Canon’s New “Sandwich” Lens Design Patent Teases an Affordable RF 85mm f/1.2

[Canon Rumors]

Canon spends a lot of time trying to make lenses smaller and lighter, and most of us out there appreciate the effort. Canon has done a great job over the years shaving weight off of lenses as they evolve into new versions. “Sandwich” Lens Element One of Canon’s latest patent applications is geared toward weight […]

See full article...

 

[DhlcadR6]

Looking forward to have a cheap&small 85/f1.2... I guess it'll be marketed as something resembles to EF 85mm f1.2L

 

[Steve_FR]

Interesting! There is no RF 50mm f/1.4 lens from Canon though, unless you meant the RF 50mm f/1.4L VCM? But you said no L series lenses have PMO optics. Which lens were you referring to?

 

[Del Paso]

I do not find the use of resins shocking or disturbing. My little cheap RF 28mm f/2,8 is at least as sharp as my Leica M Asph 28mm f/2,8.
But I'm still waiting for more "L" cuties, like a 180mm macro, a 14mm TS, a 70-200 f/2 , a 35mm f/1,2 etc...
Yet, it's nice to offer affordable luminous lenses, which, despite or thanks to their residual aberrations, have a charm of their own.

 

[GMCPhotographics]

I'm a long time user of a EF 85mm f1.2 II L. I love the look and teh files it turns in. However, my biggest issue with it is it's AF accuracy. This lens literally entered into a whole new world of ability and usefulness when I put it on my R8 / R6ii. Suddenly, I could explor the new world of eye detection AF and no longer use point and re-compose. Prevously I would use a single point AF then move the camera / lens so that my subject was now in focus. It was tedious, slow and required a fair amount of skill / patience. Now...the eye AF pretty much nails it every time and "oh....this is how sharp and contrasty this lens can be" is now my current rhetoric. In low like I still see a lot of focus errors, especially if the subject isn't posing but moving about a bit. The R6ii / R8's AF struggles tracking with this lens. HOWEVER...it's completely different on my R6iii. it's nailing fast moving people and I'm getting a higher keeper rate.

But, I would like to buy the current RF L version, it's sharper and it's AF is less taxing on the camera. I'm not sure this rumoured RF silver ring version would be much of an upgrade for me compared to my current EF version.

 

[Brown]

Interesting! There is no RF 50mm f/1.4 lens from Canon though, unless you meant the RF 50mm f/1.4L VCM? But you said no L series lenses have PMO optics. Which lens were you referring to?

The f/1.8

 

[Uneternal]

You mention there is a PMo element in the RF 50mm f/1.4. Is that a typo, cause underneath you said no L lenses use a PMo element?

 

[Canon Rumors]

Sorry.. typo. 1.8

 

[blackcoffee17]

My RF 28 2.8 is amazingly sharp and good optically, so i don't care if the lens elements are made from cheese.

 

[Skyfall]

My main hesitation with the current 85mm f2 is the af speed, so i rather have them make a smaller faster focusing 85mm f2 than slow focusing 85mm f1.2, but maby that is just me?

 

[muentzer]

We already have an 1.2/85 L USM, 1.2/85L USM DS, 1.4/85L VCM, and a 2.0/85 Macro IS STM. I don't think another 85' would make any sense.

 

[exkeks]

We already have an 1.2/85 L USM, 1.2/85L USM DS, 1.4/85L VCM, and a 2.0/85 Macro IS STM. I don't think another 85' would make any sense.

Same situation as with Canon's 50mm section: The might just call it a 80mm/1.2 STM and be there. Especially if you look at the real focal length in the cited patents.