APS-C 60mm or 100mm macro lens?

Hi,

im not sure if to buy the ef-s 60mm for my APS-C or the EF 100mm.

pro thing would be that i could use the 100mm on a FF camera too. contra perhaps that 100mm on APS-C is really shaky. but i wanna use a monopod anyway.
price wise they are not so much different. so which one should i go for? thought im gonna go with the YN 14 EX flash. original canon flashes are like extremly expensive for macro shooting...

Canon Mail In Rebate Question

Hi,

I was filling the Rebate form, I noticed "Limit 1 Claim per eligible product per household, except for residents of Rhode Island – Claim form may include separate purchases of different eligible products." I had delivered the item to my work address where few hundred people work and was about to give the same address for American Express Card delivery. I can't use my residence (billing) address because I'll change residence in near future.

Will there be any problem to use work address? I'm doing Mail In Rebate for the first time, so I am taking precaution. Please advise.

Thanks.

which telephoto for travel?

Hi all

Short version - should I switch out my 70-200 4L IS, or even my 70-200 2.8L IS II, for a 135L?

Longer version ...

Over the last 12 months I have bought and sold a few lenses and I'm generally pretty happy with my kit now. I have a 6D with:

35 2 IS - general walk around / street / indoors / low light / shallow depth of field / wider portraits

40 2.8 pancake - haven't used it much since I got the 35 2 IS but for the price useful when you want the camera to be as compact as possible or to have in a pocket as a wider option if carrying a long zoom

85 1.8 - portraits / low light / shallow depth of field / occasionally as small and light short telephoto for travel (esp if hiking long distances)

24-70 4L IS - general walk around / travel zoom, landscapes, some close up ability (I know it's not really a macro despite its macro mode, but I've never got into macro photography). I know the 2.8L II would be "better" in most respects but I find the 4L good for travel, especially when doing a lot of hiking, and the 35 2 IS gives me better low light ability than the 2.8 zoom.

70-200 2.8L IS II - portraits / events / general purpose, especially outdoors, when I'm doing something where the weight/size is not an issue / anything and everything which works in that focal range

70-200 4L IS - travel telephoto zoom / general purpose, especially outdoors, when I'm doing something where the weight/size of the 2.8L is an issue. Either 70-200 is great for landscapes, but I tend to use the 4L more for that, because it's the one I'm more likely to carry to places which have nice landscapes!

I would quite like to add a fast 50 to my kit, and otherwise I'm not keen to add more lenses to my kit - I think I have more than enough already! I do occasionally think about the 16-35 4L IS, but am trying to resist. Don't think I'd make enough use of the 16-24 range to justify it.

So, the question is whether any of you would recommend a different travel telephoto option? In particular, I'm thinking about the possibility of switching out my 70-200 4L IS for a 135L. Good idea or bad idea? I've also considered switching my 70-200 2.8 for a 135L, but in the end I think the 70-200 2.8 is probably too good and too useful to part with.

The 70-200 4L IS has the advantages of the flexibility of a zoom, weather sealing, and IS.
The 135L has the advantages of being easier to pack/carry (it's shorter), draws less attention (being black and shorter), two stop faster aperture, and being a fantastic portrait lens as well.

I've also thought about the 70-300L, but I've used it a few times and just never been taken by it. It's not the photos it takes - they're great - but I just didn't enjoy using it that much. Maybe I just need to use it more to get used to the reversed placement of the zoom and focus rings but ... well ... I think I'd rather keep my 70-200 4 than switch to the 70-300L.

Obviously this is a question I will have to answer for myself in the end, but I figured if there was anywhere I might get some useful advice, it's CR ...

Thanks for any thoughts!

More Canon EOS C300 Mark II Talk [CR1]

HTML:
We’re hearing more and more about new Cinema EOS products has we get closer to NAB 2015 in April in Las Vegas, a show we will be attending.</p>
<p>We were told the following about the upcoming 4K Canon EOS C300 Mark II</p>
<ul>
<li>Color rendition a top priority</li>
<li>Future proof mandate, great dynamic range, codec and usability</li>
<li>Canon does not see the FS7 as a competitor, as they expect their camera to be better in every way.</li>
<li>New motor zoom lens for C-series coming</li>
<li>Shoulder mount system for EOS C300 Mark II coming</li>
<li>No more on pricing at this time</li>
</ul>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Patent: Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS & Others

HTML:
<p>A patent for a new EF 300mm f/4L IS has appeared. Other optical formulas appearing in the patent are 24mm f/2.8 and 50mm f/1.3 with variable diffractive index elements which help correct some aberrations <em>(thanks Keith)</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Patent Publication No. 2015-28551</strong> (Google Translated)</p>
<ul>
<li>Published 2015.2.12</li>
<li>Filing date 2013.7.30</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Example</strong></p>
<table summary="embodiment" frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Example</th>
<th>Focal distance</th>
<th>Fno.</th>
<th>Half angle</th>
<th>Image height</th>
<th>Overall length of the lens</th>
<th>BF</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>One</td>
<td>294.00</td>
<td>4.14</td>
<td>4.21</td>
<td>21.64</td>
<td>239.07</td>
<td>83.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Two</td>
<td>24.48</td>
<td>2.86</td>
<td>41.47</td>
<td>21.64</td>
<td>92.00</td>
<td>38.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Three</td>
<td>51.70</td>
<td>1.30</td>
<td>22.71</td>
<td>21.64</td>
<td>94.01</td>
<td>37.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Four</td>
<td>294.00</td>
<td>4.14</td>
<td>4.21</td>
<td>21.64</td>
<td>240.00</td>
<td>82.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Five</td>
<td>6.15 20.45 71.28</td>
<td>2.88 3.71 3.69</td>
<td>30.34 9.98 2.89</td>
<td>3.60</td>
<td>84.11 86.12 90.41</td>
<td>11.74 15.68 8.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Six</td>
<td>293.97</td>
<td>4.14</td>
<td>4.21</td>
<td>21.64</td>
<td>239.98</td>
<td>85.34</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2015-02-18" target="_blank">Egami</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
<div id="adkengage_ssp_div"></div>
<script
    type="text/javascript"
    src="http://adkengage.com/pshandler.js?aid=11563&v=Rzv9QQ%2BeQKSVnAaEOwTXfA%3D%3D&dpid=6638&ru=http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-admin/post.php"
>
</script>

Camera sales in Japan 2014

"BCNranking published the full 2014 camera sales date in Japan. The good news is that Sony dethroned Olympus and is now number one in the mirrorless system camera market in Japan. And in Japan mirrorless is very strong and on par with DSLR in terms of cameras sales. The (unsurprisingly) bad news is that Sony really holds no more any meaningful share of the DSLR market:"

Canon is still leader in DSLR market

http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/

which 200mm lens to get

Hello everyone,

i am planing to obtain a 200mm lens and looking into various options. i would use the lens mostly for outdoors, portraits, sport, kids playing etc. i was looking into 200mm F2.8 L which is very similar to 135 f2 L. The only problem for me would be lack of IS with this focal length. Second choice would be one of 70-200mm, preferably f2.8 IS II. however my issue with this lens would be size/weight and not really being as "special" as my 135L. My ultimate choice would be 200mm F2 L. For the quality of shots i would forgive the size/weight factor, but price would be an issue and would need a bit more time to gather $$$. I already have 70-300 L and do not use it much since it does not produce the same "feel" as 135L

What is your experience with lenses mentioned above and how would you compare them?

thankfully,

50 1.8 II inconsistent focus

i have had my 50 1.8 for over a year now and never use it because the focus is terribly inconsistent. i mean like 1 sharp image out of 30 even at f8. i wasn't overly disappointed because it only cost 80$ on sale and i know you get what you pay for. i have been doing a lot of reading instead of shooting because of the arctic temperatures we have been having for over a month , and found a few website where people have used the "solder trick" to fix their nifty fifty. i decided to give it a whirl since it is basically a disposable lens and i dont use it anyways. i started by popping the back cover off, its just clipped in. then found the contacts that need to be soldered together. this was the complicated part because none of the posts i read were clear about which contacts needed to be connected. they basically said try it and see what works. well i can tell you joining all the contacts like one guy said , doesnt work at all. the focus motor started making noise as soon as i connected the lens to the camera and it wasnt even turned on yet. then i tried the 2 contacts on the left together and the 2 on the right together. no funny noises , but it would not focus at all. it just kept hunting. then i tried just the 2 contacts on the right joined together and bingo ! focus is perfect 95% of the time versus around 10% before.
i have no idea what joining those contacts does , but it works great for me. its still a plastic cheapo lens but at least now i can use it with confidence.
now i wish i would warm up a little outside so i can start taking pics again instead of fiddling lol.

this is the back cover. very easy to pop out with just the tip of a sharp knife
IMG_1912 by sedwards679, on Flickr

these are the contacts i am talking about
IMG_1910 by sedwards679, on Flickr

and these are the 2 i joined together(blue arrow)
IMG_1910-2 by sedwards679, on Flickr

16-35F4 L IS, Any good?

hi, I am keen to get the 16-35F4L zoom as a replacement for my 17-40. I have tested two copies from the store and this is what I get.

copy One, distant image of building slight softness at all apertures on left 20% compared to the right side....

Copy Two, distant image of building very definite softness on right side , sharp objects almost have a double image at all apertures , right 20% of image.

I have done numerous tests etc, copy one seems almost fine, especially compared to copy Two. I am reluctant to take it and then take it to service center and then being told that it is within specs. I have already paid for the lens but don't want to take it out of the shop until I am satisfied.

So my answer is how are owners of this lens finding them? Any other problems. I am talking about critical professional use...

Sigma 150-600 Sport - finally some in Canada

:) :) :) :) :) Well, I finally got my Sigma 150-600 today!! I was told that I probably got the first one in Canada. Maybe that is fitting, since I ordered back in October 2014. Now the fun begins. I am going to start some testing of the lens, probably crude compared to what the "labs" may have done, but I have to make sure it will work for me, particularly at the longer focal lengths.

WesternGuy

Corrupt images from 6D camera and 32GB SDHC Memory cards

I wanted to know if anyone was experiencing image corruption issues with their SD card and the Canon 6D. I bought my 6D last July and have shot over 2000 photos with it on a Lexar 32GB SDHC Class 10 600x card. I got error rates at about a 1 in 50 rate. I thought it might have been the Lexar card, so I sent the card back to Lexar for warranty replacement. They replaced the card, but I ended up getting similar image corruption issues on a shoot afterward. I have transferred images both directly from the SD card to my computer, and through the camera plugged via USB to my computer. I have tried loading the images on other people's computers, used iPhoto, Aperture, and Lightroom to try to read the formats - all with no luck.

Before I go out and spend money on different SD cards, I would like to determine if it might just be my camera. Has anyone ever encountered these kinds of write issues with Lexar Cards? Has anyone ever seen similar issues with cards of a different brand? I noticed someone with a post about 7D Mk II and Lexar cards as well. Is this a Lexar or Canon problem?

I have attached four photos below that illustrate the problem. The appear as banding or solid colours where there shouldn't be any. These corruption problems happen to both JPG and Raw files.

Attachments

  • IMG_0747.jpg
    IMG_0747.jpg
    282.1 KB · Views: 301
  • IMG_1688.jpg
    IMG_1688.jpg
    260.5 KB · Views: 276
  • IMG_2091.jpg
    IMG_2091.jpg
    110.8 KB · Views: 301
  • IMG_2217.jpg
    IMG_2217.jpg
    333.3 KB · Views: 295

Canon st-e3-rt problem

Hi there

I have a problem with my Canon st-e3-rt, I use it with my Canon 5d mk3 and 2 600ex-rt

I have experienced that the flashes don't flash when I release the shutter, the connection to the flashes work fine when I push the test button, its like the camera and the st-e3-rt are not connected...but if I put a flash directly on the camera, all is good, both as master releasing a slave, or on its own.

I have tried to clean all contacts, and I have repeatedly changed between the st-e3-rt and the flash on its own, the flash always work, but the st-e3-rt still wont release the flashes via the camera, only with the testbutton....

anyone have any idea if the camera...or the st-e3-rt is faulty?? or did I miss some setting, it used to work fine, have I accidently changed some settings???


Best

Klaus

6D firmware 1.1.6 exposure issue

I posted on dpreview forum that after updating to firmware 1.1.6 on my 6D I cannot get correct exposure on flash photography in low light. My pictures get extremely overexposed 9 out of 10 times. I cannot seem to find firmware 1.1.4 anymore, does anyone have a link for the 1.1.4 firmware so I can attempt a downgrade?

Background:
After upgrading to firmware 1.1.6 on my 6D I am no longer able to consistently use my flash.

I tried resetting all camera settings to default without remedy.

I have the 430EXII flash

I tried another 430EXII flash on my body and the problem was the same

I tried my lens and flash on a different (120D) canon body and could not repeat the issue..

When I use the flash it seems to turn up the power to high, especially if I use the flash in indirect setting in not so bright lit rooms. Ie most (9 out of 10) pictures are severely overexposed/unusable. However 1 out of 10 photos turn out as expected. Iso, exposure and time settings are all consistent between shots.

I have tried Lenses 24-105F4L and 70-300L with the same issue.

Since I did not experience the behavior before firmware 1.1.6 I would like to roll back to 1.1.4 but I can not find it on canon support site anymore.

I noticed someone else complaining about exposure issues on 1.1.6 so I am not alone?

Can anyone with firmware 1.1.4 download PM me please? Is it even possible to downgrade firmware?

-- Sorry I posted this to the wrong forum, can the moderator move it please? (EOS bodies for stills)
Regards,

Fredrik

7D Classic Good Enough for Pros?

When the 7D came out, it was marketed as a sports and wildife camera and it was highly regarded with 8fps and 19 crosstype AF points. Now, 19 crosstype points is what they're putting on the Rebels. Are 19 crosstype points really good enough to do pro quality work with anything action related? Or do I really have to step it up to a 5D Mark III with its 61 points? What do the keeper rates tend to be for these cams? And for those of you who'd say that a 5D Mark III is necessary for pro work, how did the pros survive before the 5D Mark III?

Which Lens to buy for Portraits

I've been thinking about getting a new lens mainly for portraits. I currently use a Nikkor 50 F2 with an adapter on a EOS 650D. The image quality of the lens is outstanding in comparison to the Canon 24-70 F2.8 MK I and the Canon 50 F1.4 I compared it to.

I've been thinking about buying one of the following lenses.
1. Canon 85 F1.8
2. Canon 100 F2
3. Tokina 100 F2.8 Macro
4. Canon 70-200 F2.8 IS USM II

I'm mainly shooting and making money with business portraits. I'm not into macro photography. I'm mainly considering the first 3 because of the cots and I guess that the image quality of primes is a lot better. I'm going to upgrade to FF within a year or two. So I'm only considering FF lenses.

What lens would you recommend. How is the image quality of the Canon 70-200 F2.8 IS USM II compared to the Canon 100 F2? What lens could you recommend? What are they reasons why you would choose one over the other?

Canon to Gold Sponsor 2020 Games in Toyko

HTML:
<em>Canon to sponsor the Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games as an official Tokyo 2020 Gold Partner (Still Cameras and Desktop Reprographic Hardware)</em></p>
<p><strong>TOKYO, February 18, 2015</strong> – Canon Inc. and Canon Marketing Japan Inc. announced today that the Company will support the Games of the XXXII Olympiad and the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games (Tokyo 2020) as a Tokyo 2020 Gold Partner in the category of Still Cameras and Desktop Reprographic Hardware which include desktop printers.</p>
<p>Canon has entered an agreement with the Tokyo 2020 Organising Committee, making the Company a Tokyo 2020 Gold Partner. In this capacity, Canon will contribute to the delivery of the Games of the XXXII Olympiad and the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games, which will be held in 2020 in Tokyo, and in addition, will provide support to the Japanese national Olympic and Paralympic teams competing from 2016 to 2020.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Tokyo 2020 Gold Partners are positioned as the highest tier of the Tokyo 2020 domestic Sponsorship Programme. As a sponsor of Tokyo 2020, Canon products and services in the still cameras and desktop reprographic hardware categories, which include desktop printers, will be designated as Official Products of the Games.</p>
<p>Canon will provide behind-the-scenes support to members of the press covering the Games, including camera and lens maintenance services and product loans. Drawing from the Company’s experience and know-how cultivated to date, Canon will improve on-site media support for cameras during Tokyo 2020, including on-site camera service and support centers to assist the numerous journalists and sports photographers from various countries and regions across the world.</p>
<p>Canon will continue contributing to the advancement of sports through the use of Canon still cameras and desktop reprographic hardware which include desktop printers.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Canon Unveils the HJ24ex7.5B Lens

HTML:
<strong>London, UK, 18 February 2015</strong> – Canon today unveils a new addition to its HD broadcast lens range – the HJ24ex7.5B. A successor to the hugely popular HJ22ex7.6B, the lens has been updated using customer feedback and includes a number of new features, including a wider and longer focal range with enhanced image quality, as well as an improved design and user handling. A truly versatile lens, the HJ24ex7.5B is perfect for a diverse range of broadcast environments, including studio sets, live production and news gathering, thanks to the unique combination of a high quality 24x zoom – the longest zoom in this class available today¹ – an impressive 7.5-180mm wide-angle view and a lightweight, portable design.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><strong>Advanced optical performance, both wide and far</strong>

Created specifically for the world of TV production, the HJ24ex7.5B’s enhanced optical design allows broadcasters and producers to go both wider and closer on their shoots, with the new 24x zoom giving added freedom whilst on set or on location. Demonstrating Canon’s expertise in optical design, the lens’ 7.5-180mm focal range surpasses that of its predecessor and removes the hassle of mounting different lenses, enabling users to switch seamlessly between long distance, fast action shots, to close ups. The HJ24ex7.5B’s revised optics also produce a sharper, more refined image throughout the entire zoom range, with the quality and clarity that’s required for HD productions.</p>
<p><strong>Exceptional portability and professional performance in one</strong>

An enhanced ergonomic design and revised optical structure ensures operators can quickly and comfortably shoot on the go. The weight of the lens has been reduced down to just 1.78kg, allowing shooters to freely move around sets and locations, as well as easily keep pace with subjects. The lens has been engineered to be both lighter and better balanced than its predecessor, with an improved centre of gravity – thanks to the weight reduction and optimisation of the optical layout and body structure. The lens can also be easily handled when shoulder mounted, with access to settings easily accessible in the palm of the hand, ensuring operators don’t have to move away from the camera’s viewfinder.</p>
<p>Designed to provide the best possible performance for broadcasters, the HJ24ex7.5B features the same Digital Drive Unit found in the latest HD High-end ENG lens line-up, which enables camera operators to select repeatable zoom positions and speeds, as well as focus and iris settings as they wish. An absolute value encoder, built into the Digital Drive unit, also allows operators to quickly commence shooting without any initialisation, ideal in news gathering and sports environments. Also suited to virtual applications, the absolute value encoder improves the lens’s power consumption, helping operators to shoot for longer, as well as enabling the lens to automatically detect lens positions so the chromatic aberration compensation function on cameras works instantly.</p>
<p>The HJ24ex7.5B will be available from May 2015.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,441
Messages
973,729
Members
24,807
Latest member
psjovane

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB