Canon hood options for the EF 35mm f/2 IS USM

I'm interested in picking up this lens during the current instant rebate period. (Unless I can catch one for sale on the Canon Refurb site.) Either way, my question still applies.

I looked at the lens at the Canon Online Store, where they recommend the EW-65 II hood.

On the B&H and Adorama sites, they list the EW-72, instead.

The '72 looks deeper (offset by its petal shape), but it's more than double the price, at $54 compared to $25 for the '65 (currently on sale, down from $29).

Can anyone with hands-on experience with either or both of these hoods weigh in?

Which do you use, and why?

If you've used both, which do you prefer?

Are these hoods of the bayonet-mount style, or do they have the spring-loaded "click on" mechanism, like the ET-65 III hood used with the 85/1.8, 100/2.0, etc. I've read one review stating that the '72 has a "locking button," but no specifics beyond that.

The price difference is only about 5% of the total purchase (lens + hood), but there's no point in throwing away $30 on a more expensive hood with no appreciable advantages. Thanks in advance for any input.

More Sensor Technology Talk [CR1]

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=16448"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=16448">Tweet</a></div>
<p>We’re told by a few other people that Canon is working on a “foveon like” sensor for their next generation of full frame cameras. The goal is to have the new sensor tech in their next “prosumer” camera, so perhaps that means a new large megapixel camera with a smaller body than an EOS-1, or the EOS 5D Mark IV in 2015.</p>
<p>The replacement to the EOS 7D will have a new sensor not currently available in the Canon lineup, but we’re told the camera is being specced more on features, especially for fast action and video than brand new EOS technology. By the sounds of things, the new sensor tech is best suited for the full frame segment.</p>
<p>More to come…</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

135L v 85 1.8

Hi. Recently purchased the 85 1.8 for portraits and weddings to go along with my other primes , and have to say a little dissapointed with its performance especially at 1.8/2 where i was expecting greater things, it also has the worst CA i have seen on any lens wide open especially on reflective surfaces or indoors

I am considering the 135 to go with my 24 and 35 primes and still have the 24-105 and 70-200 with my assistant so those bases cover , the quality of the 35 is that good that i believe it can fill much of the gap left between 35-135 just by cropping, anyone else gone this route or have any advice ? Or anyone got the 85 1.8 and think i may just have a dud ?

www.andrew-davies.com

Another question about Canon MTF charts, Sir/ Madam.

Dear friends and Teachers.
I have go back to Photography school/ Local Technical College more than 15 Classes in past 8 years, Start from The Beginning of Photography---To the Advance Photography, Wedding Photography and Studio Light Photography.
Many of my dear teacher teach me that, Most of the Lenses in this world have a sweet spot F. stop between F = 5.6 to 11.0, And the best sharpest corner to corner = F 8.0 , That Why Canon company use F/8.0 as the Blue Curve Line on their MTF chart, and Compare to the Most not too sharp in Black Curve line at the Maximum/ Widest aperture ---as the Black Curve Line on MTF chart.
---- QUOTE from Canon "
Here’s a breakdown of how to identify the different curves in a Canon MTF chart:

Black curve lines: lens performance at maximum, widest aperture.
Blue curve lines: MTF curves with lens stopped-down to f/8.
Thick lines: MTF data showing contrast — measured with thicker line sets on test target.
Thin lines: MTF resolution data — tests measure performance rendering thinner lines on test target.
Dashed lines: Lens’s MTF performance with harder-to-reproduce Meridional line sets.
Solid lines: MTF performance with Sagittal lines, arranged parallel to a diagonal from image center to corner."
And from the link:
http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resources/articles/2013/reading_MTF_charts.shtml

Yes, I know that all MFG.s use difference MTF chart and difference setting, BUT, THE QUESTION IS =as my teachers teach me that Most of the Lenses , have the Best Sweet spot/ Sharpest F. Stop at 8.0 ----That still True ???.
Thanks you, Sir/ Madam.
Surapon

Attachments

  • LENSES COMPARE-2.jpg
    LENSES COMPARE-2.jpg
    84.4 KB · Views: 217

Who's on Instagram?

When Instagram first came out, I thought it was pretty lame and was just a way for mobile photographers to add filters to make their lousy photos look better. A while back, I signed up and was surprised to see National Geo and others posting real (i.e. not mobile) photos. After realizing that you can upload your own photos, I began doing so and just uploaded my 99th photo today. I don't like the square format - I don't like 4:3, either, I'm definitely a 3:2 or wider guy, but I'm having fun with it. I like seeing others photos and sharing my work with people from around the world.

[shameless self-promotion]
If you'd like to see my photos and follow me, here's my link - click on the badge or use the link. I'm planning to hold a print giveaway contest tomorrow to mark my 100th post:


http://instagram.com/ianandersonphotography

[/shameless self-promotion]

How many other members are on Instagram? What are your thoughts on using it?

If you like, please post your link so we can follow each other.

Need advice re. video tutorials on 600 Speedlight usage

Comrades - I always refer to the sun as my light source. But now I am looking for a source of video tutorials on use of speedlights, from soup to nuts -- starting with the absolute basics of 'how to turn this on', through correct flash exposing in various venues and fill situations, up to use of multiple flashes with the radio triggers (either canon or aftermarket.) Strobist seems too complex, and I want something geared specifically to thorough use of canons. Either free or for-pay. All suggestions gratefully appreciated. Thanks for your time.

Lens choice for airshows

I have a Canon 5D MARK III body and have been shooting air shows using my 70-200 f2.8L IS II with a Canon 2 x III extender.

This works pretty well but I could be doing with some extra reach so I am looking at a new lens or lens/EX combination without selling body parts to finance it.

I have come down to the following options:

Canon 400mm f5.6 L with a 1.4 TC - this will get me just under 600mm but at f8.
This worries me in low light situations and I am unsure how the 5D3's AF will suffer - it might not be good for airshows.

Canon EF 300mm f4 L IS USM with either a 1.4 or 2 x TC - this gives me IS and with the 1.4 TC a 420mm lens with f/5.6 and IS. I could also use the lens with a 2X converter to get a 600mm lens with f/8 and IS.
Once again though I am concerned about image quality and AF performance, particularly as I will be focusing fast jets.

Does anyone have a similar combination and can help with the performance of this body/lens and the image quality I can expect?

Sharpness is king for me, I was looking at the new Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD but I have ruled it out due to the poor image quality above 500mm.

Canon EF Lens Production Surpasses 100 Million Unit Mark

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/04/canon-ef-lens-production-surpasses-100-million-unit-mark/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/04/canon-ef-lens-production-surpasses-100-million-unit-mark/">Tweet</a></div>
<p><em>Canon achieves a world’s first as production of EF interchangeable lenses surpasses 100 million mark</em></p>
<p><strong>TOKYO, Japan, April 30, 2014</strong>—Canon Inc. today celebrated an impressive lens-manufacturing milestone with the production on April 22, 2014, of the Company’s 100-millionth EF-series interchangeable lens for EOS cameras—an EF200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x.</p>
<p>Production of interchangeable EF lenses for Canon EOS-series AF (autofocus) single-lens reflex cameras began in 1987 at the Company’s Utsunomiya Plant, which continues to play a central role in Canon’s lens manufacturing operations. In May 2013, EF lens production surpassed the 90-million-unit mark and now, approximately eleven months later, the Company is commemorating its first-in-the-world1 achievement of having manufactured 100 million lenses.</p>
<p><!--more-->Canon’s proprietary EF lenses, launched in March 1987 along with the EOS SLR camera system, have continued to evolve since their introduction, leading the industry through the incorporation of a wide range of innovative technologies, including such world’s firsts2 as the Ultrasonic Motor (USM), Image Stabilizer (IS) technology, and a multi-layered diffractive optical (DO) element. In May 2013, aiming to further expand the realm of photographic expression, the Company introduced the EF200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x, the world’s first3 super-telephoto zoom lens with a built-in 1.4x extender that makes possible a 200-560 mm focal length range.</p>
<p>In recent years, in addition to renewing such models as super-telephoto lenses ideal for sports and nature photography along with zoom lenses that offer a bright f/2.8 maximum aperture throughout the entire zoom range, Canon has launched multiple entry-class interchangeable lenses equipped with a stepping motor (STM) that delivers smooth and quiet autofocus performance during video recording. As a result, the Company’s extensive EF lens-series lineup currently comprises a total of 89 models.4 In addition to enhancing its lens offerings, Canon has expanded the optical technologies incorporated in its EF lenses into new fields, launching EF Cinema Lenses for digital cinematography in January 2012, and EF-M lenses for compact-system cameras in September 2012.</p>
<p>Furthermore, during the 11-year period from 2003 to 2013, Canon maintained the No. 1 share worldwide within the interchangeable-lens digital camera market and, in February 2014, marked another manufacturing milestone as combined production of its film and digital EOS-series interchangeable-lens cameras surpassed the 70-million-unit mark.</p>
<p>Canon will continue refining its diverse imaging technologies based on its core optical technologies, striving to produce exceptional and reliable lenses and cameras that cater to the varying needs of photographers—from first-time users to advanced amateurs and professionals—while contributing to expanding the photographic and video imaging culture.</p>
<ul>
<li>Among interchangeable lenses as of April 22, based on a Canon survey.</li>
<li>Among interchangeable lenses for SLR cameras, based on a Canon survey.</li>
<li>Among interchangeable lenses for interchangeable lens cameras (SLR cameras, compact-system cameras), based on a Canon survey.</li>
<li>Including two EF lens extenders and three models available outside of Japan. As of April 30, 2014.</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://www.canon.com/news/2014/apr30e.html" target="_blank">Canon</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Build quality of Speedlite 600ex-rt; "Lock"?

Just had my first failure of a 600ex-rt. While getting my setup shots for a big group session, I was turning off one of my Speedlites when I noticed a little resistance in the switch. I did not apply much pressure, but I felt a mild snap. Sure enough, the switch had just broken, and the unit is now on its way to CPS. (I guess you could say the toast dropped butter side up, because the switch left the speedlite powered on, meaning I could go ahead an use it. Only way to power off though was by removing the batteries.)

I have several of the 600's, so I can't be sure exactly when I bought it, but it was within the past 18 months. I know that I did drop one (landed on its side, not an end) while walking fast from about 4' onto a grass covered (but hard) field. That was a year ago, but it never had an apparent issue. I don't know if this is the one with the broken switch, but other than this incident, I have not had a single problem with any of them.

So, as I'm getting more location work (thankfully), I'm wondering if other owners of the 600ex-rt have comments about its ruggedness and reliability.

Also--does anybody actually use the "Lock" position of the power switch?

Thanks!

Sony RX100 MIII

Since Sony launched the RX100 I have been an interested fan. Seems to be a very useful camera with some great features and it is so compact it can easily fit on your belt.

Now that they are supposed to launch the Mark III (tomorrow - 1 May) I must admit that the improvements they are rumoured to be making are more attractive than ever. It is expected to have a new 24-70mm f/1.8-2.8 lens.

It also seems to have quite a following over at DPR.

Anyone here have an RX100 or interested in the new Sony RX100 Mark III? What are your thoughts and impressions?

One good and bad thing about Sony is that you are always guaranteed a new version within the next 12 months - sometimes just 6.

Added specs supposed to be:

20MP sensor (same as RX100/M2 models)
ISO 125-25600
24-70mm f/1.8-2.8 lens
Built in View finder (SVGA OLED Tru-Finder 1440k dots)
Tiltable screen (180 degrees up)
Record in XAVC S format (Same format of the Sony A7s but with no 4K output option)
Others same as RX100 II

http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr5-sony-rx100m3-specs-records-in-xavc-s-format-just-like-the-a7s/

Third-pary Grip. Safe?

Hi
I have been doing alot of lengthy outdoor video shoots on my 5D lately. Even without ML raw, this can cause quite the power drain, so I am looking at different budget options for extended shooting. So far I am using extra cells and a car charger, but it is still not enough.
Rather than just buying more cells, I am thinking about getting a grip for the option of using normal AA cells in case of emergency. (If you badly need more charge than expected, you can send someone to pick up a load of AA's at a gas-station)
So, my question is if anyone here has any good/bad experience with the really cheap third-party no-name grips from ebay like this one: http://www.ebay.com/itm/331137824745?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1439.l2649

I know quality will not be the same as an original grip (possibly worse than the more expensive third-party options) but do you think its safe?
If it's DOA or stops working after a while, that's fine. Ebay buyer protection actually works, and I have always gotten full refunds in those cases. My only concern is if it could cause damage to my camera even though my intuition tells me that this would depend on the cells I use rather than the grip?


Nb. No need to preach about using cheap stuff on paid gigs. I am doing what I can with what I've got (rigging a DSLR for real video production is expensive) and this is meant to be a backup solution rather than something I will rely on regularly.

Recommendation for large format prints in UK?

Hello!

Can any of you good people of the UK recommend a high quality place to print large format photographs for hanging on the wall? Specifically I'm looking for a style that I've seen described variously as "Citiblock" (www.dscolourlabs.co.uk/citiblocks.cfm) or "Studio Block" elsewhere. It's where the photo gets mounted to the front of a block of wood (usually chipboard) with a black/white veneer edge for display on the wall directly (no additional framing/laminating necessary).

I've been happy with the results I've got from dscolourlabs in the past but their Citiblock size limit in 3:2 aspect ratio is 24"x16" and I'm looking to go a little bigger for my next print.

Thanks in advance for any help.

New Sensor Technology Coming From Canon? [CR1]

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/04/new-sensor-technology-coming-from-canon-cr1/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/04/new-sensor-technology-coming-from-canon-cr1/">Tweet</a></div>
<p>We’re told by a new source that a new generation of full-frame CMOS sensors slated for both a forthcoming mirrorless camera as well as updated versions of the current range of prosumer DLSR models.</p>
<p>The new full frame sensors are said to have lower production costs. Yields have improved for these sensors when compared to their predecessors, and that has probably lead to the cost reduction in production. There was also a bit of information about the new sensors having Foveon like technology, we’ve asked for clarification on this.</p>
<p>New source, so a big grain of salt for this one is required.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Canon's f/1.2's: What is really going on?

I've spent time carefully looking through online sample images of the two Canon f/1.2's, the 50mm and the 85mm. Consistently, the shots from the 85mm significantly outshine those from the 50mm in terms of sharpness and contrast. In many cases, colors seem better rendered by the 85mm also.

I own and love the 85mm 1.2, and I feel I'm just starting to hit my stride and understand its wide-open capabilities.

But, even before the latest Sigma anticipation, I've been craving something with a bit more room that allows me to step physically closer to subjects. I've heard negative and positive things about the 50mm 1.2, but that is true about most lenses.

So, I found as many 50mm 1.2 online images as I could, and what I'm seeing is a consistent lack of sharp center focus.

What is really going on? Is it a problem with the lens or the photographers? Are the 85mm 1.2 images on, say, pixel-peeper, being taken by better photographers (because the lens costs more, and, with its several quirks, appeals to more experienced photographers)?

Is the 85mm 1.2 really that much better than the 50mm 1.2? Because, from what I'm seeing in an overwhelming number of samples, the 50mm seems quite soft even dead center. With portraits, I want the option of having sharp eyes without having to apply too much sharpening in post, and I can do this with my 85mm even at 1.2.

Thanks in advance for any insights.

Zeiss Otus 55/1.4 vs. Sigma 50/1.4 Art

This thread shall be fully focused around comparing all aspects around these two lenses.

Rules:
1: All posted images must have a shot from each lens
2: All shots must be equally framed, e.g. tripod required
(The 50mm - 55mm difference must be accepted)
3: All image pairs must be given the same post processing, preferably as little as possible, to make
sure we don't mask out or increase artifacts
4: All comments and posts must be referring to the images, observed phenomena within the images
and theortical and practical arguments to explain these
5: All images must be accompanied with body, lens, shutter speed, f-stop and ISO information

Both lense have their individual threads, so please keep this thread dedicated to posting and discussing the images and the specific similarities and differences between these two lenses. The other stuff belong elsewhere.

Attachments

  • _D7T6059.jpg
    _D7T6059.jpg
    3.1 MB · Views: 1,125

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,439
Messages
973,561
Members
24,804
Latest member
zukibird

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB