Threads

Aug 25, 2014

i begin to think we will not....

LovePhotography · Aug 24, 2014

I want the ultimate set up for nighttime athletics (etc.)
Currently have a D6 and 70-200 2.8 mk2 and then just crop like heck in DxO9

Options:
1. Buy a 200-400 with 1.4 tele (but it weighs as much as a gallon of milk, is expensive and then miss shots when the ball comes to this side of the field)
2. Add the 2x tele mk3 but lose some f-stop and sharpness and also lose the close shots
3. Buy a crop sensor body or use the T5i or EOS M I already have with the 70-200 and use the Canon 6D with Sigma 24-105 Art lens.

Will a good crop sensor (like on the 70D) have just as much sharpness and resolution as the full sized sensor on the 6D, or do you lose resolution because the lens can't handle the resolution, or the sensor isn't as good as the 6D even though they have managed to squeeze just as many pixels on the APS-C as on the full-sized 6D sensor?

Here's what I'm talking about.. The winning goal in overtime the other night (Baylor vs Rice) from about 60 yards away, after being cropped in DxO9. Shot with 6D and ef 70-200 f/2.8 mk2 at f/6.3 1/320 ISO 12800. (Yes, I know f/6.3 was a poor choice, should have gone with f/4.5, my bad).

I want the best, but don't want to spend $11k if I will have just as many challengess as I've got now.

You think the price of the 200-400 1.4 will continue to drop?

neosec · Aug 24, 2014

Am I missing a setting that may help with a tough to shoot video scene? Or a better technique?

I use a 5D Mk3 with a 70-200 2.8 to shoot video at a race track. Typical settings...
1920/30 IPB, Manual, f16 (daylight) f5 (night), Shutter 250 (day) 125 (night).
As the cars circle the track they range from ~35 feet to ~200 feet which is why I need to stay stopped down a bit to maintain focus. At night I trade off some definition from the higher shutter speed for better exposure as it gets dark (the track lighting is poor and a mixture of HPS (yellow) and MH (white) lights. A white balance nightmare).

In an effort to expose for my subject, the cars, I use auto ISO during daylight because the cars drive in and out of harsh shadows from trees as they circle the track. This works quite well but it only useful during the day since the Auto ISO tops out at 12800. By the end of the night I'm shooting with a fixed ISO of 16000. This becomes a problem since I'm panning from poorly lit areas to shooting right into the lights.
I'm thinking switching to Tv mode at 125 and ISO 20000 and let the aperture handle the exposure, though I haven't tried that yet. Hopefully the very High ISO would keep the aperture stopped down enough to maintain the focus throughout the range.

Comments/Suggestions?

Hjalmarg1 · Aug 24, 2014

I have rented the 85mm f1.2L and its AF turns to be slooowwww, even on my 5D3. I have heard that its AF is a little faster on 1Dx due to higher voltage of the battery.
Have any of you experience any improvement in the EF 85 f1.2L AF speed when adding battery grip?

Thanks

polarhannes · Aug 23, 2014

Hello everyone,

I own the 70-200 II and I am mostly doing portraiture.
Does someone here own both and can upload some sample shots (wide open)? The question is if the bokeh and sharpness really is that much better (of course it is, but is it worth the serious amount of cash? How much is the difference really in IQ and bokeh?)

I also thought of getting the 300 2.8 (which would then be my longest lens), but it might really be a bit long for portraits.

Thanks to all of you helpful people

jeffa4444 · Aug 23, 2014

All the talk is of the impending 7D MKII and whether the 5D MKIII will be upgraded if the 7D MKII has new sensor tech.

Well here is my wish list for the 6D MKII its not long:-

Same ground glass set-up as 5D MKIII - the removable one now gets dirt behind it

Joystick like the 7D / 5D MKIII etc. - the joypad is slower to use

19 cross point AF points - useful for flying birds, cars, planes etc.

Tilting LCD screen - Like the type Olympus use which is great for high or low shots

Ruined · Aug 23, 2014

The 85mm f/1.2L II, while one of the most stunning portrait lenses ever made, does have some significant disadvantages expressed by users that can pop up even in portrait scenarios (especially portraits during events or outdoors):
85mm f/1.2L II disadvantages:
* Durability - exposed rear element near flush with mount resulting in precarious lens changes in the field, focus motor susceptible to damage when barrel extended and powered off, lack of weather sealing
* Autofocus - Slow on most bodies (1D excluded) due to higher voltage required to drive motor efficiently with large elements & extending barrel
* Manual focus by wire - some dislike this style of focusing, as it may feel less responsive and does not work when camera is powered off

The 50mm f/1.0L had virtually all of these disadvantages and Canon was able to rectify virtually all of them by releasing a slightly slower 50mm f/1.2L, which retains most of the look of the f/1.0 but with increased sharpness and less distracting flare. While the 50mm f/1.2L is not the most popular lens as it is challenging to use and not the sharpest, it is both far easier to use and sharper than the 50mm f/1.0L. The 50mm f/1.2L is currently my go-to lens for event portraits; I wish I could also regularly use the 85mm f/1.2L II but some of its design characteristics do not appear compatible with the often hectic and unpredictable events that could occur during an event.

Given the design similarities between the 50mm f/1.0L and 85mm f/1.2L II, what if the same revisions could be done with the 85mm f/1.2L II using design cues from the 50mm f/1.0L > 50mm f/1.2L revision? Would you accept the below disadvantages in exchange for all of the deficiencies listed in the first paragraph being completely rectified - with the same or greater sharpness & similar "look" with lower weight/size as a bonus:

Known disadvantages of next 85L being f/1.4 instead of f/1.2:
- 50% less light entering lens wide open
- 14% less DOF isolation capability wide open

Potential advantages of next 85L being f/1.4 instead of f/1.2 (using 50L f/1.0>f/1.2 design cues):
- Better protected rear element
- Lens barrel does not extend when focusing
- Weather sealed, easier to accomplish due to lack of extending lens barrel when focusing
- Faster autofocus, similar to speed of 50mm f/1.2L, due to lack of extending barrel and smaller lens elements
- Full time manual override, does not require camera to be powered on
- Lower weight
- Smaller size
- Potential minor increase in sharpness
- Potential minor reduction in flare
- Lower price as less expensive to make
- Overall "look" is similar, but not identical to the 85L f/1.2L II; like the 50L f/1.2L and 85L f/1.2L II, the lens design would be for portraits and hence not overcorrected/clinical.

Thoughts?

JusSayin · Aug 23, 2014

Nikon D800E thermal issues chronicled here: http://scottreither.com/blogwp/2012/07/01/nikon-d800-e-long-exposure-issues-problems-2/
and here: http://www.trichardsen.com/blog/nikon-d810-and-why-i-am-returning-it
and here: http://photosofarkansas.com/2013/08/02/d800-reticulation-issues-during-night-photography-white-dot-problems/

If the sensor in the D810 is physically (without anti-alias filter) the same as the D800/D800E, differing in the pipeline firmware/software; or - if the sensor in the D810 is physically different from the D800 series yet every D8XX has thermal issues, what are we to learn from all this?

polishphotographer · Aug 23, 2014

Is this lens usable on a full frame? Maybe is it passible to use this lens with a full frame on 16/17mm?

Canon Rumors · Aug 23, 2014

HTML:

<div style="float: right; margin:0 0 76px 0px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=17099">Tweet</a></div>
<p>We’ve been told to get the maple syrup ready, as a new 24mm pancake lens will arrive with the EOS 7D Mark II. No aperture was given, though f/2.8 would be assumed.</p>
<p>The same source also said a wide angle zoom was coming. This may be the previously mentioned 15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM. The third mentioned lens was a standard zoom, though no focal length was given for this. Perhaps this could be a non-L full frame zoom?</p>
<p>What isn’t getting mentioned anymore is the thorn-in-my-side Canon EF 100-400 replacement.</p>
<p>The same source also said that the <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/08/canon-ef-11-24-f2-8l-coming-cr1/" target="_blank">previously mentioned EF 11-24 f/2.8L</a> hasn’t been spoken about in their circles, so it could be a post Photokina thing or nothing at all.</p>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Canon Rumors · Aug 23, 2014

HTML:

<div style="float: right; margin:0 0 76px 0px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/08/update-on-the-eos-7d-mark-ii-spec-list/">Tweet</a></div>
<p>We’re going over the information we have and have noticed a few inconsistencies that we’d like to mention. We have a bit of doubt about the sensor spec we’ve listed for the camera and will work to confirm that. There is a possibility that it’s an all new 20.2MP sensor and not the same one as the EOS 70D.</p>
<ul>
<li>We’re not 100% sure about GPS, we think the camera may actually have it.</li>
<li>We mentioned radio triggering with the popup flash, but that may have been a mistake.</li>
<li>“Fine Detail CMOS Sensor” is standard Canon language for Canon sensors.</li>
<li>The camera has iTR (metering sensor-assisted servo tracking) just like the EOS-1D X</li>
<li>The camera should be compatible with f/8 lenses at the center, and maybe more points.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Lots more to come….</em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Canon Rumors · Aug 23, 2014

HTML:

<div style="float: right; margin:0 0 76px 0px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/08/new-large-sensor-powershot-rumor-cr2/">Tweet</a></div>
<p>We’re told by a very good source that Canon will announce a new PowerShot camera with a 1″ sensor. The camera will be nearly as compact as the S series camera and is intended to compete with Sony’s RX100.</p>
<p>No specs were given.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

jebrady03 · Aug 23, 2014

Turns out, we already know! http://a248.e.akamai.net/pix.crutchfield.com/Manuals/280/28070D135_DL.PDF
Look at the very first sentence under Introduction...

The EOS 70D (W/N) is a high-performance, digital single-lens reflex camera featuring a fine-detail CMOS sensor with approx. 20.2 effective megapixels...

[email protected] · Aug 22, 2014

Colleagues:
The rubber grip or cover that fits on the zoom ring on my 24-70 II has come loose and become very slightly stretched out. At this point it is a minor annoyance, not a disaster, though I am going overseas next week and don't like surprises. Any suggestions for managing this problem? Or should I send it back to CPS (after I return) and get it replaced? Thank you for your time.

Canon Rumors · Aug 22, 2014

HTML:

<div style="float: right; margin:0 0 76px 0px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/08/are-these-the-eos-7d-mark-ii-specifications/">Tweet</a></div>
<p><strong>Updated on August 28, 2014</strong>

Updates and clarifications on the specifications are in bold below.</p>
<p>We think we have the specifications for the upcoming Canon EOS 7D Mark II, we’re trying to authenticate things down to the CR3 level. We have been incorrect about previous features of the camera. For one, the top plate is not an “EOS-1 Style”, and the camera does not shoot 12fps. <strong>Previous sources have said the sensor does have new technology, but it is not multi-layer, <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/06/new-sensor-tech-in-eos-7d-mark-ii-cr2/" target="_blank">which is what we originally reported.</a> We have been thrown off by patents showing layered sensors. We can’t confirm at this time if there is indeed new technology in the sensor. Our source for this specification list just mentions the megapixel count.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Canon EOS 7D Mark II Specifications</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Kit lenses: 18-135 IS STM and 15-85 IS (no STM)</li>
<li>CF, UDMA mode 7 + SD, UHS-I</li>
<li>GPS is in the camera</li>
<li>No WiFi</li>
<li>Fixed LCD, with no touch function.</li>
<li>20.2MP APS-C Sensor</li>
<li>Dual Pixel CMOS AF</li>
<li>Dual DIGIC 6 Processors</li>
<li>65 AF points “All Cross-type”. Dual cross on the center point.</li>
<li>f/8 on center point at least, could be on more points.</li>
<li>10fps</li>
<li>ISO 100-12800, ISO Boost mode 25600 and 51200</li>
<li>1080p/720p both get 60fps</li>
<li>Servo AF for video shooting.</li>
<li>Anti-flicker mode, eliminates flickers under flickering lights (e.g. fluorescent lamps).</li>
<li>Spot metering size 1.8%</li>
<li>Built-in flash</li>
<li>Mic and headphones connectors</li>
<li>Can sync time between 7D II cameras.</li>
<li>Lens electronic MF</li>
<li>About 100% coverage OVF</li>
<li>New Battery – LP-E6N</li>
<li><strong>New Battery Grip BG-E16</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>I stress I am trying to confirm everything above, and once I do I will update the rating on these specifications. I am 90% confident these are accurate EOS 7D Mark II specifications.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

SPL · Aug 22, 2014

Hi everyone….I apologize in advance as I think this has been discussed before. Just wondering what everyone’s opinion is regarding how and what they use to clean their lenses. Any drawbacks/concerns when using various types of lens cloths, Lenspen, ZEISS pre-moistened lens cloths, one’s own shirt leave? Thanks!

Canon Rumors · Aug 22, 2014

HTML:

<div style="float: right; margin:0 0 76px 0px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/08/sigma-adds-eos-c100-support-to-the-18-35-f1-8-dc-hsm-art/">Tweet</a></div>
<p><b>Sigma has released Firmware v 1.02 for the 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM</b></p>
<p><span style="color: #222222;">Autofocus is supported at any aperture value when used with the Canon Digital Cinema Camera EOS C100.</span><br style="color: #222222;" /><span style="color: #222222;"> </span><br style="color: #222222;" /><span style="color: #222222;">Please Note: Before upgrading the firmware of 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM A013, please first update your </span><a href="http://www.sigma-global.com/download/en/" target="_blank">SIGMA Optimization Pro to Ver1.2.0</a><span style="color: #222222;">.</span><br style="color: #222222;" /><span style="color: #222222;"> </span><br style="color: #222222;" /><strong><a href="http://www.sigma-global.com/download/en/information.html" target="_blank">Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Firmware v1.02</a> | <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/967344-REG/sigma_18_35mm_f1_8_dc_hsm.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 DC HSM Art at B&H Photo</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

3kramd5 · Aug 22, 2014

I now own two third party stabilized lenses, the sigma 70-200 2.8 EX (there are a lot of letters and I always forget them) and the tamron 150-600. I've noticed a quirk they both exhibit that none of my canon IS lenses do: when the stabilizer engages, the frame tilts down what visually feels like about 5-10°. With the 70-200, it's not that bad, but at 600mm with the tamron, 10° is a lot.

Has anyone else noticed that kind of this happening? What's the explanation? Misalignment in the stabilizing optic? Maybe I'll shoot a video if nobody can picture what I'm seeing.

Canon Rumors · Aug 21, 2014

HTML:

<div style="float: right; margin:0 0 76px 0px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=17082">Tweet</a></div>
<p>Canon is celebrating the 25th anniversary of the EOS-1 series, the company’s flagship range of SLR cameras, which began with the launch of the EOS-1 film SLR in 1989. CPN recently got the unique opportunity to talk to two of the key men behind the development of the EOS-1 series and EOS System – Tsunemasa Ohara and Yoshiaki Sugiyama of Canon Inc. in Tokyo. In two exclusive interviews they reveal the secrets behind the historical development of the EOS-1 SLRs</p>
<p>Yoshiaki Sugiyama has worked on the design of Canon SLR systems since 1978, including the T90 (1986), the EOS 650/620 (1987) and the EOS-1 (1989) cameras. CPN spoke to him about the history and development of EOS-1 series SLR designs.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/education/technical/developing_the_eos_1_series_design.do" target="_blank">Read the full interview here</a></strong></p>
<p><em>article image from <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com" target="_blank">kenrockwell.com</a></em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Ruined · Aug 21, 2014

I have always been fond of the output of the 85L II.

But, I have never tried full time deployment for event photography. Has anyone used it for this purpose?

My concerns:
1) Slow autofocus might result in missed shots, such as wedding reception entrances (where people often run or do unexpected maneuvers). I have used my 50mm f/1.2L for this and it seems that this is about as slow as I would want for autofocus, but the 85L II is significantly slower than the 50L.
2) Fragile - the exposed rear element during lens changes, potential of damaging the lens motor (or so I have heard) when lens is placed face down with the barrel extended, and lack of weather sealing - I am wondering if this is the best fit for event photography which often is fast paced, hectic, and unpredictable.

Has anyone deployed this lens for event photography? I love using my 70-200 f/2.8L IS II but f/2.8 is not always fast enough and for portraits the bokeh of 85L II is unmatched. But the build of the 70-200 just seems so much more robust in more ways than one. 135L is an alternative but I do not like the bokeh at f/4 (which would be needed at times) and it is often too long of a focal length indoors. 85 1.8 same issue with bokeh at f/4... can't seem to find better alternative to 24l/50l/70-200 Thoughts?

JusSayin · Aug 21, 2014

Clarkvision.com did an analysis here. Any thoughts? http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/evaluation-canon-6d/

nielsgeode · Aug 21, 2014

Yesterday I received my new Sigma 50 art ;D I immediately tested it (on my 5DIII) and found some shocking results. :'(

I have not calibrated this lens yet. Attached are two pictures, both taken at f/1.4. First picture: I used center AF point. Second picture: I used an AF point on the very far left. I contacted Sigma and they say this is not normal.

What are your experiences? Is this likely to be a fault with this single lens or do all sigma 50 art's suffer from this issue?

Thanx!
Niels

JumboShrimp · Aug 20, 2014

DxO's website's last post was on or about July 24. Have they gone bankrupt or are they on vacation? Or do I just have an old cached page ...?

chmod · Aug 20, 2014

Is this normal board policy to remove entire posts?

Serious question.

Canon Rumors · Aug 20, 2014

HTML:

<div style="float: right; margin:0 0 76px 0px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/08/samyang-teases-new-lenses/">Tweet</a></div>
<p><strong>*Update*

</strong>We’re told the new Samyang lens will actually be a 50mm f/1.4. (<em>thanks!</em>)</p>
<p><strong>Original post

</strong>Samyang has started with the teasers for an announcement on August 26, 2014. It is expected that they will announce a  50mm f/2 lens for their VDSLR line.</p>
<p>It doesn’t look like we’ll see their first autofocus lens this time around.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/samyang50teaser.jpg"><img class="alignnone wp-image-17068 size-medium" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/samyang50teaser-416x575.jpg" alt="samyang50teaser" width="416" height="575" /></a></p>
<p>Source: [<a href="https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http://dicahub.com/2014/08/20/%EC%82%BC%EC%96%91%EC%98%B5%ED%8B%B1%EC%8A%A4-8-%EC%9B%94-26-%EC%9D%BC-%EC%83%88%EB%A1%9C%EC%9A%B4-%EB%A0%8C%EC%A6%88-%EB%B0%9C%ED%91%9C-%EC%98%88%EA%B3%A0" target="_blank">DH</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Threads

Threads

Poll Poll will we see the EF 100-400mm MK II announced at photokina?

YES

NO

Attachments

Attachments

Locked what happened to the M3 rumor post?

Filter

Forum statistics

Gallery statistics

Poll

will we see the EF 100-400mm MK II announced at photokina?

Locked

what happened to the M3 rumor post?