Maru said:

How do you look at current 5dmkIV refub price of $1750..is this a good deal!

Click to expand...

If you can wait until winter I expect new ones will be at $1999

Mike27713 said:

Can anyone tell me if Canon has given up on us Pro DSLR users? I don't want a mirrorless! Please don't start telling me about any advantages to mirrorless, I don't care.

Click to expand...

Officially Canon stated a week ago they have not given up on EF , but rather are "optimzing" the lineup.


Mirrorless is definitely their focus right now, but there are some like myself who won't buy that and canon knows this

So they will probably have more systems now with less products available in each system

SHAMwow said:

I'm primarily focused on using the 70-200 for sports, and I feel crazy, but does the throw distance on the RF bother anyone else? Or bother enough to not get it? I rented it, and am surprised at how noticeable it is. And how stiff the zoom is as well as ring dampening. I understand this was all necessary with the new telescoping design, but am shocked its barely a footnote in most reviews. Anyone shooting sports with the RF version and think you get used it?

Click to expand...

Many people used the non-telescoping zoom as a reason they preferred the EF 70-200 f/2.8L and f/4L over the 70-300 f/4-5.6L. super common sentiment

So whether or not people are saying it now because this RF lens is the new thing and the only RF option available of this type, yes a lot do agree with you. Personally I use the telescoping ef 70-300 f/4-5.6L for travel when I want to keep the size down, and the non-telescoping ef 70-200 f/2.8L is II for sports/racing when I need fast and precise zoom.

I hope Canon use the opportunity to use the iris scanning used for the eye control as a security unlocking option just like thumbprint scanner for smartphones .
Iris scanner would better for cameras as we sometimes need to wear gloves

Biggles Csolander said:

I'll continue to use that "nice feature" on 1DXII and 5DIV bodies during my professional whale watching shooting and use the R5 purely with my hobbyist hat on. If the specific functionality is released on the R3 and not subsequently on the R5 via firmware, without any corresponding explanation of any technical limitations, I'll suspect it will be a marketing "up-sell" decision

Click to expand...

Sorry, should have been more clear. My comment was more on the 'disable IBIS separate from the lens'. Which on both the other cameras, I suppose you can say that 'feature' is enabled by default . All joking aside... to say it's an 'issue' vs a 'want' is what I was getting at.

Chaitanya said:

If you are patient enough and know behaviour of frogs and toads you can easily get close to them even with wide angle lenses.

Login to view embedded media
Login to view embedded media
Login to view embedded media
Login to view embedded media
Login to view embedded media
IMG_9132 by Chaitanya Shukla, on Flickr

Western Burrowing Frog(Sphaerotheca pashchima) by Chaitanya shukla by Chaitanya Shukla, on Flickr

None of these were setup or handled in anyway.

Click to expand...

Nice job!

Kit. said:

Then Canon will double the prices of new lenses.

So, no. Having competition is healthy.

Click to expand...

RF Lenses are already big profit items.

pedroesteban said:

I love my EF 135 f/2 and it works even better on the R5 than it did on the 5D mk IV, due to IBIS and eye autofocus. I don't think that Canon will match the EF 135 price, size, weight or bokeh "creaminess" with the rumored RF 135, so I don't see myself buying it.

Click to expand...

Kinda tough for bokeh to not be creamy at 135mm f/1.4. I would think it would be even better. Absolutely will not be near the same price as the EF.

Mikehit said:

Thank you all for your replies.
I decided to try Antono and Maximillian's suggestions of SD vs CF cards (with only one in the camera and when doing this realised.......I had picked up my 5DIV by mistake. D'oh!
...oh, how many emojis can express how I feel right now???

Who mentioned Occam's razor....?????

Click to expand...

Mike, don't blame yourself.
Be happy that all your gear is working and you don't have to deal with the service center.
And praise Canon for having a good implementation of detection of correct FW.
I don't want to imagine what could happen, when you overwrite your 5D4 memory with 7D2 FW - if that was possible...

Bennymiata said:

Acting like a duel gain sensor?

Click to expand...

I do not understand sir

Bit the bullet, did like I wrote above....R6, Kirk L plate and Control Ring. Looking forward to macro with the 100L and the wonderfully wizardry of the magickal 135L.

Thanks Gordon

Well, I don't know what features of cameras and lenses will have in five years from now or how much will they cost but I'm almost certain that I will not want to change. Why? Because I'm not really interested in the new features I read about here.
Just to mention the latest: eye controlled AF. I think you simply don't need more than 5x6 AF points in a camera. Or In-body Image Stabilization. Ok, it will probably make lenses smaller. But will it be included in all cameras? What if a camera with IBIS goes wrong and the replacement camera does not have this feature? And if the lenses still will have IS what do we need the IBIS for? How can I turn off IBIS if I don't need it for any reason? On lenses I simply switch it off with the IS switch. Will it have a button on the camera to make turning on and off simple?
Touch-screen? Button illumination? Vari-angle screens? What for? I made a self portrait with my 1200D and only needed a remote controller and two shots to get a picture that was perfect for my needs. The more software and electronic parts you have in a camera the more things that can go wrong. By the way, this step in my opinion is very similar to the decision of motherboard makers: all motherboards you can buy could run any modern games and you have to buy it even if you would like to use your computer only for text editing and mailing and never want to run any stupid FPS (or other) games.

As a person who mostly shoots wildlife.....I've been more annoyed at the black screen after trying to wake the R5 up a few times.....the screen and view finder are solid black but the IS is activated and camera awake etc.....missed a few shots. Only fix turn the camera on and off again.

Just in case somebody hesitates.
I own the Nissin MF 18 ringflash, in a Canon "dedicated" version. I believed I could use it on any more or less recent Canon DSLR or MILC. I should have looked for compatibility on the Nissin website...
This flash doesn't work on many Canon cameras, for instance on the latest models, with the exception of the EOS R, it's not even compatible with the EOS 5D IV.
Lesson learnt: stick with original accessories, if you, like me, hate expensive surprises.

I was just outside trying to take self-portraits of myself and experienced a bug with my R5. In Servo, Continuous AF mode with Self-Timer Enabled, the camera will not track my face while the timer is counting down. Instead, it will hold single-point focus from when I initially press the shutter, only. This means all my self-portraits are blurry when I step back. Right as it takes the photo, the LCD screen will show the locked blue focus square quickly flash to a white face tracking box over my face, but it will not refocus.

Would anyone else check their R5 to see if this issue occurs for them? My firmware version is the most recent, 1.3.1. I just called Canon and reported it. It'll be forwarded to their engineers.

Thanks!

usern4cr said:

Thanks, Canonmike! I'm probably just one of the many who have predicted that Canon would have to eventually come out with BSI sensors as you can only have so much circuitry blocking your photo receptors before there is insufficient light for them. But thanks for seeing my post on it and mentioning it.

I also remember "guessing" early on that the price of the RF 100-500L would be the same as the RF 70-200L ($2,700 as I figured rounding was appropriate). So I missed by $1 on that one. Well, that one was just a lucky guess (I've guessed prices on others that have missed as well).

The one I like to remember was when I saw the early patent post for the RF 800mm DO lens. I noticed 2 things: it didn't have any IS elements indicated in it (obviously they did add IS to it in production) and that there were absolutely no lenses in the back of it so that I predicted it would have a collapsing ability to shorten it's length by ~30% or so for storage. That one I nailed!

Now, if I only knew which way the stock market was going ...

Click to expand...

Ha! Ha!. When you figure that out, I hope you share your info with the same insight and enthusiasm as your camera predictions. Now, go get to work on it.

I'd ask Canon for a replacement foot. Finish issues from improperly prepared parts do happen. They can be one off or batch related. If the paint is not adhering well and not bonded to the primer then it might chip easily.

Curious how the new RF mount can benefit supertelephoto technology.
would be nice to see some interesting new supertelephoto lenses like a 500mm 5.6, 200-600mm, 600mmf5.6 or f8 feel these will sell very well. Don’t believe it would canabalize the f4 sales either. Just like 16-35f 2.8 vs f4 or 70-200mmf2.8 and f4 some people would be happy with abit less weight but good performance. Like some of the older seasoned pros who sometimes would like to lug around something less backbreaking.
It nice to have options.
like look at the comparision of the Nikon 500mmf4 vs f5.6

privatebydesign said:

But the problem becomes one of getting what we ask for without realizing the costs.

I love that Canon still essentially give us access to relatively uncooked RAW files, I hate that Sony don’t and that they use up a portion of their editability by covering up the lensEs shortcomings. But you know what will happen next if we keep drinking that cool aid? Canon will be forced to doctor their RAW files even more to ‘keep up’, which isn’t keeping up at all it is dumbing down.

In the scheme of things T stops are an irrelevant distraction from the much bigger issue of cooking RAW files.

Click to expand...

Cooking RAWs is a different thing and has nothing to do with T-stops IMO.

But as physicist I agree 100% with your opinion about cooking RAWs: It is a no go. I want the real original really raw data - processing should be a separated step done independently and without any loss of the original data. That was always the reason to use RAW - exploit more and more information with increased knowledge and processing power about/of computers.

Ramage said:

Known issue with slow shutter speeds and high iso.

I was able to reproduce this issue but for the life of me I cannot think why anyone would be shooting with a Shutter Speed of 1/100(or lower) ISO 3200 or Higher and be panning the Camera.

What is the use case for doing this?

Click to expand...

Motion blur effects/trails with available light. Like if trying to track cars in the evening...

Crazee said:

I meant the R6 can do 1080 slowmo compare to the R which only does in 720.

Click to expand...

I have the other two cameras (an R5 and an RP) and don't do much video (I'll take pictures of animals then a video if they're moving, for instance); thanks for the clarification!

dtgphoto said:

OK..thanks.. Will go through CPS and get that recalibrated. What makes you think the sensor is bad?

Click to expand...

Hi dtgphoto,

I got my EOS RP repaired three months ago and maybe they replaced a board. Today I was outside the first time with that camera and I observed the same issue: roughly 3 degree off consistently. Do you had success with calibration/repair?

(Methodology of the test: making 4 photos of a vertical line (window rim) through the center of the image in different orientations (portrait 90 deg rotation landscape 90 deg rotation etc.).

Hopefully Canon will release a lot of new RF lenses in the coming year, because Sony is doing very good on this side. Their new 1,8/14 looks quite amazing and Canon don't have anything to compete in this range. Just like the 200-600 and some others...

Fischer said:

Remember to tell what you see afterwards. Have a nice one.

Click to expand...

Sold the 400 and 600 this week. And lost quite a bit of money. So decided that I am going to try and live with the Tamron 150-600 G2 as a stopgap till the rumored 200-500 f4(with tc?) is released, hopefully next year. That way I wont lose a lot of money again. I had a 400 F4.0 DO II that I sold to finance the 400 F2.8 III. I never should have done it, realised it was my favourite lens, but too late!!!!