• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Tamron compatibility issues in live view mode with Canon 750D and 760D

This is my first post here so... Hello to everyone!

I've read recently that Tamron lenses has similar issues in live view mode (with Canon 750D and 760D) as Sigma lenses.
Some informations about this issues:
http://www.tamron.co.jp/en/news/release_2015/0423.html
http://www.tamron.co.jp/en/news/release_2015/0508_3.html

16-35mm f/4 IS vs 24-70mm f/4 IS - First Lens for 7D MkII

Hello folks, I am looking into getting a newer camera for myself and my wife for general photography / pictures of our son. Usage will be indoor and outdoor, but more focused on taking pictures of people than landscapes.

The only SLR we have experience with is our Nikon D40, for which we have the 18-55mm kit lens and a 35mm f/1.8 prime. We plan to move to Canon due to the better lens lineup and pricing, which brings me to my question.

A 7D Mark II will be our first Canon camera, so we have no Canon mount lenses. We're primarily focused on EF lenses as we may move up to a FF in a few years and would prefer to stick with weather sealed lenses, which I believe means we would be restricted to the L lineup.

So if you were buying your first lens, not expecting to buy another for at least a few months, would you go for a 16-35mm f/4 IS or 24-70mm f/4 IS?

Thanks!

Sell 70-200 2.8 II and keep 100-400 II?

Since I picked up the new 100-400 II, my beloved 70-200 II has been sitting unused. I tend to shoot a lot at the mid-long range of the 100-400 for sports especially, but something in my gut says to keep the 70-200 for portrait/low light work. As much as I love it, it's hard to justify the expense of the 70-200 for the odd shoot though (I'm no pro). Don't want to kick myself later if I sell it now. Is there too much overlap for these lenses, making them a little redundant or are they really complimentary?

Any thoughts?

Leica Monochrom Type 246 DNG Files Can Wipe Your Apple Photos Library

HTML:
Leica has discovered a serious bug that owners of the new Leica Monochrom Type 246 should be aware of.</p>
<p>LEICA SERVICE ADVISORY</p>
<p>Today, Leica Camera has issued a notice regarding a compatibility issue with DNG files from new <a href="http://leicastoremiami.com/collections/leica-m-system-m-system-camera/products/leica-m-monochrom-typ-246-black" target="_blank">Monochrom (Typ 246)</a> and Apple’s Photos App. From Leica:</p>
<p><em>Leica Camera would like to inform you that the Leica Monochrom (Typ 246)’s DNG files are currently </em><em>incompatible with Apple’s ‘Photos’ App in Mac OS X Yosemite causing the library to crash and potentially lose all existing image files in the Apple Photos library.</em></p>
<p><em>As we will start shipping the new Leica Monochrom in the coming days, it is important that all dealers, sales personnel and customers are aware of this incompatibility issue.</em></p>
<p><em>With the new Apple ‘Photos’ App, when loading Monochrom DNG files from the new Monochrom, the library will crash continuously on loading. This may cause the Apple Photos library to be destroyed. This means that pictures previously taken with any other camera will be lost. <strong>As such, Leica Camera does not recommend using the Apple ‘Photos’ App for DNG files from the new Monochrom (Typ 246) until further notice.</strong></em></p>
<p><em>Leica and Apple are collaborating to resolve this issue and develop a solution so that the DNG files from the new Monochrom can be used with the ‘Photos’ App without any issues in the near future. It is anticipated that Apple will have this resolved in the next update for ‘Photos’.</em></p>
<p><em>Meanwhile, we recommend all users of the new Leica Monochrom to use Adobe Photoshop Lightroom CC/6 for DNG files of the new Monochrom. The latest version of Adobe Photoshop is fully compatible with Mac and Windows PC. The JPEG files from the new Leica Monochrom work with all Apple applications.</em></p>
<p><em>Leica Camera Inc. will include a ‘Warning Notice’ regarding the Leica Monochrom (Typ 246)’s incompatibility with Apple’s ‘Photo’ App in all product boxes.</em></p>
<p>We always recommend using Adobe products to process Leica DNG files, but if you are using the Photos app in Mac OSX it is important to be aware of this issue. Please do not hesitate to call or <a href="mailto:[email protected]?subject=Leica%20DNG%20File%20Compatibility">email us</a> with any questions.</p>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://www.reddotforum.com/content/2015/05/leica-monochrom-typ-246-dng-files-currently-incompatible-with-apple-photos-app/" target="_blank">Red Dot Forum</a>]</p>

Pentax Australia Suggests Full Frame Camera Coming in November

HTML:
Pentax Australia has suggested that a full frame camera from the company will be addressed “closer to November” of this year on their Facebook page.</p>
<p>The Pentax digital medium format 645 is quite a good value and I suspect their first full frame camera will follow that same concept. Pentax has to do something that is feature rich and a great value if they want people to buy their 35mm DSLR.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/pentaxfacebook.jpg"><img class="alignnone wp-image-20362 size-medium" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/pentaxfacebook-575x541.jpg" alt="pentaxfacebook" width="575" height="541" /></a></p>
<p>Source: [<a href="https://www.facebook.com/PentaxSnaps/photos/a.144462695614423.28162.130482700345756/936007586459926/?type=1&theater" target="_blank">Pentax Australia</a>]</p>

Panasonic DMC-G7 Mirrorless Leaked

HTML:
The specifications for the upcoming Panasonic DMC-G7 mirrorless camera have leaked.</p>
<p>SPECIFICATIONS</p>
<ul>
<li>4k 30p/24p video</li>
<li>DFD contrast AF</li>
<li>16MP Digital Livo MOS sensor</li>
<li>New Venus engine</li>
<li>360º panorama function</li>
<li>Shutter speed: 1/16,000</li>
<li>2.36 million dots organic EL EVF</li>
<li>104k dots LCD screen</li>
<li>Available in silver and black</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://digicame-info.com/2015/05/g7-1.html" target="_blank">DCI</a>] via [<a href="http://photorumors.com/2015/05/13/panasonic-dmc-g7-mirrorless-mft-camera-specifications-leaked-online/#more-71574" target="_blank">PhotoRumors</a>]</p>
<p> </p>

Review: Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L

HTML:
Sometimes it’s nice to get a new perspective on an older lens. The EF 50mm f/1.2L might be one of the most polarizing lenses in the Canon lineup, some can’t live without it, while others wish it never existed. The contrasting opinions of the lens are usually because of the focus shift that some photographers experience with it. Certain shooting styles make the issue more prevalent for some.</p>
<p>Friend of the site Dustin Abbott has completed his thorough review of one of my favourite lenses in the Canon lineup. I love the EF 50mm f/1.2L as well as the EF 50mm f/1.0L. I think I just have a fetish for fast 50’s!</p>
<p>Dustin has this to say about the 50L when compared to the competition:</p>
<blockquote><p>The biggest threat to the Canon 50L has been the release of the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 ART lens. TheZeiss Otus 55 f/1.4 (review coming next week) remains the class leader since its introduction, but its dizzying price (nearly $4000) and lack of AF means that it will stay off most photographer’s radar. The Sigma, however, has image quality that charts much better than the 50L’s along with autofocus, although it can struggle with focus accuracy and consistency. It also retails for about a third less than the 50L (which retails for $1450 when not on sale). You can read my review of the Sigma here. Is it the better lens? It is certainly sharper and has better contrast, but I’m not convinced that it has as “magical” a drawing/look as the 50L.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree with most of what Dustin says in his review and I’d recommend the EF 50mm f/1.2L to anyone.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://dustinabbott.net/2015/05/canon-ef-50mm-f1-2l-usm-review/" target="_blank">Read the full review</a> | <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/457680-USA/Canon_1257B002AA_Normal_EF_50mm_f_1_2L.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L at B&H Photo</a></strong></p>

Meike Mk320 Speedlite

Hi all, looking for a bit of input.

I'm going on a trip to Ireland soon. This will be more of a vacation with my girlfriend than a dedicated photo trip, though I do want to catch some good shots and she is pretty understanding. I'm trying to pare down my kit since lugging around a bunch of stuff I end up not actually using is a pet peeve.

I have a 6D, and shoot almost exclusively without flash. I have a 430ex II, but since I don't use it much it seems large to carry around as a "just in case" piece of equipment. I've been looking for a more compact flash (more for fill). I thought about a white box 90ex, but I have heard very mediocre things here about it. I looked at a Sunpak RD2000, but that doesn't play well with the 6D.

That's when I found the Meike Mk320. It seems like an alternative to the 270ex that can act as a master unit.

Has anyone used one of these here? Any feedback? I was planning on picking one up on Amazon for $80.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00UHNT8XA/ref=ox_sc_act_title_3?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A3A14HZTSVPRLX
Not sure about the EACHSHOT name. I think it may be re-branded but...

Also, planned gear for the trip: 6D, 24-105mm, 40mm, (possibly a 14mm), remote, spare batteries and cards, polarizer, ND, Lowepro Photo Sport 200 backpack.

Also looking for a stable small (possibly table top sized) tripod. Not convinced I want to drag around my 3 Legged Thing, but I don't really trust the old Gorrilapod that I have.

7d mk2 poor image quality and noise in raw images using lightroom

Hi everyone..

Has anyone else had a problem when downloading raw images into lightroom from the 7d mk2...they have poor image quality and have bad noise even with low ISO (200) .I have tried various versions of lightroom ,various computers etc....

The only satisfactory way of downloading images from the camera is using canons own software....when the results are vastly improved......

Andy

Canon EOS 7D Mark II Firmware 1.04 Available

HTML:
<p>Firmware Version 1.0.4 incorporates the following fixes:</p>
<ol>
<li>Fixes a phenomenon in which the camera’s AF function may not operate properly at a focal length of approximately 100mm when used with the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens.</li>
<li>Fixes a phenomenon in which, in rare instances, the reduction of the flicker effect cannot be achieved when in AI servo AF mode, despite the “Anti-flicker shoot” function being set to “Enable”.</li>
<li>Fixes a phenomenon in which the Picture Style settings may not be applied to the captured image when the camera is set to custom shooting mode C1, C2 or C3.</li>
<li>Fixes a phenomenon in which, in very rare cases, the first still image captured in live view mode may not record the correct date and time.</li>
<li>Fixes a phenomenon in which, in very rare cases, image noise may appear in JPEG images when brightness or contrast is corrected by the Auto Lighting Optimizer function.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong><a href="http://usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/slr_cameras/eos_7d_mark_ii#DriversAndSoftware" target="_blank">Download Firmware 1.04 via Canon USA</a></strong></p>

Canon 10-18 mm f/4.5-5.6 EF-S IS STM - IS broken?

Hey guys, maybe you could help me.

I've received today Canon 10-18 mm f/4.5-5.6 EF-S IS STM and started to take pictures rightaway with 7d2 (100d hasn't arrived yet). I realized there is literally no difference between IS on and off. Anyone who owns that lens can tell me if it should make some sounds while IS is active (half pressed shutter button) and if there is visible lag (compensating for ie. shake) with IS on? With this copy there is no sound with or without IS, it reacts to even little shake and move right away - but it's hard to tell with its short focal length :) it's so bloody wide. Does anyone had similar problem with canon IS lens?

TIA

EOS M3 AF is a test winner!

The EOS M3 is a test winner according to the German „photoMAGAZIN“ journal 06/2015.
(http://www.fotomagazin.de/ , German only)

They were testing the Canon EOS M3, Fujifilm X-A2, Panasonic Lumix GF7 and the Samsung NX500 in categories like image quality (OOC JPEGs), speed (AF and shooting speed), features and handling.
The M3 and NX500 won a shared overall 1st place with Canon having the best IQ (!!!, OOC JPEGs) and AF speed (!!!) of the test field and the NX500 with the highest shutter speed (9/sec).

Interesting was the overall conclusion that Canon needed 2 (and a half) attempts for a good MILC (M, M2 counting half and M3) and a detailed analysis that the AF with EF-M lenses is now one of the fastest, while still struggling with EF and EF-S lenses. Good numbers are coming from a continuous AF independent of pressing the shutter or the AF mode used (don't ask me, what that means for battery life).

Shutter delay with AF in numbers (average time):
EOS M 0.8 sec
EOS M3 0.2 sec
Both with EF-M 18-55 (Canon was saying that AF would be six times faster)

EOS M3 with EF-S 18-135 STM 0.5 sec
EOS M3 with EF 24-105L IS USM 0.8 sec
STM being overall faster with EOS M than USM.

For comparison:
Fujifilm X-A2 0.7 sec (with 16-50 OIS II)
Panasonic Lumix GF7 0.25 sec (with G Vario 12-32)
Samsung NX500 0.25 sec (with 16-50 PZ OIS)

Canon EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS Update Information [CR2]

HTML:
We were initially <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2015/02/new-50mm-70-300-coming-soon-cr2/" target="_blank">told about an update to the EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS at the same time</a> as the recently announced EF 50mm f/1.8 STM. At that time we assumed they’d be coming out together, but that turned out not to be true.</p>
<p class="p1">We’re told that the new EF 70-300 IS will have a new USM motor as well as “some feature that one of Canon’s competitors have announced recently”. What that “feature” is, we’re not sure. The source goes on to say that the lens, whenever it comes to market, is a very good upgrade to the current version.</p>
<p class="p1">The same source also confirms that the EF 35mm f/1.4L II will come in 2015 if all goes to plan.</p>
<p class="p1">More to come.</p>
<p class="p1">

Canon Issues EOS 5D Classic Service Advisory

HTML:
Thank you for using Canon products.</p>
<p>Please note that the after-sales service period (service reception period) for this product will end on September 30, 2015. The free repairs are also scheduled to end on the same day.</p>
<p>We have discovered that, in rare instances, the main mirror of some EOS 5D Digital SLR cameras may detach due to deterioration in the strength of the adhesive. Accordingly, we would like to convey the details and our service policy concerning this phenomenon.</p>
<p>We offer our sincerest apologies to those customers who have been inconvenienced by this issue. Canon always strives to provide the highest quality products to our customers and we will spare no effort in our quality management to make sure our customers can use our products with confidence. We hope our efforts will earn your understanding.</p>
<p><strong>Phenomenon

</strong>The main mirror of the camera detaches and images cannot be viewed through the viewfinder.</p>
<p><strong>Affected products

</strong>EOS 5D Digital SLR cameras whose main mirror has detached.</p>
<p><strong>User Support

</strong>We will repair and reinforce the mirror portion of the affected products free of charge. If you own one of the affected products, please contact our Customer Support Center.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/EOS5D_Mirror_Detachment.jpg"><img class="alignnone wp-image-20323 size-full" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/EOS5D_Mirror_Detachment.jpg" alt="EOS5D_Mirror_Detachment" width="486" height="200" /></a></p>
<p>We appreciate your patience, and we offer our sincerest apologies to the customers using these products who have been inconvenienced by this issue.</p>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/support/consumer?pageKeyCode=prdAdvDetail&docId=0901e0248004cd94">Canon USA</a>]</p>

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB