• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Three New PowerShot Cameras Coming Shortly

Well, it cannot compete against the LX100 as the sensor in the G7X is too small.

Please Canon, DON'T pull another G1X II with a horrific sensor nor a S120 with a slow lens.

For it to be competitive, it needs to have a 1.8-2.8 lens or faster.


tayassu said:
I'm really looking forward to that G7X. Let's see how it competes with RX100III and LX100... ::)
Upvote 0

Which grass is considered greener (do nikonians complain as much as canonians)?

JohanCruyff said:
After 76,643,917,265 topics and 54,781,245,232,107,412 posts (and counting) in this forum about the better performance of SoNikon's sensor at base ISO, I was wondering if even SoNikonians sometimes complain, for example,
- about their Lenses price / range
- because they don't have STM lenses or Dual Pixel Autofocus
- etc.

and, in general, if SoNikonians spend more time taking pictures or complaining about their brands.

Any thoughts?

They do, read the comments here: http://nikonrumors.com/2014/09/12/nikon-d750-full-frame-dslr-camera-announced.aspx/#more-80280

Different brand, same story.
Upvote 0

Another Nikon FF body released -- is this a new segment for Canon?

ahsanford said:
FEBS said:
2 years behind? who behind who?

This seems much more a 5D3 variant to me, 2 years after the 5D3 is released on the market, then only this spec? The Nikon reactions are not that positive. This is not a worthy successor of the marvelous D700. Think about water sealant, fps, 1/4000 max shutterspeed, missing AF-On, max 1/200 x-sync.

As mentioned by the OP, a lot of this camera is a mix of pro but also of entry level. Thought this Nikon would really push Canon to look at further development. However, it only seems a spec that's close to the 5D3. Never the less a nice specification, but not a D700 version 2.

Features-wise, I understand your point, but I price would imply pros will value this camera less. 5D3 is a D8-something competitor (regardless of the MP count). The 5D3 is a $3399 camera vs. the D750 at $2300.

So I'm assuming the build quality, pop-up flash, etc. imply the D750 is for enthusiasts more than pros. It may not be built for dyed-in-the-wool pros with tougher needs and higher expectations.

- A

The price and build may imply prosumer but Nikon wedding shooters will be looking past that and snapping up the D750. The D750 is basically a 5DM3 for Nikon shooters, albeit a few years late :) It solves the primary shortcoming of the D600/D610, which was the AF system, while giving them the lower MP they want vs the D800/D810.
Upvote 0

Oh Sigma, when you fail, you fail so wonderfully hard

mackguyver said:
ahsanford said:
I can't help but think some megapretentious industrial design fan of an executive at Sigma has protected X% of Sigma's money on "Project: The Future", and he/she just knows that this project, by the 35th or 36th version, will change photography forever.

I design things for a living, so I LOVE out of the box ideas. So please understand that I am -- at the same time -- mocking the madness and tipping my cap for Sigma's bravery with fielding these cameras.

- A
That sounds like a pretty cool job - do you mind if I what kind of things you design? Also, Sigma's courage sometimes produces pretty cool things like their f/1.8 zoom!

As a lens company, I love what they do: high quality, disruptive tech that shakes the bigger players at times.

As a camera company... Yikes.

I design medical implants and instruments, so its a different animal completely. But I do know a few things about grip, something both photography and instruments have in common. But I do not ride a Segway to work or live in a Bizzaro orthogonal world like the Sigma dudes do.

- A
Upvote 0

Fuel for the fire: Amazon DSLR Rankings...and no REAL 2012-2013 market data?

jrista said:
just like Canon, they are repositioning their ILC cameras to pick up the slack, which means GROWTH on the DSLR front. For both companies.

No. Canon expects their DSLR sales to crash with just over 11% this year according to their pre 2014 year-to-year market guidance. Since they have not sent out any corrections on projected sales for 2014 the general number should still be close to 8 mill. DSLR units 2014.

I think it is remarkable how Nikon DSLR sales exploded in 2013 given how Canon's are imploding from 2012 to 2013 and 2014. From being the undisputed market leader Canon will lag Nikon in DSLR sales by a margin in 2015 unless Canon reverses the current trend (if the Nikon numbers given above are correct).
Upvote 0

Mirrorless vs DSLR Camera

I gotta say that I'm with RLPhoto on this. I just received the EOS M and while it's nice, it's honestly more of a toy than a useful tool. My S95 is even easier to use. Definitely my SL1 is easier to use. In other words, there are other options that simply work better. Granted the EOS M, while not junk, is not as well done as the Sony (et al) ML offerings but it's still a very convoluted and limited market.

If ML ever becomes as prolific and adoptable as the SLR, that is still many years away. For many of the reasons RLPhoto already mentioned. Just making a camera smaller/lighter with decent IQ does not make it a camera to rely on for universal professional use. There is so much more to the equation not the least of which is trust in the company that stands behind it for years/decades to come.
Upvote 0

Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Announced

Re: Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 Full Frame Lens to be Announced Tomorrow

tron said:
Khalai said:
tron said:
Khalai said:
From the images, it looks like a built-in hood with slightly bulbous front element. That's a bad news for filter users :(
+1 Exactly! Add 1mm and you get a 2.8 zoom lens that takes filters!
I can only assume, that filter users will opt for 16-35/4 anyway, as you usually use filters on tripod at f/8+ and don't care much for the speed of the lens. Conversely, action shooters could not care less about filters and will go for this lens, if it proves to be better than C16-35v2 or T16-28...
Landscape Astrophotographers though will either continue using a 14mm which has a bulbuous front element too or will opt for a 2.8 zoom lens with no bulbuous element for better protection (from light) via a hood. At least this is what I need for that kind of photography...

That, and a coma free lens ... :)

Let's see what that Samyang 12mm fisheye will bring. Could be a nice astro UWA prime, if coma is controlled as well as CA :)
Upvote 0

New Canon XF205 And XF200 Professional Camcorders Deliver Ideal Performance For Run-And-Gun, Cinéma

Re: New Canon XF205 And XF200 Professional Camcorders Deliver Ideal Performance For Run-And-Gun, Cin

Further building upon the successful features of the XF105 and XF100 Professional Camcorders, the Canon XF205 and XF200 Professional Camcorders support two recording formats – MXF, a file format used by broadcast stations, and MP4, which offers high versatility through its compatibility with various viewing and content providers such as web browsers and television news outlets. The new camcorders each have a compact, lightweight body with approximately 58 percent of the mass and volume of the XF305/XF300 models.
Upvote 0

Sigma Corporation Announces New 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary

HTML:
<p><strong>RONKONKOMA, N.Y — September 12, 2014</strong> – Sigma Corporation of America, a leading researcher, developer, manufacturer and service provider of some of the world’s most impressive lines of lenses, cameras and flashes, is adding a new lens to its Global Vision Contemporary category with today’s announcement of the 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM. The lens will become available in October for the street price of $579.</p>
<p>Designed exclusively for APS-C camera sensors, the new 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM features a 16.6x high-ratio zoom lens which equates to a 27-450mm zoom range. It incorporates four “F” Low Dispersion (FLD) glass elements, which have performance equal to flourite, in addition to one Special Low Dispersion (SLD) glass element. This enables the lens to minimize the chromatic aberration, especially toward the telephoto-end, and provide clear image quality with high color fidelity. Also, this lens comes with a newly developed optical stabilization (OS) system, ensuring better compensation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1082147-REG/sigma_18_300mm_f_3_5_6_3_dc_macro.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296" target="_blank">Preoder the Sigma 18-300 f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro HSM Contemporary at B&H Photo</a></p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>“We expect the 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM to be yet another standout in our Global Vision lineup, and a perfect option for anyone looking to carry minimal equipment and still be able to capture breathtaking images” said Mark Amir-Hamzeh, president of Sigma Corporation of America. “It will be a compact and affordable, high-performance, all-in-one lens that offers wide-angle to telephoto versatility and the very unique macro-zoom capability for close-ups. It’s perfect for all photographic needs – especially for those purchasing this product as their first time interchangeable lens.”</p>
<p>The lens offers a minimum focusing distance of 15 inches, with a maximum magnification ratio of 1:3. To enhance the macro capabilities of the lens, Sigma Corporation has also designed a dedicated close-up AML72-01 lens that pairs with the 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 to offer a maximum magnification ratio 1:2 and changeable angles of view. Even when this close-up lens is attached, the image taken at maximum magnification ratio, at 300mm, infinity, shows very little difference in modulation transfer function (MTF). This close-up lens will be sold separately for $55 and will also be available in October.</p>
<p>The 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM incorporates a bigger and newly developed Hyper Sonic Motor (HSM) that ensures high speed and quiet AF. Additionally the Super Multi-Layer Coating reduces flare and ghosting, to provide the user with sharp and high contrast images.</p>
<p>The lens will be available in Sigma, Nikon, Canon, Pentax and Sony mounts; Pentax and Sony mounts will not offer OS.</p>
<p>The 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM is compatible with Sigma’s USB dock, allowing photographers to update the lens’ firmware and change focus parameters using Sigma’s Optimization Pro software. It is also compatible with Sigma’s Mount Conversion Service. Sigma remains one of the very few manufacturers whose products are solely made in Japan. Moreover, all products, including the 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM was designed to surpass the required quality inspection of every Global Vision lens with Sigma’s own modulation transfer function (MTF) “A1” measuring system to create a new optical standard to align with the high-spec cameras on today’s market.</p>
<p>The company will be exhibiting at the 2014 Photokina in Cologne, Germany, later this month. The latest lenses from the Global Vision lineup will be on display at the event and attendees are invited to stop by booth #B20/C29 in Hall 4.2. For information about Sigma, go to www.sigmaphoto.com or follow the company on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.</p>

Sigma Announce a 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport Lens

Steve said:
jrista said:
I'm curious what 300 f/2.8 you were using. The original, or the Mark II?

Canon 300mm f2.8 non-IS and Canon 2x TC mark II. I can't really complain about the AF on my 1DIV, to be honest, just that with the TC its not as fast as the native 5.6 of my Sig 300-800. Without the TC, or even with the 1.4, the original 300 2.8 is blazing fast. Its hard to imagine a 300 2.8 IS II being even quicker although I know it is.

I'd be willing to bet that the Sigma is kind of faking out the camera firmware similar to how my Kenko TC does. That's probably how they are achieving the faster AF. In some ways, Canon's AF speed throttling is artificial. It does have it's benefits, though, as it tends to guarantee a good lock more often than if they tried to focus faster. The PDAF line sensors used for the lower light stuff are not as precise. The pixels of each line are larger...to make them more sensitive. But being larger, you cannot divide them as finely, so phase detection is coarser. By throttling, Canon gives the firmware more time to accurately evaluate the information coming in from the AF unit as they more slowly shift focus. They could just try to make one single AF move to lock focus, but with the coarser phase detection, that one move wouldn't always produce the best focus.
Upvote 0

7D with 800 Great White Naked vs 5D Mark iii +1.4 iii Teleconverter

Roger Doughty said:
The reach is somewhat comparable: (1280mm for the 800 naked with the 7D vs 1,120mm for the 5D with the 1.4 tele). Noise and cropping are always going to be a much bigger issue with the 7D BUT!!!! I am wondering if my keeper rate will go through the roof with the superior AF speed running without a tele on a naked 800. Add to that the rumored 7Dii improved AF system. . .It makes me wonder.

I am a birder. I have no illusions that noise will be a much bigger problem with the 7dii. That issue alone may force me to stay with the 5D iii.

Thoughts?

The 7D focuses faster, but it is also less accurate. The Mark II may be better, we will just have to wait and see what actual users and testing tells us. One thing to remember is that a ton of AF points does not mean AF is more accurate. I'd get a 1D Mark IV over the 7D MK II, unless there is something that the specs don't reveal.
Upvote 0

Odd Odin Behavior+Odin question+a flash meter question (Phew! Too much?):

Johnathan,

No worries

"Missing flash trigger on first shot... Clients/models get nervous when this happens and I don't like using anything that makes them worry. I don't remember these "wake-up-moments" from shoots a while back before upgrading the firmware. Maybe they happened. Missing frames doesn't square with everyone's eager praise foe 100% perfect Phottix Odins. I haven't heard this described by anybody."

I have done some more checking of this with my Odins and to be honest I can't seem to get them to miss a first frame!!
That said I am sure that this does happen/has happened to me occasionally I'll just have to take more notice when it does. I have had other misfire issues at times but found them to be related to the flash or TCU not being properly seated, but that is not what I am speaking of here. Like you describe a first up "miss" then no further "misses" for an entire session has happened?.....but I can't seem to replicate it in testing.

I even just now tried a complete battery change and re set on all the odins without a first up misfire, and then tried the same using MF to ensure there was no shutter/button lag waiting for AF....same result with no misfires....BUT I KNOW IT SOMETIMES DOES HAPPEN!

HOWEVER I also took special note AND FOUND
IF the TTL comms are correctly established during setup......WHEN you engage Metering via the halfpress of the shutter button or via another assigned function button, the following happens:

a)The green LED on front of ODIN receivers stops blinking and remains on.
And IF the same button also engages AF
b) the Red LED in the 580 exii and Mitros+ Flash units (used as IR pulse) also lights up and pulse a couple of times

( Note : I could see the red pulses despite them being taped over with gaffer tape ,to block the pulsing. That pulsing annoyed me and I thought it to be superfluous when using radio!?...perhaps its not entirely? ......they might be uncovered, at least
partially, now? ::))

So "maybe" instead of just taking an initial shot to establish the TTL control comms and expecting it to misfire,( as my vague recollection of a "post" on another forum suggested) we should just be disciplined enough to test as above before we blaze away...just as we would if connecting by cable/IR/Optical now or "back in the day"....we sometimes are unreasonably hard task masters?....its just the way the Odins are setup to operate and not a malfunction/fault! :o

THAT SAID it helps when you know how the kit works in "detail" , BUT the instruction manuals leave a lot to be desired!!... BUT HEY!..we're working this stuff out through forums like this I suppose!
:D :D

There is after all, a fair bit that needs to happen with RADIO TTL control as opposed to a simple manual trigger signal like a pc-sync connection ( i.e set mode, power levels & zoom for those groups/guns on the TCU then trigger) so it might be worthwhile just taking that extra step to make sure the "transport" system is working!? ;)

Sure Radio signalling is fast but I could imagine a situation when using MF ( or when AF is already established), where the shutter is released before that initial TTL signal is established and results in a "misfire". Quirky perhaps but feasible! That is perhaps why Phottix put in the annoying IR light pulse to signal "connection established"...( No arguments that they should have better user manuals!).

"OK, switch to manual light output settings on some(?) or all of the channels, and there is no longer a 2.5-second gap between preflash and "real" pulse. So the meter cannot be used. No way to get a reading without using the camera sensor, I guess."

I don't understand the above. Do you mean having the flashes themselves set to manual or the TCU. If the guns are set to TTL and the TCU group is set to manual the pre flash will still pulse if USING THE TEST BUTTON! If the guns themselves are set to manual the odins behave as a simple manual trigger and no pre-flash is emitted.? why would it need to for manual? BUT you can still meter.

The only time you can't meter is when using in TTL mode ( ie TTL on The TCU for the group, and the flash itself) and shooting "live". (ie relying on the camera to trigger and NOT the Test Button of the TCU)

".........He felt I did not have to push the Measurement button again."

Correct!..if the L558 is the same as the L308 in non cord mode (I think it is) when the gap is 2.5 seconds it firstly records the pre-flash and then records the main pulse and overwrites the initial pre flash reading on the LCD...no need to press the "meter" button again.

Andrew
Upvote 0

to 600rt + st-e3 or not....

neuroanatomist said:
eyeland said:
Would you guys advice against getting the yongnuo st e3 to save a few bucks? Also, is there a reason why you cant get an st e3 receiver/transceiver?

For me, a key benefit of the Canon -RT system is reliability. Personally, I wouldn't compromise that with a YN transmitter.

There's no receiver because it's really not in Canon's best interest to make something that allows cheap, 3rd party flashes to be added (but I wish they would, to add in monolights).

If my livelihood depended on it I would go Canon all the way. For me at this stage in my photography (I do automotive product photography as a secondary business) I find the YN stuff to be quite good. the three YN flashes and four 622 triggers haven't missed a beat. solid performers on my 5D3. no experience with their YN-E3-RT though -- I'd be careful there as I'm hearing it may have pushed to market too soon. gotta be careful with the reverse engineered stuff.
Upvote 0

iDC Triplethreat

I realize this is an old thread but I thought I would offer an important observations

1. The IDC tripple threat works wonderfully on Canon. I like the billet design which is very solid, and the non-adjustable foot is a nice bonus.

2. After I purchased these, I found that they didn't marry as well to my Yongnuo flash feet. Now that I have converted to all-Yongnuo flash I find that I don't need these anymore

if anyone is interested in my IDC triple threats I have a pair for sale.
Upvote 0

When will we see a replacement for the 100-400?

I'm starting to wonder if Canon pulled any replacement to look at producing a longer zoom. A 100-500mm f/5.6 might be possible. It would be larger and a lot more expensive, but might compete with the Sigma or Tamron 150-600 which are f/6.3 lenses.

For now, I'm hanging on to my 100-400. I like it, and use it at 400 mostly, even with a 1.4X TC on my 5D MK III. I've ordered a 2nd 1.4X TC (Kenko) to see if I can make it work with my 100L by taping pins. I can shutoff the AFMA, but my 100L needs 10 points, so that's not a option.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB