• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

EOS 7D Replacement Mentioned Again [CR1]

Loren E said:
Nikon folk are lucky to have a crop camera with F8 autofocus in the D7100 - Canon really needs one!

Canon decided agaist competing with Nikon on a feature/price basis and most likely this strategy will stick for some time concerning camera bodies. Obviously they just revised their pricing strategy with midrange lenses (16-35L/4), but camera models that get revised rather often is a cash source they won't give up unless threatened by their shareholders.
Upvote 0

Canon iP2770 external ink cartridge problem?

My black ink level is about half left and the other CMY are over half left but for some reason the pictures that I printed which have more darker black/blue/purple colours in it are printing out with a green tint. It used to print out perfectly fine but then all of a sudden the green tint starts to appear.

I've researched a bit and it seems like the magenta ink is low but then the level is actually more than half left so I don't really understand. Is it because the magenta ink pipe is blocked?

I also noticed that the link levels on my external ink cartridges go down extremely slowly despite me printing loads. Is this normal because this is the first time I'm using it. The supply levels are finished as well when I checked the levels on my computer.
smile.gif

Zeiss Otus 55/1.4 vs. Sigma 50/1.4 Art

Eldar said:
Thanks for taking the time traingineer. If you had access to the full RAW-files, you would find that the differences are a bit more visible, but not much. And it is also true that you need to produce very large and high quality prints to tell the difference. So for all practical purposes, I believe we all could live happily with the IQ from the Sigma. I even thought of posting images without telling which was from which camera, but thought it would be better to be explicit.

Main issue with the Sigma is the unreliable AF. If that remains unresolved, I´d rather have a 50 1.2L. I´d rather have slightly softer, but in focus images (with a beautiful bokeh), than the occasional crisp and sharp. Hopefully a firmware version with improvements are underway.

I am looking forward to the nest high-MP body though. It might be that the IQ differences will be more visible then.

Well Canon might be releasing a prosumer body a few months after the new UWA lens, but this is Canon Rumours after all.
Upvote 0

Tilt & Shift Fan?

dgatwood said:
....If that's the water tower I'm thinking of, it's on one of the roads out to one of the public beaches south of Santa Cruz. .....
No, the photo above is an Ansel Adams, shot in 1960 in San Francisco.

But I'm thinking I recall the tower you mention south of Santa Cruz, I seem to recall there are 2 to 4 of them in a row, maybe a quarter mile between them.
I just google map cruised the area, thinking west of Watsonville on Beach Street, west of San Andreas, but I couldn't find them in satellite view.
--- a little later---
Kept google map cruising, found pedestals, no towers.
Paste;
2326 W. Beach St., Watsonville, CA
into google maps street view, there's one pedestal there, another down the road at 2488.

If you can think where towers are out that way, it's your turn. I sorta do and sorta don't remember towers now that I've found pedestals.

Awful color cast, not my photo......
663643d9f32ab2a307c6414c6e6746e8




.
Upvote 0

CHICAGOLAND, DEATH ROW STORIES, and MORGAN SPURLOCK: INSIDE MAN Captured On Canon Cinema EOS Digital

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=16508"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=16508">Tweet</a></div>
<p><b>MELVILLE, N.Y., May 14, 2014</b> – Canon U.S.A. Inc., a leader in digital imaging solutions, is proud to announce that three shows that premiered in spring 2014 chose Canon Cinema EOS Digital cameras and lenses to capture their compelling stories. The three series, airing on CNN/U.S., include <i>CHICAGOLAND</i>, from Executive Producers (EP) Robert Redford and Laura Michalchyshyn and the award-winning Brick City Television, LLC (BCTV) filmmaking team Marc Levin and Mark Benjamin, <i>DEATH ROW STORIES</i>, from Academy Award-winning Executive Producers Alex Gibney and Robert Redford, and <i>MORGAN SPURLOCK: INSIDE MAN</i>, from Oscar-nominated filmmaker Morgan Spurlock. These television series were developed in 2013 to produce unscripted, informative, and entertaining non-fiction programming for the cable television news channel. Each turned to Canon when making their eight, one-hour long episodes.</p>
<p>“Canon is honored to be the camera of choice for these three television series,” said Yuichi Ishizuka, president and COO, Canon U.S.A. “Our Cinema EOS Digital cameras have been designed for use in productions just like these and to be chosen for three docu-series on one network is quite humbling.”</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<div><b>CHICAGOLAND</b></div>
<p>When cinematographer Daniel B. Levin was preparing for <i>CHICAGOLAND</i> - a series that tells the story of its namesake city as it confronts an education system in turmoil and public safety crisis – he turned to the Canon EOS C300 Digital Cinema camera in order to fulfill his need for a rugged, ergonomic, compact camera, that would produce a cinematic image to meet the high standards of the production team. “We wanted to weave beauty, texture, and the city in with doc-verite, real, gritty, run-and-gun filmmaking,” said Levin. “The remarkable thing about the C300 camera is you can build it as big as you want, or strip it down as small as you want.”</p>
<p>The flexibility of the Canon EOS C300 Digital Cinema camera system made it possible for Levin to follow Chicago’s policymakers, community leaders, and residents through the various elements and public locations like Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s office at City Hall as his team works to improve the metropolis’ social policy, education, and public safety.</p>
<p>To keep his rig light and his focus sharp, Levin paired the Canon EOS C300 Digital Cinema camera with a set of Canon EF L-series lenses, including the EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.2L USM, and the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM. “If you have these lenses – which could all fit in a backpack – you’re basically good to do anything,” concluded Levin.</p>
<p>Airing on eight successive Thursday evenings, <i>CHICAGOLAND</i> began March 6, 2014 at 10:00pm ET/PT.</p>
<div><b>DEATH ROW STORIES</b></div>
<p>Academy Award-winning directors Alex Gibney and Robert Redford teamed up to create <i>DEATH ROW STORIES</i>, a series that unravels a different capital murder case per episode, calling into question the myriad of beliefs about the death penalty and the American justice system. Directed by Gibney, narrated by Academy Award-winning actress Susan Sarandon, and executive produced by Sundance Productions’ Robert Redford and Laura Michalchyshyn, and Jigsaw Productions’ Alex Gibney, Dave Snyder, Stacey Offman, and Brad Hebert, <i>DEATH ROW STORIES</i>relies on powerful interviews and chilling recreations to explore the issues surrounding capital punishment.</p>
<p>Cinematographer Antonio Rossi chose the Canon EOS C500 4K Digital Cinema camera and the EOS 5D Mark III Digital SLR camera to capture the look he wanted for the series. “We are dealing with extremely dramatic, life and death subject matter, and I try to express that drama in my camera work. So we try to make our interviews noir-ish and saturated, while conveying the gravity of the events portrayed. The EOS C500 camera beautifully allowed me to achieve the look I desired,” said Rossi.</p>
<p>To balance a high-quality picture with a simple workflow, Rossi chose to record a 1920 x 1080 HD image from the EOS C500 camera to a Sound Devices PIX 240i portable video recorder. He relied on an EOS 5D Mark III as his second camera and mounted Canon Cinema lenses and EF lenses interchangeably between the two. Using a Canon Cinema CN-E30-105mm T2.8 L S lens for all interview segments, his lens package also included an EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, Cinema Primes CN-E24mm T1.5 L F, CN-E50mm T1.3 L F, and CN-E85mm T1.3 F L, as well as L-series EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM, EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, and EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lenses.</p>
<p>Rossi sums up his experience using Canon on <i>DEATH ROW STORIES</i> by noting, “The EOS C500 and the EOS 5D [Mark III] cameras work really well together as a system. And, you have the ability to use a range of lenses and shoot in a lot of different kinds of situations.”</p>
<p>The first episode of <i>DEATH ROW STORIES</i> debuted on Sunday, March 9, 2014 at 9:00pm ET/PT. A summer season will air beginning Sunday, July 13, 2014.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<div><b>MORGAN SPURLOCK: INSIDE MAN</b></div>
<p>CNN’s popular original series <i>MORGAN SPURLOCK: INSIDE MAN</i> and its charismatic producer, director, and host will return to the airwaves this spring for a second season. The show, which clocked in as the network’s third most-watched program in 2013, explores topical subjects as Spurlock immerses himself in the issue at hand to provide a personal perspective. “Celebrity,” “The Future,” and “Income Disparity” are just a few of the themes <i>MORGAN SPURLOCK: INSIDE MAN</i>will tackle during its sophomore season. And while the topics of the show are varied, the producers’ emphasis on image quality is unchanging.</p>
<p>“We want the show to feel cinematic, large in scope, but at the same time, want it to feel real,” said Jeremy Chilnick, Executive Producer of the series and Head of Production at Spurlock’s Warrior Poets production company. “The authenticity of what you hope your audience feels is as important as making sure that it looks beautiful.”</p>
<p>In order to deliver the aesthetic and realism required for the show, cinematographer David Vlasits relied on the Canon EOS C300 Digital Cinema camera, as well as two Canon EOS 5D Mark III Digital SLR cameras, for both seasons one and two. While the EOS 5D Mark III Digital SLR served as his go-to camera for interior car shots, Vlasits chose the Canon EOS C300 Digital Cinema camera for day-to-day production because of its low-light capabilities, small profile, dual CF card slots, and long battery life.</p>
<p>The camera’s ergonomics were also a major benefit to Vlasits. “From an operating standpoint, I want a form factor that’s comfortable and balanced on my shoulder that can just as easily be put placed on a tripod when needed,” Vlasits said.</p>
<p>Season two of <i>MORGAN SPURLOCK: INSIDE MAN</i> premiered on Sunday, April 13, 2014 at 10:00pm ET/PT.</p>
<p>Daniel B. Levin, Antonio Rossi, David Vlasits, and Jeremy Chilnick discussed the lengths they go to capture their compelling stories and why they rely on Canon Cinema EOS systems at the “Canon Spotlight: CNN Original Series” panel at the 2014 Sundance Film Festival. These testimonials, along with additional behind-the-scenes videos can be found at the Canon Professional’s Vimeo page at <a href="https://vimeo.com/canonpro" target="_blank">https://vimeo.com/canonpro</a>.</p>
<p>For more information about Canon Cinema EOS cameras and lenses, please visit the Canon U.S.A. website at <a href="http://cinemaeos.usa.canon.com/" target="_blank">http://cinemaeos.usa.canon.com/</a></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

5D iii with 135 mm 85 mm 50 mm wedding in servo poor focus any ideas?

Luke you would be in one shot mode. And yes, do yourself a huge favor and save up for the 5d mark iii. Unfortunately for Canon the only two good focusing systems in their entire lineup are the ones in the 5d mark iii and 1Dx. While the 1Dx is an amazing camera it is just overkill for weddings and events when first starting out. Although I do plan on purchasing one as my next camera to compliment my 5d iii it would be solely for gear lust and not because I need it to get the job done. You could easily own two 5d mark iii cameras for your wedding bodies and never ever miss the 1Dx. Just don't ever pick up a 1Dx in the store and play with it haha...then you will have serious gear lust for that thing lol.
Upvote 0

Canon Patent For 70-400 f/4.5-5.6 Lens

Maybe this is a Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM replacement and we will all be very disappointed ;-)

An EF-s 55-300 instead of 70-400 would be more logical. The EF-s line up has been matching lensen at the 55mm point for ages, and now even the 10-18 is matching at the 18mm end.

This probably is a clever lens design the dreamed up, that was at risk of leaking to tamron or sigma. And they registered it to protect it. With no intention of making the lens. Or its a "what if we make the 100-400mm wider, what would happen to cost and weight" kind of exercise.

Patents don't seem to make it to a market product very often. Especially outrageous ones.

(oh wait, there was this one: http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2013-12-06)
Upvote 0

Canon posts 1Q14 Financial Results

Thanks for the information, Neuro.

unfocused said:
Thanks Neuro. I love seeing these reports.

Wish there were more details about this: Optimization of product mix in entry class SLR cameras and thorough cost reduction activities contributed to the recovery of operating income ratio from 5.1% in the 2nd half of FY3/2013 to 8.8% in the 1st half and 10.0% in the 2nd half, averaging the annual 9.4% rate.

No mention of Mirrorless.

I think decrease in sales but rise in profits means they were able to sell more of the items with larger profit margins. Which cameras have more profit margins? I guess entry level ILCs, from Canon's slides.

One thing caught my attention "Expand sales through launches of new products" (Canon, FY'2014)
Me likey... :)


Anyone else think the Nikon slides were horrible?
Upvote 0

Great Lens 135 mm With Old 2002 Canon 1DS MK I body

Sporgon said:
Like your BF-10 picture of the leaves; works well.

These older digital cameras do have a certain signature - a little abrupt in tonal graduation compared with film and latest digital but it can work well.

Thank you, Sir, Dear Mr. Sporgon.
Your Good words make my Night, To night.
Good Night , Sir.
Surapon
Upvote 0

EF 16-35mm f/4L IS available for pre-order for $ 1199

Mr_Canuck said:
One thing I've realized coming from Sony then Pentax (with in-body stabilization), is that IS is really a big discussion point here in Canon land. I didn't think that stabilization was that huge a deal but maybe I have steady hands. Regardless, at the wide end I think it's much less critical. I guess the IS discussion is a trade-off for the previous discussions about ultrasonic motors vs all the noisy screwdriven ones Pentax and Sony/Minolta put out. I just don't know why any Canon lens at all in the future would not have IS. Just make it like Subaru all wheel drive in every vehicle. Standardization makes for economies of scale. Ends the debate too.

I agree it should be added into every new generation lens
after getting the EF-M 11-22 with IS i absolutely LOVE having IS on an UWA Lens
but I also love having wide aperture on a UWA too
Upvote 0

Photozone comparison of Canon 35L vs. Sigma 35mm F/1.4 'Art'

tiltshift said:
great lens. used to own a 35L now i got the sigma. Pros and cons. I am happy with certain aspects of the sigma and miss others from the canon.

Hi "tiltshift" I was wondering if you would mind telling us which aspects of the Canon you miss... I am about to buy the Sigma but really not too sure whether to get a used 35L instead...

Thanks!
Upvote 0

Canon 1DS 2002 Camera and EF 180 MM F/ 3.5 L MACRO USM..

clink=topic=20873.msg395721#msg395721 date=1399942199] [quote author=wickidwombat said:
There is something unique about the colour from the early canon 1d bodies IMO
And surapon don't you get a sore back?

My neck is hurting even from seeing those pictures.
I carry less than this (far less) in my photo backpack and I was grumbling about that weight on these forums (and guess who made a really helpful suggestion? Mr Surapon, of course).
:(
[/quote]

Ha, Ha, Ha---Dear Friend Mr. sagittariansrock
You still young and not as old man like me----Ha, Ha, Ha----BUT If You go back to see the Photos of Crazy ME, You can see the most Weight are on my Big Belly = 80%, Only 20% weight are share by two Shoulders/ My Back.
I love my Duoble Belt/ Harness system, That Make my Big Belly have a hard Exercise----Ha, Ha, Ha.
Nice to talk to you, Sir.
Surapon
Upvote 0

Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS Ext 1.4x review

Canon Spain lend me this beautiful and expensive lens for 3 weeks and I tested it against my 500mm f/4L IS and the 100-400 mm f/4.5-5.6L IS. With and without teleconverters.

I wrote a long test in my blog. It's in spanish, but you can translate it with Google Translate and there are plenty of images and a video.

http://blog.alamany.com/2014/05/test-canon-ef-200-400mm-f4-teleobjetivo-zoom.html

Enjoy!

Oriol Alamany

http://www.alamany.com
http://blog.alamany.com
http://www.facebook.com/oriolalamany.photography

Barcelona (Spain)

EF-S 10-18 f/4.5-5.6 IS STM & EF 16-35 f/4L IS Around the Corner? [CR2]

Re: EF-S 10-18 f/4.5-5.6 IS STM & EF 16-35 f/4L IS Around the Corner? [CR2]

RGF said:
wickidwombat said:
LetTheRightLensIn said:
wickidwombat said:
erggg what is with all the underwhelming slow aperture lenses! why not a 16-35 f2.8 IS? really c'mon canon
f4 wow awesome... NOT

room to fit in IS, $1300 instead of $2300 perhaps, potential to make it perform a touch better stopped down to landscape DOF where this focal range is most often (although yes not always) used when used on FF, makes it smaller and lighter by a lot, also nice, since you might want to hike around with it paired with one or two other lenses.

One of the main reasons i use the 16-35 f2.8 II is to shoot it wide open. Although I do understand the reason for cheaper slower lenses but cmon how about giving the top end some love canon lets have a 16-35 f2.8 IS L that sharp corner to corner like the 24-70 II.

It would nice if canon would swallow it pride and license Nikons incredible 14-24 lens.

Yeah, it's really incredible at shooting lens charts and brick walls....not so good for landscapes or groups of people. The difficulty in using front filters is a serious deficiency. Most landscapes require stopping down for Depth of Field....so at f11, there is little difference between the sharpness of a 16-35IIL and this Nikkor lens...so I often wonder why I would bother with the size, bulk and cost of such a lens which really only has advantages wide open.
Upvote 0

Ai servo inconsistency with zone af on canon 5d3

wickidwombat said:
more likely user error
which AF case were you using?

at f9 everything should have been sharp.
Let`s put it this way: f9 will provide a good depth of field but 1/250s is too long of a time for moving subjects, like people running.
I would recommend using f5.6 or f8 and a shorter time, like 1/1000s or 1/500s.
For example for soccer I never go use a time longer than 1/750s and I don`t have any problems with motion blur.
Additionally I would recommend not to use Zone AF at all because the camera will focus on the closest (nearest) subject, which is not always what you want.

Cheers:)
Nelu
Upvote 0

Testing Rokinon FE 14M-C, 14 mm. F/ 2.8

Dear Friends.
This is my fist time that use this Awesome / Cheapo Lens Rokinon 14 mm, F/ 2.8( $ 297 US Dollars) to shoot in the night time, with hand held shooting in the dark of the night , with the Technique of our friend Yorgasor by use 2 sec. self timmer and deep breathing, and hold, during press the shutter.
Use My dear Canon 1DS MK I with 14 mm. Lens, Set at manual Mode, F= 2.8, and Suck the air out of my Lung, and shoot these photos with SS. 1/6 sec. and 0.3 sec, with 2 sec. Time delay/ Self Timer ,
= ITS WORKS, SIR= thousand thanks for your great trick, Dear teacher Mr. Yorgasor.
Enjoy.
Surapon

http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=20846.0

Attachments

  • T-1.jpg
    T-1.jpg
    57.4 KB · Views: 227
  • T-2.jpg
    T-2.jpg
    70.7 KB · Views: 303
  • T-3.jpg
    T-3.jpg
    72.1 KB · Views: 237

What would you do, if you have...

Dan,
I agree, a heavier tripod would be better and I have seen the same lens on a Gitzo 1548 (Old) seems to be more stable- but ...
I feel that the large diameter of the front end results in a much higher surface area for the wind to strike and that is where left hand may be helpful.

Steve
Let me answer your specific questions/make counter statement

You just don't know how to use the equipment.[/i]
Agree. That was the purpose of this thread.
Why did you buy both of these lenses?
Because I have too much money to waste(just kidding). I thought prior to my trip to Africa and subsequently, , I would need these two-both on 1Dx each Perfect for games, isn't it ?

Were you upgrading from something else?
Has been using 100-400, unacceptably soft at long end.
How much wildlife shooting have you done and what were you using before?
There is first time for evrything, isn't it ( kidding again). Did some in India/B'desh. 400 DO F4 and 100-400

Have you been developing technique?
Trying to.
There isn't anything else you can buy that's going to make the pictures easier to to take, you just have to go out and do it, over and over and over again until they start looking decent.
Agree. Just was wandering whether there are things that exist to support the front of the lens. e.g. RRS long lens support.

Lion,
I shoot exclusively from a tripod, as I mentioned earlier. I am a small person but I am ready to carry a load of lenses if necessary as image quality is of utmost importance to me. I take my gear to India every year for the last 15 yrs that I have been shooting pictures

BTW- a Lion scared of a 200-400? ;D


Thanks everybody, for your time- sorry for the delay in replying. Working extra--have pay for these bazookas, right ?

Dholai
Upvote 0

Landscape Filters

jrista said:
ScubaX said:
jrista said:
jeffa4444 said:
As for you can do everything in Photoshop etc. if that was the case then why do professional landscape photographers such as Joe Cornish, Jeremy Walker, Mark Denton, David Ward, Charlie Waite, David Noton, John Gravett, Tom Mackie, David Clapp (he has made videos for Canon on the 6d) etc. carry them in their kit bags adding weight & bulk?. I would suggest looking at Xposure the free new download magazine on the Lee Filters web-site this highlights professional photographers using filters in many situations and why.

The reason you cannot simulate what a solid ND does in post is because it allows you to expose over a duration of time within which motion is occurring. You can take a photo of water, but if you take it with a high shutter speed, your not going to be able to replicate the effect that flowing water produces over a longer duration with an ND filter. Same goes for clouds, or anything else with motion. ND filters reduce the rate of light entering the lens, and therefor allow longer exposure times. There is no way to simulate a longer exposure time in post.

The reason you cannot simulate what a GND filter does in post is because it reduces the dynamic range OF THE SCENE. If you are actually clipping your highlights without a GND, then those pixels are pure white. There is no recovery, and there is no simulating a GND filter...all you could do is make those pixels gray, you could not actually recover the detail that was lost by not using a GND filter. With GND filters, you pull down highlights in ANALOG space, before the light ever even reaches the sensor, thereby reducing the dynamic range of the world around you AS it enters the lens.

These are real-world physical effects. They cannot be simulated. Hence the reason photographers who know what they are doing invest the money on a good multi-filter holder (like the Lee Filter system) and a bunch of good 4x6" filters. Because they are quite literally ESSENTIAL to achieve the effects they support.

I agree with most of what you said, but I think there are situations where GND can be simulated in post. Just like using a filter, it takes some forethought by taking multiple exposures of that scene and then in post compositing and masking. As long as it doesn't include motion such as clouds or water it will be a pretty good substitution for a GND filter.

The whole entire point of GND filters is to AVOID having to take multiple shots, which is where you get into HDR. HDR is really a misnomer...doesn't matter if you do an HDR blend and convert down to 16-bit, use Enfuse, or manually tonemapp, all three approaches achieve the same thing, and all three require more than one shot. HDR is certainly a viable option, however HDR is different than using a GND and it's not the same as single-shot photography. The purpose of a GND is to balance contrast and reduce dynamic range so you can take one single shot of your scene and not have to worry about clipped highlights.

I agree 100%, but that doesn't mean there are not photographers that would prefer using multiple exposures to obtain the same effect as GND in some instances. They save on the cost and don't have to carry the equipment. My preference is to use the filter and skip the post process of doing the same thing. But since I also prefer shooting movement, that is only done with a filter or in very low light.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB