Threads

GuyF · Dec 2, 2016

Only 148 pages

http://www.canon.co.uk/support/consumer_products/products/cameras/digital_slr/eos-1d_x_mark_ii.aspx?type=manuals&manualid=tcm:14-1474187

LordofTackle · Dec 1, 2016

Hi all,

the big german online shop AC-Foto does, as last year, a advent calendar "promotion".
Every day, some article(s) are drastically reduced in price. Last year it was almost exclusively canon gear. All the high end stuff could be had for considerable discounts (1D series, 5D, 6D, all the supertelephoto lenses, etc). Sometimes also other stuff like backpacks is reduced.

Today they started off with massive price reductions on the 300 2.8 II and the 500 4 II (reduced by 1349 and 1249€, respectively!)
https://www.ac-foto.com/onlineshop/v3/?s=advent

and no, I'm not affiliated with them^^
But if you are looking for some specific canon gear that might be your chance (crossing my fingers for the 16-35 III)

ahsanford · Dec 1, 2016

The new horsepower-spec overloaded A99 II -- which I thought had the A7R II sensor in it -- apparently laid an egg in sensor testing:

http://www.thephoblographer.com/2016/12/01/dxomark/#.WEBTt5J_3-8

Question 1: If it has the A7R II sensor in it and a year's newer internals to process the data, shouldn't we be getting the same (or slightly better high ISO) results as the A7R II?

Question 2: How the hell did PB get this data? It's not public yet.

- A

ahsanford · Dec 1, 2016

The 24-105L II tested on both 50MP and 21 MP:

http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff/995-canon24105f4ismk2?start=1

And, like at TDP, the Mk I slightly outresolves the Mk II. When compared on the 21 MP rig (5D2), the Mk I is a hair better.

"Honestly, we were a little shocked by these results. The first tested sample also showed a higher than usual optical decentering. Thus we repeated the exercise with a 2nd sample. This one was well centered (albeit still back-focusing like hell) but not really better."

Distortion was improved on the 24mm end from that staggering 5% (Mk I) to 3.2% (Mk II). For perspective, the 24-70 f/2.8L II was 2.8% and the 24-70 f/4L IS was 2.4% at their site, which they consider 'moderate' distortion for such a FL range of lens.

But evidence continues to mount that this lens does not clearly one-up its predecessor like prior 'II' and 'III' sort of sequels.

- A

Canon Rumors · Dec 1, 2016

HTML:

DPReview has completed their review of the Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II USM, and have come away impressed.</p>
<p>From DPReview</p>
<blockquote><p>This is the best 35mm F1.4 prime currently available. On performance overall, it leaves all-comers floundering in its wake with outstanding image quality, especially at F1.4, and extra-robust build. Some rivals come close optically, but none offers a total package to match the Canon 35mm F1.4L USM MkII. <a href="https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-35mm-f1-4-ii">Read the full review</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II : <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1180801-REG/canon_9523b002_35mm_f_1_4l_ii_usm.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/CA35142.html?utm_term=UbK24x0al34oSlvW4eT8QxjoUkX3mDVXeWC-Ug0&utm_medium=Affiliate&utm_campaign=Other&utm_source=rflaid64393&cvosrc=affiliate.64393" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/1Uehm5w" target="_blank">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://bit.ly/1KPvgKw" target="_blank">Canon Store</a> | <a href="https://mpex.com/canon-ef-35mm-f-1-4l-ii-usm.html?acc=3">Midwest Photo</a></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

ahsanford · Nov 30, 2016

Just dropped:

https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2016/11/canon-24-105-f4-is-mk-ii-mtf-results/

- A

Canon Rumors · Nov 30, 2016

HTML:

B&H Photo has informed us that they now carry am “<span class="s1">extensive line of Really Right Stuff products and accessories”.  For now B&H Photo is listing some tripods and sliders, but the lineup should expand over the coming weeks as B&H rolls out inventory.</span></p>
<p><strong>About Really Right Stuff</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>What started in 1990 as a personal challenge to create a better quick-release plate has grown into a mission to deliver superior camera support systems from the ground up. To date we’ve shipped to over 120 countries around the world, and we continue to grow every year. Our product line has expanded from a handful of custom camera body plates to an extensive line of support products including hundreds of custom plates, clamps, flash brackets, pano gear, studio gear, ballheads, gimbal heads, tripods, and now fluid heads. Our gear is made, as it has always been, right here in San Luis Obispo, California.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/buy/0/Ntt/really+right+stuff/ipp/100/Ns/p_PRICE_2%7c1/N/0/view/GRID/bi/2466/kbid/3296">Really Right Stuff at B&H Photo</a></strong></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon Rumors · Nov 30, 2016

HTML:

According to <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2016/11/29/sigma-lenses-price-increase-9-28-coming-to-europe.aspx/">Nikon Rumors</a>, it looks like Europe is going to see an increase of 9%-28% on most of Sigma’s lenses. This new prices will take effect on January 1, 2017.</p>
<p>We haven’t seen anything that shows increases coming to other parts of the world, but we’ll let you know if we do.</p>
<p>The image below shows some of the lenses and their prices increases.</p>

		<style type='text/css'>
			#gallery-1 {
				margin: auto;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-item {
				float: left;
				margin-top: 10px;
				text-align: center;
				width: 25%;
			}
			#gallery-1 img {
				border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-caption {
				margin-left: 0;
			}
			/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
		</style>
		<div id='gallery-1' class='gallery galleryid-27523 gallery-columns-4 gallery-size-thumbnail'><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon portrait'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Sigma-Europe-price-increase.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Sigma-Europe-price-increase-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="sigma-europe-price-increase" /></a>
			</dt></dl>
			<br style='clear: both' />
		</div>

<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon Rumors · Nov 30, 2016

HTML:

It looks like Canon is continuing to research curved sensors, this patent is geared towards light fall off on the sides of the sensor.</p>
<p>Patent Publication No. 2016-197663 (Google Translated)</p>
<ul>
<li>Published 2016.11.24</li>
<li>Filing date 2015.4.3</li>
<li>The central portion of the light falloff is not noticeable to the flat shape</li>
<li>The periphery light falloff is noticeable a curved shape</li>
</ul>

		<style type='text/css'>
			#gallery-1 {
				margin: auto;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-item {
				float: left;
				margin-top: 10px;
				text-align: center;
				width: 50%;
			}
			#gallery-1 img {
				border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-caption {
				margin-left: 0;
			}
			/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
		</style>
		<div id='gallery-1' class='gallery galleryid-27518 gallery-columns-2 gallery-size-thumbnail'><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon portrait'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/2016_197663_fig03.png'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/2016_197663_fig03-168x168.png" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="2016_197663_fig03" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/2016_197663_fig02.png'><img width="168" height="149" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/2016_197663_fig02-168x149.png" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="2016_197663_fig02" /></a>
			</dt></dl><br style="clear: both" />
		</div>

<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

flux capacitor · Nov 30, 2016

Hello everyone,
I recently picked up a 1Dx MK II to replace the MK I Version and I can't find a certain AF Function.
With the MK I, one was able to move the AF Point instantly by simply using the small joystick. Now with the MK II I have to press the AF Selection Button first to move the AF Point which slows me down every time. The User manual wasn't helpful on this topic and I hope someone here can tell me which settings need to be changed to move the AF Point with the Joystick anytime.

Cheers,
Flux

Cory · Nov 29, 2016

In the name of minimalism I'm going to swap out my Canon 85 1.8 for either the Canon 100L Macro or Tamron 85 1.8 for two reasons - so that all of my main lenses use the same 67mm filters and to maybe get an image quality bump. The image quality thing could potentially be a jump; not sure, but it'll be cool to get something new regardless.
The purpose, on my Canon 70D, would be portraits (#1), sports (mostly running races), stage performances (I normally use my 200 2.8, but sometimes 85 works) and general purpose.
Is there a "better" choice between the Canon Macro and the new Tamron? One factor is that I don't care much about macro.
Many thanks.

Canon Rumors · Nov 29, 2016

HTML:

<em><strong>*note</strong> I incorrectly named the EF 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS as the lens pertaining to the issue, when in fact it is the brand new EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM lens. Sorry about that.</em></p>
<p>Canon appears to have updated every legacy DSLR that has aberration correction to fix an issue with the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM.</p>
<ol>
<li>Corrects a phenomenon in which when using the camera with the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM lens, even if lens aberration correction is set to “Enable”, correction will not be applied.</li>
</ol>
<p>The following DSLRs have available firmware updates.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-1d-x/eos-1d-x#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS-1D X</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/support-dslr/eos-1d-mark-iv/eos-1d-mark-iv#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS-1D Mark IV</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-5d-mark-iii/eos-5d-mark-iii#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS 5D Mark III</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-6d/eos-6d#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS 6D</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-7d/eos-7d#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS 7D</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-70d/eos-70d#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS 70D</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-60d/eos-60d#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS 60D</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-rebel-t5i-ef-s-18-55-is-stm-kit/eos-rebel-t5i-18-55mm-is-stm-lens-kit#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS Rebel T5i</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/support-dslr/eos-rebel-t4i-18-135mm-is-stm-lens-kit/eos-rebel-t4i-18-135mm-is-stm-lens-kit#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS Rebel T4i</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-rebel-t3i-ef-s-18-55-is-ii-kit/eos-rebel-t3i-18-55mm-is-ii-lens-kit#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS Rebel T3i</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/support-dslr/eos-rebel-t2i-ef-s-18-55is-ii-kit/eos-rebel-t2i-ef-s-18-55is-ii-kit#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS Rebel T2i</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/support-dslr/eos-rebel-t1i-ef-s-18-55mm-is-kit/eos-rebel-t1i-ef-s-18-55mm-is-kit#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS Rebel T1i</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-rebel-t6-ef-s-18-55mm-is-ii-kit/eos-rebel-t6-ef-s-18-55mm-is-ii-kit#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS Rebel T6</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-rebel-t5-ef-s-18-55-is-ii-kit/eos-rebel-t5-18-55-is-ii-kit#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS Rebel T5</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-rebel-t3-ef-s-18-55-is-ii-kit/eos-rebel-t3-18-55mm-is-ii-lens-kit#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS Rebel T3</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-rebel-sl1-ef-s-18-55-is-stm-kit/eos-rebel-sl1-18-55mm-is-stm-lens-kit#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS Rebel SL1</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/?field-keywords=http://cweb.canon.jp/drv-upd/eosd/eosm2-firm.html&tag=thedigitalpic-20">Canon EOS M2</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/support-dslr/eos-m-ef-m-22mm-stm-kit/eos-m-ef-m-22mm-stm-kit#drivers_downloads_tab">Canon EOS M</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Happy firmware updating!</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon Rumors · Nov 28, 2016

HTML:

<p>B&H Photo has some one day deals on two Datacolor Spyder5Pro Display Calibration systems.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1130968-REG/datacolor_s5p100_spyder5pro_downloadable_software.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296">Datacolor Spyder5Pro Display Calibration System $94.95</a> (Reg $139.99)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1130983-REG/datacolor_s5el100_spyder5elite_downloadable_software.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296">Datacolor Spyder5Elite Display Calibration System $149.95</a> (Reg $195.00)</li>
</ul>
<p>If you don’t have one as a photographer, you definitely should!</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon Rumors · Nov 28, 2016

HTML:

New firmware for the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV has appeared on the Canon USA site.</p>
<p>Firmware Version 1.0.3 incorporates the following fixes and improvements:</p>
<ul>
<li>Corrects a phenomenon in which the color of images varies depending on the metering mode selected during flash shooting.</li>
<li>Improves the reliability of communication when using the EF1.4X III or EF2X III extender.</li>
<li>Corrects the level display when the camera is held in the vertical orientation with the hand grip pointing downward.</li>
<li>Improves the reliability of communication via USB cable when using the Lens Data Registration function with EOS Utility 3.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/dslr/eos-5d-mark-iv?tab=drivers#Z7_MQH8HIC0L88RB0AMD0F1Q42K25">Download firmware v1.03 at Canon USA</a></strong></p>
<p><em>thanks <a class="account-group js-account-group js-action-profile js-user-profile-link js-nav" href="https://twitter.com/raspberryjuice/status/803433899137388544" data-user-id="64233863"><span class="username js-action-profile-name" data-aria-label-part="">@raspberryjuice</span></a></em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

JPAZ · Nov 28, 2016

Sorry all. There was a very long thread about "How Do You Carry Your M" a while back. But now I've moved up a bit in size. Still have my FF kit and too many lenses, but getting more use out of the M3 which, along with the EVF and the L-Plate, is a bit bigger than the M1 kit.

So just this past week, I carried the M3, EVF, ef-m 22, ef-m 15-55, and 3 batteries in a Mirrorless Mover 10. Heck, with this bag, if I really over stuff it,I'll add the ef-m to ef adapter (you know, the one WITH the tripod adapter

)and a 40mm pankake. That is not pretty but it sort of works. Without the adapter and the 40, this bag works well quite well.

But I just got crazy and ordered the ef-m 11-22 (the 22 was just not wide enough for some of the shots and I know I could take this and leave the 22 at home but I also like the f/2.8 ). I am thinking a Mirrorless Mover 20 should work. I really want my small kit to stay small. Am I correct in this assumption?

jolyonralph · Nov 28, 2016

How many people would like Canon to do a monochrome-only body option, similar in concept to the Leica M Monochrom?

I'd certainly be very interested...

Canon Rumors · Nov 28, 2016

HTML:

A patent <a href="http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2016-11-25">over at Egami</a> showing a 3.8-380mm f/2.3-7 lens for a PowerShot camera has appeared.  You read that right, we have a patent for another 100x zoom lens for a PowerShot application.</p>
<p>Published 2016.11.10 (Google Translated)</p>
<ul>
<li>Filing date 2015.3.31</li>
<li>Optimization of the aperture flare cut</li>
<li>To mitigate the amount of peripheral light change</li>
<li>To move independently in the zooming</li>
<li>Vibration control</li>
</ul>
<p>Read the full patent after the break.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<table summary="embodiment" frame="box" rules="all">
<caption>embodiment</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Example</th>
<th>Zoom ratio</th>
<th>Focal length</th>
<th>F-number</th>
<th>Half angle of view</th>
<th>Image height</th>
<th>Overall length of the lens</th>
<th>BF</th>
<th>Lens constitution</th>
<th>Aspheric surface</th>
<th>UD</th>
<th>Super UD</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>One</td>
<td>97.21</td>
<td>3.87 22.14 376.02</td>
<td>2.39 3.31 7.07</td>
<td>42.00 9.93 0.59</td>
<td>3.48 3.88 3.88</td>
<td>142.65 165.30 218.19</td>
<td>0.89 0.89 0.89</td>
<td>16 19 sheets group</td>
<td>3 face two</td>
<td>One</td>
<td>Three</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Two</td>
<td>95.36</td>
<td>3.87 23.52 369.00</td>
<td>2.56 3.38 7.07</td>
<td>41.99 9.36 0.60</td>
<td>3.48 3.88 3.88</td>
<td>142.14 164.84 217.99</td>
<td>0.83 0.83 0.83</td>
<td>17 20 sheets group</td>
<td>Four sides two</td>
<td>One</td>
<td>Three</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Three</td>
<td>81.02</td>
<td>3.88 28.26 314.00</td>
<td>2.69 3.97 7.04</td>
<td>41.94 7.81 0.71</td>
<td>3.48 3.88 3.88</td>
<td>125.68 142.90 189.01</td>
<td>0.66 0.66 0.66</td>
<td>17 group 21 sheets</td>
<td>5 surface 3 sheets</td>
<td>Five</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>This optical formula patent is a good sign that we’ll see some kind of replacement for the PowerShot SX60 HS.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

nda · Nov 28, 2016

M5- hands-on review

https://youtu.be/PhHpV0kc7as

TommyLee · Nov 27, 2016

EDIT: I originally was going to post this to... birds in flight.. made some error... and whoops.. it asked for a subject... didnt realize I started a new post.... a little rusty at this...
I meant it to go with the big pile....
///////////////

refurbished ... by Audubon - Portland Oregon ... May 12
001, 001a are the bird leaving the box..cropped
01-06 flyover
5D3
didnt have the 1Dx2 ... shot jpg to get fast enough
/////

now the 1Dx2 runs RAW continuously.. a slight improvement..ha!

note: I just got the 100-400 ii and it was not calibrated.. micro-adjusted
it DID need a slight tweak.. which I did later....
I saw this in the shots right away...

that lens and the new 35L ii are some of Canon's best work lately...

I see that for the post body the shots compress a lot... click on them and they are a lot sharper...

Sabaki · Nov 25, 2016

Man! Am I equal parts excited and frustrated by this lens!

I've read the reviews saying how difficult it is to use this lens at higher magnifications, reading that the viewfinder gets darker and small movements are massively exaggerated.

I thought I was prepared. lol I fooled myself ;D

I've now decided to work with magnifications no higher than 2.5X until I have worked out the muscle memory needed to wield the camera but I'd much appreciate some advise if anybody is willing to teach me.

My subject matter are insects, shot handheld like I do with my 100L.

And BIG respect to those of you who have taken pin sharp photos of live insects at 5X magnification

Thanks everyone

SkynetTX · Nov 24, 2016

In my opinion the Focus by Wire technology with the Initial focus reset "feature" is good for videographers and A+ mode users only. For still and especially for macro photographers the Ring-type USM motor is much better since it supports Full Time Manul focusing.
As AF doesn't always work in macro photography if you want to go beyond lifesize magnification the FTM feature is a must for me. I think Canon should release EF-V lenses for videographers with FBW and EF(-S) lenses for still photographers with the Ring-type USM technology.

Zeidora · Nov 23, 2016

I want to use some M39 and M42 mount lenses for macro-stacking with a 5D2 body. I am looking for pros/cons on various options. The main question is availability of various adapters. Auto functions are of no concern to me, and Tilt/Shift is not important at all. And, cheaper is better, all other things being equal.

Canon FD bellows: it's Canon but not sure about M39 to FD and FD to Eos adapters.
Nikon PB4/5/6: Lots of Nikon adapters out there. Not sure about pros and cons of 4/5/6. Prices are quite different and on high end compared to other options.
Contax: Have a C/Y to eos adapter, but M39 to C/Y seems rather rare.
Minolta: M39 to Minolta may be an issues, Minolta to Eos should be straight forward.
Novoflex: Quality of bellows themselves? I think they come in EOS mounts, so no issues there.
Olympus: Not sure about M39 to OM adapters.
Arca 4x5": Getting a AS lens board for M39 should be easy (or could be ordered from Grimes), but attaching the SLR to the Graflock back may be tricky. Upside, I have 3 Arca bellows and all the trimmings.

Thanks for any input!
Irony is, I had a OM and a C/Y bellows, but sold them both. Note to self: don't sell odd ball photo equipment.

scottburgess · Nov 23, 2016

All I want for Christmas is my two great whites.

However, at $9k+ each, a more realistic price range is under $50. So I need to fill out my wish lists, as many of you do too. What are some of the best gear pieces you have in this price range? Please share!

Scott

craiglove · Nov 23, 2016

I can maybe get 10-15 minutes of video recording before my camera shuts down. I shoot mostly live music and do turn the camera off briefly between songs. I also use a 80D and 70D and have no issues there at all but I can see a quality difference with the 5D3. Are all copies having this problem? It is very frustrating to have to change bodies in the middle of a show. i have another friend who has no problems at all.

When I bought the new about three years ago it came with a bad sensor. There were lines all across the image. Canon replaced it but once I started shooting video it has just been endless problems.

Any thoughts here? Thanks in advance, Craig

Canon Rumors · Nov 23, 2016

HTML:

<p>Sometimes no news is bad news.</p>
<p>We’re told that Canon is developing a new 50L and working with different apertures, but that no announcement of a new 50L should be expected in 2017. The Canon world is waiting impatiently for a new 50 f/1.4 or a new 50 f/1.2L, but it looks like we’ll be waiting a long while longer.</p>
<p>We haven’t nailed down when the EF 85mm f/1.4L IS USM is going to be announced during the year, but we do wonder if the new lens will lead to a new 50mm f/1.2L and a new 135 f/2L IS?</p>
<p>One interesting bit of information we’ve heard about a new 50mm lens is that Canon is testing an f/1.0 design, which would be quite the followup to the original “classic”. We haven’t seen any patents for such optical formulas yet, but we may over the next year.</p>
<p>We’re expecting 4-5 lens to be announced by Canon next year, starting with the new EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM (woo!).</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>