Canon releases firmware v1.3.3 for the EOS 5D Mark IV
What? No idiot comments about a 20$ camera now? 
Upvote
0
That's odd. It works for me. I turn the camera on and rotate the "mode dial", as you describe. It happily goes from Auto to L, to 100 and back from there down to L and Auto. Just as you wish for.1) When dialling through ISO using the top back wheel (the one with the MODE button in the centre), whilst looking through the viewfinder I cannot dial in AUTO ISO. It's just missing. Prev models (eg 5d, 1d etc) you would reach AUTO ISO by dialling it in below 50. But it isn't there on the r5. Instead I have to stop my workflow, take my eye from the viewfinder, hit ISO on the touch screen and then find and select AUTO ISO, just below ISO50.
I don't think so. When it is locked up; even turning it off doesn't work; you have to pull the battery. If the viewfinder is powered down because you haven't been using it; it does take a second or two for it to wake up. How fast the evf & screen power down can be adjusted in the menu if it is happening to quickly; but keeping them powered up when not in use will reduce battery life.Would this freezing be related to my R5 being slow to have the viewfinder data elements “wake up” for some time after the image is displayed and shootable (but with no idea of focus points, exposure, etc.)? Is that normal?
what does 12G mean?![]()
I have a tamron ef 150-600 G2, which I use on an R5. Its ok, wouldn't rave about it. I understand from reading reviews your 100-400 II will out resolve my tamron at a 400 v 600 comparison.Hello I wanted to see if anyone had any recommendations for a zoom lens that was up to 600mm for an R5. I have the EF 100-400 II but would like some additional reach for birds and other more rapidly moving wildlife. I didnt really see an advantage on the RF 100-500 with an f7.1 so I was trying to see if there were any other options others were using with the ability to focus rapidly and be sharp. Some of the reviews of the Sigma and Tamron lenses seemed to mention this, but I wasnt clear on how significant the issue was. I wanted something <2000 USD and more useable than a 7.1. I had hoped Canon would have done a 200-600mm f6.3 but alas no. Any thoughts or recommendations would be appreciated. Thank you.
Great photo, I am loving the haze down in the valley.
I was shown a demo in which the ads displayed on the low wall around a soccer field were replaced in re-run. The system identified the wall, as well as the occlusions, and replaced the ads. I wouldn't be surprised if, eventually, it could be done in real time, and the broadcasting rights would include the right to replace them with localized ads.After reading thru the Wikipedia article that describes the current state, it is a technology that is starting to be possible but its true potential is currently out of reach. The amount of data, computing power, and bandwidth required to view a high end volumetric video at home does not exist but some fairly basic uses are currently in use such as 360 cameras for sports games.
The future potential is only limited by the imagination, it will truly change the world, It will be used for things we don't even expect. Once a background is captured, it can be modified and reused over and over in ways that viewers may not recognize.
The R5 reduces image quality when shooting at 20FPS by reducing the RAW files to only 12 bit.Not really as fast as it's 30fps is only compressed RAW , the A1 can only shoot 20fps RAW same as the R5
Twitter friend, whisky connoisseur, and TWiT TV host Ant Pruitt has completed his review of the Canon Cinema EOS C70. I prefer reviews that come after the initial hype of a release.
Canon Cinema EOS C70 Key Features
Canon Super 35mm Dual Gain Output (DGO) Sensor, 16+ stops of Total Dynamic Range
DIG!C DV7 Image Processor
Canon Log 2, 3, PQ, HLG Recording
RF Mount
EF Lens Compatibility with Mount Adapter
Direct Touch Control
9×16 Vertical Shooting
New Compact, Uni-Body Design
@Crazee ... Quick question on the OP.
Are you saying it did not over heat prior to 1.3.1 or it did not change existing overheat limits with 1.3.1?
And I believed Canon was a charity.Of course it’s not. There were patents for it. But releasing it only in an RF mount, or releasing a lens like the 28-70 f/2 only in RF mount, drives sales of both those lenses and the R bodies in which they mount.
You asked, “Why bother with an RF mount?” The answer is simple…more profit. You may wish they’d just stuck with the EF mount because it would be easier/cheaper/more convenient for you. Canon doesn’t really care about making things easier/cheaper/more convenient for their customers. They care about profit. That’s what for-profit companies are for, which is why they’re called for-profit.
I haven't tested 1080 in either mode, so no help at this point.is crop mode better for 1080 as well?