Hey. New user here! Just sold my Pentax K5 to get the 6D and I love it!!
One question I have (tried search, but no results from my phone) after taking a photo, and seeing the instant review, how do I instantly zoom in without hitting the magnify button first? I just got in the habit of instantly reviewing and zooming photos, and it may sound silly, but an extra button press is annoying haha.

Thanks for your help!

Anybody have any side by side comparisons of Zeiss lenses against Canon?
I'm mostly looking for Zeiss 15mm 2.8 to anything wide made by Canon.

I purchased a 60D body only so I could save a few bucks and roll it into some lenses. I borrowed a kit lens from a friend, but it needs to be returned once I get my own glass. I would really like to get 2 lenses, a all purpose walk around like a 24-105 or 24-70 range, and a telephoto zoom something like a 70-200ish. Thing is I am looking for something better then the kit lens, but doesn't need to be L grade. I have seen many, many, many suggestion for L grade glass but as of right now if I went L grade I could only do 1 lens. I don't have anything again L grade, but this stuff is mainly for learning how to use the camera and learn to take good pictures. Later on as I learn more, yes I would upgrade to L glass. Right now I just shoot whatever just to get to know the camera, and that is pretty much just going to be used for fun not to make money. I am up for any suggestion you guys have.

Thank you

Also if you want to make a recommendation for a tripod I have been looking at those as well, and would like to keep the budget around 250$ for the tripod and head.

I'm still getting used to my camera and have got good results with the practice. As some of y'all know, I have been inquiring about the 70-200 f/2.8 IS II. I could get this lens but it would be the only lens I could get for football season and I believe I need a good wide angle lens to get pics and videos of the stadium, interviews, and shots at certain spots of the town I'll be visiting. So far, the IS II is still around $2,100 at Best Buy and havent had any luck finding a good deal on a refurbished one. So, I had been set on a new non IS version that I could get at the end of May or a little earlier. However, I have seen on Craigslist about the f/2.8 IS Version I and these lenses are selling around $1350-$1600. A little more than a non IS version (and used to boot) but the IS could come in handy when I need to do video of football action, band performances, etc.

Also, since I'm still learning how to apporpriately use aperture, what is the biggest difference between f/4 and f/2.8 and how would the extra stop benefit me? I believe that it would but I'm not quite sure how. The stadiums I'll be shooting at will vary on lighting quality so f/2.8 could come in handy. I had some trouble with my kit lens trying to take shots at a soccer game in the evening. The close up shots with the lens at mid length with f/4.5 were good but when I focused on far action it was grainy and looked too dark. Could beit operator error. Probably is operator error but the 28-135 kit lens may not be built for sports.

I'm not sure how good f/4 can be. I dont know. Maybe f/4 can totally suit my needs. I was thinking of just buying an f/4 non IS 70-200 for $500 and just use this one for now but the f/2.8 non IS is available and I can get it.

Many of y'all had experiences with f/4 and f/2.8 70-200 L lenses. What is the biggest difference between them. What makes the IS II that much better than the IS I? Does the non IS take better shots than the IS? And if I go with the non IS after all, is there software that can remove the camera shake. When i took video of my nephews baseball game with my kit lens, i did two clips. One with IS and one without IS. I also did it for the soccer game I was at and the non IS shots gave me a headache. I thought I was holding the camera firm but it was still too shaky and my family couldnt enjoy it but the IS shots were much more manageable and the video was good for a 7D.


Thanks for all your input. I promise this will be the last time I ask about the 70-200 L lenses. Big decision that I dont want to regret. I'll definitely let you all know which one I get and be glad to show samples. I really need to upload some sample shots I have now just to get some feedback. I'll do so in the near future (all shots I have are with the kit lens).

Hey everyone, I'm sure this question has been asked a million times before, but I couldn't find anything specific too my scenario. I'm looking for someone that has extensive experience with both Canon's 600EX-RT and PocketWizard's Flex TT1/TT5/AC3. PW's system is unreliable at best in my experience, with the AC3 failing to control zones properly at times. I shoot primarily weddings, engagements, and couples.

Here's my current setup.
Canon 5D Mark III
Canon 7D
Canon 580 EX II
2x Canon 480 EX II (I mainly use these as the range is much longer due to no interference)
3x PocketWizard Flex TT5
PocketWizard AC3 Zone Controller

I'm looking into selling all the flashes/PocketWizards on ebay (I should get between $1100-1200 for everything) and replacing them with 3 Canon 600 EX-RTs or 2 600 EX-RTs and ST-E3-RT. What is everyone's recommendations? How are the Canon's to work with as far as convenience, control, and reliability go? I would like to get rid of the 430 EX IIs so I have a more powerful flash, but I can't use all 580EX II's due to the RF interference. Thoughts? Thanks in advance.

Canon Rebel T5i (700d) Hands-On

it´s sad.. but well ... it´s the truth.

Hi everybody, now i have 24-105mm and tamron 90mm i sold my 50mm 1.4 yesterday
iam looking for buy 24-70mm tamron and 70-200mm 2.8 is usm
do you think the tamron is a good choice?

Greetings folks!

Looking to accumulate a slow growing collection of lenses for run/gun work as well as some work in controlled environments for interviews etc. for documentary work.

What do you guys think of the following:

1. 24-70
2. 24-105
3. 70-200

Which is the best/most useful for a starting zoom. I don't think my Tamron 17-50 cuts it, unless I need to give it a second chance since I'll be upgrading to the 5D MKIII (from 60d)

Also this is what I already have:

A. Canon 50 1.8
B. Tamron 17-50 2.8
C. Samyang 85 1.8

I'm looking to do most of the video/interview run and gun stuff by myself so that should be kept in mind.

Thanks!

JM

I wonder if Canon will do anything about the advanced high end point and shoot market that Fuji is just killing it in and even Nikon has the coolpix A that is OK. This is Fuji's 2nd camera in this segment and still nothing from Canon. I just don't find that the G15 or S110 are really a decent comparison to the Fuji X20 in so many ways. I think something more enthusiast focused would be awesome but it doesn't seem like Canon want's to try anything new and different in a big way. The 2/3" sensor in the X20 and the f/2-f/2.8 zoom lens are HUGE. And somehow, Fuji managed to make the images extremely sharp. You can download some Fuji X20 files in a review at: http://learningcameras.com/reviews/9-other/128-fuji-x20-hands-on-review
Has anyone seen images this sharp from the Canon G15 or S110?

There is a review on youtube for it as well:
Fuji X20 Hands On Review

So the new Fuji X100s looks awesome so far. Reviews all say it is unbelievable and it is sold out everywhere. Check out the low light results too...look better than the 5D3! I wonder why Canon doesn't try to compete in this market of enthusiasts who love the manual controls in a smaller body with good low light and AF performance. The only problem (if you call it that) with the X100 is that it is a fixed lens. Canon could make an interchangeable lens body if they wanted to I'm sure with whatever sensor they use in the new 70D (hopefully a new one). The EOS M just wasn't close to competing on this level. Hopefully a new Canon sensor comes with the 70D and I don't care how many MP it is if it looks great in low light. 16-18MP is fine but give me great IQ, great low light results, and figure out how to control banding in the shadows.
Take a look at the X100s low light results at 6400 ISO...you can hardly see grain even in the raw files. The review which has the RAW & full size JPEG files is: http://learningcameras.com/reviews/9-other/137-fuji-x100s-review

And there is a video review on youtube:
Fuji X100s Hands On Review & Test

Maybe this has been discussed prior. With the latest deal, I picked up my first Canon 50 1.4. In autofocus, it's great. However, one thing that bothers me is the focus ring... Whether I am focusing manually or full time focus in autofocus, I noticed that there was a friction when I turn the focus ring. Along with the friction, I can hear some sound as the focus ring turns. Unlike the 24-105 or 70-200 or the shorty 40 where the focus ring was smooth like fluid and silent, this one has a drag and some sound as though it was rubbing against something. I realize that the 50 1.4 does not have USM ring type like the other ones. For instance, without evening turning on the camera, if I hold the camera on one hand and then start turning the focus ring on the lens, I can hear the sound and feel the drag. Is this normal or is this a bad copy?

Hello,
I just bought a 6D and I was looking for a focus screen to help with manual focus. I am getting mixed information about the compatibility; some say that any focus screen that work for the 5D MkII will work and other say that none will. Can anybody help me? If it can help, I am looking for a split-sreen focus screen like this: http://www.ebay.ca/itm/180-horizontal-Split-Image-Focus-Focusing-Screen-For-Canon-EOS-5D2-5D-Mark-II?item=271183492503&cmd=ViewItem&_trksid=p5197.m7&_trkparms=algo%3DLVI%26itu%3DUCI%26otn%3D4%26po%3DLVI%26ps%3D63%26clkid%3D7174353032350245585.
Thank you very much!

Hi guys!

Anyone know where I can get the rubber seal that's on the back of the mount of a 24-70mm f2.8 mk1?

I asked my local Canon-shop if they could send me one for me to fix myself, and they could, only it was 211 USD! I tried looking on eBay, but couldn't really find one.

Thanks!

The competition's hotting up. New 35, 50 & 75mm lenses -

http://www.studiodaily.com/2013/04/schneider-optics-announces-new-family-of-4k-xenon-ff-primes-for-hdslr-cameras/

A friend of mine knows that I've been looking for a new camera and his friend is selling his for $700 for body only with 3K shutter count with 1 battery and charger. $820 for the body, battery grip, 4 batteries, 2 chargers, and memory card. The Owner had it for 2 years.

I'm thinking of purchasing it although I really want the Canon 6D coz of low light performance.

What do you guys think or what would you do?

Dear Forum contributors and wise adviser!


Not having any experience about replacement foot I am about to purchase the Canon EF300mm/f2.8 IS II USM and I am considering to right from the beginning purchase a replacement foot for the lens.
However there is a few to make the choice of.
But I am mostly into the RRS clamps and ballheads and tilt head from RRS.
So please is the RRS the best option?
1. a RRS LCF-52: Foot for Canon EF300mm/f2.8 IS-II Cost in Euro: 111.90€
Or should I instead choose one of these:
2. A Jobu Quick Release Lens Plate Replacement Foot LF-C504M2 - Euro 99.95€
or 3. a Kirk Quick Release Lens Plate LP-59 for Canon 300mm f/2.8 IS II USM Euro 78.95€ incl. VAT


All look good but somehow I am a bit tempted to go with the Really Right Stuff LCF:52 with the weight of only 68 g!


I would very much appreciate your thoughts and advice if you have time and interest in this question about replacement feet to tele-photo-lenses.


Wishing you All the Very Best!


Charl (Sweden)

From the net - http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/04/24/canon-earnings-idINDEE93N05I20130424

"Canon Inc raised its full-year operating profit forecast by $300 million as a weakening yen triggered by Japan's latest deflation-fighting policies inflates its overseas earnings, despite smartphones sapping compact camera sales."

So much for people who were anticipating a fall in prices of Canon products due to JPY devaluation.

Interestingly smartphones have started eating into the P&S sales. I am not surprised.

I am going to disney with my 5d. I have a 600 ex and want a lighter speedlite for portraits on the trip. Just torn because the 270 is small and seems like it will cover with my 24-70 ii. I do like the extra power of the 430 for fighting the outdoor lighting also but double the batteries and much larger. Anyone use the 270 in a similar situation and was happy or should i just lug the 430?

I just bought a canon 50 L lens and was checking it over this evening; I shook it lightly, and it rattled a little bit. I also have to micro adjust the focus on it on my 5D Mk III 15 points!! Never had to do it that much with any of my other lenses! On my 1dx I have to adjust it the same direction 5 points. Should I return the lens? Or send it to Canon? Or just live with it? I need some advice from someone with a little more experience.

Dear Friends,
Have just shot some footage using Canon 5D Mark III @ 500 ISO(!), 1920 x 1080 ALL-I, ZEISS ZE-series lenses.
Here are the grabs from the footage while playing in QuickTime.
Shot in Technicolor Cinestyle profile. No editing/grading whatsoever.
The question is - how come the noise is so bad?
1. Could I mess up the settings?
2. Is it a sensor issue (i.e. technically bad performance of the sensor itself)?
3. Could it be the Firmware issue?
4. ???
5. ???
Any word of advice is absolutely precious.
Thanks from Moscow, Russia.

Hey All.

so I am thinking of getting a better second body firstly I have a 7d and my backup it frankly the kids camera is an xti.

I shoot all over the board, family, candies, night seems, sports, landscapes, macro etc. So I will be adding to my gear bag in the next month and I am looking at a used body to the wife/backup.

I am thinking it f getting another 7d or a 1d mark II N.

I do have an assortment of glass and will also be adding the 70-200 2.8 of s mark I or II soon.

so just looking at peoples thoughts

thanks

Hi All, it's been some time since I've posted on this forum and once again I need all your feedbacks, mates!
I'm debating between the 50mm 1.2L vs. the 35mm 1.4L. They are priced pretty similar, so price is not an issue.
I will be using this mainly for weddings.

Currently I'm using 5D M2 w/ 70-280mm 2.8 v2; 24-70 f4L & 50mm 1.8.
I find the 50mm 1.8 not meeting my needs in low lighting.

So, bottom line, which lens would you go for and why?

Thanks again!!

Hey folks,
I'been waiting so long fot the 70d.... now it's again some more weeks away-at least. :-(

Looks like I'm finally going to switch to Nikon after 8 YEARS Canon... and now i'm wondering who else?
Anyone else out there who takes the consequences of the missing features or am i the only one?



Just wondering....

Hi again! For those interested in reading a review of this excellent lens along with a lot of sample images taken with it, I have just posted a review to my website at: http://www.dustinabbott.net/2013/04/canon-70-300mm-f4-5-6l-is-review-the-ultimate-zoo-lens/

Among the things I address are its use with teleconverters (sample images included). A lot of you are now familiar with my review technique, but in case you aren't, this is a real world review with pictures of things as opposed to charts. I am a part time professional photographer with a lot of real experience. If you don't care to look at the review, here is the conclusion: I like the lens...a lot 8)