• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

TS-E 24mm Poor Performance

To all,

I rented this lens before I purchased it new. The rental appears to be an excellent copy so I was hoping the one I purchased would be too; unfortunately, it was a disappointment compared to the rental.

I tested this lens using stars. Stars are the toughest test for a lens, but they really show the lens' aberrations quite easily. I would like your thoughts and opinions on this lens. For example, is it a poor copy? If so, what do you think is wrong with the lens (e.g. De-centered, field curvature, etc.)? I have sent this lens to Canon for repair. I felt it had a De-centering problem. Upon return, the De-centering problem seems fixed, but now it seems to have a very bad field curvature problem. I'm no optics expert so perhaps something else may be wrong with lens. I plan on sending the lens back again with more data showing the problem I'm experiencing. I have included several links showing the rental lens and how it compares to my lens at each stage. The images are approximately 1.5 MB each.

I focused using LiveView with a 10X loupe using the belt stars of Orion near the center of the frame. The stars are trailing slightly due to using a fixed tripod.

As mentioned before, I just can't imagine how a $2200 lens can perform so poorly, especially since it is designed to cover 67mm. My TS-E 17mm is substantially better wide-open (see the last link). It is possible I have too high of expectations for the TS-E 24mm or just have a very bad copy. :-[

Rental non-shifted
http://www.northwest-landscapes.com/images/testing/ts-e_24mm_non-shifted_rental.jpg

Rental shifted 10 degrees
http://www.northwest-landscapes.com/images/testing/ts-e_24mm_shifted_10_degrees_rental.jpg

Purchased non-shifted
http://www.northwest-landscapes.com/images/testing/ts-e_24mm_non-shifted_purchased.jpg

Purchased shifted 10 degrees
http://www.northwest-landscapes.com/images/testing/ts-e_24mm_shifted_10_degrees_purchased.jpg

Purchased non-shifted "fixed"
http://www.northwest-landscapes.com/images/testing/ts-e_24mm_non-shifted_purchased_fixed.jpg

Purchased shifted 10 degrees "fixed"
http://www.northwest-landscapes.com/images/testing/ts-e_24mm_shifted_10_degrees_purchased_fixed.jpg

Purchased TS-E 17mm for comparison
http://www.northwest-landscapes.com/images/testing/ts-e_17mm_non-shifted.jpg

Thanks,

Wade

The Next DSLR Will Be Entry Level [CR3]

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=15531"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=15531">Tweet</a></div>
We’re told by a great source that the next Canon DSLR announced with be a brand new entry level model below the EOS 100D. We’re told the announcement is “soon”. Which we expect to be for CP+ next month in Tokyo.</p>
<p>The same source also commented that two more DSLRs would be announced in 2014 and one of them would be the EOS 7D Mark II. There was no mention of what the third one would be, as that could still be under tight wrap in Japan.</p>
<p>No specs were given for any of the cameras.</p>
<p>It was also confirmed that “a lot” of lenses were coming this year.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Loosey Goosey Lens Hood

I recently got a steal on a used 24mm 1.4L II. As you probably suspected by now, the lens hood shakes. It doesn't rotate after it 'clicks', but it definitely moves around as I move the camera and is not firm like the other lenses. I was offered a full refund, but the glass is flawless and I am hoping there is some way to jerry-rig the thing so that the public doesn't see the rigging, but it still works as it should.

I am going to continue working on it, but I appreciate any ideas. Surly among the photogs here, we can brainstorm a solution.

Thank you for your ideas,
-Tabor

5DIII moisture damage after light drizzle

I bought my 5Diii about 6 months ago, it's a terrific camera. But during a trip to Mexico, it broke down after getting wet during a light drizzle.

I got Error 20 and the shutter couldn't stop firing. So I removed the battery and next morning everything was back to normal.

When I got back from the trip, I sent it to Canon to check the damage. The tech says that the problem was "corrosion caused by moisture". Since water damage is not under warranty, it would take me $400 to fix the problem.

The tech sent me some pictures, and from the look of it, the damages aren't that bad. Should I spend $400 to fix it or just take it back?

Also, I have friends that have used 5Diii under heavy rains, and their cameras didn't suffer any damages from it. Does it mean that my camera has a manufacturing defect? If so, will Canon replace it?

Thanks!

Attachments

  • IMG_6766.jpg
    IMG_6766.jpg
    531.3 KB · Views: 696
  • IMG_6778.jpg
    IMG_6778.jpg
    443.8 KB · Views: 721

Sigma 105 F2.8 EX DG macro OS

Sigma 105 F2.8 EX DG macro OS was somewhere out the lights, because the lens price was too near to 100L.
But about 2 months ago Sigma drop the price in USA and Europe and now it's much more interesting. I bought one and I'm impressed - 100L is slightly better only with focus speed and accuracy.

Sigma105OS_18.jpg


Here is my review (translated) - http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://nonchoiliev.com/blog/935

Lastolite Hotrod Octa / Striplight softboxes - are they good?

Hello CR users,

I'm looking for new softboxes to get more flexibility with my setup (4x 600EX-RT, already have some umbrellas and cheaper softboxes)

Did anyone try the Lastolite Hotrod Octa 36" (90cm) softbox or maybe owns it?
http://www.lastolite.us/hotrod-speed-lite-octa-box-36-new-llls2690
Did you like it? What were your experiences?

Same for their Hotrod Strip Softbox - is it any good?
http://www.lastolite.us/hotrod-speed-lite-strip-box-12-x-48

Thanks for sharing your opinion / thoughts!

My new 6D, Two weeks in Cape Town, a Review

I got my 6d in Novemer last year. I traveled through the Karoo for a week and then spend two weeks in Cape Town over the December & January holidays. Over this three week period I took thousands of landscapes, people & travel photographs. My first impressions and review regarding the image quality & what it can do at high ISO, of this awesome 'smaller' dslr can be seen here at . . . http://thelazytravelphotographer.blogspot.com/2014/01/my-canon-eos-6d-review-part-1-image.html

Attachments

  • _MG_3010-2-B-Nik-Detail-Extractor.jpg
    _MG_3010-2-B-Nik-Detail-Extractor.jpg
    384.8 KB · Views: 2,124
  • _MG_2709-2-B-viveza-+-N-S.jpg
    _MG_2709-2-B-viveza-+-N-S.jpg
    366.7 KB · Views: 2,122
  • _MG_2919-A.jpg
    _MG_2919-A.jpg
    356 KB · Views: 2,107

TSE + Macro?

Is there a tilt-shift lens with macro capabilities?

I did come across this: http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/hartblei_120_4_pc_n10 but it is certainly priced as a professional piece of equipment.

Is there a combination of tubes and/or extenders that would work with current Canon TSE lenses to provide acceptable macro capabilities? I have access to a 24mm II TSE lens to experiment with- just not sure where to start.

7D user - advice on my best option for a 'go to' lens?

Hi

I'd like some advice on which lens to get for my 7D.

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS USM

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

I'm torn between these two because I don't know which one will suit my style more. I have been used to a 17-85mm f/4.0 kit lens and a 50mm f/1.8, both of which I'm selling. I'm concerned that the 24-105 is slower and will limit me with depth of field and low light shooting. And the 17-55 has less reach and may be less of a future investment as an EF-S. Here are a few details about my photography...

I think I'm quite lazy about the technical side of things, and like to keep gear as simple as possible. I don't mind small losses in quality or control for the sake of convenience (eg. staying with my 17-85mm lens for years before getting the 50mm). I like being zoomed in rather than zoomed out. Being wider than my 17mm shots has never seemed necessary to me. I like shooting in low light, and I like shooting with shallow depth of field. I think I will be sticking with my 7D for a while, and I will be getting the Canon EF 50mm - f/1.4 USM. Below are a couple of links to my stuff for reference.

https://www.behance.net/gallery/Portrait-Photography/2075548
https://www.behance.net/gallery/Photography/775988

Any advice greatly appreciated!


----Sorry, moved this from the Rumors forum

Sell 16-35 II for 24-70 II/24TSE?

Just looking for some feedback on shuffling my lens stable/adding a lens. I've noticed I am rarely using 16mm on my 16-35 and often find myself wanting more reach, which lends itself well to the 24-70 II, yes? But for landscape, I COULD see myself wanting a bit wider. So... How realistic is it to expect to be able to use shift on the TS-E to get me a wider FOV, thus satisfying my desire for "there if I need it" wide ability?

Does anyone see a downside to selling my 16-35 II and picking up the 24-70 II and 24 TSE II? I currently have a nifty 50 and the 70-200 IS II as well. Likely swapping the 50 for whatever Canon cones out with soon(?) OR the 50 ART.

Camera focusing

I am currently using a 5d mark iii and I love it. I have AFMA all of my lenses. I use mostly the 24-70 2.8ii and the 70-200 2.8i and every once in a while the 85 1.2 ii. My issue is that when post processing my pictures the ones shot in landscape orientation look considerably better and are in focus better than the ones shot in portrait orientation. Is there something that could be causing this in the camera or is this most likely operator error? It wouldn't be a big deal if it was only occassionally but looking back at my past shoots the best pictures are always taken in landscape orientation. Thanks for all replies and insights.

Canon 400L 5.6

Just wondering if anyone has any experience using the 400mm 5.6L with a FF for bird shots. I currently have a 70-300L and use it with a 7d for birds. I have been pretty happy with this, but I would like to use my 5d3 for some bird shots and 300mm just doesn't cut it. Anybody use the 5d3/400 5.6L combo? It sounds like it is light enough to hand hold, so that is good. My main question is how big a deal the lack of IS really is. One of the bigger IS whites would be great, but not in the budget since I mainly do landscapes. I guess I am looking for a solid, value 400 and wonder if this is it or if I just should stick to what I have right now. Any thoughts or advice appreciated.

Canon 17-40mm & ND filter

I was wondering if anyone out there is using a Canon 17-40mm lens with a high (i.e. 10 stop) ND filter. I'm thinking of building a small set of 82mm ND filters (separate, not variable - probably a 4 and a 10 stop to start with) along with step rings so I can use it on all my glass.

I guess the question is two-fold:
Is anyone using strong ND filters with this lens and do you see any vignetting on the 17mm end?
Any ramifications to using an 82mm ND filter and step ring to put it on the 77mm thread of the 17-40 lens?

TIA for any info.

I finally get my new Canon gear this weekend

This is a useless post except to say I'm excited about finally heading across to the US from Canada and picking up the Canon 6D and lenses I ordered some weeks ago from BH and Adorama. Looking forward to getting back into full-frame and trying out the Voigtlander 20 especially, as well as the 50 2.5 macro. Some obscure lenses that I have a feeling will really perform well. The 40stm and 70-200/4is everyone already knows are great. I'll start shooting and posting soon!

  • Locked
Canon 7D - Vertical Banding Noise

Hi,

My 7D (bought in Oct 2010) had been taking sharp, clear photos until recently when it developed Vertical Banding Noise (I believe) - on all images and videos, regardless of ISO, etc. Strong vertical black lines become very pronounced when an image is cropped. See the sample below. Any ideas for causes or solutions?

Cheers!

Tom

Attachments

  • Vertical Banding Noise - Canon 7D.jpg
    Vertical Banding Noise - Canon 7D.jpg
    512.8 KB · Views: 2,176

Sigma 50 f/1.4 Art Lens Should be Amazing

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=15513"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=15513">Tweet</a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2014/01/08/sigma-50mm-f-1.4-art-targets-zeiss-otus-ignores-canon-l-nikon-glass" target="_blank">Imaging-Resource</a> sat down with Sigma at the CES show that wrapped up last week in Las Vegas to talk about the new Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art lens they announced.</p>
<p>It turns out Sigma’s goal isn’t to top the Canon 50′s in performance, but to get as close as possible to the new king of resolution, <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1007599-REG/zeiss_2010_056_55mm_f_1_4_otus_lens.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">the $4000 Zeiss Otus 55 f/1.4</a>.</p>
<p><strong>From Imaging-Resource</strong>

<em>“But the most impressive information we gleaned? When discussing their goals of image quality and sharpness for the lens, Sigma mentioned they’re confident they’ll surpass competitive products from Canon and Nikon and are instead gunning for Zeiss’s new 55mm Otus lens. It’s a serious claim. The Zeiss 55mm f/1.4 Otus lens – with its $4000 price tag — is squarely aimed at high-end professional shooting such as fashion, advertising and editorial work.”</em></p>
<p>A lofty goal indeed.</p>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2014/01/08/sigma-50mm-f-1.4-art-targets-zeiss-otus-ignores-canon-l-nikon-glass" target="_blank">IR</a>] via [<a href="http://photorumors.com/2014/01/14/the-new-sigma-50mm-f1-4-dg-hsm-art-lens-should-be-crazy-good/#more-53136" target="_blank">PR</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Sony A65 to Canon Move - What do you suggest/ recommend?

To save you some reading I put the full back story after my question.

I am interested in purchasing the 6D for it's low light dominance but I currently don't have the budget for one and still get a quality lens, Canon 24-70 L or Canon 24-105 L. I am currently working with $600 and would like to be comfortable with the new system by mid March.

-I can sell my Sony set up for close to $600-$700 to give me a total of $1200/$1300.
-Or I could keep the Sony gear since I am familiar with it (back up camera) and do more photography and web development between now an march to save up the money for one of these systems.

What do you suggest/ recommend?

I do not have a FF or Crop preference right now, funding limit, but I do know in the long run I want to shoot FF for the “genre’s” I mentioned above.

Canon EOS-1D $430 (used) - Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Lens - $760 (used) - total $1,190 plus tax

5D Mk 2 $1,590 (used) - Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Lens - $760 (used) – total $2,350 plus tax

6D $1,400 (new) - Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Lens - $760 (used) (Add $200 for kit) – total $2,160 plus tax

60D $540(used/new add $100) – Canon 17-55mm f2.8 IS - $879.00 – total $1,419 plus tax

_________________

I currently shoot with a Sony A65 camera and want to make the move to Canon. I am still developing my craft as a photographer and have not selected a specific “genre” but I do know I would like to stay close to business portraits, fashion, products, and maybe some weddings (low-light ability for not being able to use flash is key) areas of photography. I like shooting with natural light but I do have a Canon EX550 (I know I have Sony but it was free so I use it manually with a converter). I also have a set of flashpoint studio strobes.

I’ve been asked today to be a second shooter for a wedding in March of this year, and I also have an upcoming wedding in August of this year. Again, I do not want to be a “wedding photographer” but I am willing to shoot it with art/ creativity, and making the bride and groom happy, in mind.

note – Again, I am a user and would like to get familiar with the new camera system as soon as possible but do not want to waste money so if saving up is your suggestion, I’ll rent a better lens for the Sony for the wedding in March and make the money before August to get the 6D for it’s low light capabilities and a quality L lens.

PowerShot G1 X Mark II Specs Emerge? [CR1]

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/01/powershot-g1-x-mark-ii-specs-emerge-cr1/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/01/powershot-g1-x-mark-ii-specs-emerge-cr1/">Tweet</a></div>
Rumored specs for a replacement to the PowerShot G1 X have surfaced on the Xitek forums. The camera will “probably” be announced for CP+ next month in Tokyo. If true, it looks like Canon isn’t straying too far from the original G1 X. Pricing will probably be the biggest thing in this cameras success. It can’t be anywhere near the original $700 price tag.</p>
<ul>
<li>20.2MP 1.5″ CMOS sensor</li>
<li>3 inch LCD touch screen</li>
<li>Similar size and design to the G1 X</li>
<li>DIGIC 6</li>
<li>24-120mm f/2.8-5.8</li>
<li>New “real image” optical viewfinder.</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://forum.xitek.com/thread-1233550-1-1-1.html" target="_blank">XT</a>] via [<a href="http://photorumors.com/2014/01/14/canon-g1-x-mark-ii-camera-rumored-specifications/#more-53202" target="_blank">PR</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Hybrid Viewfinder Coming To Canon DSLRs? [CR1]

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=15508"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=15508">Tweet</a></div>
Another mention of a <a href="http://www.canonwatch.com/rumor-canon-eos-7d-replacement-cp-new-tidbits-rumored-eos-a1/" target="_blank">hybrid viewfinder coming to a “high end” Canon DSLR</a> is making the rounds.</p>
<p>Basically, the viewfinder is both electronic and optical. The electronic viewfinder would take over for video recording and the optical viewfinder would be used for stills.</p>
<p>I see this as a possibility in one of two cameras initially. Either a replacement to the EOS-1D C or in the EOS 7D Mark II (could be named something else). We’ve been told in the past that the EOS 7D replacement would receive a host of video features to help differentiate the camera from the EOS 70D and everyone else currently making a high end APS-C DSLR.</p>
<p>I think whatever replaces the EOS 7D will definitely have some new technology in it, just like the 7D did when it arrived on the scene 4.5 years ago.</p>
<p>More to come…</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB