Bob Howland said:

Would something comparable to the Sony FX30 be too much to hope for?

Click to expand...

Yes. My baseless speculation is that it will be more like the Sony Sony ZV-E10 II and Nikon Z30.

​

R5 Mk 1, Firmware 2.1.0.. The checkered flag button doesn't work for me in video mode. I mean the right-most one with the grid, official name "AF point selection" button.

That is it works before recording, including button customizations, but once I start recording it does nothing.

E.g. I set it to "Movie Servo AF enable/disable" and it only works before recording. The same function works during recording when I put it on the "Depth-of-field preview" button or the "Auto Exposure lock" button.

Same with other functions, they just won't work during recording when I put them on that button, yet work fine on others.

Does it work for you? Any ideas besides a full reset?

Richard CR said:

Compact camera does struggle as a category here for sure. I honestly thought these nonsense superzooms were crazy and probably never sold well, but I guess they did.

Click to expand...

Yesterday’s Nikon was the first I’ve seen for several years now. My experience is that the very long zoom compacts are niche products with birders, and I see more birders than most.

Just saw this and I'm going to try and track one down to play with.

Two thoughts:

1. It flabbergasts me that this didn't launch focused on the sporting (birding/hunting) market first.
2. If OIS is only in play for the visible light optics, hitting a pin (or a deer) might be fairly difficult as your laser would drift differently than what you see through the monocular.

The second one is less of an issue for golf as most pins have retroreflectors in them now, but for 300yds on an animal? That'll be tough.

That said, super neat product and I'll be interested to test it vs the hunting focused options I have already.

MikeGalos said:

Not if you want to be able to focus to infinity.

The flange focal distance of RF mount is 20mm. The flange focal distance of Z mount is 16mm. Without using something exotic like an adapter with internal elements the adapter would have to be -4mm thick.

Click to expand...

Thanks for the confirmation - I suspected as much

P-visie said:

Sorry, I also forgot Canon using more obtuse and opaque terminology, like “paraxial image height” in patent applications.

Click to expand...

indeed. i still don't really understand that in terms of a optical patent application.

Click said:

Very nice series. Well done!

Click to expand...

Thank you, Click!

Jersey City, NJ

Pretty cool shot! Well done, Noreaster.

Josh-H said:

Nope, I'm not - paid hard-earned for all my Canon cameras over the last 25+ years.

Click to expand...

Nothing wrong with pointing out a good camera when you use one. Don’t worry about all the naysayers. They’re never gonna buy one nor ever going to have the equivalent skills to know if it’s right for them if they did. Fantastic work, lovely write up.

seriyong said:

Very nice photos, we can see that you had a great vacation!

Click to expand...

That we did, everything went great, apart from my diet

Not something as simple as the camera AF tracking just happened to coincidentally be following the action that you were also looking at?

Good that Canon is removing many paper handling limitations of the previous models - with my PRO-10 I have to get panorama prints printed by an external lab. But how easy is to get pre-cut panorama paper? I've seen some but based on A4 size - I'd like something based on A3/A3+. It is true one can get a roll and cut it themselves., but may require de-curling.

It's certainly interesting prospect. The EF 8-15mm L f4 fisheye is a great and small lens that sits easy in a travel bag and can go wider than anything else. I've been a bif fan of this lens since it's launch and it's easily the most versatile fisheye lens ever made. Sometimes I de-fish the images in lightroom for good effect and I get images that are wider in perspective than my EF 11-24mm. Sure the corners are stretchy and mush....but as an occasional (and light weight) lens it's verry useful.
Addding a drop in element that allows this sweet little lens to become a 16mm rectilinear prime really adds a lot more to it's versatility.

frankchn said:

The RF is a bit smaller and lighter (10mm and ~100g) but yeah. They'll just discontinue the old one when the introduce the new one, but I guess they might want to wait till stock of the EF has been depleted first.

Click to expand...

Yes and no. It's suprising how many new EF lenses are still being sold across the world. It's still a significant market for Canon. Many have not migrated to RF cameras and many that have are happy with their EF glass,

There's a new version that came out on the 27th for 1.10.1

Has all the same updates from 1.0.9.1 except they added one more thing:

11. The accuracy of the timecode when the camera is turned off and the [Time Code Run] setting is set to [Free Run] has been improved.

Along with fixing some of their bugs from that latest firmware announced in December.

koenkooi said:

The LP-EL does charge in LP-E6 chargers, which adds to the confusion.

Click to expand...

True...but the LP-EL extends beyond the side of the charger, whereas the LP-E6 does not.

JWest said:

Hey, more than a year later but did you ever get a tse 135? I did recently, december I think, and it was incredibly difficult to find a new one. I ended up finding a source on amazon and while I was skeptical, it turned out to be legit. I now have all the last canon tse lenses as well as the fuji 30TS and laowa. 15 and 20 Shifts.

Click to expand...

Nope, I decided to pass. Hope you’re enjoying yours!

David - Sydney said:

I wonder if the body form factor puts some people off as it doesn't look like a "traditional" camera. It is rare that it is compared to the Sony ZV-E10 for instance. Maybe the V1 will change that. Hopefully better than the Nikon 1 V1.

Click to expand...

well, the ZV-E10 has interchangeable lenses and is in a totally different price bracket too.

I think this camera has a messaging issue. Traditional media views it through the lens of a traditional camera and judges its merits by traditional camera metrics. So automatically the majority of them are going to scoff at its merits because it doesn't fit how they use a camera. Canon can't even get any of the traditional camera reviewers to even cover the V10, instantly dismissing it as a toy camera. Youtube is also a weird demographic. All the massive YT channels stick to a phone. You watch YT and you think everyone is using a Sony cam like an a7R4 for vlogging when statistics show they're not.

The people I've talked to love the form factor (my coworkers are generally Gen Z with millennials aging out or moving into managerial positions), but the issue is how to get the video into a state for social media. On a phone, you record in the app (like TikTok) and then apply a bunch of filters, stickers, effects, etc. Edit on the timeline of the app. But with the Canon, you have to transfer the video to the phone which takes time. The traditional way of copying the video to a computer and then using a NLE editor produces the best quality and results. But in a social media world, it's perceived as inauthentic. And it takes a lot of time when people want to shoot something out super quick.

And then there's trying to satisfy the traditional camera world but also satisfying the social media world. Like 4K is a "must" for the traditional camera world. But it's not for the social media world. What the social media world needs is vertical resolution. so a 1080x1920 works great. So with a 4K camera, you can take that 3840x2160 and crop it down to 1080x1920. But it's not optimal. 1920x1080 only gives you 1080 vertical resolution. The Canon does do 1080x1920 vertical videos and 2160x3840 vertical video which is pretty cool. Set the camera to FHD 1920x1080 and turn the camera to record horizontal 1080x1920 videos. It saves on battery, produces less heat and looks great on social media/phones. Hmm, now I have test if my R5ii does vertical 1080x1920... I never actually tried.

And there's the whole matter of carrying two things. It's like if you have a MB and an iPad. super annoying. It's why I have a Surface Pro. But if Canon can somehow smooth out the transfer process, it would smooth out the entire workflow. An AirDrop or Quick Share method for the Canon world. I know

I wonder if only a 2× zoom range would be enough to justify an addition to the "Z" range (including compatibility with the power zoom adapters)...
The 10-20mm already has a 2× zoom range but starting at the much more impressive 10mm (albeit at f/4).

Personally, I am hoping for something like a 15-45mm f/2.8 – that would create enough separation between the existing lenses to justify the new lens and a zoom range that would justify use with a servo. (Similar to the separation between the 24-70 f/2.8 and the 24-105 f/2.8 Z.)

That being said, if I could only get one more "Z" lens, my vote would be for one in a super-tele range like a 200-600 or 300-800 f/8.

CJaurelius said:

You can get full frame cameras that are the same size as apsc's these days.

Click to expand...

Not quite.
APS-C lenses are also much smaller.
Since I already have full-frame, the only thing attracting me to APS-C is size.

I have a Deity V3 shotgun mic, but when I'm shooting video of my daughter playing you can hear the lens adjusting in the video, and it drives me nuts. I need to get a remote mic of some kind that I can just place a couple feet away from the camera so I don't get that noise. Obviously I'm not going to attach a mic to my daughter, so just something that I can place nearby that connects wirelessly is what I'm looking for....

el peso said:

I’m wondering why it’s still a problem to make something like 48x36mm sensor at least? Or even 56x56.

Click to expand...

might be less that its a problem and far more to do with a complete lack of lenses that would work with the larger sensor, its a huge aspect that holds back medium format cameras and lens availability is the main reason ARRI made the Super 35 instead of a new full frame or LF camera.

Hi everyone,
I would like to know if you know a way to prevent all this condensation from forming on the body of the photographic lens:
Login to view embedded media I was using an anti-condensation band as you can see in the photo, I put it on the lens hood, but unlike last time, yesterday a very high amount of condensation formed on the body of the lens which I then dried before putting it in the bag and before closing the lens barrel so that it did not remain trapped inside it.

but is there a way to prevent it from forming on the barrel body too? Do you put something on it?

The light house of Amrum.