Threads

jepabst · Jan 14, 2015

Canon 5D Mark II
f/6.3
ISO-500
1/80sec
40mm

Taken at wedding just prior to ceremony - in Yorkville, IL at FOBs farmhouse. This was a DIY Farm Wedding
-chicago wedding photographer-

Leadfingers · Jan 14, 2015

I've seen the phrase "full frame lens" several times recently, and it makes no sense to me. Isnt a lens a lens?

Aren't all EF-mount lenses basically the same, in regard how a full frame body or APS-C body uses it?

Please correct my misunderstanding

JohanCruyff · Jan 14, 2015

"It measures 3 feet long, weighs 36 pounds, and cost $60,000 when it was released back in 1993..."

http://petapixel.com/2015/01/09/nikon-1200-1700mm-helps-french-photogs-capture-h

DRR · Jan 14, 2015

In my opinion, Canon is missing a small, UWA prime between the 14mm/2.8 and the 20mm/2.8.

I find myself wanting wider than 20mm, but the 14mm is larger, heavier, and wider than I need. (Not to mention the cost)

If Canon came out with a 17mm/2.8, similar in size/build quality to the current 24mm/IS, with IQ about on par with the 17-40 at 17mm... and it was under $500, would you buy it? It would autofocus of course.

Or am I the only one wishing for this unicorn?

Canon Rumors · Jan 14, 2015

HTML:

<p><a href="http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_EOS_7D_Mark_II/" target="_blank">Gordon Laing of CameraLabs</a> has completed his extensive review of the Canon EOS 7D Mark II. As with most of the reviews I’ve seen , he has come away very impressed with the current king of the APS-C DSLR. The autofocus, build quality, image quality and features make it a very attractive camera at its price point.</p>
<p><strong>From CameraLabs

</strong><em>“Canon’s EOS 7D Mark II becomes one of the toughest, fastest and most confident DSLRs for sports and action photography. If you always wanted the flagship 1Dx but couldn’t afford it or accommodate the size and weight, the 7D Mark II will give you most of its handling performance in a smaller, lighter and much cheaper package. Indeed it’ll also throw-in AF in lower light, effective focusing for movies and a built-in GPS receiver. Sure it can’t compete with full-frame cleanliness in low light, but the field reduction applied by the APSC sensor is actually preferred by many sports and wildlife photographers.”</em><strong>

</strong></p>
<p><strong><strong><strong><strong><a href="http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_EOS_7D_Mark_II/" target="_blank">Read the full review</a> | EOS 7D Mark II $1799: <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1081808-REG/canon_9128b002_eos_7d_mark_ii.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NEWZDRG/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00NEWZDRG&linkCode=as2&tag=canorumo-20&linkId=4IHYPE3ZKJN5VL4X" target="_blank">Amazon</a></strong></strong></strong></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Canon Rumors · Jan 14, 2015

HTML:

<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fkBOsTVfpdA?feature=oembed&start=13" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>If you enjoy being a geek about glass, this video should be right up your alley.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Stavrosbbb · Jan 14, 2015

I love this combination for bird photography. It is light to carry and has reach. I would appreciate others experiences with this killer combo. Attach 2 bird photos, very little crop.

nostrovia · Jan 14, 2015

As seen elsewhere on the web, Amazon has pulled the Nikon D750 from their listing and is advising those that purchased it to contact Nikon for support.

tculotta · Jan 13, 2015

I finally had the opportunity to spend a few hours with the new 100-400 and have posted some photos and thoughts about my experience. You can find at tedculotta.com under the blog.

Cheers,
Ted

Geek · Jan 13, 2015

I finally upgraded my EOS 40D after using it for about 7 years. I am an amateur and can't justify the cost of the 5DIII, although some of the prices of the grey market units were very tempting.

After reading all of the reviews and as many of the personal experiences with the 7DII, I finally bit the bullet and spent my money. It's been a big learning curve over my 40D, but I couldn't be happier.

I know that most people relegate the 7DII to a sports/action or wildlife camera, but I was wondering if anyone else was using it as their primary general purpose body?

sparda79 · Jan 13, 2015

It's interesting to see that Canon still leads the number of flickr user and 5D Mark III is the only full frame in top 10 Cameras Overall.

SOURCE

Top 5 brands on Flickr, 2013-14 by Matthew Almon Roth, on Flickr

Top cameras overall on Flickr, 2013-2014 by Matthew Almon Roth, on Flickr

Top DSLRs on Flickr, 2013-2014 by Matthew Almon Roth, on Flickr

andrewflo · Jan 13, 2015

So I was Googling small concealable GPS/Bluetooth trackers that I can put in my camera bags... and then it hit me that my 6D has built in GPS duh!

Wouldn't it be awesome if Canon created a feature like Find My iPhone that uses the camera's GPS to track it down if it's stolen?

There would need to be a way to "enable" the stolen flag or the GPS would need to be on continuously. It would only be pingable when the camera is turned on most likely.

But if I had the option for my GPS to be pinged on each start up of the camera for this feature to work, I'd gladly trade the battery life.

Thoughts?

AlanF · Jan 13, 2015

The first review of the EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II has just appeared in ePhotozine
http://www.ephotozine.com/article/canon-ef-400mm-f-4-do-is-ii-usm-lens-review-26785

The sharpness at f/4 is phenomenal. The sharpness falls off with increasing f number, and rapidly above f/11. From the Canon MTFs, at 560mm with the 1.4xTC it is probably sharper than the 300mm f/2.8 II at 600mm with the 2xTC and slightly lighter. It is a superb lens - pity it is so expensive.

JennyGW · Jan 13, 2015

Windows 7 64
Latest versions of EOS Utility and DPP

Been using my 5D2 with this PC for ages. I upgraded to the new versions of the Util and DPP about a month ago. Everything was running fine.

Now when I try and download images the camera flashes busy when I hit the shutter, this usually triggers the EOS Utility to load, but nothing happens.

I have tried a different cable and reinstalling the Canon software. I also removed the battery from the 5D2 to make sure it was reset. I removed all of the Canon software for the camera and installed just DPP, Util and the Lens database stuff.

Pretty desperate for a fix if anyone has any ideas, please?

jdramirez · Jan 13, 2015

It isn't really a studio, but with limited space, we have a backdrop, a few flashes and a few umbrellas... I adore my 85mm, but in a studio setting I generally shoot at f8 and it is a touch long given the space.

Also, 85-135mm is considered the portrait zone... So that's not happening...

I have my 24-105 and I think I can comfortably work between 24-50mm... So the lens doesn't have to be sharp wide open, but it should be sharp at f8...

I was thinking the 35mm f2 is.... maybe the 50 art... I'm probably looking at a prime more than a zoom.... So yeah...

YuengLinger · Jan 13, 2015

How often do you use IS on your Big White(s)? From what I understand, the 300mm and 500mm models are the only ones close to practical for hand-held use.

Doesn't IS deactivate when a tripod is used?

What about a monopod?

Thanks!

surapon · Jan 13, 2015

Dear Friends.
In winter time, at my home town= I do not have a chance to go to shoot the picture any where.
But, I need to snap shots some thing, for my dear HOBBY.
Here is the snap shot of the Sparkling Deers, My Wife Chrome deers Mini Sculpture.
Enjoy.
Surapon

PS. Yes, The Tricks that we must set F. stop at F= 32 to get the sharpest detail and sun star of Light reflection, And we need to use self timer , and Tripods = not have the motion blur at slow shutter speed at SS = 1/6 sec..

Canon Rumors · Jan 13, 2015

HTML:

<p>TOKYO, January 13, 2015—Canon Inc. again ranked first among Japanese companies and third overall for the number of U.S. patents awarded in 2014, according to the latest ranking of preliminary patent results issued by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services on January 12, 2015.</p>
Canon actively promotes the globalization of its business and places great value on obtaining patents overseas, carefully adhering to a patent-filing strategy that pursues patents in essential countries and regions while taking into consideration the business strategies and technology and product trends unique to each location. Among these, the United States, with its many high-tech companies and large market scale, represents a particularly important region in terms of business expansion and technology alliances.</p>
<p><strong>Canon U.S. patent ranking among Japanese companies 2005 – 2014</strong></p>
<table class="noline" width="600">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th class="w25">Year</th>
<th class="w25">Ranking*</th>
<th class="w25">No. of patents</th>
<th class="w25"></th>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>2014</td>
<td>1st (3rd)</td>
<td>4,055</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>2013</td>
<td>1st (3rd)</td>
<td>3,817</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>2012</td>
<td>1st (3rd)</td>
<td>3,173</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>2011</td>
<td>1st (3rd)</td>
<td>2,818</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>2010</td>
<td>1st (4th)</td>
<td>2,551</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>2009</td>
<td>1st (4th)</td>
<td>2,200</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>2008</td>
<td>1st (3rd)</td>
<td>2,107</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>2007</td>
<td>1st (3rd)</td>
<td>1,983</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>2006</td>
<td>1st (3rd)</td>
<td>2,367</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>2005</td>
<td>1st (2nd)</td>
<td>1,828</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Number in parenthesis represents Canon’s ranking among all companies

Note: Number of patents for 2014 based on preliminary figures released by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services. Figures for 2005 to 2013 tabulated by Canon based on information issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.</p>
<p>Canon prizes its corporate DNA of placing a high priority on technology. And with regard to research and development results, the Company actively promotes the acquisition of patent rights in accordance with the management direction of the Canon Group and technology trends while conducting thorough pre-application searches to raise the quality of applications. Through close cooperation between Canon’s technology and intellectual property divisions, the Company aims to improve its technological capabilities while further enhancing its intellectual property rights.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
<p> </p>

LovePhotography · Jan 13, 2015

I don't have a tilt shift lens. And so, this is a naïve question. I know that...
I'd like to get a TS lens, but not just for tripod photographs of landscapes or tall buildings. I'd like the increased depth of field for things like basketball games, when (when you are up in the crow's nest) you can have players quite close and quite far away, and ideally all would be in focus.
I've read where it takes so long to get a TS shot just right. But isn't there, in theory, a lens angle setting that would maximize DOF no matter what direction you point the camera? In other words, once you get what you want as far as exposure, etc., before the game starts, you could shoot quickly and basically everything (give or take) be in focus? (See throw-away shot below that illustrates what I'm talking about. This isn't a great shot or anything, but it would be nice if he girl down by the baseline was also in focus. Or the parents/students in the bleachers even). You never know at a sporting event what interesting stuff is going on away from the main focus of the photo.

(p.s.- in advance of the usual flaming that comes on this website from those for whom photography is not an adequate solution for a deep-seated personality disorder, I understand the problems with this photo regarding needing higher ISO 6400 or more, 1/1000 shutter speed, adding +1 EV for reflections, using an f/2.8 here, post processing, etc. This was a spontaneous off the cuff shot done in "creative sports mode". The main thing I was simultaneously up there to do was video. The point of the question is DOF, not motion blur, etc.)

Jemlnlx · Jan 12, 2015

Recently picked up the Photoclam 33 for about $80 FS on Ebay. I have been keeping my eye on good travel bullheads for a while and considered Markins, PhotoClam, Sunwayfoto and Sirui. RRS area great from what I here, but a bit too big for a Gitzo 1541T. I tried the Sunwayfoto 36II, which was rated at about 40lbs load. The build quality seemed good. The knobs were metal without rubber gripping, which made for hell on my fingers when tightening. I loaded my 5DIII with 85 1.2 II which weighs about 6 lbs. and even at the highest tension, I was able to move the mounted camera very easily. I returned it. I was keeping my eye out for aMarkins Q3 as I see then go for $175-200 on the used market. There were a few though nothing worth jumping on. I saw the deal on the Photoclam and jumped on it. It arrived in great condition with box and all. I loaded it up attached the camera with very good results. I was able to tighten it to an immovable position with ease. The rubber knobs were a blessing and the base diameter worked fine with my 1541. The build quality seems pretty good. Now I know the bigger the ball diameter the better, the sunwayfoto had 36mm which was disappointing, the photo clam has 33mm and performed great. The markins I believe has 38mm and the reviews are outstanding, even in the long run. I think I may jump on one if I come across one, but for now the photo clam seems to work great. I hope the review and pics help. BTW i bought the sunwayfoto 5DIII plate which sells for $30 and works wonderfully.

Jemlnlx · Jan 12, 2015

Just sharing a review on a recent bag I purchased. I, like some I'm sure, was looking for a bag for a day out or overnight trip. I have larger bag, Lowepro which holds tons of stuff. I have a few smaller shoulder bags and some holster bags that were either too big or too small. I wanted something different, more like a canvas material as opposed to the nylon, which I believe all of my other bags are made of. After looking at a few bags, the Domke caught my eye as well as the Think Tank retrospectives. I went to B&H and compared to two. Besides the awesome wax wear finish of the Domke, I loved the fact that it was only 3.5" thick. I loved the rugged feel of the bag, which really set it part from other bags. It very lightweight as well, partly due to the lack of padding. The bag does not look like a camera bag, just a plain messenger bag. The bag was small, which was great for my 5' 7" stature. Though, looking at it made me highly doubt fitting a 5DIII in there. Most of the reviews have called this a perfect bag for mirrorless cameras. There were only a handful of review I found where DSLRs were used. I purchased the bag and started to try different configurations to see what I can fit. I was pleasantly surprised. The bag comes with one padded insert which is perfect for a 70-200 lens. (I have the 70-200 f/4 and 300 f/4, which both fit fine, except the 300mm was a big higher than I would like). The 5DIII fit fine. The front pockets were spacious and more than accommodating to fit flashes...the 430exII was a great fit, while the 580ex was a bit bulky. Comfortably, I would bring the 5DIII with 24-70mm attached and my 70-200 f4. My 430exII and filters, battery, card, and cleaning stuff which all fit comfortably. This bag is perfect and I hope to use it for years to come. The biggest con I would say is the lack of padding in the main compartment, which helps with the weight. I took some old pads from older bags and lined the bottom only which would help when setting the bag down. Domke sells a few different "inserts" which can compartmentalize the bag, though will greatly minimize the space inside. I hope this brief review along with the photos attached help anyone thinking about buying this bag.

Canon Rumors · Jan 12, 2015

HTML:

<p>I must admit, I’m one of those people that make fun of the PowerShot N whenever possible. I shake my head at the fact this <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1081864-REG/canon_9547b001_powershot_n2_digital_camera.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">camera actually got a sequel</a>!</p>
<p>That being said, photographer <a href="http://photo.stackexchange.com/users/24205/paul-richters" target="_blank">Paul Richters</a> decided to convert one into a rather cool waist level Rolleiflex style shooter. Below is a schema from <a href="http://www.diyphotography.net/spoil-point-shoot-making-waist-level-shooter/" target="_blank">DIY Photography</a> that breaks down what was needed to convert the PowerShot N into a new era Rolleiflex.</p>
<div id="attachment_18329" style="width: 585px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://www.diyphotography.net/spoil-point-shoot-making-waist-level-shooter/"><img class="wp-image-18329 size-medium" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/schema-575x575.jpg" alt="schema" width="575" height="575" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Click for the full article</p></div>
<p>I might actually try this, I love the idea!</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.diyphotography.net/spoil-point-shoot-making-waist-level-shooter/" target="_blank">Read the full article at DIY Photography</a>.</strong></p>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://www.diyphotography.net/spoil-point-shoot-making-waist-level-shooter/" target="_blank">DIY Photography</a>] via [<a href="http://petapixel.com/2015/01/12/canon-powershot-n-transformed-waist-level-rolleiflex-style-camera/" target="_blank">PetaPixel</a>] & [<a href="http://photo.stackexchange.com/users/24205/paul-richters" target="_blank">Paul Richters</a>] | <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/909815-REG/Canon_8230b001_PowerShot_N_Digital_Camera.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">PowerShot N $129 at B&H</a></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

grey4 · Jan 12, 2015

I've finally saved up some money for a new lens and I wanted to take a little poll.

Would you rather purchase the 70-200 f/2.8 L IS USM ii, or purchase both the 70-200 f/4 L IS USM and the 100mm f/2.8 L Macro?

The way I see it, with modern ISO performance on FF cameras, f/2.8 isn't as critical as it use to be, but I wanted to read some discussion.

Thanks

Canon Rumors · Jan 12, 2015

HTML:

<p>Rokinon has launched a new 135mm T/2.2 cine lens. It’ll retail for $599 USD.</p>
<p><strong>Product Specifications</strong></p>
<ul data-selenium="FreeRebates">
<li data-selenium="sellingPoint">135mm Lens</li>
<li data-selenium="sellingPoint">Full-Frame Coverage</li>
<li data-selenium="sellingPoint">Multi-Layer Coating to Reduce Flare</li>
<li data-selenium="sellingPoint">Standard Gearing for Focus and Iris</li>
<li data-selenium="sellingPoint">Dual Side Focus and T-Stop Scales</li>
<li data-selenium="sellingPoint">De-Clicked Aperture Ring</li>
<li data-selenium="sellingPoint">Hybrid Aspherical Lenses</li>
<li data-selenium="sellingPoint">Manual Focus and Aperture</li>
<li data-selenium="sellingPoint">Removable Lens Hood</li>
<li data-selenium="sellingPoint">Accepts 77mm Threaded Filter Rings</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/buy/0/Ntt/Rokinon+135mm+T2.2+Lenses/N/0/BI/2466/KBID/3296" target="_blank">Preorder Rokinon 135mm T/2.2 Cine Lens at B&H Photo</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Canon Rumors · Jan 12, 2015

HTML:

<p>We’re told that Canon will replace the EF-S 18-200 f/3.5-5.6 IS with a new version soon, and it will come as an EF-S 18-300 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM. This lens has been rumoured for a while now.</p>
<p>There was no word if this was coming for CP+ next month.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>