• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

C300mk2 release date pushed back?

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but from every article I had read the expected release date for the C300mk2 was September of this year. I just checked BnH and now it is October 20. I've done a little research and can't find any specific reason.

It's only a month so it's not that big of a deal, but I was just really hoping to have it for September. Were all the September dates just guesstimates?

What's your thoughts: Photozone's Canon 11-24mm f/4 L review?

Hi all

On 16 July 2015, Klaus from Photozone.de posted his review of the Canon EF 11-24mm f/4 L USM :)

http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff/940-canon1124f4?start=1

The analysis outcome from testing a copy of that lens (on the 50 MP Canon EOS 5Ds R) indicates it faces a number of challenges (understandably) - particularly at 11mm:
  • corner sharpness - not sharp at any aperture
  • vignetting - very high, especially wide open 3.3 EV
  • barrel distortion - high at 4.46%
  • Chromatic Aberrations (border CAs) - high ~3.8 pixels

Flare actually is quite good. No mention is made of bokeh (understandably).
Vignetting, barrel distortions and border CAs can be (mostly) corrected in post.
But sharpness can not actually be added in post. I realise that 50 MP is a new benchmark (which Klaus also clearly states in his review).

I appreciate the physical constraints and challenges of creating such a lens - and I applaud Canon for creating this lens... However I am really interested what other CR folk here think of the lens - particularly seeing the Photozone review. ;)

Looking forward to your comments, for a useful & good thread of discussion.
(PS... there are a number of threads about this lens, e.g. announcement, and now some in use, with great photos - but I particularly wanted to receive & read people's thoughts on the lens review!)

Paul 8)

DxOMark Review: Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II

HTML:
One thing is certain with DxOMark reviews, they will always stir up debate. DxOMark has completed their review of the brand new Canon EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II, which has been highly regarded since photographers got their hands on it. It fixed everything that was wrong with the previous version and performs far better in the real world.</p>
<p>From DxOMark:</p>
<blockquote><p>As the replacement for the original model, Canon have improved just about everything they can from operation through to optical quality. However it’s the performance at the long-end that’s crucial and while Canon have made advances most of the gains are in the outer field where users of Canon’s crop bodies aren’t so likely to benefit. Sure the chromatic aberration is lower and sharpness at the edges is better than the old model but users aren’t going to see any improvement in the center.</p>
<p>The new model is also up against a capable and more accessibly priced rival in the form of the Tamron 150-600mm though it’s larger still and somewhat disappointing at 600mm. For all that, the Canon is an attractive option and a strong choice for the long term… <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-100-400mm-F4.5-5.6L-IS-II-USM-review-Worthy-upgrade" target="_blank">Read the full review</a></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Canon EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II $2199: <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1092632-REG/canon_9524b002_ef_100_400mm_f_4_5_5_6l_is.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296/DFF/d10-v21-t1-x574561" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/CA1004002U.html?KBID=64393" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/1fFufZe" target="_blank">Amazon</a></strong></p>

Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II Pricing Information [CR2]

HTML:
<strong>*UPDATE*

</strong>A retailer has written in and said they were told the lens would launch at $1699 USD. This info has apparently come from a Canon rep in a recent conversation with the retailer, and not an official price sheet.</p>
<p>Sometimes reps enjoy conjecture as much as the rest of us.</p>
<p>Original Post:</p>
<p>We expect to see the brand new Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II to be announced next month, with the popular date for the announcement being Friday, August 14, 2015.</p>
<p>Exact specifications for the lens are still unknown, but the big one a lot of people want to know is pricing.</p>
<p>We’re told the EF 35mm f/1.4L II will cost <del>$1899 USD at launch</del>, which is about $400 more than the current Canon version and more than double that of the <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/898831-REG/Sigma_340_101_35mm_f_1_4_DG_HSM.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296/DFF/d10-v21-t1-x393562" target="_blank">Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art, which is $899</a>.</p>
<p>We’re told that this pricing may not be set in stone, as it’s “older information”. Currency movement could change the launch price next month. For the record, the Nikon 35 f/1.4G is currently around $1799.</p>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>

Tokina 24-70 f/2.8 Pro To Start Shipping This Month

HTML:
Last month <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2015/06/tokina-24-70mm-f2-8-fx-lens-officially-announced-and-coming-in-august/" target="_blank">Tokina announced</a> their new 24-70mm f/2.8 FX Lens would start shipping in August, but it looks like that date has been moved forward. <a href="http://www.tokina.co.jp/camera-lenses/news/at-x24-70pro-fx-canon.html" target="_blank">According to Tokina Japan</a>, the lens will start shipping July 24, 2015.</p>
<p><em>*Note that the USA retailers are still showing August availability</em></p>
<p><strong>Preorder the Tokina 24-70mm f/2.8 FX Lens $999: <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1084636-REG/tokina_at_x_24_70mm_f_2_8_pro.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296/DFF/d10-v21-t1-x650067" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/TN2470FXCA.html?KBID=64393" target="_blank">Adorama</a></strong></p>

Your crop vs your full frame camera.

Many of you have or have had a crop sensor camera and a full frame camera. Asking specifically about portraits: Do you see a huge difference? Does your lens choice vary that much? Say a person has an EF 85mm 1.2L or EF 200mm f/2L... would you hesitate to use those lenses on your crop sensor camera for portraits? Maybe someone has examples of those two lenses on both a crop and full frame camera of the same subject? Thanks!

E-TTL III a Long Way Off [CR2]

HTML:
We were told a while ago that Canon was working on a <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2015/05/new-flash-system-in-the-works-cr1/" target="_blank">new metering system for their flagship flash</a>, we dubbed it E-TTL III. Not much has been said since, although we’ve seen the <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2015/07/canon-announces-the-speedlite-430ex-iii-rt-flash/" target="_blank">announcement of the Speedlite 430EX III-RT</a>.</p>
<p>We’re told that while the next Canon DSLRs (EOS-1D X and EOS 5D Mark III replacements) will support the new flash metering system, the launch of the flash is actually a “long way off” and won’t arrive before late 2016 at the earliest.</p>
<p>It’s worth mentioning the source did say that Canon’s new system should perform better than the Nikon’s, which has long been superior.</p>

Problem with Adorama Customer Service

I order a Think Tank bag from Adorama and as a member of Kelby One I remember that Adorama was giving a 10% discount on Think Tank bags. So I searched for the webpage and found an Adorama webpage that provided instructions on how to get the 10% discount.

I followed their instructions and order the bag but did not see the 10% discount (which the order page said would be applied on the final step of the order).

So I wrote the Adorama CS and the rep asked for the page (which I sent to him). That was Thursday. Bags will be delivered on Monday, have not heard back from Adorama (in spite of writing a second time), and my card has been charged the full amount.

Perhaps I will get a response, but so far service is rather terrible.

1DX CF Door Flex

Hey guys,

This might seem like a dumb or silly thing, but I'm wondering if it is normal to have a bit of flex on the CF door when gripping the camera?

I've been doing a lot of walk-and-shooting lately on my travels and I started noticing that I could feel the CF card door move slightly under the pressure of my grip. It could be completely normal and I've never noticed it do it before, it's just that I've literally been hand holding my camera for five to six hours a day for the past week and have just started getting sensitive to it.

How noisy is the IS motor of the 70-200mm F/4L IS USM?

Hi guys

I'm going to purchase a 70-200 lens that I will use for video work. IS is a must, but I don't really need F/2.8 and the extra weight. However it's been mentioned several places on the net that the IS motor in the 70-200mm F/4 IS USM is very noisy. I will be having a shotgun mic mounted on the camera, and I'm worried that it will pick up the IS motor noise.

Anyone here who have experience with the 70-200mm F/4L IS USM in regards to camera mounted microphones and the IS noise? Is it so bad that I'll have to suck it up and get the 2.8 Mk II version?

- Alex

PhotoZone starts testing lenses on 5DSr

We often take for granted that the 1Ds III, 5D2 and 5D3 were all within 1 MP of each other. That allowed Canon users to tap into lens review sites that used a 'reference' camera for many years, which allowed us to (within that 21-22 MP FF testing ground) compare lenses relatively consistently against each other.

Oh, the times they are a changin'.

Disregarding the useful but likely one-off test on the 5DS rigs by LensRentals, PhotoZone is (to my knowledge) the first site that has published resolution numbers on a 5DS/5DSr rig. To them, LensTip, and others, this migration suuuuucks pretty hard* as it represents a need to retest everything. They'll be at this all year, I'd guess.

To the point, though: Photozone's reference camera is now the 5DSr, and they have two lenses to report on with the 50 MP:

  • Sigma 24mm f/1.4 Art (the resolution trends vs. aperture are the same as other reviews, but the scale of the resolution is obviously increased)
  • Canon 11-24 f/4L USM (impossibly, the center performance is best wide open, but it's an odd duck in the corners at those wide FLs)

To PhotoZone's credit, they refuse to give a 1-5 star rating to the optical quality of those two lenses until they've had more lenses to compare against.

- A

*DXO, despite being batsh-- crazy, oddly gets full marks here as they do update their lens testing as new bodies are released. But that's another conversation.

5DsR + Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art Strange Error

I was testing my new 5dsr and the time to put the sigma 35mm art , something strange happened , appeared some circles in both images , jpg as in the video, the raw disappear , but look at the preview .

after some research I found that it was the fault of the Lens aberration correction // peripheral illumination , disabling resolve the issue .

Video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVESl6Uv8zg

Jpg (example):

0O8A0048.JPG

55-250 IS on crop sensor vs 100-400 (mk I) on full frame

Cross-posting from Reddit. There are probably more Canon users on this forum.

I recently bought a Canon 100-400 L IS to go with my 6D. Based on the reviews it looks like on the 6D it should be better than my 55-250 IS on my T3i, and almost as good as the highly regarded 100-400 II without having to spend $2k. But I've done some tests, and it doesn't look any better than what I had before. My 55-250 is much sharper than my 100-400 in the corners, and the same or slightly better in the center. But the 55-250 has a bit more CA and a bit lower contrast.

Here's my comparison: http://imgur.com/a/K5aAy
The 100-400 is on the left on my 6D. 400mm f/5.6 1/25 sec ISO320.
The 55-250 is on the right on my T3i. 214mm f/5.6 1/15 sec ISO800.

Is the 100-400 supposed to be this soft in the corners? Or did I get a bad copy? It's kind of disappointing to spend 8x as much ($800 used vs $100 used) on a lens and get worse results.

I adjusted the exposure of each in LR to be about the same, so don't compare the exposure settings above, but I applied no other adjustments and set sharpening to 0. The setup is not ideal, and the light is not that great. I left the tripod in the same position for both shots, except for re-aligning slightly. The chart is printed 11x17 size on plain paper, and it's at the size and resolution limit of my printer. I tried printing it on 8.5x11 paper, and the finest lines aliased despite setting "4800x1200 DPI equivalent" resolution whatever that means. The test chart is a vector PDF I found online. The distance from the camera to the chart is about 15 feet. A real test chart, longer working distance, better lighting, better alignment, sturdier tripod, etc would be nice, but I don't think it's necessary since I can get good results from the 55-250 and from the center of the 100-400

Here's The-Digital-Picture's comparison (with the 55-250 STM selected because that looks the most like my 55-250). http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=856&Camera=736&Sample=0&FLI=5&API=1&LensComp=113&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=7&APIComp=0 Note that the TDP test chart is twice the resolution of mine, and they have a much better test setup. (http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Help/ISO-12233.aspx)

Understanding Lens Patents

Quite frequently, Canon rumours publishes information on Canon lens patents.

Mostly these posts include a diagram showing lens elements in a number of groups, with arrows going backwards and forwards, along with a descriptions including positive and negative positive and negative positive.

Well it confuses the heck out of me.

Has anyone got a 'Understanding lens patents for Dummies' guide :)

In all seriousness, I'd like to know a bit more about lens design, so any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

DoF features : wishlist or stupid question ? your opinion ...

Hi,

Context: I have only started using fast lenses with nifty fifty 3 years ago, then bought 100 2.8 L Macro 2 years ago and finally pressed the button for the 70-200 2.8 L IS II last year (bundled with the 7DII) ...
Use case:
- I have been enjoying shallow DoF for portraits or nice bokeh (in macro/near field), but sometimes feel that my DoF is not fully optimized : face is sharp but part of the hat or necklace is not, that flying bee is a bit blurred in the back of that lovely rose, the bird is sharp from tip to tip but so is too much of his background and sometimes closing that much the aperture doesn't give me enough speed to freeze it (with decent ISO) ...
- Wanting shallow DoF for bokeh / quite open aperture for speed (bees/birds... ) so fighting to get just enough but not too much ... And in many situation (portraits in a parade, flying things ...) you cannot get a second attempt after checking it at x10 on the image once taken...
Disclaimer: I have been playing with DoF preview button, but i didn't find it super precise to make the distinction of sharp/beginning of blur, especially with the darkening of the viewfinder in not fully sunny days / inside ...
I never changed focussing screen though, a bit newbie on that ...
Idea of feature(s):
1) "DoF bracketing" : we have exposure bracketing, so i would propose similar feature where you can do say 3 or 5 shots, and vary aperture 1/2 stop, 1 stop ... in between. With 10FPS like on the 7DII, click & voila ! It is all about the same picture and then you select the perfect one once zoomed in x10 or once back home on your gigantic screen ...
2) "DoF indication as overlay" : on 7DII you can overlay some stuff on the screen ... i would propose similar feature if transmission possible to the body and calculation done inside : on the lens i see the focal distance => could it be reported to the body and then DoF calculated like on the apps, and then displayed on the screen ? (in stills macro for example i can do depth measurement, then open apps on smartphone, and calculate/adjust DoF ... but lengthy and not practical ...)

Your thoughts ? Is it plain stupid because there are already ways to do something similar (combination of DoF preview button and change of focusing screen ?) ? Or would that be useful to any of you ?
In that case, do you think it could take place as a normal in-body feature in a distant future on some special stuff like say magic lantern ...

Thanks for your feedbacks!

How can you find the front element size of Canon lenses?

I just picked up one of the SLR Magic Anamorphot lenses to hook onto my DSLR lenses to try to shoot anamorphic ally...I got a good deal on ebay for one.

The SLR Magic site says it works best on lenses with a front element of 50mm or less. I can't find easily on the canon site the specs saying the front element size, only the filter size.....

Any suggestions how to look up lenses that have 50mm or less front lens elements?

Thank you in advance,

cayenne

Preorder the New Sigma 24-35mm F2 DG HSM Art Lens for $999

HTML:
<p><strong>Sigma Corporation Announces Pricing and Availability of 24-35mm F2 DG HSM Art Lens</strong></p>
<p><em>Market’s first F2 full-frame zoom available in late July for $999</em></p>
<p>RONKONKOMA, NY — July 16, 2015 – Sigma Corporation of America, a leading DSLR lens and camera manufacturer, today announced that the new Sigma 24-35mm F2 DG HSM Art lens will become available in late July for the street price of $999.</p>
<p>The 24-35mm F2 DG HSM Art lens is the market’s first full-frame zoom that allows photographers to carry one fast aperture lens that can do the work of three popular fixed focal length lenses – the 24mm, 28mm and 35mm. It includes an optimized autofocus (AF) algorithm for smooth, fast, and accurate focusing, a manual focus (MF) override functionality, and is made of Thermally Stable Composite (TSC) reducing its size and weight.</p>
<p>Built upon the impressive versatility offered by Sigma’s 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Art lens, the new 24-35mm continues the Art line tradition of top optical performance that’s comparable toSigma’s 24mm F1.4 DG HSM Art and 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Art. It offers optimized lens power distribution, and minimizes spherical aberration, axial chromatic aberration and field curvature. The Sigma 24-35mm F2 DG HSM Art lens also features a video-friendly, inner focusing system that eliminates front-lens rotation, enhancing the lens’ stability as well as a Hyper Sonic Motor (HSM) that ensures a silent, high-speed AF function.</p>
<p><strong>Preorder: Sigma 24-35mm f/2 DG HSM Art $999: <a href="http://adorama.evyy.net/c/60085/51926/1036u=http://www.adorama.com/SG2435EOS.html" onclick="__gaTracker('send', 'event', 'outbound-article', 'http://adorama.evyy.net/c/60085/51926/1036u=http://www.adorama.com/SG2435EOS.html', 'Adorama');" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1162798-REG/sigma_24_35mm_f_2_dg_hsm.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296/DFF/d10-v21-t1-x657240" onclick="__gaTracker('send', 'event', 'outbound-article', 'http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1162798-REG/sigma_24_35mm_f_2_dg_hsm.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296/DFF/d10-v21-t1-x657240', 'B&H Photo');" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a></strong></p>
<p><!--more-->

“The combination of fast, constant aperture and zoom versatility will make this lens exceptionally popular for photographers who crave the convenience of wide angle zooms, paired with the performance of fast, wide primes,” said Mark Amir-Hamzeh, president of Sigma Corporation of America. “The Art lenses have raised the bar for total imaging performance, and this lens is going to make a lot of photographers very happy.”</p>
<p>As with all new lenses under the Global Vision categories, every 24-35mm will be tested using Sigma’s own modulation transfer function (MTF) measuring system, “A1,” in the company’s factory in Japan. It is compatible with Sigma’s USB DOCK, which allows photographers to update the lens’ firmware, adjust focus points and customize full-time MF function settings by using Sigma’s Optimization Pro software. Sigma’s exclusive Mount Conversion Service, which enables users to easily convert the lens’ camera mount between supported versions, is also available for a fee. The lens will be available in Sigma, Canon and Nikon mounts.</p>
<p>The Sigma 24-35mm F2 DG HSM Art lens will also feature:</p>
<ul>
<li>Large-diameter, aspherical lens elements, which require advanced technologies to produce, one “F” Low Dispersion (FLD) glass, and seven Special Low Dispersion (SLD) glass elements with two aspherical lenses. The advanced optics and optimized lens power distribution minimizes spherical aberration, axial chromatic aberration and field curvature, resulting in outstanding optical performance</li>
<li>A video-friendly, inner focusing system that eliminates front-lens rotation, enhancing the lens’ stability and allowing use of circular polarizing filters</li>
<li>A Hyper Sonic Motor (HSM) that ensures a silent, high-speed AF function. Smoother AF is achieved when the this AF algorithm is optimized</li>
<li>Full-time MF by rotating the focus ring of the lens while auto focusing</li>
<li>A nine-blade, rounded diaphragm creates an attractive blur to the out-of-focus areas of the image</li>
<li>Specifications: Lens construction containing 18 elements in 13 groups; a weight of 33.2 ounces; a diameter and length of 3.4 inches by 4.8 inches, respectively; a minimum aperture of F16; and angle of view (35mm) of 84.1° to 63.4°; minimum focusing distance of 11 inches; and a maximum magnification ratio of 1:4.4</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><strong>Preorder: Sigma 24-35mm f/2 DG HSM Art $999: <a href="http://adorama.evyy.net/c/60085/51926/1036?u=http://www.adorama.com/SG2435EOS.html" onclick="__gaTracker('send', 'event', 'outbound-article', 'http://adorama.evyy.net/c/60085/51926/1036?u=http://www.adorama.com/SG2435EOS.html', 'Adorama');" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1162798-REG/sigma_24_35mm_f_2_dg_hsm.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296/DFF/d10-v21-t1-x657240" onclick="__gaTracker('send', 'event', 'outbound-article', 'http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1162798-REG/sigma_24_35mm_f_2_dg_hsm.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296/DFF/d10-v21-t1-x657240', 'B&H Photo');" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a></strong></strong></p>

Review: Canon EOS 750D & EOS 760D via DXOMark

HTML:
DXOMark has completed their reviews of the sensors in the EOS Rebel 750D and EOS Rebel 760D and found them to be nearly identical.</p>
<p>In regards to the <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-750D-Rebel-T6i-sensor-review-First-Canon-APS-C-format-camera-to-offer-12-stop-dynamic-range" target="_blank">EOS 750D</a> (T6i)</p>
<blockquote><p>As an entry-level model the Canon EOS 750D (T6i) makes some compromises in layout and controls — for example, there’s no top plate LCD as found on the EOS 760D(T6s), but sensor performance is on par with the camera maker’s mid- and high-end models, the EOS 70D and the recently-introduced EOS 7D Mk II. While it’s true that the Canon sensors are behind the very best APS-C models in terms of low ISO performance (particularly noticeable when comparing dynamic range), the company is making some noteworthy advances.</p></blockquote>
<p>In regards to the <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-760D-Rebel-T6s-sensor-review-On-par-with-Canon-s-high-end-APS-C-models" target="_blank">EOS 760D</a> (T6s)</p>
<blockquote><p>While it’s not our place to discuss why Canon should choose to introduce two models that vary mostly by their controls (although the 760D’s tracking AF capability in live view is likely a worthwhile feature), the sensor performance for the EOS 760D is intriguing. Canon has made significant advances over the previous generation sensor, particularly with regard to low ISO noise levels and improved dynamic range. While sensor performance is still behind the very best APS-C models, Canon appears to be taking up the challenge set by Sony, and while it’s still got some way to go, that has to be good news for the consumer.</p></blockquote>

Canon Enters 3-D Machine Vision Market In The US

HTML:
<strong>MELVILLE, N.Y., JULY 16, 2015</strong> – Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging solutions, today announced the entry into the growing machine vision market in the U.S., with the launch of 3-D Machine Vision Systems, models RV300, RV500 and RV1100. Designed for use with industrial robots, these systems are capable of high-speed, high-accuracy three-dimensional recognition of objects. The systems in combination with a robotic arm can help increase production efficiencies in factories by facilitating the automatic high-speed supply of parts to production lines.</p>
<p>Enabling a robotic arm to accurately and successively recognize and pickup individual items from a randomly assembled pile of parts requires a system capable of the three-dimensional recognition of the shapes of the parts. All three models of Canon’s Machine Vision system feature a 3-D machine vision head, which encompasses the system sensor and 3-D machine vision recognition software for recognition processing. The highest level of performance in speed and accuracy for three-dimensional object recognition capabilities of the Canon’s Machine Vision system were made possible by applying innovative image-recognition and information-processing technologies cultivated through Canon’s research and development of cameras and business machines.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Canon’s 3-D Machine Vision systems can accurately recognize a diverse range of objects, including parts with curved features, parts with few distinguishing characteristics and intricately structured parts. The RV300, RV500, RV1100 enable the 3-D recognition of randomly piled parts as small as approximately 10 mm<sup>2</sup>, 20 mm<sup>2</sup>, and 45 mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively<sup>i</sup>.</p>
<p>Contributing to improved production-line efficiency, all three models deliver high-speed performance, taking only approximately 1.8 seconds to recognize randomly arranged small-scale parts in 3-D. This data is then sent to a robotic controller unit attached to the robotic arm.</p>
<p>The new systems feature high-performance 3-D recognition with a high level of accuracy; the RV300, RV500, and RV1100 achieve exceedingly small error tolerances of less than 0.1 mm<sup>2</sup>, 0.15 mm<sup>2</sup>, 0.5mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively.</p>
<p>Users can easily register data for parts to be picked up by inputting CAD data and by capturing images of the parts randomly assembled in a pile. The 3-D machine vision systems can use computer-generated images to automatically learn how to visually identify the parts. Since no complicated programming is necessary, users can easily re-register parts in accordance with changes in type and shape of parts to be supplied in production.</p>
<p>The Canon 3-D Machine Vision System is capable of instantaneously measuring the location and orientation of designated parts in three dimensions and helps eliminate the need for separate 2-D vision sensors to determine the positioning of parts or a table on which to temporarily place parts during the parts-supply process. Accordingly, the system allows the construction of production lines to be simplified for parts provision while achieving higher efficiency in feeding parts to the production line.</p>
<p>In 2014, global sales of 2-D and 3-D machine vision systems for use with industrial robots totaled approximately $22 million<sup>ii</sup>. The market for 3-D machine vision systems is expected to grow significantly in the future, driven by strong demand for the further automation of production lines used by manufacturers in a variety of industries, including automotive and automotive component manufacturers.</p>
<p>The Canon 3-D Machine Vision Systems, models RV300, RV500, and RV1100 are expected to be available on Oct 1, 2015.</p>

One of Quebec's leading photojournalists has all is archives stolen

Sorry for the main article being in french, but its a saddening, angering and somewhat stunning story. After hearing about stolen camera gear from the games, this story puts things in perspective. Gear is expensive, but can be replaced. On the other end, your work can't be replaced...

Jacques Nadeau, one of Quebec's leading photojournalists, has just had all is archives (and TV) stolen from is Montreal's appartment. The camera gear and other valuables were left alone. For example, his 300mm prime was sitting on the table and left there, but the burglars stole all his printed archives and all is hard drives. Incredibly, Nadeau did not have off-location backups except for his later news work, which is archived at Le Devoir, where he is a staff photographer. These archives are not full resolution however. He is also appalled that he has lost all of his work for his next photo book project. All he has left is a few USB sticks...

Nadeau was known for taking some of the most poignant portraits of Quebec's and Canada's politicians for the last 35 years or so. Now, his life's work has vanished. I'm floored (and I'm going to back up my drives, I swear...).

Full story in french
http://www.ledevoir.com/societe/actualites-en-societe/445148/vol-chez-jacques-nadeau

short story in english
http://montreal.ctvnews.ca/montreal-photographer-jacques-nadeau-s-life-s-work-stolen-1.2470355
http://petapixel.com/2015/07/15/photojournalist-loses-lifes-work-after-burglars-steal-hard-drives/

7d mark ii or 6D

Going to upgrade my camera and having a hard choice... i currently have a 60D and use the 85 1.8, and 50mm 1.8, i shoot mostly events and eventually will get into video work. So im wondering which camera will be a better suite for me or any other recommendations. also im looking to pick up another lens for all around shooting, so any tips, hints or suggestions are welcome.

Panasonic GX8 micro four thirds body review video plus 100-400mm & 25mm lenses

fresh from The Camera Store, a video review from the pre release version:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNIRBGXdxV4

brief summary

pros:
stills Oriented
weather sealed, including the articulated display and tilting EVF
very fast AF
new 20MP sensor
32 shot raw buffer @ ~ 8fps (estimated)
75+ jpg buffer
4k (crop mode)
built-in stabilizer works WITH lens stablizer too.
outperforms Olympus OM-D E-M1 making it the new best of MFT
customizable function buttons

cons:
stills oriented
larger than GX7
2.5mm mic jack
smallish battery limits shooting

not many details on the 100-400mm f/4-6.3 lens
also a new 25mm f/1.7 lens

And a "capture and refocus" technology that's not like lightfield but based on a buffered burst of stills

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB