here tell canon…I need to add my voice here.
I own both the R3 and the c70, actually sold an R5 for an R3. And I DO believe canon should bump up the video features. At least on par with Nikon and Sony’s A1. Such as:
- shutter angle
- custom WB in movie mode in Live View
- RAW output to Atomos
- Atomos compatibility, like shutter button triggers REC.
- XF-AVC
- Cinema RAW, this is not the same as Canon RAW.
- Cinema RAW Lite
- oh and let me disable IBIS but retain lens IS!
Please!!!
Adorama has the Prograde Digital 160GB CFexpress 2.0 Type-A Memory Card as their Deal of the Day for only $291 (Reg $364).
Prograde Digital 160GB CFexpress 2.0 Key Features
160GB Storage Capacity
NVMe PCIe 3.0 x4 Bus
800 MB/s Max Read Speed
700 MB/s Max Write Speed
400 MB/s (VPG 400) Min Sustained Write Speed
Records Raw 4K Video
Metal Enclosure for Temperature Control
Built-In Thermal Throttling
Prograde Digital 160GB CFexpress 2.0 Type-A Memory Card $291 (Reg $364)
If same controller is used as R5 then results won't change much(other than better firmware implementation) but if new controller is used then results surely would change quite a bit.
I was referring to the Canon NON-L EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 II lens that sells for $599, not the L lens. The non-L consumer level EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 II outperformed (in sharpness) the Sigma 100-400 at 300mm cropped to the same FOV as the Sigma at 400mm, at least in my experience with the 2 Sigma lenses I briefly owned.It's more than 3 times the price of the Sigma and also a native (is this term right?) lens. Would be a shame if it wouldn't perform better. The question is: Does the better performance justify the huge price difference? I don't know. I tried to figure it out, but didn't find any serious information about a comparison. If you find, feel free to tell me ... Thank you!
I'm sure I'll get the 35 L, despite having the 28-70. At first I sold my 50 1.2, thinking it was redundant having both, but the 50 is considerably smaller and lighter than the 28-70 (and of course is a stop and a third faster), so I bought the 50 again LOL!Can't wait to see a new L lens in the popular focal length! However, I would still probably stick to my 28-70 f2 as it's the beast.