Portrait lens setup -what should I get next?

procentje20 said:
Ah, i see. Its jargon. Not very scientific, but hey, i'll adjust to it. If this is the way cameras are compared it will just be confusing if I stick to my method.

Not jargon, but rather comparing apples to apples. In this case, that means a comparison based on capturing the same subject framing and perspective with both cameras.

A comparison that involves different framing or a different perspective doesn't make much sense.
Upvote 0

Make yourself happy

Dantana said:
RGF said:
Singsling said:
Forget all the high tech guff for a minute...go out and buy a 100D/SL1 slap on a shorty forty, walk down the city street and shoot, shoot, shoot. Go on you know you want too....it's called fellin gooooood! Don't be shy post them here.

Is this combination good for BIF (birds in flight) or macro or landscape. Street photographer is a narrow field

Might I suggest you buy a 1Dx, 600mm II, Wimberley head, TV 2x, ... and shoot birds

Great point that the OP's version of "happy" is a narrow focus.

Although to be fair, the original idea is a bit more budget friendly than what you suggest. I'd love to take the advice though.

I'll stick with option C for right now, which is trying to get the most out of the gear I've got while saving up for a new rig.

Agree that there is more than 1 one way to fun. And if I knew more than nothing about street photography the rig would be great. It always fun to try new things. :D
Upvote 0

Zeiss 15 vs Canon 14

risc32 said:
i'd love a zeiss 15mm but decided to slum it with a samyang 14mm. It gets it done just fine, better(sharper) than my 16-35mmv2 was. The build seems okay, but Roger at lensrentals says internally it's not so great, but as he points out, one could buy new replacement for the cost of a typical repair to something like the canon 14mml.

Thanks - I must say I am not a fan of use and toss lenses. If they will not hold up, I'll tend to skip them
Upvote 0

5D Mark III & RAW Video, A Case Study

Re: 5D Mark III & RAW Video, A Case Study

dirtcastle said:
Jent said:
LOL eyeland ;D

In all seriousness, as Phillip Bloom said, it is an awesome accomplishment for ML and it is phenomenal that they have allowed DSLR owners to shoot RAW. However, do most people need to shoot RAW - no. Unless you're super well off, you are going to be blowing alot of cash. I'm gonna wait to get a 5DIII after they fix the kinks.

That word "need" is a funny one. Six years ago, there was no "need" for a smartphone. Now everyone "needs" a smartphone. It might take more than six years for RAW video to be a "need". But it will probably happen.

Yeah...I keep thinking that this color TV thing is still pretty much just a fad that will fade away myself....
Upvote 0

Cut sized FF alternative to 28-300mm L

Mt Spokane Photography said:
You can check out a Tamron 28-300mm zoom. Much cheaper. You get what you pay for and its a lot less expensive than a pro grade lens. Good luck at finding a competent review, the better reviewers don't have time to waste on bashing a lens.

I believe I shot this whole set with the Tamron 28-300 on my 5DIII if you want a sampling of what it does:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/brand_b/sets/72157632198594770

You can see what he means, it is definitely a few steps down from something like the Canon 70-300L.

It is, however, reallly compact, and for the price, a decently built and performing lens, and the IS is pretty decent. Has a lock switch so it doesn't droop on you. I used it happily for a few years before I got my 5D and some better lenses.
Upvote 0

What flash should I get for my 60D?

bholliman said:
I would also recommend the 430EXII, but the 600EX is even better if money isn't an issue.

Not necessarily - the 600rt on the 60d is rather unbalanced and large, no fun to hold for extended times - I'm always amazed how light the camera feels when I switch my 600rt for my old 430ex, esp. at the end of a flash bracket. Plus the larger flashes aren't as easy to store, so to have at least one smaller flash around is a definitive plus for me.
Upvote 0

Refurbished Body

I just checked my wife's refurbished T3i, it has an almost imperceptible little pin mark by the serial number. Also checked my refurbished 600 RTs, they also have a little pin mark. So tiny, you'd never notice it if you weren't looking.

Another way to know, I think, would be if the owner still has the original box. Refurbished never come with the original box, but always with the "generic white" Canon refurbished box.

Really though, if you are buying used, it doesn't matter much whether the seller bought it refurbished or bought it new. In either case, you don't really know anything about the history of the camera and can only judge by the apparent condition, the price and what the seller is telling you.

Also consider this, even if the camera was once new, you have no way of knowing if you are buying it from the original owner, or if they just bought it used from someone else.

At any rate, if the seller isn't offering the item at less than what you can buy refurbished then they are asking too much, regardless of whether they bought it new or not.

As an aside, I recently saw a new phenomenon on eBay -- people re-selling refurbished items still in the sealed Canon refurbished box. Looks like they bought them during the recent 15% off sale and then when the items were sold out at the Canon store, they were selling them for a slight markup.
Upvote 0

2 Ways the 6D's Wi-Fi Have Proved to Be a (Kinda) Lifesaver

Chuck Alaimo said:
Drizzt321 said:
TWI by Dustin Abbott said:
Chuck Alaimo said:
I rented a 6d and am 90% sure I will have one of my own in the next week or 2 to be a backup body for my 5d3. the one thing that kind of disappointed me with the wifi, and kind of potentially ruins one of my plans with it is -- for weddings I had had the idea to set it up in an area I can only access before the ceremony (like behind the altar). The problem is after like 5-10 minutes of not being in use the camera and phone lose connection and there is no way to reestablish the connection without direct access to the camera. It can still be done, set up, then just make sure to snap a shot every minute to keep the connection active.

Another valid point. Have you tried changing the Auto Power Off setting? You have a lot choices there, including never shutting off. I haven't tried that, but I suspect it should keep the camera live and thus the connection on during that time.

BTW, that is a very clever idea and use for the Wi-Fi connection, particularly considering you can you change DOF and lighting on the fly.

I forget the name of the device, but there's a thing floating around that connects via USB and supports a variety of remote control functions. Sounds pretty analogous to the 6D + WiFi + Canon Remote app for anyone who doesn't have a 6D or can't use their phone (non-Android, non-iPhone user here).

I think turning off the auto-power off might do the trick for you. Probably kind of distracting to try and work both that and shooting from the normal angles. How do you manage that? Or is it simply knowing which parts of the ceremony are better captured from the alternate camera and using it then?

I tried turning the the auto power off off...camera did as it was supposed to, it stayed on, but the connection still timed out, and you need access to the camera to reestablish connection. I only had the 6d for a few days so my tests were less than scientific...lol.

As to " Probably kind of distracting to try and work both that and shooting from the normal angles. How do you manage that?" Specifically I was thinking about Catholic weddings, where the ceremonies are long and the B&G are up by the altar kneeling for a half an hour, I can only take so many shots of their backs! So my idea was with the 6d, get there early, talk to the priest and ask him if setting up the remote camera was allowed...on that kind of wedding there are plenty of moments where you just have to chill out and wait because again, how many shots do the B&G really want of their backs? The remote came would be able to get their faces. So I don't think it would be too distracting for me, at least on those kid of weddings.

Ah, I see. That makes total sense. I've never been to one of those big, formal, drawn out weddings before. Good idea though!
Upvote 0

Anyone gotten a full spectrum conversion done on their camera?

neuroanatomist said:
The spectral sensitivity curve of digital and film are fairly different (and films differ widely, too, which is why there were so many types available). The CFAs differ between cameras, too, so you'll even see differences between converted dSLRs of different models.

Thanks.
Possible to develop filters matching some film frequencies to emulate the same look?
Upvote 0

5D Mk III RAW video: rock climbing in Idaho

dirtcastle said:
Good stuff!

When I first saw the timelapse, I was like... "Good God!... How did he get that much RAW footage???". Duh. ::)

LOALTD said:
I only have one 64GB 1000X card so I had to use some of the crummy stock Canon video (see if you can spot it!) for some of the shots. Luckily most of these climbs are not very far from your car so I was able to run back to the trail head and dump the files onto my laptop.

I think a lot of us early adopters are accumulating similar stories about how we're getting around the temporary limitations. My own personal limitation is a 2011 Macbook Pro, which has no USB3. Most card readers use USB3. And so there won't be any rushing those files into the MBP.

Pretty soon we'll be looking back and laughing how much extra time/effort we had to spend just to move and convert RAW files.

I don't have a USB 3.0 port on my Macbook either! My model is the last model to NOT have the port! It takes about 30 mint to offload the files...can't wait till the 256GB CF cards are fast and affordable. It usually happens sooner than we think.

I love doing timelapses because really, all you have to do is setup one good shot and then you can go to bed and the camera just does its thing!

Niki:
I think with the latest builds you can record as long as you like. I'm not sure if audio is working on the latest builds, I don't think it is...it is definitely being worked on.
Upvote 0

What else should I have in my armour?

bycostello said:
trsaining (i don't mean that as any slight, we all need better skills not kit)

I would echo this. It's great you've signed up for a model course. I would look around for courses that cover your other interests.

You are likely to figure out much of what you need by getting some hands on experience in a good class.

I would also say that at least on the video side of things, don't brush off the idea of renting gear. That could be true for everything from the start, until you find the things that you really need to have in your kit for the majority of your work.
Upvote 0

My first portrait session and what I learned

Thanks for sharing your experience and lesson learned however I wouldn't personally call it a failed session. It was merely a pre-shoot to get to know the client. Now, it sounds like you're ready for the next session and will know exactly how to take the emphasis off the client. Being a family counseling service, maybe a shot of two people holding hands walking through a park (in the shade) or something that describes what the service is focused on.

Having other photos of the owner in the business environment might help in some way too.
If it were me, I'd ask the owner again exactly what some of her ideas are and build from that.

Good luck and keep us posted with the next one.

I fully understand how you feel about the first shoot. It's happened to me too. I did a shoot for a PT training company and focused on the facility and equipment that makes the gym what it is and separates it from the competition, however, the owner didn't want any of that! Ha! I did portraits of all the trainers previously and those are hung in the business and posted on their website but this second shoot was not what they wanted. ?
Upvote 0

EOS-1D Mark IV & EOS-1Ds Mark III Firmware Update

Re: EOS-1D Mark IV & EOS-1Ds Mark III Firmware Update

neuroanatomist said:
Bosman said:
I can't believe there isnt a 1dm3 update also, that is more likely to be used with a 200-400 than a 1ds...
Maybe Canon doesn't want to touch the 1DIII AF system even with a 10-foot pole... :o

In fact, there is an equivalent update for the 1DIII.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,478
Messages
975,312
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB