• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

The New Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II

HTML:
<p><strong>EF400mm F4 DO IS USM II Specifications</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Total length 232.7mm</li>
<li>Weight is 2100 grams</li>
<li>Third generation DO lens</li>
<li>One large-diameter UD lens</li>
<li>One large-diameter aspherical lens grinding</li>
<li>Camera shake compensation effect of the four stages</li>
<li>SWC special coating</li>
<li>Dust and water resistant</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://digicame-info.com/2014/09/ef24-405mm-f35-56-is-stm-ef400.html" target="_blank">DCI</a>] via [<a href="http://www.cameraegg.org/ef-24-105mm-f3-5-5-6-is-stm-lens-ef-400mm-f4-do-is-ii-usm-lens-images-specs-leaked/" target="_blank">CE</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Canon EOS 7D Mark II Specifications Confirmed

  • Rugged magnesium alloy body
  • Dust proof
  • 20.2 MP CMOS sensor
  • Dual-pixel CMOS AF
  • New 65-point AF, all points cross-type
  • ITR EOS AF
  • Continuous shooting: 10 frames per second
  • Dual DIGIC6
  • Max ISO: 16,000
  • RGB+IR new 150,000-pixel metering sensor
  • Video full HD 60p
  • Built-in GPS
  • Interval timer
  • Bulb timer


http://www.cameraegg.org/beaking-news-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-image-specs-leaked/

http://photorumors.com/2014/09/11/canon-7d-mark-ii-leaked-picture-and-specs/

http://digicame-info.com/2014/09/eos-7d-mark-ii-18.html [Japanese]

Attachments

  • Canon-7D-Mark-II.jpg
    Canon-7D-Mark-II.jpg
    44.6 KB · Views: 13,764

Do you need a really high ISO?

Since the rumors of the 100 - 12 800 (native) ISO in 7D m2 I wonder why they don't pay enough attention?

I begin asking myself: Am I the only one that looks for an affordable body for low-light shooting?
I know Lenses should be faster. But lense is not everything. I say 3/4 the glass needs another quarter push from the body.

So if you remember: the fireflies perhaps about exactly a year ago there was this small discussion. And now have the things changed?
Aside from my unchanged disappointment I ask you about it.

That way I might be able to reset my expectations...

Yonguo YN560-TX Transmitter Released

I didn't see any other threads discussing the transmitter, other than one on the 560 III. Looks like Yongnuo released the new transmitter back in June. Looks promising, remote power and zoom control of the 560 III, plus dummy triggers for 602 and 603/II receivers.

http://www.amazon.com/YONGNUO-YN560-TX-Transmitter-Compatible-Receivers/dp/B00KM1QZRY/ref=sr_1_17?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1410364860&sr=1-17

There's a couple of reviews online. Anybody get one of these yet?

http://flashhavoc.com/yongnuo-yn560-tx-now-available/

What worked for me in Namibia....

I have just come back from two weeks in Namibia. I traveled from South Africa, via Botswana to the central part of Namibia including the Namib Naukluft. I have written a blog of my experiences and the equipment I used on the first part of my journey up to Sesriem which can be seen here: http://thelazytravelphotographer.blogspot.com/

Attachments

  • _MG_0669-E-s.jpg
    _MG_0669-E-s.jpg
    542.9 KB · Views: 194
  • _MG_1278-s.jpg
    _MG_1278-s.jpg
    476 KB · Views: 204

DXOMark Reviews Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4

HTML:
<p>DXOMark has completed their review of the Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 Apo Planar T* for both Canon and Nikon. As you would expect, this lens is an absolute gem when it comes to image quality. It easily outperforms all the 85mm lenses from both Canon & Nikon in optical tests. How that all translates in the field is up to the photographer.</p>
<div id="attachment_17207" style="width: 585px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/dxocanon85compare.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-17207" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/dxocanon85compare-575x494.jpg" alt="Click for larger" width="575" height="494" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Click for larger</p></div>
<p><strong>DXOMark says:</strong>

<em>“The new Otus 85mm is without question the most desirable and best performing 85mm portrait lens available but at $4,490 it’s not for those without deep pockets. It’s also rather large and bulky (although it’s remarkably well balanced on the D800 models), and it lacks the convenience of autofocus. While that may not be an issue for most enthusiasts or professionals (particularly as AF is at best difficult with f1.4 models) it’s likely to further limit its appeal, even if the real reason is obvious.”</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Zeiss-Otus-85mm-f1.4-Apo-Planar-T-Canon-ZE-and-Nikon-ZF.2-mount-lens-reviews-World-s-best-performing-85mm-portrait-lens" target="_blank">Read the full review</a> | <strong><a style="color: #900000;" href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1077281-REG/zeiss_2040_292_otus_apo_planar_85mm.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 Apo Planar T* $4490</a></strong></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Samyang Announces 12 mm F2.8 ED AS NCS Fisheye for Full Frame

HTML:
<p style="color: #000000;">Samyang Europe announces the upcoming Autumn release of the full-frame Samyang 12mm 1:2.8 ED AS NCS Fish-eye lens. The new model is yet another product of the Korean manufacturer and its widest 35mm film format lens. The lens will be officially introduced during Photokina fairs in Cologne on September 16th 2014.</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">Samyang 12mm 1:2.8 ED AS NCS Fish-eye is a bright, super wide-angle fish-eye lens designed especially for full-frame cameras. It offers the image area in 24 x 36mm format and the diagonal angle of view of 180 degrees. In terms of the optics, it is one of the most advanced “fish-eye” lenses. The product’s sophisticated optics consists of 12 lens elements arranged in 8 groups. This includes three elements made of low dispersion ED glass and two aspherical lens elements to ensure perfect image depth and minimized chromatic aberration. Samyang 12mm 1:2.8 ED AS NCS Fish-eye is the third lens of the brand (along with 10mm f/2.8 and 12mm f/2.0) with highly effective nanocrystal anti-reflection NCS coating applied together with standard UMC coatings. Owing to this solution and the fast aperture ratio (f/2.8) the lens can be used as a perfect tool in diverse lighting conditions, as it provides great focus, high contrast and natural colour reproduction even with the fully opened aperture. The premiere of Samyang 12mm 1:2.8 ED AS NCS Fish-eye is like a dream coming true for professional photographers and filmmakers who seem to have an increasing demand for this type of lenses since the release of 8mm and 7.5mm models, which are considered to be the best “fish-eye” lenses on the market.</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">You will have an opportunity to take a look at the pre-production copy of the new lens on the Samyang stand (hall 2.1, A-025) during the upcoming Photokina 2014 fairs in Cologne. The visitors will be also able to test two other recently introduced lenses: Samyang 50mm 1:4 AS UMC and Samyang V-DSLR 50mm T1.5 AS UMC.</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">The market release date for the new lens and its retail price will be announced at a later date.</p>
<p style="color: #000000;"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

  • Poll Poll
When will we see a replacement for the 100-400?

When will we see a replacement for the 100-400?

  • Photokina

    Votes: 1 1.9%
  • This fall

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1st half of 2015

    Votes: 11 20.4%
  • 2nd half of 2015

    Votes: 7 13.0%
  • 2016-2020

    Votes: 12 22.2%
  • When hell freezes over

    Votes: 23 42.6%

There have been lots of talk of a 100-400 replacement and yet nothing has materialized. When might we see this lens?

I have all but given up hope that it will be replaced. After all, it is Canon's top selling lens and if they made it too good it would hurt 200-400F4 sales :o

The 'Original' S90 and underwater housing WP-DC35

I'm considering getting an underwater housing for my little S90. It's a great little camera (the original pocketable quality powershot!). I'm going on a holiday though and would like to try some underwater photography.

Interestingly, getting a new WP-DC35 for my S90 seems to be the cheapest way for me to do that and have acceptable image quality too (and RAW ability to boot).

Any recommendations regarding setup of the camera, tips and trick are welcome because I don't have much opportunity to experiment.

My S90 has been modified with Richard Franiec's Custom S90 Grip and Lensmate control dial ring. Can I leave these accessories on when I want to use the underwater housing or do I need to strip them off?

Many thanks.

1DX vs D4s

I have to admit I only shoot Canon and this is probably pointless but I wanted so say it anyway. I also have a 1DX and love it. I am a wedding photographer and all of my favorite photographers love Nikon and talk about how awesome their D4s cameras are. I read in reviews that the D4s beats the 1Dx hands down. The 1DX loses to Nikon by 7 points in a sensor test on the DOX website. After reading about them I have a couple of observations.

The 1DX has more MPs
The 1Dx has a higher fps
The 1Dx has a better viewfinder
The 1DX has a better, faster, more accurate AF system

Now the D4s is supposedly better in all areas related to the sensor, especially DR, but here are some quotes from DOX website, "As for the much-vaunted dynamic range the Nikon D4s has an extra 1.5 stops at base over the Canon EOS-1D X but that advantage is eroded at higher ISOs and there’s nothing in it by ISO 1600....The Nikon D4S sensor may have a wider dynamic range and better color discrimination than the Canon EOS-1D X but the gulf between the two sensors is less than you might think, and that’s certainly the case with noise levels....The upshot is the Nikon has better low-light performance overall, but even then it’s really only a slight advantage when using raw, and may not be visible at all with out-of-camera Jpegs...the Nikon D4s is ahead of the Canon EOS 1D X, but in reality the two are closely matched and that applies as much to the technical spec’ as anything else... in the right hands both cameras produce results that would be difficult to tell apart.

So the D4s is a "better" camera because of the sensor, which is, in all reality, so little better that most won't be able to tell the difference, but it doesn't get any credit for better AF, more MP and a higher frame rate? Also it is 2 years older than the D4s.

This news is exciting!

Well it would seem that the new much rumored, much anticipated new 7mk2 is 'only' going to be an incremental improvement over the old 7 '. It remains to be seen if its actually going to be so much better than the 70d ...much like the 5d3 vs the 6d...same sensor for all practical purposes, differentiated by other nice to haves, which we all know about. . .but essentially one can coach the same image quality out of both cameras. I think that's where the difference between the 7d2 and 70d will lie, same sensor on both (which for me would be rather disappointing to say the least!) and some differences elsewhere...problem is that the 70d seems to be quite competent as it is so the 7d2 wil have to be a huge improvement in a lot of areas to make it a worthwhile 'upgrade' from 7d2...especially if its the same or almost the same sensor?

But that's not really where my excitement lies...its in that rumored 1inch sensor camera. By all accounts the Sony rx100mk3 is a kick ass little camera, and although ultimate image quality would seem to lag slightly behind the G1xmk2 it is astonishingly close, and quite a feat, taking the size of the sensor, size of camera and price into account. Wouldnt it be grand if Canon can deliver something similar? I am sure it would have less pixels, ( Canon just cant seem to get this megapixel thing together ), which might be a blessing in disguise because perhaps the high iso quality would benefit...

Anyway I am looking forward to that camera if the rumors turn out to be true...and if it can compete with that little Sony wonder

Lastly if the 7d2's sensor is indeed the same as the 70d then what does that say about Canon's sensor R&D? Are they going to sit out this recession with their existing sensor technology and wait for the economies of the world to pick up before spending money on R&D? or do they just not have it? Or will they release it later...like we have been 'rumoring' for the last couple of years?

So in my view, it all hinges on this new 7d2 sensor, if its the same as the 70d it will be rather disappointing from what we can expect in the future.

BTW I am not in the market for either a 7d2 or 70d, but I have been keenly interested in the rumors of a new sensor.

Will this 7d2sensor point the way forward, or not?

Rent, adapt or tele-convert?

Hey guys quick question. I'm going to an event where I'll be sitting a bit far away from the main goings on. The longest lens I have is my 70-200 f/4L IS.

Was thinking I could probably do with a bit more reach. Here's my Q -

Rent - 300mm f/4L IS (f/4 because the performers aint movin much and I wanna keep a lowish profile) ~ $50

Adapt - I'd have to buy an adaptor for the EOS M but then I could use the 70-200 on it. ~$80

Tele-convert - again I'd have to buy a tele-convertor (thinking Kenko). ~$150

Option 4 - crop. $0

I kinda wanna try out the 300 just to see what's it's like. It would also be my first time renting a lens, could be fun.

I have a T2i lying around but carrying 3 bodies plus all the crap along with them is not my idea of a fun time. I wanted to go with the 5D / tele and EOS M / 11-22 for the occasional wide shot. Light and easy.

Thoughts?

(This is totally non urgent btw and I'll prob rent but just wanted to see some of your thought processes).

A light camera on a light glidecam/steadycam with high video quality?

Hello all,

Been playing with video captures on my 5D2 and falling in love with it.
However, the system would be too heavy for me, if I add a glidecam/steadycam.

Can someone recommend a light videocamera/SLR that works well with a mini/light glidecam?
Pls recommend the mini glidecam too.

Since most clips will be shot outdoor, I am hoping this light videocamera can match the 5D2
video quality when set at ISO at or below 400. (1080p 24 & 30fps is a must)

I love magic lantern for video and I hv my eyes on SL1. Any other recommendations for a light videocam/glidecam combo? I will mainly be shooting at 35mm (full frame) or wider.

Thanks a lot!

Fuel for the fire: Amazon DSLR Rankings...and no REAL 2012-2013 market data?

http://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Electronics-DSLR-Cameras/zgbs/electronics/3017941/ref=zg_bs_nav_e_4_3109924011

I just found it interesting...this page used to be completely dominated by Canon DSLRs. Earlier in the year/late last year, there were only a couple Nikon cameras on the list, and all of them were below 10th place. Today, I just thought I'd take another gander:

Canon still holds the top spot, with the T3i...however (at the time of writing this...seems the report is updated hourly, so who knows what it will be by the time anyone reads this):

#2: D3300
#4: D5300 Kit Option
#7: D7100
#9: D810
#10: D3100
#15: D5300 Kit Option
#17: D5200

That is seven DSLRs on that list that are now Nikon. Plus a Pentax. Of the cameras on the list, all of the Nikon's except for one held their position or GAINED. ONE Nikon fell. Of the cameras on the list, it was split 50/50 between which FELL and which gained or held their position.

This has been a staple ranking for those who tout the market share argument. I think, in general, THIS page is one of the key pages that fuels the market share argument. In addition, so does this page:

http://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Electronics-DSLR-Camera-Bundles/zgbs/electronics/2476680011/ref=zg_bs_nav_e_4_3017941

Where the top two spots are held by Nikon kits now. It should also be pointed out that Nikon and Sony cameras hold the top spot on all the Digital Camera best sellers listings. I don't think that a page that updates hourly is honestly a good gauge of which specific camera is best...however I do believe that the consistency of brands on these pages over time is an indication of market trends. These pages used to be dominated by Canon on a regular basis...today, they seem to be much more diverse. Regardless of who has what rankings, the greater diversity is very intriguing to me.

I started looking at these pages to see what the current state of "the market", in this case, let's just say the whole damn digital camera market, really was. In my additional searches...I have actually not found any recent market share data that's been aggregated into something easily comparable between brands. There are lots of reports, up supposedly through 2012, and some reports published in 2013, however from an actual real data standpoint, most seem to reference data up through 2010 and maybe 2011. I have not actually found any global sales reports, for the DSLR market specifically, but even the digital camera market in general, that was completely through 2012, and nothing at all for 2013. I found some reports that speak about just the Japanese or Asian markets, however the demographics there, and the cameras sold, don't seem to jive with the rest of the world (more mirrorless, for example).

So...the whole market share argument...I'm just curious, honestly curious, where it comes from. When I look around, I see that market share up through 2010 was indeed dominated by Canon. It was still controlled by Canon in 2011, however Sony and Nikon apparently closed the gap. Since then...the most critical years...2012, 2013, 2014...there doesn't actually seem to be any concrete data about the real state of the market. Only bits and pieces of disparate data that aren't directly comparable. Who is dominant, who is selling the most...and of what kind of cameras? How has market share shifted, if it's shifted at all? Which camera types are most popular, and what alternatives are REALLY cutting into what markets and where?

Based on the current Amazon Digital Camera best sellers rankings...Canon, which I do remember held the top spots in pretty much every category...only seems to hold the top spot in ONE category now, and Nikon and Sony cameras are much more prevalent in those categories as well. Overall, those pages contain a greater diversity of brands, and the very strong dominance Canon cameras once held seems to have wavered.

Trip to Easter Island & Machu Picchu. Need advice.

In November my wife and I are headed to the aforementioned destinations. What we can bring is rather limited in weight and bulk, so I need some first-hand advice as to how much camera equipment to bring. As a minimum I will take my 6D and 24-105mm f/4 lens. I would also like to take a 60D and 70-200mm f/4 zoom. I cannot see risking my 70-200mm f/2.8 II due to size, weight or risk of loss. I read that nothing over 200mm is allowed at Machu Picchu unless you pay $300 as a pro photographer, which I certainly am not. One body/lens set scares me should something break. From a security standpoint, some travelers recommend a "frontpack" as opposed to a "backpack". Our personal safety is more important than the contents of a backpack, since at least the camera equipment is fully insured. I want to take pictures, but I also don't want to be a slave to my camera. This is the first time we have ever been out of the US or Canada, so at 67 years old I need to make reasonable choices. Your input desperately desired!

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB