• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

RF Native Lens

Purchased an RP a few weeks ago. Love the form factor and ability to use some of my prime EOS lenses by adapter. Wish canon would produce a line of light weight and affordable RF lens in f 1.8. Seems like all their producing is ridiculously expensive, large and heavy F1.2 lenses. The only affordable prime RF lens is their 35mm f 1.8. Which is well regarded. Would love to seen companion f1.8 in 50 and 85mm.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Which possible f/1.2 Primes would be practical for you?

With Canon seeming to be developing a line of f/1.2 primes I have to wonder which would be practical for my use. I can see a 35, 50, 85, and even a 100 f/1.2L prime being practical for what I do (portraits). I don't know that a 28 or 24 would be practical for portraits, but I could be very wrong. Even 35mm pushes the boundaries for me.

So what would be appealing for you and what you do? Also, how many of you shoot portraits at 28 or 24mm? Group shots come to mind.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Premiere Pro And Final Cut Pro X finally Support the Canon XF705


Saw this in the Canon Press Releases. I've been following this camera since it was announced. It would be perfect for the type of ENG work that I do. I've read reviews by early adopters who were frustrated by the lack of support for the new file format. It looks like it took Adobe almost 1 year to add support for the XF705 to Premiere Pro.

Patent: Some crazy fast RF mount prime lenses, including an RF 18mm f/1.0L

Back in August, I mentioned that Canon was working on a whole line of f/1.2L prime lenses for the RF mount. So far we have the RF 50mm f/1.2L USM and the RF 85 f/1.2L USM, but there are more clues that more f/1.2L lenses are in the pipeline.
Canon News has uncovered the following optical designs for the RF mount.
Canon RF 18mm f/1.2L USM

Focal length 18.51mm
F-number 1.24
half angle of view (degree) 49.45°
Image height 21.64mm
Total lens length 129.00mm
BF 16.40mm

Canon RF 24mm f/1.2L USM

focal length 24.59mm
F-number 1.24
half angle (in degrees) 41.35°
Image height 21.64mm
Total lens length 129.01mm
BF 13.57mm

Canon RF 16mm f/1.4L USM

Focal length 16.42mm
F-number 1.43
Half angle of view (degree) 52.80°
Image height 21.64mm
Lens total length 133.46mm
BF 13.55mm...

Continue reading...
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

buying choice: 5DS vs. RP

OK, without going into details (ugly divorce issues), I've lost access to my 5DMkIV and my IR-converted 6D until late summer of 2020.

I primarily shoot landscapes (esp. HDR), travel, portraits (mostly of my kids), and occasionally mess around with macro shots of flowers and butterflies. Since I got the 100-400L, I've found bird photography to be something I want to try a bit more, but I'm not prioritizing that.

So, without access to my camera gear, I need to get a stopgap solution for the next 10 months, something that eventually I might convert to IR photography when I move on and sell off the 6D (or maybe covert for astrophotography, if I save up and buy a Sigma 14mm f/1.8).

Ignore price (mostly), but I'm comparing the 5DS vs. the RP. My simple pros and cons are this:

  • 5DS pros: big resolution, double that of the RP; form factor I'm used to; feature set and many functions similar to what I've grown used to with the 5DMkIV; native fit for my entire lens kit--which I've invested 10+K in and pretty much completed
  • 5DS cons: I know I said "ignore price," but the grey-market deal I can get is still 30% higher than what I can get an RP for; mirror box will cut off bokeh balls with my 85mm f/1.4 L; mirrorslapper could be dinosaur technology in 5 years; larger DLR aperture than the RP (might be detrimental when I shoot landscapes at f/22 to get star-points on a sun)

  • RP pros: newer technology and mount, with some very appealing lenses. If mirrorless is the future and the EVF is as good or better than OVF, I can see myself transitioning to mirrorless bodies when I replace my 5DMkIV; better autofocus performance, especially in low light (one reason why I've shied away from astrophotography--I've had problems with focusing in the dark); focus bracketing (which might be nice to have when I shoot macro)
  • RP cons: need the adapter to use all my current lenses; I'm not sold on the EVF; I like the idea of being able to crop shots and retain IQ with the 5DS; I'm not about to spend $2K+ per lens on the RF mount after spending $10K+ over the past 5 years filling out my EF mount kit.


I think I've pretty much covered it. Basically, I'm shy about moving to mirrorless, even as a short-term replacement and long-term backup body, so that's why I'm thinking about spending $300 more on a grey-market 5DS that is 5 year old technology.

Your thoughts?

Mirrorless alternative to 5D mark IV

I currently shoot with a 5D mark iv and plan to switch to mirrorless when the Canon releases the new rumored bodies. Perhaps it's too soon to ask because specs haven't been released yet, but I'm wondering which of the two rumored (the EOS RS or EOS RL) would make more sense coming from the 5D IV. I shoot mostly portrait and landscape...but do occasional sports as well and like the versatility of the 5D iv. I've heard the "L" in RL is short for landscape although not sure what would make the body would be targeted to landscape (perhaps fewer frames per second?). I also read the EOS-RS may be a successor to the 5DS(R)...but what about someone like me coming from 5d iv. I realize there will likely be a 5D mark v but I probably won't go that route. It will also be interesting to see what video capabilities will be offered on the new mirrorless bodies.

Thanks

EF lens adapter on mirrorless body

Like many i have a bunch of EF lenses, and I'm going to make the switch to a mirrorless body. What effect (if any) will the adapter have on focal length for my existing lenses. For example, the EF 11-24 L..will i still get 11mm or is this essentially like putting on an extension tube which is going to change the focal length. I may sell my 24-70 and buy and RF, but many of the lenses i have aren't available RF mount yet (not to mention the expense in doing this).

Thanks.

Interview: DPReview speaks to the “father of the EOS-1”

DPReview had the chance to speak with two senior Canon executives, Mr. Toshio Matsumoto, Senior Principle Engineer, and Mr. Kazuyuki Suzuki, Chief of Operations, the former being known as the “father of the EOS-1” about the upcoming Canon EOS-1D X Mark III.
Here are a couple of questions related to the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III:

How did you decide which features to update compared to the EOS-1D X Mark II?
There were a variety of factors. We get a lot of requests from our professional users, and we’re always listening to what they need. Their demands are sometimes very detailed! But we have to listen to their requests. In addition, we have to look at our technology – what kind of technology can meet those demands.
We then integrate [those pieces of information] and decide internally what we should include in the next model. In this new camera we’ve improved performance [in several areas], such as autofocus, networking and so on, which we’ll explain later in detail.
What...


Continue reading...


What’s next from Canon?

If you follow a rumours site, it’s likely you always want to know what’s coming next. The following is what we have been told about over the last few weeks.
First up. obviously the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III is coming soon, we hear that shipping will begin in late February or early March after an official announcement in late January 2020.
There will be a new EOS R series camera announced in early February, it will be the high megapixel replacement for the EOS 5DS/5DS R, it will be equipped with Canon’s next-generation sensors, DIGIC processors and a new form factor that will include the smart controller we first saw on the EOS-1D X Mark III. This will not be the “pro” body that people are clamouring for, but it will be upmarket from the EOS R.

Canon will announce another 4-6 RF lenses in the first half of 2020, there is going to be a total of 8 new lenses coming next year we...

Continue reading...
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

  • Poll Poll
Buying a 90D (body only.) Go for it or wait for Black Friday?

Buy now or wait?

  • Buy!

    Votes: 2 33.3%
  • Wait!

    Votes: 4 66.7%

I'm planning to buy a 90D for a trip in early December. From what I can tell, Black Friday sales are usually limited to Tn/Tni models rather than xxD models, and they usually include bundled lenses that I don't want. Is that right? Should I buy now and maximize my time getting used to the camera before I travel or should I wait and see if there are bargains to be had?

Thanks, all.

  • Locked
EOS R metering all over the place

Hi All,
I am a returning Canon user after 15 year.
In our business my wife is the photographer, me the nerd and videographer and shooting stills also when we have 2 gigs at the same time.
Bought the EOS R because my wife has a hate-hate relationship with our Sony A7 III, and she seemed to get much better along with the EOS R.

We shoot mostly moving subjects, so use Servo with either Tracking and Eye AF or 1-Point. Our Sony A7 III or our Fuji X-T3 use absolute priority when metering on the focused face / eye, even 1-point AF is using priority on the focusing point, and it functions extremely well. In the very very rare cases when I can use single point metering, and then those cameras use the focus point exclusively for metering.
The EOS R seems to miss a lot with the metering, especially with on-camera flash (with shutter speed, aperture and ISO selected manualy and using E-TTL II) . Same subject shot 3 times in a row with same settings has following results: 1 overexposed (by at least 1 EV), 1 underexposed (by at least 1.5 EV) and 1 which is acceptable. Outdoors in Av priority this happens less often, but it still happens.

My question is: am I missing a setting, is my camera broken, or is this normal for the EOS R.

So confused. Could you make me more?

I am an avid photographer. I make a living in movies. I direct, I cinematograph. But my real passion is photography.
I am very excited about the Canon 1dx3. I had 1dx2, 5d4 and lenses that got stolen. I want to rebuild my gear now but do not want to spend all the money I have (daughter's college loan!).

Although I really like the specs of 1dx3, the RF lenses attract me so much. The 50mm, the 85mm, 80-200mm.

So here is the confusion. Part of me feels I should forget about RF lenses and reinvest in DSLR. I tell myself the 50mm EF and 50mm RF can't be so different in real life. (But I know they are!). R does not compare with 1sx3 (But feel one day soon there will be a Canon mirrorless that will beat 1dx3).

Do any of you go through these thoughts? Any advice for me? o_O

EOS 300 is what you really need.

EOS 300 aka Rebel 2000 is all the camera you will ever need, it has features perfectly tuned down to all the essentials and nothing else. For a bit of extra features check out the EOS 300V aka Rebel Ti (viewfinder diopters, led-lit lcd, AF point activation indicator and metal mount). If you want to get really fancy you can look for EOS 300X aka Rebel T2 (which is basically the Elan 7 with the fancy functions hidden behind harder to access settings).
Tweakbox Appvalley https://vlc.onl/

These can be found for the low low price of $10, $20 and $30 respectively
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Canon Eos Ra, the Mirrorless Astrophotography Camera

Hey everyone,
So this is targeted at the ultra portable market. This is a great camera for folks who do not want to be bothered with a laptop and all of the other necessary steps needed to setup a camera like a ZWO or ASI.

Personally, I hike and do Milky Way landscapes. No computers or large EQ mounts or telescopes. I have gear to do astro in with an ultra portable but very capable camera, tripod, and tracker. cnv.to While I will not be buying this since I have Nikon kit, I have an astro-modded Z6 which is very similar to this. This is perfect for someone like me who needs to maintain ultra portability and enjoys the ease, functionality, etc of a DSLR/mirrorless over a dedicated astro cam.

Cue the head spinning, The Canon EOS-1D X Mark III to be 20.1mp? [CR1]

Sometimes after we report something, it brings about some contradictory information soon after. Yesterday we reported that a source was “80% sure” than the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III would house a 24.x megapixel sensor.
This is what makes the rumor mill fun.
Shortly afterwards we were told by an anonymous source that the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III would actually sport a 20.1-megapixel sensor, which would mean it’s staying with about the same resolution as the EOS-1D X Mark II.  The source claimed to be “100% sure”.
If any of our known sources could corroborate this information one way or another, we’d appreciate it.
Remember, this a rumors site, contradictions in information happen a fair bit before the truth gets nailed down.

Continue reading...

Firmware: Updates for the EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III and EF 600mm f/4L IS III are available

Canon has released new firmware for its latest super-telephoto lenses, the EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM and the EF 600mm f/4L IS III USM.
Firmware Version 1.1.2 incorporates the following enhancements:

Increases the manual focus speed when the manual focus speed switch is set to 1 or 2. *The speed when the switch is set to 3 (slowest speed) will be unchanged.
Improves the image stabilization effect during handheld shooting with a slow shutter speed when used with EOS 5D Mark IV, EOS 6D, or EOS R.

*Enables a full-time manual focus function during Servo AF when used with the EOS-1D X Mark II. The lens must be sent to the Factory Service Center in order for this function to be enabled.
If the lens’ firmware is already Version 1.1.2, it is not necessary to update the firmware.
The lens firmware version can be checked from the camera’s menu.
Download the firmware updates...

Continue reading...

Patent: New big white lens designs for the EF mount

Every so often we see new big white lens patents, and this time we get another round of designs for the EF mount. There doesn’t appear to be anything here that shows these designs are for the RF mount.
Canon 400mm f/2.8

Focal length: 392.56 mm
F no: 2.90
Image height: 21.64 mm
Lens length: 371.16 mm
Back focus: 59.99 mm


Canon 500mm f/4

Focal length: 489.05 mm
F no: 4.12
Image height: 21.64 mm
Lens length: 411.08 mm
Back focus: 86.24 mm

Canon 600mm f/4

Focal length: 584.99 mm
F no: 4.12
Image height: 21.64 mm
Lens length: 476.28 mm
Back focus: 87.97 mm

Canon 800mm f/5.6

Focal length: 778.44 mm
F no: 5.80
Image height: 21.64 mm
Lens length: 489.01 mm
Back focus: 48.66 mm

Continue reading...


In Light of the EOS R

https://solitaire.cam/With all the wailing and gnashing of teeth today about how the Sony a7III is so much better than the canon offering, my question is, wouldn't you still be better off getting the canon R to be able to use native glass and lenses like the 28-70 f2. Are those lenses possible on the sony mount? Canon glass always seems better than the competition and as everyone in any photography forum points out glass matters much more than the camera body.

Also as a landscape photographer the variable neutral density filter would encourage me to shoot with EF lenses and that adapter for some time. Besides this camera seems like a slight upgrade to the 5D at a price around or less than what the 5D sells for used.

Canon could have done more, and probably shhttps://9apps.ooo/ould have but they seem to rely on selling their system through their lenses rather than camera specshttps://solitaire.cam/

How many megapixels will the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III have? [CR2]

The biggest question people have about the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III is what the resolution of the all-new full-frame sensors will have.
We have been told multiple times that two different resolutions have been tested for the camera, but a good source is “80% sure” the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III will come equipped with a 24.x megapixel sensor.
One of the select photographers that have had the chance to touch the EOS-1D X Mark III said no memory cards were allowed into test cameras, but that in the coming weeks they’ll be able to make images with the camera, so the resolution should be known for sure before the end of November.
We’re also told that the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III will be officially announced near the end of January 2020.

Continue reading...


Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB