150 Filmmakers Ask Canon & Nikon to Sell Encrypted Cameras

HTML:
<strong>From Wired:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p><span class="lede" tabindex="-1">IN THE SUMMER </span>of 2013, when documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras was shooting a still-secret NSA leaker named Edward Snowden in a Hong Kong hotel room, she took security seriously. She’d periodically transfer her footage to encrypted hard drives, and would later go so far as to destroy the SD cards onto which her camera recorded. But as she watched Snowden through her lens, she was haunted by the possibility that security agents might barge through the door at any moment to seize her camera. And the memory card inside of it remained dangerously unencrypted, full of unedited confessions of a whistleblower who hadn’t yet gotten his secrets out to the world.</p>
<p>“When you’re in the field filming and your camera is taken by authorities, that footage is completely vulnerable,” Poitras says. “That’s where encryption is really needed.” <a href="https://www.wired.com/2016/12/200-filmmakers-ask-nikon-canon-sell-encrypted-cameras/">Read the entire article</a></p></blockquote>
<p>This is something I’ve never personally thought of, but seems to be something that should be taken seriously.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://freedom.press/news/over-150-filmmakers-and-photojournalists-call-major-camera-manufacturers-build-encryption-their-cameras/">list of filmmakers</a> can be seen in the open letter written to Canon at the Freedom of the Press Foundation website.</p>
<blockquote><p>As filmmakers and photojournalists who value our own safety and the safety of our sources and subjects, we would seek out and buy cameras that come with built-in encryption. Adding these data security features to your product line would give your company a significant competitive advantage over other camera manufacturers, none of whom currently offer this feature.</p></blockquote>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Fazza Falconry Championships Dubai

I attended this incredible event this morning, these birds want for NOTHING, they're better treated than most humans, they actually fly them in 1st Class on Emirates Airline when they take them overseas to compete!!
Prizes stand at around 5 million Dirhams and multiple luxury $x$ SUV's (Nissan Patrols, Lexus, Range Rovers) and the competitors stand to make a tidy sum if their birds are the fastest.
The birds I saw today are all Gyr-Peregrine hybrids and they fly, timed, a 400 metre course.

Attachments

  • IMG_6906.jpg
    IMG_6906.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 247
  • IMG_6928.jpg
    IMG_6928.jpg
    980.7 KB · Views: 186
  • IMG_6951.jpg
    IMG_6951.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 196

So the 50mm f/nooneknows IS guy is renting a 50 f/1.2L...

...but it's not what you think!

Holiday travel has us visiting a lot of family, including some little ones we don't see enough. I thought it might be worth grabbing a rental to fool around with (gasp) a 50mm other than the one I want. I get by with my 50mm f/1.4 USM in general, but running children seemed like too great an ask for that jumpy / erratic AF. So the 50 f/1.2L is coming out for the trip.

A few decidedly more inane questions (than I normally ask) have come to mind:

  • In a bright daylight scene with the kids in snow, any chance opening up to f/1.2 would require faster than a 1/8000 shutter? It seems insane, but might I need a 72mm ND? (Sure, I could stop down, I know, but who leaves a Ferrari in 2nd gear?)

  • I'll only have one evening to dial in the AFMA before I go, and it's possible I don't even get to that until after we fly. What's your best makeshift target for AFMA when you don't have a proper target nearby? Ruler? Rows of newspaper or book text? Print a paper target out in advance and bring it with me?

  • I will be entirely off-tripod and relying on the AF. I know not to focus and recompose when shooting wider apertures, but can any 5D3 owners vouch for how the off-center (cross type) points work with this lens?

Thanks for any 50L experience you can share.

- A

Interview: Sigma CEO Kazuto Yamaki

HTML:
<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/194960739" width="728" height="410" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="https://www.cinema5d.com/interview-sigma-ceo-suggests-potential-video-shooting-cameras-in-future/https://www.cinema5d.com/interview-sigma-ceo-suggests-potential-video-shooting-cameras-in-future/">Cinema5D</a> had the opportunity on a recent trip to Japan to sit down with Sigma CEO Kazuto Yamaki and talk all things Sigma.</p>
<p><strong>Here is a rundown from <a href="https://www.cinema5d.com/interview-sigma-ceo-suggests-potential-video-shooting-cameras-in-future/https://www.cinema5d.com/interview-sigma-ceo-suggests-potential-video-shooting-cameras-in-future/">Cinema5D</a> of questions asked in this interview:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>00:17 – How was it to grow-up in a house with an enthusiastic father? (Mr. Michihiro Yamaki established the company in 1961 and passed away in 2012, at the age of 78).</li>
<li>01:29 – Can you please share with our audience your daily routine?</li>
<li>03:14 – How do you prioritise which mount and lenses to make?</li>
<li>04:01 – How easy was the decision to start making the Art line of high-quality lenses?</li>
<li>05:27 – In the past, Sigma lenses were considered affordable. Then you decided to hit the upper end of the market. What was the reason?</li>
<li>06:53 – In such a crowded market, Sigma is producing a high-quality stills camera that does not offer any video functionality. Why is that?</li>
<li>07:51 – Are you able to keep good sales is a declining market?</li>
<li>09:07 – Why did you decide to produce cine lenses?</li>
<li>09:57 – Where did people go? Why aren’t they buying lenses anymore?</li>
<li>10:26 – What would be your dream zoom lens?</li>
</ul>
<p>One of the most intriguing parts of the interview is at about the 7:40 mark where he talks about the possibility of Sigma producing a mirrorless camera with video capabilities.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

EF 200-400 OR 5D MK IV?

Hi All,
I'm looking for opinions on my set-up and potential changes in my gear. Keeping in mind that these thoughts are centered around the plan to go to Masi-Mara in the spring of 2018 with the family (3 little pack mules :o) and I need to get my gear there as carry on luggage.
What I have currently is the following:
7D MKii's (2), 6D, EF 100-400 MKii, EF400 f2.8 IS MKi, 1.4 ext MKiii, EF 24-105 f4/L, Plus more that's not applicable.

I want the EF 200-400, but can't justify the cost and it's still heavy for carry-on/travel accumulation. What I'm thinking is that the performance of the new EF 100-400 MKii with the 1.4iii extender is pretty good, but I want better low light capability for wildlife in motion etc. at the low light ends of the day.
So I'm thinking of getting a 5D MKiv. From the reviews on it and it's ability to pull details out of the shadows etc.and it's auto focus capability that this would be a lighter, cheaper alternative for traveling in place of the EF 200-400 option. My 12 pound 400 f/2.8 is not really a travel option as well as lack of zoom flexability. I would use the 5D MKiv at the ends of the day.
I just do this for fun, no business or profits, so hard to justify what I've already got.
What do you guys think?

Question: Performance of 24-70 4.0 on 7DII (based on tdp and real world)

Dear all,

sometimes I check the lens comparison tool of tdp, which gives me good advice about sharpness of lenses.
Always thougt I understand the findings.

Now there is one thing not quite clear, the comparison of Canons 24-70 2.8II vs. 4.0., which is showing a bigger than expected difference between the two lenses, as you can see here:
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=787&Camera=963&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=823&Sample=0&SampleComp=0&CameraComp=963&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0

Sure, most people find the 2.8II the sharper lens (to a certain degree) than the 4.0. So, of course, there is only a small difference in sharpness between the two lenses on 1DsIII or 5Dr. See here.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=787&Camera=453&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=823&Sample=0&CameraComp=453&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0

But when tested on 7DII the difference gets much more significant, the 4.0 is getting " kind of bad" in comparison.
All tests on tdp with 7DII and 24-70 4.0 are showing not really sharp results with that combo (even 18-55 II is sharper on 7DII than 24-70 4.0).
Can anybody please explain why that is?
Anybody got some experience with that combo?

Thanx.

Patent: Canon Reversible Mount Lens

HTML:
A patent showing a lens design from that shows the ability to reverse mount for greater macro magnification has appeared.</p>
<p>Patent publication number 2016-206568 (Google Translated)</p>
<ul>
<li>Release date 2016.12.8</li>
<li>Application date 2015.4.28</li>
<li>Reversibly attachable lenses</li>
<li>Reverse attachment detection switch</li>
<li>Switch control according to installation position</li>
</ul>
<p>There have been a few adaptors over the years that would allow you to reverse mount certain lenses for macro usage.</p>
<p><a href="http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2016-12-12">Egami suggest</a> that this patent may have been part of the EF-M 28mm f/3.5 IS Macro lens development.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

What next for Canon?

Technology in the form of smart phones, wearables, TVs etc. is still evolving as are other areas such as the smart home.
Technology in cameras has started to slow down with incremental changes rather than anything radical. Where do you think the manufacturers will go and what do you want to see that would make you upgrade.

Some thoughts:-

1. Laser focus - point a laser dot where you want the optimum focus point to be, on the screen select the area you want to be sharp i.e. hyper focal distance - The camera then adjust focus, f stop & ISO.

2. Laser focus tracking

3. Laser focus stacking

Which gear for a 15 years birthday party?

I just want to get some help from you guys on what lenses and accessories may I need for the celebration of a 15 years birthday party. Photography is a hobbie but a friend that is budget restrained needs my help. I already explained to him I am not a pro.
I currently own a 5D Mark 3 with 3 zooms (24-70mm f4L IS, 16-35mm f4L IS, 70-200mm f2.8L IS II) and 3 primes (15mm f2.8, 50mm f/1.8 STM, 100mm f2.8L IS). I know it is kinda special event and don't want to miss any important moment so, I will be using as backup my travel camera Fujifilm X-T2 with 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f2 and 90mm f2 lenses.
I will have a set of 3 Canon 600EX-RT and transmitter (and umbrellas/softboxes) for the Canon and a hotshoe speedlite for my Fuji camera in case I needed.

In this event, there is no such a church ceremony like weedings but a ceremony/party at a medium-lit hall.

After all this story, which gear and set up would you suggest? Thanks in advaces for your suggestions.

  • Poll Poll
How much is your camera gear worth?

How much is your camera gear worth?

  • My camera gear is worth more than my bike

    Votes: 30 36.6%
  • My camera gear is worth more than my car

    Votes: 52 63.4%
  • My camera gear is worth more than my house

    Votes: 0 0.0%

This thread
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=31444.0
got me thinking: how much is your camera gear worth?

I'm curious about people's priorities.

Getting a new prime lens to match two DSLR bodies

I was in a local shop to get a new Sigma 50 1.4 ART for my 70D and 5D (yes, the "original/classic" one).

I went through 3 copies of the lenses and only one of the them autofocus well enough on the 70D without AFMA. Unfortunately that copy is part of a kit (with Sony mount converter). I couldn't buy on its own.
The other two copies AF are off on both the 70D and 5D.

My question here is that
1. Shall i just grab any copy and send the lens and cameras to Sigma for calibration right after purchase..
2. Or shall I at least get one copy that AF sharp on 5D, since it does not have AFMA, or 70D? Assuming I use both cameras evenly.
3. Is the USB dock really helpful in this situation?

P.S.
1. Looking at the roadmap now. Most likely I will upgrade to 6D mark II in early 2018. I'm assuming by that time, the Sigma 30 month warrantly here would cover calibration the ART again on the new body. From then on I should just have one DSLR and one Mirrorless
2. My other primes were already calibrated by Canon to match my DSLRs.
3. I'll 90% upgrade from EOS M to EOS M5 mid- 2017. Tried on the same day, seems great.
Thanks in advance for your reading and suggestion

Newbie Question About Rules Or Lack OF...

To the site administrators:
Yesterday i read some information on another Canon rumors website that I thought was pertinent to one of the current topics in the forum here and would be of interest to the forum members. I mentioned this site by name. When I returned later I found that the name of the mentioned site had been replaced by asterisks. Just curious as to why it was changed. Is there bad blood between that site and this one? I often see this site referred to in their official rumor posts and I am quite certain that they have been mentioned by admin posts on this site. They don't appear to be a commercial site nor competing with this site in any way and the two sites are so similar in look that for a long time I thought both sites were being run by the same people.
So my question is this: is it taboo to mention the name of other rumor sites in this forum?

Review of 5DIV from a bird photographer

This is probably the review of the 5DIV I have been waiting for, from Arash Hazeghi who produces some stunning work of raptors. For those not familiar with his work photography is his hobby and his personal standards are way, way higher than I could ever dream of and more than a lot of professionals who sell their work.

http://arihazeghiphotography.com/blog/eos-5d-mark-iv-field-review/

The choice between this and the 1Dx (Mark 1) becomes very tricky...

Flash triggers with remote adjustment - Yongnou 622?

Hi Guys!

As many of you wrote to get used to light, I was working on this skill intensively. Therefore I bought an lighting-umbrella and an softbox for flashes. I use flash triggers from Yongnou RF-602/C and RF-602TX to trigger my two of my flashes. This works, but it is inconvenient to change all settings manually. In my softbox, the flash has to be installed reversely, so I have to take off the flash from the tripod to change the power.

I need new triggers with an "wireless" possibility to change the power without taking off the flashes.
One way would be to use my ring flash from canon to take control of my flashes (I own an Canon 550 and an Nissid Di866II). But the ring flash works only on an 58mm lens, so on all other leneses, it would has to hang down from the camera. So, I want an better solution.

I looked this up in the internet and found the Yongnuo YN-622C II and the YN-622C-TX controller. There it should be possible to change the power of the flash from the remote-controlled. Furthermore I want to extend my system with two flashes for highlighting the background, so a third group will be used (1 softbox, 2 umbrella or second softbox, 3 background).

Is this an good choice? Do the version II triggers work with the controller?
Which flashes should I buy for background lighting?

Thanks you a lot
Daniela

Different MTF of Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 L IS USM on FF vs APS-C ..... Why?

The site of Photozone.de shows the resolution graphs (MTF) of the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 L IS USM for different focus settings (zoom settings), when mounted on a Canon 5D (FF-body).
The same site also shows the resolution graphs (MTF) of the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 L IS USM for different focus settings (zoom settings), when mounted on a Canon 50D (APS-C-body).

I am puzzled by the (huge) difference between these two setups.
And I cannot explain that difference, nor can I find (the theory of) the reason behind it.

With my limited knowledge of applied optics, my reasoning (thatclearly is faulty) was as follows.
1. A lens projects a sharp image on the sensor if mounted correctly on the camera body: that is implicit in the design of the camera body (its dimensions) and the lens (its optical properties in combination with its size). That is the same for both setups, so no reason for discrepancies here.
2. When, on a given focus setting, the lens performs with a certain number of lines/mm, this is not influenced by neither the qualities of the surface on which it projects the image, nor the size of the surface. The light falls on the lens and is projected on that surface.
3. I see that aberrations like an imperfect plane of the projected image affect the MTF. But comparing the same lens on FF vs APS-C, that would be visible in the results for the borders and corners. And the same, so I was thinking, goes for all other lens aberrations.
4. I do not see how a different size (either in millimeters or in number of pixels per millimeter) of the surface on which the image is projected, affects the number of lines/mm that the lens can discern. And therefore I cannot understand how a property of the camera body, i.e. FF vs APS-C, makes a difference.

But the difference is there, so much is clear. ???
So the question remains:
Why is the size of the surface of influence on the MTF of the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 L IS USM at the center of the image, as indicated by the different results for FF versus APS-C?

Can anybody explain the why (the theory) behind this difference in MTF?

*UPDATE* Vote for Your Favourite Canon Gear of 2016

HTML:
<p><strong>*UPDATE*</strong>

We’re going to announce\ the poll results on Monday, December 19, 2016 instead of Friday, December 16, 2016.</p>
<p><strong>Original Post:

</strong>It’s time for the annual best of 2016 from Canon. This time we’re going to let you select the winners!</p>
<p><strong>How it works</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>You can only vote once in each category, best camera, best lens and most anticipated product of 2017.</li>
<li>We will announce the results on Friday, December 16, 2016.</li>
<li>Please keep the debates on the forum friendly and fun.</li>
</ol>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p> </p>
<script>
  (function(d, s, id){
    var js,
        fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],
        p = (('https:' == d.location.protocol) ? 'https://' : 'http://'),
        r = Math.floor(new Date().getTime() / 1000000);
    if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;}
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.async=1;
    js.src = p + "www.opinionstage.com/assets/loader.js?" + r;
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'os-widget-jssdk'));
</script>
<div id="2406083" class="os_poll" data-path="/polls/2406083" data-width="728" data-fif="false"></div>

<p> </p>
<script>
  (function(d, s, id){
    var js,
        fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],
        p = (('https:' == d.location.protocol) ? 'https://' : 'http://'),
        r = Math.floor(new Date().getTime() / 1000000);
    if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;}
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.async=1;
    js.src = p + "www.opinionstage.com/assets/loader.js?" + r;
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'os-widget-jssdk'));
</script>
<div id="2406088" class="os_poll" data-path="/polls/2406088" data-width="728" data-fif="false"></div>

<p> </p>
<script>
  (function(d, s, id){
    var js,
        fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],
        p = (('https:' == d.location.protocol) ? 'https://' : 'http://'),
        r = Math.floor(new Date().getTime() / 1000000);
    if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;}
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.async=1;
    js.src = p + "www.opinionstage.com/assets/loader.js?" + r;
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
  }(document, 'script', 'os-widget-jssdk'));
</script>
<div id="2406091" class="os_poll" data-path="/polls/2406091" data-width="728" data-fif="false"></div>

<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Zero D Review - Dustin

I’ve got my text review finished and released (http://bit.ly/2h28TKx) and the video review is now live (http://bit.ly/2h2eCQk)

Here's an image gallery: http://bit.ly/2fUACgw
Here's a video that looks at the "Distortion Free" claim: http://bit.ly/2gkLkvN

Finally - this isn't visible to the public yet, but I do have a video that directly compares the pros and cons of the Sigma 12-24 ART and the Laowa: http://bit.ly/2gisWiO

It's an interesting lens. I love the build and the size. Optically the Sigma has the edge.

Patent: Electronic Curved Sensor

HTML:
Another patent showing a curved sensor design from Canon has appeared. A <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/patent-canon-curved-sensor-to-reduce-vignetting/">previous patent showed how a curved sensor</a> could help reduce vignetting.</p>
<p>This patent shows how to electronically bend the sensor.</p>
<p>We’ve now seen a few patents for curved sensor technology, so we expect we’re going to see some sort of implementation in the future.</p>
<p><strong>Patent publication number 2016-201425 (Google Translated)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Release date 2016.12.1</li>
<li>Application date 2015.4.8</li>
<li>Coupling the imaging element and the expansion / contraction section</li>
<li>As the stretchable portion expands, the amount of curvature of the imaging surface increases</li>
<li>The expansion and contraction section is electrically controlled</li>
</ul>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

USA - Wildlife - Big Game

Hi everyone,

I visited the US this year and used the opportunity to shoot some big wildlife. I created a little article on my website about my (at times very thrilling) experiences. If you're interested you can see it here:

http://focrates.com/articles/usa_2016/usa_2016_part4.html

I would appreciate some visits to my site and maybe some feedback.

Thanks and have a great day!
Ben

Proof of concept: UV-reflectance stacking with MP-E 65

This right up front, this is not a great picture, it is a proof of concept, to be refined.

I am interested in UV reflectance photography and to see whether there are insect patterns not visible in "normal" light on some minute orchid flowers. The flower is 1.76 mm (no, not a typo) wide. Shot with full-spectrum modified 5D2, MP-E 65 at f/2.8, manually stacked 10 frames, Baader UV-pass visible opaque filter, ISO 400, about 4 second exposure, illuminated with single UV 365 nm LED flashlight.

First off, the MP-E 65 DOES transmit some UV. That's already great. I also have a Nikon EL 80/5.6 but still waiting for some parts to arrive to put it all together. Should have much better UV transmission, so will be interested to see the differences.

Further refinements are additional UV flashlights (can't diffuse them because of absorption and fluorescence issues), and stacking with StackShot (have that).

Some single shots on some other orchid flowers do show some different patterns, so that works as well. The dotted highlights, those are the individual cells, with their rounded surfaces (verified by scanning electron microscopy). In visible light, the flower is uniformly green.

Attachments

  • Ob-miniata.jpg
    Ob-miniata.jpg
    331.5 KB · Views: 324
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Flash battery doors

Is it just me being unlucky, or are there problems with flash battery doors breaking? Inevitably the little plastic tabs that lock the door in place just fail. I thought this was just because I had been a cheapskate buying 3rd party flashes, but so far I've had one Yongnuo 468, a 568EX II and one of my Yongnuo 600EX all with doors breaking at least partially.

So. When I wanted a flash for my A7R II I decided not to skimp and buy an official Sony HVL-F43M flash. And within a month the door on that was broken too.

I don't think I use my flashes in a particularly destructive way and I try to keep care of my kit - but it does seem these doors are quite fragile.

I've never owned a genuine Canon Speedlite, are these any better constructed? And if the battery door latch does fail does it look like a simple component to replace? (On the sony it seems the whole outer shell needs to be replaced!)

Jolyon

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,439
Messages
973,564
Members
24,804
Latest member
zukibird

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB