Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III Coming in June [CR3]
Any more rumblings about this lens? Crossing my fingers that we will get official word on it any day now 
Upvote
0
Mt Spokane Photography said:My thought after seeing and reading the recent patent is that the object of the new lens is mostly to cut manufacturing costs, and to make more profit, of course. It may also be a slight improvement, but I'd bet cost is the driver if the one in the patent is it. So maybe the initial cost will be less than I first assumed.
barton springs said:The Canon store now has it marked down 20% so $479.20 instead of $599-
http://shop.usa.canon.com/shop/en/catalog/wireless-file-transmitter-wft-e8a?WT.mc_id=C126149
thetechhimself said:Woody said:Hey, there's no mention of the Nikon D5! ;D
It'll be the D500 that gets compared against it; D5 is a FF, would be unfair to compare the two. DXO hasn't benchmarked the D500 yet or else they would've compared it.
BTW, I'll be very interested in the D500's performance as it (probably) represents Nikon's newest APS-C tech.
Pookie said:Back in the days this was done by stretching a nylon pantyhose or some other similar material over a lens. I've even seen thin spreads of vaseline used on lenses for this effect... wouldn't recommend but I've seen it done.
Larsskv said:RogerCicala said:
That is the only issue we have seen also. Being a rental house we don't say much about scratches or coatings -- we don't know what might have happened to the lens. But we replace 24-70 f/2.8 II front glass more frequently than any other Canon lens.
I understand I am only one of a gazillon that want to ask you a gear related question, but since you're here, I grab the opportunity: have you had any issues with the 35LII? I am very curious due to the tear down of that lens. Answer is appreciated, but not expected. Thank you!
Mt Spokane Photography said:The issue is that DXO scores are based on a secret scoring system which, often results in absurdities.
amfoto1 said:The 5D Mark IV is supposed to carry on the tradition of being an exceptional video camera...
As such, for a kit lens it will likely get a new version of either the EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM or an EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Mark II. This will be compatible with the Power Zoom module, that's currently only usable on the EF-S 18-135mm IS USM. Makes sense, for a camera with high hopes for video uses.
USM lenses weren't ideal for video in the past... however apparently the EF-S 18-135mm is using a new type of USM that's quieter and smoother, yet still gives at least 2X as fast focus as the STM version of that lens.
kaihp said:marvinhello said:ethanz said:I had a friend tell me that the 30 minute limit has nothing to do with hardware or software, But is actually due to tariff laws. I guess if I camera can record past 30 minutes it is seen as a video camera and the export taxes or whatever are different for it as opposed to a still camera.
When you're in liveview and not recording, the camera still exits liveview and cut the signal every 30min. This has nothign to do with tariff law since the camera is on stand by.
Oh, it's a tariff law alright. It's to circumvent a butt-stupid EU law that taxes video cameras higher than still cameras.
Video cameras are defined as being able to take at least 30m in a single shot.
+1wunderpink said:Tony Northrup's predictions in that video on the 5D mark IV were not the only ones that were more than questionable. Actually, I think that he stated many quite unlogical predictions in this video by intention. That's because he understands how social media work. This way he generates tons of comments and references to the video. This is what the Google and Facebook feed engines like and promote.
ahsanford said:...Controlled leaks with Canon are a slippery slope as they have evaluators under NDA all over the globe. Making exceptions for one dude might imply to others that the cat is out of the bag and they can similarly make mischief like this....
Jack Douglas said:Wow, excellent although too late for me. I sure could have used this last spring. I bought the 1D4 for a better than 7D2 price and used it for eagle photography at Haida Gwaii for a month then back home for another month or two and finally sold it for roughly what I paid for it.
I was frightened away from the 7D2 by the early common complaints.
What I really didn't like about the 1D4 was the way it jumped to a high magnification for image review and how slow it was to move higher and lower in magnification using the two buttons. There were no options to change this.
I also was thrilled with my typically 25% cropped images at ISO 600 but felt quite let down at ISO 800. This was after the fact awareness and if I had known I would have fought to stay at or below 600.
My disappointments with the 1D4 were mostly relating to having to crop. As you mentioned if the frame was filled the camera was excellent! I loved the size of it and the weight didn't bother me at all compared to my 6D. The loss of IQ compared to the 6D was irritating because the 6D would fall flat on its face for BIF but I kept wasting time trying to acquire them and then finally gave up. I loved the lighted focus point.
The 1D4 would have been kept if not for the early news on the 1DX II which after using the 1D4 I was determined to own and will get later this year.
Grant, you writing style is great and with your obvious knowledge base I'll be watching for more reviews in the future and have bookmarked your site.
Here is one of my 1D4 shots that didn't need significant cropping.
Jack
Jack Douglas said:Wow, excellent although too late for me. I sure could have used this last spring. I bought the 1D4 for a better than 7D2 price and used it for eagle photography at Haida Gwaii for a month then back home for another month or two and finally sold it for roughly what I paid for it.
I was frightened away from the 7D2 by the early common complaints.
What I really didn't like about the 1D4 was the way it jumped to a high magnification for image review and how slow it was to move higher and lower in magnification using the two buttons. There were no options to change this.
I also was thrilled with my typically 25% cropped images at ISO 600 but felt quite let down at ISO 800. This was after the fact awareness and if I had known I would have fought to stay at or below 600.
My disappointments with the 1D4 were mostly relating to having to crop. As you mentioned if the frame was filled the camera was excellent! I loved the size of it and the weight didn't bother me at all compared to my 6D. The loss of IQ compared to the 6D was irritating because the 6D would fall flat on its face for BIF but I kept wasting time trying to acquire them and then finally gave up. I loved the lighted focus point.
The 1D4 would have been kept if not for the early news on the 1DX II which after using the 1D4 I was determined to own and will get later this year.
Grant, you writing style is great and with your obvious knowledge base I'll be watching for more reviews in the future and have bookmarked your site.
Here is one of my 1D4 shots that didn't need significant cropping.
Jack