Posts

koenkooi · Aug 27, 2021

entoman said:
Very useful, thanks.

"Each cycle wears the battery down by a small amount and a partial discharge is better than a full discharge."

On top of that, high (dis)charge currents will cause internal heating and reduce lifespan as well. So the 'slow' recharge through the USB port is likely better for longevity than an external fast charger.

Bdbtoys · Aug 26, 2021

So had a chance to play with the lens a bit.

IMO if you are going for that out-of-the-camera dreamy look, then go ahead and use at a wide aperture. For general use I wouldn't do it.

However as Jared pointed out... it's worth checking at narrow apertures. The blur effect (on your main subject) greatly reduced as you stop down. And then your just effecting the bokeh (which because your stopped down is not that intense to begin with).

The only odd thing is that shooting the macro at say F11+full SA is not a what you see is what you get. The image in the viewfinder is greatly softened, when compared to the final image.

If someone (with more time than I have) does a side-by-side showing how SA effects different apertures it would be telling.

Chig · Aug 26, 2021

Be cool if Canon make a proper super zoom RF 200-600 DO f/4-5.6 with their freznell DO elements and internal zooming and weather sealing.
This would be fairly short and light for hand holding but still pretty bright aperture.
Perhaps with a builtin switchable 1.4x T.C ?

Ozarker · Aug 26, 2021

cayenne said:
The lady's team?

Ohhhh yeahhhhh....

LDS · Aug 26, 2021

Lastolite products have been sold for a while as "Lastolite by Manfrotto", but now Vitec Grpup has decided to drop the Lastolite brand fully and sell those products under the Manfrotto brand.

Manfrotto: Camera Tripods & Photography Accessories

Discover the best camera and video camera tripods, monopods and photography accessories from Manfrotto US.

www.manfrotto.com

As far as I know they will be the same products made in UK - just now named Manfrotto.

kaihp · Aug 26, 2021

neuroanatomist said:
Fortunately, the supply issues seem to be ending. For quite some time, none of the adapters were available.

For some reason, all the adapters appear to be in stock here in Denmark, and has been so for some time now. The supply issues reported did give me some concern until I checked the stock at the pro dealers here.

Canon Rumors · Aug 26, 2021

August 25, 2021, Commack, NY – Tamron USA, Inc. announces the launch date of the previously announced 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di III-] VC VXD. The Sony E-Mount model B061S will be on sale on September 24, 2021, at $699 USD. Due to the current global health crisis, the release date or product supply schedule could change. The launch of the previously announced Fujifilm mount under development is expected this Fall.
The 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 VC VXD covers a wide zoom range from approximately 27mm to 450mm in full-frame equivalent focal length. The first APS-C mirrorless camera zoom lens in the world with a 16.6x zoom ratio, the lens delivers the benefits of a versatile all-in-one zoom lens ideal for an extensive array of photographic scenarios. Its AF drive system uses Tamron’s VXD (Voice-coil eXtreme-torque Drive) linear motor focus mechanism for superior quietness and agile performance. The lens includes special lens elements arranged...

entoman · Aug 26, 2021

neuroanatomist said:
Ergonomics is a personal thing. When I use a non-gripped camera, my hand is sore by the end of the day. I think mainly my 5th digit being curled under and even more the lack of weight to counterbalance a heavier lens – even the 24-105/4L feels unbalanced on my R, and the other day I was shooting with the (adapted) 11-24/4L and that was a whole other level of front-heavy.

I used a gripped 7D and 5DII, which were ok but the integrated grip has a different shape that I find much more comfortable (the add-on grips bulge on both sides to accommodate transverse batteries, the 1-series only bulges in front). I also found the flex between grip and body to be problematic on a tripod, but removing and replacing the grip is a PITA.

Not at all sure how I’d feel about something like this patent design. Bulk isn’t a big deal (my camera bags are sized for pro bodies), but not sure about all-day comfort, and too much weight savings would be bad for me (as above, it’s more about balance than total mass).

I agree that ergonomics is a personal thing, although there are a few basic rules such as leaving a sensible gap between the grip and the lens - a problem with early Sony cameras. I've owned, hired or borrowed virtually every camera that Canon has made, at some stage. I found the 5D and 7D series handled extremely well. The gripped 1Dxii handled even better, but was just too heavy to carry, and I often shoot in very tight situations, sometimes with the camera on the ground, and need to have the lens as low as possible, so most of the time I prefer ungripped bodies. I can't get on with the RP, which I find much too small and fiddly, especially if using anything longer than a 100mm lens. The R5 balances well in my (largish but skinny) hands, with all the lenses I own (listed below).

canonmike · Aug 25, 2021

UPDATE on RF14-35 availability......just rec'd notification from B&H that my June 29th pre-order has shipped, with ETA of Fri Aug 27th. So, after having rec'd my Jun 1 pre-ordered RF100mm F2.8L is macro lens last week and soon to be rec'd RF14-35 pre-order in just two days, is this a sign of Canon's supply chain finally catching up?? Let's hope so, as R3 announcement lingers soon, we hope, even as we wonder if there will be some new lens announcements that day as well........It's worth noting, whether you are interested in the 14-35 or not, that while I pre-ordered the RF14-35 a month after the RF100, it will arrive just one week later. That sounds encouraging.

YuengLinger · Aug 25, 2021

Makes me wonder if more has gone into the IBIS part of the FW for the R5 than for the R6. In other words, was more IBIS enhancement achieved in this FW update than when the R6 was last updated?

canonmike · Aug 25, 2021

carpenter said:
When you say "root" does that mean I have to keep the DCIM and then 100 Canon where I put the firmware? I can't get the camera to change the firmware yet. I've got the latest firmware for the lens from Canon, opened it on my Mac, copied the .afu file to the SD card. Nothing. Tried to load it into the DCIM folder, nothing again. Tried copying it onto the card with both DCIM and the other folder--nothing. I've tried every combination, including deleting both DCIM and the other folder. Nothing works.

Hopefully, you've solved this problem by now, after receiving all the advice from fellow members. Don't feel too bad, I've been guilty of this same snafoo on occasion. In my case, the problem was always my incorrectly copying and pasting the new firmware into the folder(s), instead of the root directory. I learned the hard way to never put the firmware into a folder. The camera will not recognize it.

FrenchFry · Aug 24, 2021

Jemlnlx said:
Best of luck to you....

I was very disheartened when the claims department denied me twice (once on the lower level and then again when I appealed it) despite having clear evidence that my package mysteriously "lost weight"...

It wasn't until I emailed all of the corporate contacts I could find that they contacted me the next day, reviewed my case and granted to honor the claim...

Thanks! I think the corporate contacts are an excellent suggestion!

HarryFilm · Aug 24, 2021

unfocused said:
Welcome back Harry. We were down about a quart of crazy, but now I see we are all full up and even spilling over.

Like I said! It's nice to be back up to ONLY ONE BRICK SHORT of a full load !!!!

I should note that all the inventions described are fully real and in actual real-world working products. The main sensor we use in our 70mm Medium Format Plus camera is a 1.89:1 aspect ratio 16384 by 8640 pixel as-per-documented notch-filtered multi-sized photosite pixel array.

The substrates are all new so the photosensitive area of the image sensor is basically full-colour nightvision with only the barest starlight and moonlight needed for full colour scene illumination. It goes waaaaaaaaaaaaaay beyond what a Sony A7s3 can do in terms of low-light-levels for still photo and moving video image quality!

YES! I am soooooooooo BACK !!!

V

TAF · Aug 24, 2021

definedphotography said:
If you're testing a product, why would you test with a different firmware to the one that would be released to the public? Surely you'd be wanting to test the product to its limits? The Olympics is perfect for this given the need to capture images at a high speed and also deliver them to various news agencies at high-speed.

I was very unclear in what I wrote.

I was thinking that maybe they have this new feature where a higher resolution sensor can output full frame images at lower apparent resolution.

TAF · Aug 24, 2021

How does the image look on an R5 without cropping?

If I understand correctly (and please correct me if I don't), on the FF sensor it's a equivalent to a ~13.5mm lens.

How do the edges look?

Anesmezig · Aug 24, 2021

I tried all apertures with my 24-70 2.8 Tamron and saw that it occurred in every aperture except 2.8. Also, I have faced a problem similar to the aperture issue. While VS is on, during the record an instant frame dislocation is occurring and I found out this happens because of the VS and turn it off. But in this aperture problem, it seems like it stops only 2.8 or when the AF is off and it is really annoying. I have never faced such a problem with my old mark4. Do you have any suggestions to fix this issue or is my lens garbage for r5?

Nounours18200 · Aug 23, 2021

Interesting, but I have 2 questions:

a-.do you know if this accessory provides the 24V Phantom power supply for the microphones requiring this ?

b-.are you aware of a similar accessory for the EOS 5D Mark III ? ok it is an "old" model, but I love it, and I miss this kind of accessory ! this is the reason for which I continue to use a professional camcorder....

Thank you

privatebydesign · Aug 22, 2021

Kit Lens Jockey said:
I recently got a dreaded print head error on my PRO-4000 printer. It looks like there is no option but to replace the print head, which I have now ordered.

However, I'm suspicious because my house experienced a "brown-out" due to storms while I was out of town (and shortly after I got back.) For a period of time my wall outlets had about 80 volts coming out of them instead of the proper 110V. I leave the printer on all the time because it seems to be happier that way compared to constantly turning it off and on. So the printer was on when this occurred. But, it's worth noting that I had the printer plugged into a Furman PST-8 surge protector, which it pretty much the best surge protector you can buy. While I'm not 100% sure, I seem to remember that the surge protector wouldn't even turn on when the voltage in the house was low, so it might even have logic to just shut off the power going through it if it senses low voltage.

Series Multi-Stage Protection | Ultimate Power Surge Protection

Discover Series Multi-Stage Protection for advanced power surge protection, ensuring safety and performance for your electronics.

www.furmanpower.com

The print head error happened the very next time I used the printer after the power issues though. Now I'm trying to figure out if the print head damage might have been related to the power issues, or if it just coincidentally happened right at the same time.

What do you guys think? I have heard some people say the print heads only last about two years anyway, and if that's the case, then I guess mine was about due to go out. My main concern is that I usually only print one small thing about every week just to keep the head from clogging up. Maybe I need to print more often to avoid printer head issues in the future?

Ultimately I'm just not sure if I should consider the head failure a result of the power issues, even though I had it plugged into a very good surge protector, or if I should change my printing habits to prolong the life of the new head. Thanks.

Two years seems about average pretty much regardless of the actual printing the head has done. I have replaced the head on my three year old Pro-2000 once.

One nice thing is the heads are easy to change and readily available, unlike Epson who will not sell their large format print heads.

An unnerving aspect of changing the head is that you can’t initiate a head change from the menu all the time it is telling you to replace the head! You have to switch the printer off, then manually move the head carriage then take the old head out, it takes just a few seconds. Then power the printer up and it will reset the carriage and give you an install head option. I found this very strange but Canon support talked me through it very efficiently.

blackcoffee17 · Aug 22, 2021

Skux said:
I see we have different definitions of 'portable'.

Of course, everything is relative. A 5kg broadcast lens is considered portable. Or a 3kg 800mm lens.

StoicalEtcher · Aug 21, 2021

Many thanks for sharing. I was tempted by the product, though was one of those somewhat skeptical that Vitec plc (who own Gitzo) needed to crowd-fund., and so had some doubts about it.

By the time I'd decided to go with it anyway, the offers in the UK that were of interest to me were taken up, so I decided if there was no "offer", I may as well wait to see what it looked like once available.

As an aside - and I haven't followed the process and the videos you mentioned about packaging - I'm a little suprised that the earlier packaging caused wear/scuff issues - it doesn't bode well for longevity in the field . My kit goes through some fairly tough work-outs (deserts, jungles, ocean spray, arctic conditions) and other than some TLC around joints and cleaning, has all fared well.

I'll be interested to see any follow-ups you have after a few month's use.

Cheers. Stoical.

AlanF · Aug 21, 2021

Tell us who sold it to you then.

AlanF · Aug 21, 2021

koenkooi said:
Agreed, but the big missing thing, for me, is that DPP4 can't run DLO on CRAWs. Which isn't a problem for L lenses (except the EF17-40L), but the EF and RF f/1.8 lenses benefit greatly from it. Miles ahead of what Lightroom can do for those.

CRAW in crop mode with the electronic shutter saves me a lot of disk space when trying to do DIFs

And miles behind what DxO PL4 can do!

canonmike · Aug 21, 2021

Bdbtoys said:
Did you accidentally move the Dioptric Adjustment Knob that's right next to the viewfinder (to the right) while attaching the lens?

Was thinking the same thing. Try checking diopter adjustment by the viewfinder to see if this could be the cause.

jrista · Aug 21, 2021

Well, its an odd, odd world....

So, today, out of the blue...I received an email. Telling me that Abes of Maine had shipped something to me. It didn't say what, but back when I'd first received the camera and discovered the cable protector didn't fit/work, I emailed the sales guy who helped me and asked him about it, and if they could send the correct part. I never received any response to that, even though I followed up once. Well, lo and behold, today...I received also received a package from some electronics company, and in that box was the correct cable protector part. The invoice listed non-standard stock. Odd, that they never responded to me, and yet still shipped the part!

Oh, and, it is the right part, and it works just fine.

Also odd... I received a package in the mail late last week, with....part IFC-100U. Labeled EOS ACC in a red box in the corner. This box contained nothing but a USB-C cable.... So, apparently...Canon decided to send me an extra cable, even though the one I have works fine, and I never asked them for an extra. The guy on the phone said the cable protector is only sold "with" a cable... Odd, however, that they never actually sent the part I needed....... Also that they never mentioned they would be sending me anything, the call was cut off midway through, and I was never able to finish the conversation. Only got an extra part I did not need, and only tangentially related to the part I needed.

I hope I'm just having one of those occasional bad experiences. I would hate to think this is what has become of Canon's once-vaunted world-class customer service!!

ronaldbyram · Aug 20, 2021

I am a NEW R6 owner, and I am using the older EF 24-105 with the EF adapter. using it in past on my 7d2 was no issue. but with the smaller r6 Body, this seemed awkard to shoot. I bought the BG-R10 today and Man what a difference in handling I was looking to get the 24-240, but I will wait now. Thoughts?

Posts

Posts

Filter

Forum statistics

Gallery statistics