• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

The "Lowly" Canon SL1

Just for fun: The north face of the Pantheon in Rome, with piazza fountain in foreground. Taken with SL1 and Canon 10-22 at 10mm f/9. Sky added in Landscape Pro 2. Perspective correction in Elements 13.

I love carrying this easy-on-the-shoulder combo with me all day.

Any other good shots to share made with this underrated body?

Attachments

  • IMG_3228alspa-web.gif
    IMG_3228alspa-web.gif
    628.9 KB · Views: 172

Firmware: Canon EOS 5DS & Canon EOS 5DS R v1.1.1

HTML:
Canon has released updated firmware for the EOS 5DS and EOS 5DS R. The firmware for each camera is different, so please be sure to download and install the correct one.</p>
<p><strong>Canon EOS 5DS R Firmware v1.1.1</strong></p>
<p>Firmware Version 1.1.1 incorporates the following fixes:</p>
<ol>
<li>Corrects a phenomenon in which shooting may not be completed while using HDR (High Dynamic Range) Mode, when certain combinations of settings are selected.</li>
<li>Corrects the phenomenon of Err70 which occurs with certain combinations of settings.</li>
<li>Corrects the level display when the camera is held in the vertical orientation with the hand grip pointing downward.</li>
<li>Corrects a phenomenon in which, when using certain CF cards, it may take approximately five seconds for the camera to power on depending on when the camera’s power switch was turned <ON>.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-5ds-r?subtab=downloads-firmware">Download firmware v1.1.1 for the Canon EOS 5DS R</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Canon EOS 5DS Firmware v1.1.1</strong></p>
<p>Firmware Version 1.1.1 incorporates the following fixes:</p>
<ol>
<li>Corrects a phenomenon in which shooting may not be completed while using HDR (High Dynamic Range) Mode, when certain combinations of settings are selected.</li>
<li>Corrects the phenomenon of Err70 which occurs with certain combinations of settings.</li>
<li>Corrects the level display when the camera is held in the vertical orientation with the hand grip pointing downward.</li>
<li>Corrects a phenomenon in which, when using certain CF cards, it may take approximately five seconds for the camera to power on depending on when the camera’s power switch was turned <ON>.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-5ds?subtab=downloads-firmware#Z7_MQH8HIC0L88RB0AMD0F1Q42K25">Download firmware v1.1.1 for the Canon EOS 5DS</a></strong></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Sigma 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art Preorders Start June 22, 2017

HTML:
Preorders for the brand new Sigma 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art will begin on Jun 22, 2017 at 1:00AM EST.</p>
<p>We’re also told the lens will ship at the end of June for the EF mount. So it looks like a quick turnaround, which is always a good thing.</p>
<p><del>We do not have a price for the 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art or the 24-70mm f/2.8 DG HSM OS Art</del>, which can also be preordered on June 22, 2017 at 1:00AM EST.</p>
<p><strong>We’ve now been told that pricing will be as follows, which has been confirmed by a few retailers (in USD).</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bhpho.to/2swJrCl">Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG HSM OS Art $1299</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bhpho.to/2rkYCub">Sigma 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art $1599</a></li>
</ul>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Put a phone in the 1dx3

All the talk of phone cameras eating into the camera market; lets strike back and put a phone into the 1dx3. Big body with tons of spare room for the minimal electronics required. Ergonomically somewhat larger than ideal but the image quality would destroy the competition. I offer this brainstorm for Canon's use, free of all royalty claims.

Mic drop.

Updated Canon EOS 6D Mark II Specifications [CR2]

HTML:
Below is updated specifications from various sources, so we’re not rating this [CR3] at this time. Some of this information does come from very solid sources.</p>
<p><strong>Canon EOS 6D Mark II Specifications: </strong>(specifications in italics are CR2 for the moment)</p>
<ul>
<li>26mp CMOS Sensor</li>
<li>DPAF</li>
<li>DIGIC 7</li>
<li>1080P 60p (sadly, no 4K)</li>
<li><em>45pt AF (We’re not sure if they’re all cross-type)</em></li>
<li>Wi-Fi</li>
<li>Bluetooth</li>
<li><em>NFC</em></li>
<li>3″ Vari-Angle LCD</li>
<li>Touchscreen</li>
<li><em>Approx 100% viewfinder</em></li>
<li><em>HDR Movie</em></li>
<li><em>Time Lapse Movie</em></li>
<li>A slightly taller and deeper body over the current EOS 6D.</li>
<li>New battery grip BG-E21</li>
<li>Announcement on June 29, 2017, Shipping in early August</li>
</ul>
<p>There will be more to come in the coming days.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Zeiss to Announce Milvus 35mm f/1.4 Very Shortly

HTML:
<p>It appears that Zeiss will be announcing a Milvus 35mm f/1.4 very soon. The new lens will come in both the Canon EF mount and Nikon F mount.</p>

		<style type='text/css'>
			#gallery-1 {
				margin: auto;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-item {
				float: left;
				margin-top: 10px;
				text-align: center;
				width: 25%;
			}
			#gallery-1 img {
				border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-caption {
				margin-left: 0;
			}
			/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
		</style>
		<div id='gallery-1' class='gallery galleryid-29791 gallery-columns-4 gallery-size-thumbnail'><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss-168x168.jpg 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss-144x144.jpg 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss_1.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss_1-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss_1-168x168.jpg 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss_1-144x144.jpg 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon portrait'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss_3.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss_3-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss_3-168x168.jpg 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss_3-144x144.jpg 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon portrait'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss_2.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss_2-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss_2-168x168.jpg 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zeiss_2-144x144.jpg 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><br style="clear: both" />
		</div>

<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

[FIXED] Godox TT685c Flash - underexposed images in ETTL-II mode on Canon 6D

I bought a little Godox TT685c speedlite and having some issues with underexposed images in ETTL-II mode on Canon 6D.

regardless of the camera mode used: AV, Tv, M, on camera flash or remotely triggered by X1T-C in radio slave ettl-II mode– makes no difference!
I tried many lenses and result is the same – underexposed images, badly. it almost as if pre-flash has never fired or camera has not enough time to analyse the pre-flash and set the exposure correctly.

If I bounce flash of the ceiling, underexposure even stronger. Shooting into soft box in ettl mode results in up to 3 stops of underexposure depending on how far the subject is located...

I found a workaround:
I push FEL (*) button each time prior to the shutter button release in order to force pre-flash and camera to record the correct exposure value... it works but...

Image with the same framing on tripod taken with FEL button pressed before taking the image is always perfectly exposed and without FEL button pressed can be up to 3 stops underexposed.

The necessity to push FEL button for every shot in ETTL-II mode drives me a bit uneasy :)
Godox TT685c firmware v.3.1, Canon 6D ( 1.1.7 firmware).
Camera works well with Canon, Godox ad360 II and Yongnuo speedlites in ETTL-II mode and exposure always applied correctly.
is this a known issue with Godox TT685c flash, firmware bug or the unit seems to be faulty?

[FIXED] it turns out to be the "user Issue". I failed to confirm that set of batteries I used were fully charged. and they were indeed at low charge level! but what is interesting - no low charge indicator came up on the speedlite screen. the rest is just logical. underexposure were the direct result of camera and speedlite incorrect ETTL interactions at such a low battery levels. forced preflash via FEL button set exposure levels correct though.
note to yourself: use the GODOX PB960 battery pack (as I should anyway) or swap rechargable AA batteries as soon as underexposed ETTL shots detected. pay close attention to the presence of the low charge indicator on the speedlite's LCD screen.
[/FIXED]

Review: Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM C

HTML:
The-Digital-Picture has completed their review of the brand new and aggressively priced Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM C lens.</p>
<p><strong>From TDP:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>The AF accuracy could be slightly improved and a tripod ring would be nice to at least optionally have available, but otherwise, the 100-400 C gives you a very useful range of focal lengths in a relatively small and light, nicely-designed, full-featured package. This is a lens that you will want to take with you and that alone means you will capture more images. The great image quality for a very reasonable price seals the deal on this one. The Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary is another lens warranting kit-addition consideration. <a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-100-400mm-f-5-6.3-DG-OS-HSM-Contemporary-Lens.aspx">Read the full review</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 OS Contemporary $799: <a href="https://bhpho.to/2qZrGXx">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/2tlRIFI">Amazon</a> | <a href="https://mpex.com/sigma-100-400mm-f5-6-3-dg-hsm-os-contemporary-lens-canon.html?acc=3">MPEX</a></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon EOS 6D Mark II to Get New 26mp Sensor [CR3]

HTML:
We’re told that the Canon EOS 6D Mark II will get a brand new and dedicated 26mp sensor.</p>
<p>This keeps in line with the original EOS 6D getting its own sensor.</p>
<p><strong>Canon EOS 6D Mark II Known Specifications</strong> (We’ll update this list as we get more information)</p>
<ul>
<li>26mp Full Frame CMOS Sensor</li>
<li>DPAF</li>
<li>DIGIC 7</li>
<li>Wi-Fi</li>
<li>Bluetooth</li>
<li>Vari-Angle LCD</li>
<li>A slightly taller and deeper body over the current EOS 6D.</li>
<li>New battery grip BG-E21</li>
<li>Announcement on June 29, 2017, Shipping in early August</li>
</ul>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

EOS 5DS R Firmware Version 1.1.1

http://support-sg.canon-asia.com/contents/SG/EN/0400322602.html

Changes in the Firmware

Firmware Version 1.1.1 incorporates the following fixes:

1. Corrects a phenomenon in which shooting may not be completed while using HDR (High Dynamic Range) Mode, when certain combinations of settings are selected.
2. Corrects the phenomenon of Err70 which occurs with certain combinations of settings.
3. Corrects the level display when the camera is held in the vertical orientation with the hand grip pointing downward.
4. Corrects a phenomenon in which, when using certain CF cards, it may take approximately five seconds for the camera to power on depending on when the camera's power switch was turned <ON>.

Canon EOS 6D Mark II & EOS Rebel SL2 Coming June 29 [CR2]

HTML:
We’ve received two separate tips that the Canon EOS 6D Mark II and EOS Rebel SL2 will be announced on June 29, 2017 (based on EST). Both of these cameras are scheduled to begin shipping in early August.</p>
<p>We’re trying to get this confirmed so we can upgrade the rating to [CR3]</p>
<p>We’ll have some updates on specifications very shortly.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon Dual Pixel Autofocus Explained

HTML:

<iframe width="728" height="409" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/T3YfRqGZ6C4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<p>Even with today’s advancements in digital photography and cinematography, being precisely in focus isn’t that easy – especially when doing it alone. But there’s no more need to fear autofocus with dual pixel CMOS autofocus from Canon. Watch the video to see how this unique feature can help you keep focus on both your subject and your artistic vision.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Speedlight Flash Diffuser Evolution

On camera flash is inherently pretty awful, but for some events work there is little choice, so you have to make the best of it. I've tried a few, from homemade bounce cards, Stofen, the long forgotten Gary Fong Whaletail, Gary Fong Lightsphere, an eBay clone Flash Bender and for the past few years have been moderately satisfied with two Jo Demb Flash Diffuser Pro's which are now close to being worn out. http://www.dembflashproducts.com/products/flash-diffuser/

The fact is, none of them represent the Holy Grail of on-camera flash diffusers. I've looked at the MagMod MagBounce system and wonder if it is truly better than anything else. The MagMod system looks impressive but gets expensive if you tick the boxes for accessories, particularly as anything I update to is X2 as I'll always be working with two bodies at events.

I try to keep a lookout for what is on offer, but there's always a chance I've overlooked a miraculous release from some amazingly inventive critter...

-pw

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 OS Art Preorders Start June 22, 2017

HTML:
It looks like we’re finally going to see pricing and preorders for the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG HSM OS Art series lens this week, and maybe as soon as today.</p>
<p>Sigma <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/sigma-announces-the-24-70mm-f2-8-dg-os-hsm/">announced the 24-70mm f/2.8 DG HSM OS Art lens back in February</a> alongside the 135mm f/1.8 Art and 100-400mm f/5-6.3 OS C which have started shipping and the highly anticipated 14mm f/1.8 Art series lens, which has yet to have a ship date.</p>
<p>We will notify you as soon as preorders become live.</p>
<p><strong>*UPDATE*</strong></p>
<p><em><a href="https://bhpho.to/2swJrCl">Preorders for the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG HSM OS Art</a> will begin at 1:00AM, Thursday, June 22. Pricing is not currently known.</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Why does everything frontfocus when using OCF?

Hi guys!

I've been using Godox ad360, Profoto B1 and now I'm borrowing a ad600 whilst waiting for my Broncolor Siros 800L to arrive. My question is;

Why on earth does every picture using an Off Camera Flash result in frontfocus?? Any lens is the same. Everything is spot on as soon as I turn the trigger off and take shot without flash. Only option to get correctly focuses shots with OCF is by using LV, and I'm so tired of this.....

radio transmitter YN-622C is doing weird things to EX 580II?

I have been using a speedlite 580 EXII for years and in order to get better wireless transmissio, I bought a set of YN-622C transceivers for wireless TTL (yongnuo). This works perfectly with my EX II 430, but when I tried it on my 580 EXII, the flash fires as it should, but as soon as more than half of full power is requested, the flash starts hissing for about three seconds and the red light in the front seems to flash out a random pattern during that hissing. When I put the 580 on my camera directly, I have no issues.

Things I tried which had no effect:
- another camera
- another receiver
- another transmitter
- putting the 580 on the YN 622 as pass-through, the 580 still hissed and front led remained lit
- changed batteries in speedlite, camera transmitter and receiver

When I use the test fire button on the YN-622 with the speedlite on top of it (pass-through) and put the speedlite in full power, the effect seems to disappear until you press the test button again. if you do that within the three seconds, then the hissing and flickering returns as if it is leaking power during the recharging phase and the YN-622 is routing it back to the speedlite.

Google didn't give me any results, does anybody here know what might be happening and is my 580 dying on me or are the transmitters just not compatible?

What's next in 300-500mm primes and zooms?

Anything? I don't like TC's or zooms, and I haven't found anything over 200mm that is appealing and affordable. There are fans of the Canon 100-400 II, the 150-600's, The Sigma 120-300. But not me - I want a 300 or 400 or 500mm prime, or an internally-focusing zoom (longer than 200mm).

I note that Sigma is (kind of) trending longer. Is it unreasonable to expect Sigma to upgrade their 300 2.8 and 120-300 2.8 soon? I doubt that those would cannibalize their new 100-400 or the current 150-600's...

I wonder whether this topic will energize the '.... is doomed!' crowd.

Patent: Canon 18-105mm f/4-5.6 With Built-in Telconverter, But With a Twist.

HTML:
Here’s a patent we missed that appeared in Japan and was reported by <a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/canon-ef-lenses-rumours-and-news/">Northlight Images</a>. This is a 18-105mm f/4-5.6 With Built-in Telconverter, which isn’t a big departure, expect that the TC is to make the wide angle, wider!</p>
<p>At 18mm, the lens is f/4, but with the TC engaged, the lens becomes a 15mm f/3.3.</p>
<p><strong>Normal use</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Focal length 18.40 37.44 104.0</li>
<li>Aperture 4.00 4.64 5.89</li>
<li>Half angle of view ω (degree) 36.59 20.04 7.48</li>
<li>Image height 13.66 13.66 13.66 (APS-C)</li>
<li>Lens total length 149.30 165.77 191.31</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Wide-angle TC added</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Focal length 15.40</li>
<li>Aperture 3.35</li>
<li>Half angle of view ω (degree) 41.57</li>
<li>Image height 13.66</li>
<li>Lens total length 149.30</li>
</ul>
<p>This is definitely an interesting concept and it’s likely we’re going to see some pretty innovating lens designs from Canon in the future.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Patent: EF-S 30mm f/1.8 & EF 50mm f/1.8

HTML:
A Canon patent was found over at <a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/canon-ef-lenses-rumours-and-news/">Northlight Images</a> for a 50mm/1.8, which was replaced relatively recently, and a APS-C 30mm/1.8 lens has appeared at the Japanese patent office (No. 2017-102352 )</p>
<p><strong>Full frame lens specifications:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Focal length 51.60mm</li>
<li>F number 1.85</li>
<li>Field angle 22.75</li>
<li>Image Height 21.64mm</li>
<li>Lens total length 84.19mm</li>
<li>BF 39.08mm</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>APS-C lens specifications:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Focal length 30.90mm</li>
<li>F number 1.85</li>
<li>Field angle 23.85mm</li>
<li>Image height 13.66mm</li>
<li>Lens total length 84.50mm</li>
<li>BF 35.50mm</li>
</ul>
<p>There has always been rumbings about a “good” EF-S prime coming and 30mm has been passed around over the years, however nothing has every come of it.</p>
<p>The EF-S 35mm f/2.8 IS STM Macro hasn’t started shipping yet, while a very neat looking lens, it’s not exactly the “fast” prime people have been looking for from Canon for APS-C shooters.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/canon-ef-lenses-rumours-and-news/">Northlight Images</a> does say that they’ve been told to expect a “good” EF-S prime in the future.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Sigma 100-400mm quick test

I recently reported a quick comparison of the Sigma 100-400mm on my 5DSR with shots of a nearby flagpole. The results weren't quite as good as my Canon 100-400mm II. My local dealer got in another copy today and lent it to me for more extensive testing as I had a view to buying. I took shots of my favourite chart and compared it with my 100-400mm II and also my Sigma 150-600mm C on my 5DSR. Here are 100% crops from the centre at 10.5m distance. The Sigma (top) is not as good as its big brother at 400mm (bottom) or the Canon (middle).

Attachments

  • 3Q7A1093_DxO_Sigma_100-400mm_10m_crop.jpg
    3Q7A1093_DxO_Sigma_100-400mm_10m_crop.jpg
    401 KB · Views: 174
  • 3Q7A1072_DxO_Canon_100-400mm_10m_crop.jpg
    3Q7A1072_DxO_Canon_100-400mm_10m_crop.jpg
    405.9 KB · Views: 155
  • 3Q7A1084_DxO_Sigma_150-600_400mm_10m_crop.jpg
    3Q7A1084_DxO_Sigma_150-600_400mm_10m_crop.jpg
    464.3 KB · Views: 150

Case of the Jiggly IS (resolved!)

(Quick disclosure: I contacted Canon tech support, they got out the same body and lens, used my settings, and saw NO jiggling. Right away the tech said, "You've got a problem with the IS motor." So, I know it's not normal or a characteristic of the "new" IS in the new 24-105mm!)

Has anybody ever had a lens with a jiggly IS?

(I'm having some horrendous luck trying to get my hands on a fully functional ef 24-105mm f/4 IS II. The latest one was very sharp and had accurate AF (unlike the previous one sent back because it was super soft and had so much CA it was like a multiple exposure in overcast light).)

Unfortunately, with the latest one, with the camera body held diagonally (you don't have to ask why it got in that position if you chase toddlers with your camera), the IS would jiggle like Jello before settling down. It did not have the typical snappy, tiny jerk before "locking" in; it would engage and the whole frame would jiggle for a moment longer than IS normally takes to engage. Worked fine in landscape or portrait orientation, but worrisome jiggling diagonally.

This was actually my THIRD try to get the 24-105mm, but the first reject had nothing to do with Canon--only with UPS, which attempted to deliver a badly crushed carton. (Fortunately they needed a signature and I was home and refused the delivery.) Then the one that had to be out of spec with sharpness and CA, and now this one that is much sharper than expected (after reading reviews) but with the bad IS.

Btw, serial number was 53xxx..., and the firmware is now up to version 2.0.0.

So, any other bizarre IS behavior recently?

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB