No discount for buying R5 kit?
When I bought my 6D2 there was a choice of 24–105mm lenses in the kit. In both cases, the the kit prices was the body price plus the lens price.
Upvote
0
Yeh the thing is I don't really do birds, and the extra size and weight is kinda a big deal. (really only reason i want the 70-300 is something a little easier to carry than the 70-200 f/2.8). I owned it once before, and it was a nice savings in size/weight from the 70-200. Not game changing like the 70-300 DO, but enough that it was just a bit less cumbersome. TBH I would probably miss 70mm more than I'd miss 400mm.Sounds like a really nice setup.
Depending on what you shoot I have one remark on the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS:
TBH I would take a closer look at the 100-400L II:
If I think twice, your choice might be right.
- not so much bigger - OTOH I checked the data: 130% size, 160% weight
- 100 mm more reach (if needed, e.g. wildlife)
- the 70-300mm is too much overlap to the 70-200
Ony some weight and size advantage![]()
Not a sign here in Germany. Maybe when they are phased outAny word on upcoming rebates for R6/R5/RF for Canada and/or the US?
I still haven’t upgraded to firmware 1.3 on my R5 (still on 1.2). But since your post I have stopped using my 512gb Sandisk CF Express Card and reverted to a Sandisk 128gb UHS-I card. So far nearly 3000 frames taken over 3 photo shoots and no lockups yet. If it makes it to 5000+ frames without a lockup with the SD card I will strongly suspect the CF Express card was causing the problem. With the CF Express I was getting a lockup roughly once every 2000 frames. So let’s see what happens... I’ll give it a few more weeks and then upgrade to 1.3 to test out the CF express card again. Fingers crossedThere are only a handful of vendors who actually make the flash memory chips that all of the card manufacturers buy from. It's very feasible that there are some SanDisk and some Sony Tough CF Express cards that contain chips from the same batch of the same chip maker, while other examples of SanDisk and Sony Tough CF Express cards do not contain chips from the batch that is involved in the issue. The numbers printed on the side of your memory card that tells you *exactly* which batch it is a part of are just as important as the brand label on it when trying to determine if a card is among a batch of "problem" cards.
I read the terms and at least in the Norwegian translation it looks like if you buy two products with cashback, you can only claim one of them?
I've only heard of 3 cameras coming, a crop R, an expensive R1 and an affordable R type.There are 3
Shows what I know.I'm going to take a wild guess that the two consecutively numbered lenses are the two TS-R lenses. No reasoning, just a thought.
Well, maybe a little reasoning. The similar numbers and as relatively low volume lenses they won't over tax supply chains but would be upscale.
That's exactly the results of todays shooting session. I had it @f/7.1 and focus distance far far away. No issue irl.Absolutely , I had to try the 15-35 myself to see what it looked like, and it is quite severe if you compare a 2.8 shot to an f8 one , but it cleared up nicely without introducing too much noise. And although you shoot a 15-35 often at Infinity you also often shoot it stopped down to where the vignetting is a much smaller issue, if any. So mounted to the R5 and R6 with their great sensors this is a less problem than it would’ve been using the 1dx..
I went out yesterday afternoon and did a photoshoot. Using 2 Canon E6NMH batteries in my grip, I was down to 70% on both after 425 shots.
Charging the batteries in the grip appears to be slower than charging them alone. Initially the charger supplies about 1,400 mAh when charging a single battery. It charges one battery and then the second. It may not be slower but appears to be. Of course not having to remove the batteries is a benefit.
I don't have the 600mm lens but my 100-500 has dual motors and I could believe that telephotos might be more of a load on the batteries because of that.
I always lose this fight but I argue that the more frequent the release cycle the better.Canon had indicated it wanted to up the cadence of its firmware releases, perhaps even going monthly. Reality is hitting, and this update was supposed to see light a bunch of weeks ago. There were probably worse, more obvious bugs that they fire-drilled on, and this was missed. Fast cadence software development usually means accepting higher risk on testing, knowing you have a follow-on update a few weeks later. The firm I work for is as guilty of this as anyone. This usually - but not always - makes companies a bit more lax in initial testing, perhaps testing each individual new feature, but not necessarily comprehensively testing obscure combinations.
They were clearly talking about video DR, unless you shoot your photos in CLOG3.The poster never once mentioned video. You have to be thorough with your dissing unless you want some smack right back in your face.