• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

repair center

hello, I'm new to the forum. I would love some advice; I'm looking for an independent repair center which may have better pricing than the canon repair facilities. I'm actually a nikon shooter (sorry! i love them both - just shot with nikon in college so i stuck with it..) , I'm helping my good friend out. thank you in advance!!

Scott

Bag Recommendation

If the stars align I will soon be acquiring a second 5D III. As an outdoor portrait shooter I normally work with the 5D III/70-200 2.8L II combination, which I carry to the field with lens attached in a LowePro Pro Runner 200 AW, along with a detached 24-70 2.8L II for when I want to go for an occasional wide angle shot.

http://store.lowepro.com/pro-runner-200-aw

But recently I've been doing more landscape stuff with the 24-70, and incorporating more wide angle work in my portrait sessions, and really feeling the pain of doing lens swaps out in the field. I also recently got my first occurrence of an Err 80 during a session. A battery swap cleared it but my change in shooting approach coupled with the possibility of a pending gear malfunction got me thinking about acquiring a second body.

B&H has a great 5DIII/PIXMA PRO-100 rebate deal going on right now so thought this might be a great opportunity to add a second body to my kit and just keep the 24-70 and 70-200 each permanently mounted for ease of changeup during the session, plus have a hot spare should the need arise.

Canon 5DIII, PIXMA PRO-100 printer, 32GB card, battery (3rd party), small shoulder bag - $3099 but with a $550 rebate, so $2549 after rebate. Fold in the retail value of the printer, card and battery and that's close to $2000 for the body.

I really need a good recommendation for a bag that can hold 2 5D III's each with a lens attached (24-70 and 70-200, respectively), with the goal to be able to switch from one to the other without having to go through any kind of lens detach/attach process.

I prefer a backpack style.

Any help is appreciated.

Canon 85 1.2L USM II for only $10!?

I've seen a bunch of these weird postings show up all over Amazon lately. In fact, tonight I saw this lens in "Very Good" condition listed for $800, so I bought it immediately. Soon afterwards, I got a notice via Amazon that my order had been cancelled due to "Technical Difficulties."

Now, the same seller has the lens listed at $10!
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B000EW9Y4M/ref=dp_olp_refurbished?ie=UTF8&condition=refurbished

I'm not sure how long it will stay up because I'm calling shenanigans on the whole thing, and I'm sure Amazon will catch up if it's truly fishy. I've always had good experiences with Amazon when their sellers have been dodgy because they manage all the money flow and immediately have refunded my payments from shifty sellers.

Has anyone had experiences with these sorts of things?

Thanks in advance!

Canon to Buy Video Surveillance Leader Axis for $2.8b

HTML:
<p>Canon appears to be going forward with their security camera business. With the shrinking consumer camera market, Canon is being aggressive in a space that is projected to see a lot of growth.</p>
<p><strong>TOKYO/STOCKHOLM, Feb 10 (Reuters)</strong> – Canon Inc made a 23.6 billion-Swedish-crown ($2.83 billion) offer for network video surveillance leader Axis AB on Tuesday — the biggest purchase ever for the Japanese firm trying to expand beyond a shrinking camera market.</p>
<p>Canon said it had launched a bid to buy all the Swedish company’s shares at 340 crowns apiece, a premium of nearly 50 percent to their closing price of 226.90 on Monday. At 1126 GMT, shares of Axis were up 48 percent at 336.50 crowns.</p>
<p>Axis said its board of directors unanimously supported the offer, and that three of its top shareholders representing around 40 percent of total shares will accept it.</p>
<p>Canon already sells surveillance cameras and sees the sector as a growing market, although it has not disclosed how much it earns from such products.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>The deal will make Canon a top player in the video surveillance market, which was worth an estimated $15 billion at the end of last year, according to researcher IHS.</p>
<p>Within that market, there is a $3.86 billion segment for network-connected security cameras which is led by Axis with a 17.5 percent share as of 2013.</p>
<p>Greger Johansson, analyst at research firm Redeye who had a bull case scenario of 250 crowns per share, said he thought the main owners had been unwilling to sell below 300 crowns as Axis had high revenue growth and was the No. 1 player in its market.</p>
<p>“We think some of the bigger players like Panasonic, Sony and Pelco could be interested… although the likelihood is relatively low considering the high bid.”</p>
<p>The deal comes after Canon late last month reported a slight increase in fourth-quarter profit, as a weaker yen and rising sales of office equipment offset weakness in a camera division competing with smartphones capable of high-quality imaging.</p>
<p>The company, which earned over 80 percent of its revenue overseas in 2014, said it would pay in cash.</p>
<p>Axis’ is targeting average annual growth of at least 20 percent and a profit margin of at least 10 percent. The company reported a fourth-quarter operating profit of 199 million crowns, slightly below analyst forecasts but up from 166 million a year earlier.</p>
<p>Around half of its sales come from the Americas, 40 percent from Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and the rest from Asia.</p>
<p>Axis said it will remain as a separate legal entity within Canon, and that its current management team will stay. ($1 = 8.3486 Swedish crowns) (Reporting by Ritsuko Ando,<a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/search/journalist.php?edition=us&n=chris.gallagher&">Chris Gallagher</a> and Olof Swahnberg; Editing by Miral Fahmy, Christopher Cushing and Crispian Balmer)</p>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/10/axis-canon-idUSL4N0VK3QS20150210" target="_blank">Reuters</a>]</p>

Interview With Head of EOS 5Ds & EOS 5Ds R Development

HTML:
<p>CPN has posted an interview with Tsunemasa Ohara, the Senior General Manager of Camera Research and Development at Canon Inc. He’s the man behind the development of this high resolution DSLR.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>CPN:</strong> What do you see as the potential future for Canon high-resolution cameras? Where might the technology be in five years time?</p>
<p><strong>TO:</strong> “There is a demand for high-megapixel (cameras) and high-resolution and, of course, we will continue on this quest in the future and to try to satisfy this demand. As you know, in August 2010, we announced a 120-million pixel APS-H CMOS sensor… so we have shown that we have the technology to produce even higher resolution sensors, but we must also focus on high image quality, too. So DIGIC processing, and all the other algorithms that contribute to high image quality, we need to work on too. It is the overall package that makes Canon EOS digital cameras so successful.”</p></blockquote>
<p><strong><a href="http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/interviews/developing_eos_5ds_and_eos_5ds_r.do" target="_blank">Read the full interview</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Phase Difference AF Patents for Mirrorless

HTML:
<p>A bunch of new patents for phase-difference AF have appeared. They look to be related to mirrorless and EVF applications.</p>
<p><strong><span class="notranslate">Patent Publication No. 2015-22264 (Google Translated)</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span class="notranslate">Published 2015.2.2</span></li>
<li><span class="notranslate">Filing date 2013.7.23</span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span class="notranslate">Canon patent</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span class="notranslate">Phase difference detection method to be received by the AF sensor can be reflected incident light from the imaging lens</span></li>
<li><span class="notranslate">The phase difference detection by the image plane phase difference AF</span></li>
<li><span class="notranslate">The phase difference detection by external light AF sensor</span></li>
</ul>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2015-02-11" target="_blank">EG</a>] via [<a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/cameras/Canon_rumours.html" target="_blank">NL</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Rear Gelatin Filter Questions

With a 11-24 f/4 on pre-order, I was thinking about getting some gelatin film(s) for the rear holder. If I remember, the holder on the existing lenses (14L, 8-15L, 17-40L, etc.) are all the same size. Can anyone confirm? If so, then it's probably pretty safe to assume Canon will stick with the same size. Also, does anyone know the approximate dimensions of the gelatin that fits? I thought Canon had a template in the manual or on a sheet of paper, but I can't seem to find that online - maybe it was from another manufacturer.

Senal SMH-1000 Studio Monitor Headphones Review (Dustin Abbott)

Hi, everyone, if you are looking for a great set of studio/field monitor headphones (or just a great set of general purpose headphones), this relatively unknown brand has made a pretty fantastic pair. I got some for myself after reviewing them because the sound is great (very neutral) and there is a lot of great little features.

Text review: http://bit.ly/1vD2EyZ
Video Review:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBqkIpVLMXI

Coincidence or?? MP/SEC

This is a ridiculous thought..

Canon 5DS / 5DSR - 50.6mp - max 5/sec burst = 253mp per sec
Canon 1DX - 18.1mp - max 14/sec burst = 253mp per sec

Two highest - when summed - figures from the Canon line-up in terms of image size.

As they use different processors is there another limiting factor? or is this just stupid?

My vote is stupid, but I wanted to share it nonetheless.

Am I expecting too much off my camera?

Why is the marriage between many of my lenses (Canon, Sigma, Tokina) and camera bodies (7d, 1diin, 6d) such a tumultuous one?
I mean, front focus, rear focus, somewhere in between focus...! If this was real married life, it would be "divorce galore" :o

So can any of the more technically schooled CR members please tell me why it is seemingly impossible to calibrate a camera (i.e. the autofocus module) so that it can handle any kind of lens and make it focus properly? Who is telling who what is focused and what is not in the first place: the camera the lens or the other way around!?

I would think the 'computer' in the camera has been taught what "in focus" means before being wrapped up in a box and send off to make somebody happy, and there for, as long as it is getting a decent reading from one of the focus points, it would kick the lens (even a Sigma one) in 'gear' and makes it focus spot on.

Too simple? :-[

Field of View - Canon TS-e 17mm vs Sigma 12-24mm

I want to take pictures of houses from a narrow street (the buildings are 5 to 11 meters high, the street measures 4.5 meters accross). I am trying to decide which lens will work for this project, Sigma 12-24mm @ 12mm and the camera on vertical position (portrait) or Canon TS-e 17mm also with the camera on vertical position.

I can do the math for the Sigma. If I place the camera on portrait position on a tripod 1.5m high and I stand 4m from the façade of the house, I can take a picture of a 8.7 m building.

I can´t do the same calculations for the TS-e. Could anyone help me? If I place the camera on a tripod 1.5m high and I stand 4m from the façade and shift the lens up all the way, how tall could I reach?

Thanks,
Antonio

Good reason to believe new APS-C cams from Canon use Sony sensor design

Hi guys.

I compared images from M3/760D to my own (M/SL1) and Sony a6000 (with some help of DPR test scene) at ISO 6400 and based on the output it seems to be very clear to me, that Canon uses Sony sensors/tech for their new cameras.

Here is some (okay, a bit weak, but let me explain) evidence:



Top two are this: Left one EOS M shot of my dark(black) PC case ar ISO 6400 JPG OOC. Right one is the dark cut-out of propably JPEG OOC shot from M3/760D of night town shot leaked on the internet. For example here.
Bottom two are this: Left one SL1 from DPR test scene, cut-out from the dark background. Right one is the same thing, but taken with a6000. The same mushing approach of Canon, the same approach on the right side from suggested Sony.
Similarity? Yes!

The empire will strike back....

http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/ writes:

"Sony Artisan Brian Smith: “someone might just make a 50mp camera for less than 3700 bucks!”

Sony Artisan Brian Smith commented after the Canon 5Ds launch:

Canon fired the first shot in the Great Mega-Pixel War of 2015, announcing a pair of 50.6 mp Canon 5DS cameras – This is just the first shot! Expect to hear more announcements soon… Who knows, someone might just make a 50mp camera for less than 3700 bucks!

He is likely “hearing” the same rumors I got….sounds exactly like the A7rII to me ;)

Sony has now plenty of time to “fight back” with the A7rII as the Canon 5ds preorders will start on April 30 only at Amazon. And shipment is June/July."

Camera Connect/Camera Window remote shooting and RAW files

I assumed when I got the Canon G7X that I could shoot RAW files when using the remote software (Camera Window) on my iPhone. After I got the camera and tried it, I learned that remote shooting only lets you take jpg photos even when the camera is set to shoot RAW. I am not talking about transferring files to my phone. I can understand the need for those to be smaller so they don't take forever to transfer. All I want to do is remotely shoot RAW files. Now Canon has come out with Camera Connect to replace both the EOS and Powershot remote apps. However, I tried the new software last night and it still only allows me to remotely shoot jpgs. Anyone know why it is limited this way or a way to get around the limitations placed by Canon? It seems like a simple remote trigger should be able to shoot whatever type of file the camera is set to record.

If you have super big Great White tele, how do you travel with it?

Ok, I got my 600mm beast. It came exquisitely double packed in good quality boxes, the outer box just a half inch bigger all around than the original box from Canon. And, all in all, it's about as big as a small doghouse!
So, I'm just wondering, if you have one of these monster lenses, DO you, and if you do, HOW do you travel with it? After seeing what my new luggage looks like after being checked, I can't really imagine checking it on a plane. If you do check it, you just let them bang up the $800 gray luggage, or you put that luggage in another box? Too big for carry on, and shipping it FedEx is scary also. So, I'm thinking the only way is by car or sherpa?

Upgrade to 70d or 760 d ?

Hi all,

My old 400d needs to be upgraded, so I had a look at the 70d and the new 760d. Comparing the specs, there's little difference between those two - at least to me.

One concern though is AFMA, which is only available at the 70d and absent on the 760d. So do you really need AFMA? Does it make focussing more reliable, especially with fast lenses f 1:1.4? I prefer to work with autofocus instead of manual focus. Can Sigma lenses be AFMAed as well as Canon lenses?

The other point is weather sealing, which seams to be at the 70d but not on 760d. But if WS is only basic at the 70d, this point isn't so important. How ist weather sealing on the 70d? Any damage because of rain/dust?

Batteries are also different: 70d gets 920 shots, 760d only 440 shots. But that's not important to me as I will use an additinal grip anyway because I feel more comfortable with an extra grip.

Another option would be to wait for the 80d as I'm in no hurry.

What do you think?

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB