• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Rechargeable batteries and Speedlite problems?

Sent a 600ex-rt to Canon for repair. The zoom function had stopped working, apparently in the ultrawide light-spread position, which really caused problems with exposure.

Canon repaired it with the note: "Replaced head assembly. Replaced main circuit board."

The Speedlite had failed with Eneloops in it. They tested at still 60% power when I took them out. But I had left them in there probably a couple of months before using the Speedlite. These eneloops were purchased about a year ago, and they had no signs of leakage.

Has anybody else had issues with Eneloops or other rechargeables and their gear?

Thanks!

16-35 and 70-200 a Good Combo to Call it a Day With?

So I have a 6D, 16-35 4.0 IS and 135 2.0. Almost snagged a 50mm lens, but didn't and have a longer telephoto lens on my wish list.
I do paid headshots, family portraits, word-of-mouth whatever and lots of "running" events plus my son's Marching and Jazz Bands. Even my "lighting" skills are taking on a new higher level of excellence.
Would a numbnut like myself who's unable to make decisions possibly do quite well with just my UWA and one of the new 70-200's (maybe the 2.8, but maybe the 4.0)?
Thanks.

16-35mm f/4 test shots

I had intended to stop by Best Buy in recent weeks to see how their camera department is doing. Yesterday as I drove home from the funeral for a high school classmate who had died suddenly, I did stop. They seemed to be doing very well, with a good range of Canon lenses, as well as a lot of Sony and Nikon stuff, though I didn't really look at them.

A salesman who is very knowledgable and whom I have found to be trustworthy found me after I had been otherwise greeted. He and I caught up a bit about my experience with the 6D2 he sold me, as well as his developing photographic career. He was especially interested in my video experience.

I told him that I was considering the 16-35mm f/4, and he offered me some opinions about the f/2.8 model and the 17-40mm, the main Canon alternatives. He pretty well confirmed what I had read here and in reviews that indicated the f/4 lens would be my best choice. The extra stop of the 2.8 doesn't seem to be worth the extra money and weight for my purposes. He had used the f/4 around the store to document things for corporate, as they like having done periodically. He is considering buying the lens for himself, as he is about to get a real estate client. Since I shot some houses for a realtor a few years ago, we later discussed some of the issues involved.

But in the meantime, perhaps being more aware than usual of the brevity and uncertainties of life, I decided not to wait until October to buy the f/4 for my birthday.

After braving the Charlotte rush-hour traffic to get home, I was not inclined to go out into the 96-degree heat to try out the lens. After I got out of my good clothes, I dozed off for a bit, so it was getting dark outside by the time I got the lens out and put it on the camera. I made some test shots just sitting in my den. The light was a dim CFL in a floor lamp just behind my chair. For the following picture I zoomed out to 16mm and focused on the wing of the chair I was sitting in. The camera chose f/4 for 1/30 second at ISO 12,800. Below is the full frame reduced for posting and a 100% crop of the same shot. The forum software will likely blow them up further in your browser. I didn't do anything I can recall to it in ACR/Photoshop, and certainly didn't correct vignetting or reduce the noise from the high ISO. You can see the blue Best Buy bag on the table.

IMG_1100s.jpg


IMG_1100d2.jpg

The Full List of Unreleased Canon Camera ID’s

Below is a list of all the unreleased Canon cameras and their codenames. We reported back in April that two full frame mirrorless cameras were being developed at the same time, and it looks like this list confirms that to be the case.
It looks like the K424 is being developed with a 30.4mp sensor, which is the same resolution as the EOS 5D Mark IV. We don’t know if the image sensors are identical at this time.
We also cannot confirm with absolute certainty which DSLRs the K436 and K437 are. Though there are a lot of assumptions and logical guesses as to what these cameras will turn out to be.

K424

Mirrorless camera
Full frame
Wi-Fi · Bluetooth installed
Not compatible with smartphone’s Bluetooth remote control function
Maximum size of test image: 6720 × 4480
(Judging from the progress of development) Release in late 2018 to early 2019

K433

Mirrorless camera
Probably...

Continue reading...

SD Express SDUC memory cards

https://www.dpreview.com/news/7847794311/sd-express-sduc-memory-cards-association

As the name suggests, SD Express cards are going to be fast. The SD Express format uses third-gen PCIe and NVMe transfer protocols on top of the dual-level pin layout interface to offer a theoretical maximum transfer speed of 985MB per second—almost a gigabyte per second and roughly 1.5 times faster than the maximum promised by the UHS-III cards that are only just starting to hit the market.

hehe. If ever, by when do you recon Canon will implement it in cameras? 2040? 5D Mk. XII ? ;D

Patent: Increased Precision of Shake Correction

HTML:
From <a href="https://www.canonnews.com/canon-patent-application-increased-precision-of-shake-correction">Canon News</a>, a highly detailed patent application from Canon shows how to increase the precision of the velocity sensors inside the camera to increase the accuracy of image stabilization.</p>
<p>This patent application shows Canon is improving the shake that happens with motor and mirror movement as well as when the lens is zoomed.</p>
<p>The camera in the patent image looks like <del>EOS 77D and EOS 80D</del>  the EOS Rebel 760D, as pointed out in the <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=35268.msg726710#msg726710">forum by Sharlin</a>.</p>
<p>This is Japan Patent Application 2018-101118</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Patent: Optical Formula for New EF 24-70mm f/2.8L

HTML:
<a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/canon-ef-lenses-rumours-and-news/">Northlight</a> has uncovered a patent relating to a zoom lens design with two aperture stops.</p>
<p>Within the patent are two different optical formulas, one for an EF 16-35mm f/2.8 and another for an EF 24-70 f/2.8.</p>
<p><strong>According to Northlight:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>The aim is to produce a zoom lens with constant minimum aperture, but having small variations in lens aberrations when focusing near/far. The second aperture stop is varied as the lens zooms.</p></blockquote>

		<style type='text/css'>
			#gallery-3 {
				margin: auto;
			}
			#gallery-3 .gallery-item {
				float: left;
				margin-top: 10px;
				text-align: center;
				width: 33%;
			}
			#gallery-3 img {
				border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
			}
			#gallery-3 .gallery-caption {
				margin-left: 0;
			}
			/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
		</style>
		<div id='gallery-3' class='gallery galleryid-35393 gallery-columns-3 gallery-size-thumbnail'><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/two-stop-zoom.png'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/two-stop-zoom-168x168.png" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/two-stop-zoom-168x168.png 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/two-stop-zoom-144x144.png 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/variable-aperture.png'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/variable-aperture-168x168.png" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/variable-aperture-168x168.png 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/variable-aperture-144x144.png 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon portrait'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/secondary-aperture.png'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/secondary-aperture-168x168.png" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/secondary-aperture-168x168.png 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/secondary-aperture-571x575.png 571w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/secondary-aperture-225x225.png 225w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/secondary-aperture-144x144.png 144w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/secondary-aperture.png 621w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><br style="clear: both" />
		</div>

<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Stock Notice: Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II at Adorama

HTML:
<p>Adorama has stock of the brand new Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II.</p>
<p class="tabSectionHeader"><strong>Key Features</strong></p>
<div class="widget-filter">
<ul class="original">
<li>Optical Image Stabilization at up to 5 Stops of Shake Correction</li>
<li>IS Mode 3 Effective When Tracking Irregularly Moving Subjects and Assists When Panning</li>
<li>Highly Resistant to Dust and Water, and Improved Durability Even in Harsh Conditions.</li>
<li>Three Image Stabilization Modes for Outstanding Results.</li>
<li>Minimum Focusing Distance Shortened from 3.9 ft. to Approx. 3.3 ft. (1.2m to 1m).</li>
<li>Optimized Lens Placement and Coatings Minimize Ghosting and Flare.</li>
<li>Circular Aperture (9 blades) for Beautiful, Soft Backgrounds.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.adorama.com/ca7020042.html?kbid=64393">Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II $1299 at Adorama</a></strong></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

To service or not to service..

Ok so I have an extender 1.4x iii that stopped working six months ago. It had a lot of wear and I thought that the metal connector to camera needed replaced. So off to service it went, with descriptions of the issue which was poor connection to lenses and dropping connections. Canon reported replacing the electronics.

It came back timely without the metal replaced, but acted like a 2x extender electronically on multiple lenses and bodies for instance on a 100-400mm L ii it reported an aperture of f11 at 400 and would not autofocus, should have been an f8 . On a f2.8 lens it reported and apparently set a setting to 5.6 instead of f4 at max aperture.

Real life intervened with a foot operation and when I got back to it further testing showed the Same it went back to service in California., along with a 70-200mmL ii is that had a loose barrel above the tripod ring (fixed no problems).

Well it came back with replaced metal mount, but still acting like a 2x extender electrically.

Should I try again or should I give it up, I’ve purchased an new one but was hoping to leave the older 1.4x semi permanently on a 500mmf4 L is ii usm

Shipping is about 30$us each trip out CPS covers return.

Sony introduces lightweight Sony FE 400mm f/2.8 GM OSS Lens @ 12000$/€

Found on Sony rumor sites.

Offering at: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1369634-REG/sony_fe_400mm_f_2_8_gm.html

Sony rumor site writes:
"– The world’s lightest 400mm f/2.8 at just 2,895 grams (102.2 ounces)
– Newly developed XD (extreme dynamic) Linear Motor achieves extremely fast, precise, quiet AF
– 1.4x and 2.0x tele-converter support, with high imaging and AF performance
– not front heavy weight like the Canon or Nikon lenses"

Article on DPREVIEW:
https://www.dpreview.com/news/6118705294/sony-s-400mm-f2-8-gm-will-arrive-in-september-for-12-000


Hmmm....
Nearly 1kg less weight than the 400 II 2.8...
(I hope Canon will offer something similar when the Mk III appears on the market)

Sharpest lens at F8 - F11

Hello Everyone,

yes, this topic sounds like these topics which ask for which to choose F8 or 11 for landscape photography
Im not asking that. Im sure when I want to use from 2.8 to 16 or more.

All the lens reviews mostly compare lenses at their performace wide open.
I looked across the web and found no comparison of lenses from F8 to F11.
Im interested in these apertures because I'm thinking to use another lens for landscape fotography other than my Sigma 17-50 EX.

Im looking for the lens which is sharpest at F11. Not compared to other apertures of the one lens, but Im looking basically for a chart or a list which tells me: "These are the sharpest lenses compared F11"

Has anyone of you come across testing results looking for this area?
Sure I can check DXO or digital picture but maybe you guys can shorten this up for me ? ;)

Stefan

Lots of Talk, Very Little Solid Information About Canon's Next Cameras

HTML:
Recently we’ve <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/new-canon-camera-bodies-appear-for-certification/">become aware of 6 different unreleased Canon ILC camera bodies</a> that have come up for various types of certification. The only camera out of the lot that we’re pretty sure is coming this year, is an EOS M5 Mark II ahead of Photokina in September. Beyond that, everything is currently a guess.</p>
<p>There are <a href="https://www.*********.com/first-specification-suggestions-for-upcoming-canon-cameras-eos-7d-mark-ii-eos-80d-mark-ii-eos-m5-mark-ii/">reports that two of the DSLRs mentioned will be the EOS 80D and EOS 7D Mark II</a> successors, both of which are very popular models in the lineup. Unfortunately, we have been unable to confirm that this is the case. Good sources have said repeatedly to me that there would not be a major DSLR release in 2018 and that 2019 is still an unknown.</p>
<p>Now, these certifications can happen many months in advance of an actual announcement, so it’s possible we’re looking a Q1 2019 camera bodies. Which, if true, there’s no chance of having any real specifications to report beyond guesses and logical next steps in the EOS xxD and EOS 7D line. If either of them is coming in 2018, Canon is doing a stellar job of keeping the lid on things.</p>
<p>We’ll obviously provide an update on these camera models as soon as we’re able to.</p>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Super Simple Off-Camera Set-Up?

For someone with a 6D/430EX II who wants to just do a really easy single flash off-camera flash on a single channel and doesn't even know what Slave or Group means would the following be a good place to start and maybe even stay for awhile? I already have a nice 32" Rogue silver/white reflector.
Yes? (factoring in a lot of "off-camera" fear, but having very good results with on-camera bounce) -
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1341967-REG/godox_photo_equipment_x1c_ttl_remote_controller.html
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1005757-REG/westcott_2035_rapid_box_26_octa.html
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/272945-REG/Impact_3218_Multiboom_Light_Stand_Reflector_Holder.html
Thank you very very much.

Horrific 80D build quality; creaky, brittle grip... normal?!

https://youtu.be/DYIspuDV3yI

Does everybody else's do this? It's gone straight back, hoping the eBay importer folk don't put up too much of a battle and just refund me in full... this isn't suitable for supporting its own weight, nevermind trusting it with a 400mm prime! It's like they forgot that the grip is more than just a lock-up for the battery :/

A New 50mm Lens is Being Tested in the Wild [CR2]

HTML:
We’re told that a new 50mm lens is currently being tested by a small number of select photographers. What we weren’t told was the speed of the lens or if it was an “L” lens or not.</p>
<p>There have been various rumors over the years about a new 50mm lens, and all we’ve seen so far is the EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, which is a great lens in its own regard, but hasn’t exactly created a lot of excitement with the readers on this site.</p>
<p>There was also no mention of IS being present on the testing lens in question. If it did have IS, I think it’d be safe to assume it won’t be a new 50mm L lens.</p>
<p>We’re starting to get a few more mentions about a new 50mm lens, though we still don’t think we’ll be seeing one in 2018.</p>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

New Canon Camera Bodies Appear for Certification - Updated

HTML:
<p><a href="https://www.nokishita-camera.com/p/blog-page_29.html">Nokishita</a> has uncovered more unreleased cameras from Canon through certification agencies.</p>
<p><strong>*UPDATED* Canon’s “DS126721” is registered with overseas certification bodies </strong>(Google Translated)</p>
<ul>
<li>Taiwan NCC (<a href="https://nccmember.ncc.gov.tw/Application/FUN/FUN016_JPG.aspx?fileid=rLXuZmPNrn0%3d">PDF file</a>)</li>
<li>Interchangeable lens camera (single lens reflex or full size mirrorless)</li>
<li>Wi-Fi · Bluetooth installed</li>
<li>Battery: DC 7.2 V, 1800 mAh</li>
<li>Charger: Input AC 100 – 240 V (50/60 Hz), Output DC 8.4 V 1.2 A</li>
<li>Kiss M same radio parts (WM 600)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Canon’s test cameras code named: “K436” “K437”</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>These are confirmed to be DSLRs, though which models is unknown at this time.</li>
<li>K436 and K437 of SLR also supports test data of smartphone’s Bluetooth remote control function.

<em>* and the Bluetooth remote control function from the latest smartphone of ※ List of cameras tested: M5, M6, M100, KissM, G9XII, G1XIII, SX730HS, K433, K436, K437, EC801, EC804, EC805, EC811</em></li>
<li>The remaining battery level indication of K436 is 4 stages (same as 9000D etc.). Battery level indication on K437 is in six stages (same as 5D Mark IV etc.).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Canon test cameras code named: “K424” “K433” “EC 811”</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>These are confirmed to be mirrorless cameras</li>
<li>Beyond the EOS M5 Mark II, the other model names are unknown at this time.</li>
<li>K433 and EC 811 correspond to the smartphone’s Bluetooth remote control function. K424 does not correspond at the present moment ( 6/24 correction:</li>
</ul>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Time for a 24mm Prime...To Get, Sigma or Canon?

It's time for a 24mm prime lens. I am apparently obsessed with this focal length after looking at my metadata. Out of the 34,285 images I've taken this year between 16-200mm, a considerable percentage of them were locked in at 24mm. I put a spreadsheet together to better illustrate this information for me...but it was honestly shocking to see how much I favor this focal length and how little I use 50mm.

Here is some of my EXIF data:
  • 24mm = 12.8%
  • 35mm = 3.5%
  • 50mm = 4.8% (not sure why I own two 50mm primes if I use them so seldomly now.)
  • 85mm = 34.4%
  • 135mm = 12%

So yeah...a 24mm is happening, but I find myself in a bit of a conundrum. Optically and technically, the Sigma 24mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens is much better lens than the Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM - as it should be since one is considerably newer than the other. However...I have quite a bit of experience with Sigma primes and I am not very happy with their autofocus accuracy consistency.

My Sigma 50mm Art was hit/miss on my 7D Mark II/6D/5D3. For whatever reason, it's also hit/miss on my 5D Mark IV and works pretty reliably on my 1DX Mark II.

My Sigma 85mm Art was so incredibly inconsistent that I sold it and got the Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS USM. I took a step back in overall image quality, but the autofocus has been so reliable on the new Canon, that I didn't even care...it was a marginal difference at best anyway.

With the Sigma 24mm Art priced at $850 and the Canon at $1550 I could save $700...that's a healthy amount of money and the only reason I'm really considering it at all. But I'm so worried about the autofocus accuracy.

Primary use:
  • Wedding/Event (typically low light)
  • Detail Shots
  • Dual Pixel AF on APS-C video (focal length is about perfect for my video setup)
  • Astrophotography

I'm really leaning toward the Sigma right now because of the massive savings. It seems to be a superior lens in every way except for the lack of weather sealing and the potential for autofocus problems. While weather sealing probably won't be a problem because I'll just slap on a weather sealed lens, the autofocus scares me. I would love to hear about everyone's experiences with the autofocus on this lens. I've used this lens several times and actually had a pretty good experience with it, but that was in the bright sun and in a pretty well-lit room. How does it work in low light? How has the accuracy been over time?

Thanks for any help. I'm looking to pull the trigger by late July at the latest before my next race in Chicago. I have a wedding coming this weekend and MIGHT order it before then just to test its low-light...hmmm...maybe I just made the decision for myself. LOL

General purpose f/2.8 zoom for 80D?

Hi all,

Looking for recommendations for a f/2.8 zoom for my 80D. I currently have the 10-18 STM so I'm covered for wide angle stuff, and have the 18-135 STM for use in good light. Also have the 24/40/50 STM and 100/2 USM primes. I have the 24 STM up for sale right now as I just don't tend to use it much.

So far I've been considering the Tamron 17-50 non-VC, the 17-55 IS USM, the Tamron 24-70 G2, or the 24-70L II.

Obviously the 24-70 options are significantly more expensive, but I don't tend to use 24mm or narrower all that often (hence selling the 24 STM) and I would definitely use the 50/55-70 range if it was there. The 'ready for full frame' aspect is a bonus too if/when I upgrade to FF a few years down the road.

I'm looking to get something with good IQ wide open - if I have enough light to be stopped down much I'm probably just using the 18-135.

I've searched and read reviews and there doesn't seem to be a real consensus... the 24-70 II would be the clear winner if it had IS I think but it's also by far the most expensive.

Anyone have experience with one or more of the options?

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB