who cares if it was a little bigger, just put a fan in!
Upvote
0
If this is the case then this is amazing news. I’m not sure why people (eg EOSHD) are getting so butthurt over this. Almost all my shooting is at 24p so this would work out perfectly for me!For sure 4K 24 doesn't. And this is really the primary setting a lot of video shooters will likely use for a brunt of their work. Me included.
I'm honestly surprised that I am surprised people are still talking about this. I'm a primary video shooter, and it really truly is a non-issue that the specialized codecs/settings have an upper limit for heat. Going to keep shaking my head all the way until my R5 arrives and I can go back to quietly enjoying making things. Hahaha
thank you but you have not answered my question. please be specific.:before the official release canon broadly communicated that there wasn’t a crop or any catch to their video specs. We were all shocked because 8k just seemed almost impossible without a catch
I didn’t suggest the overheating is on purpose and didn’t connect this camera to the cinema line. I wouldn’t but a cinema camera. I believe video and stills will merge over time but stills are the mostimportant to me
Oh my lord. Anyone watching this should have no doubts left that Tony is being paid to be negative about Canon:
Honestly - poo-pooed 8K said it wouldn't happen. Then said it would be timelapse, then promoted doubt around it, then focused on the overheat.
And now this - comparing these leaked specs in every way, even using coded language, to make the Sony sound superior. This is the definition of paid shilling.
Cause they were truly and rightfully shafted by the mighty Canon. obviously their butt is hurting now. picture thatIf this is the case then this is amazing news. I’m not sure why people (eg EOSHD) are getting so butthurt over this. Almost all my shooting is at 24p so this would work out perfectly for me!
so buy an R5 and have it work for 20 minutes before it bakes itself into submission...
To get a wider shot and a closeup, sharper delivered in 1080p, small reframing, digital stabilization with software etc..
Duh? He is saying how great it is to use a 12 Mpixel sensor? If you only shoot video, that may work, but still shooters are going to reject this approach! Yes, Tony is Sony Blind to the obvious.Tony makes a living by being wrong, this is what he said about the R5 when it what rumoured
View attachment 191357
Try FILMIC ProI don't know how to shoot interview on a phone.
With the creative cloud, you can install a trial version of Premiere, it'll work for a month or so. Each new yearly version will give you another trial.
I like your logic. I can have Premiere Rush which is probably a downgraded version of Pro but I'm not sure if this will do it.That's me sorted for a few hours messing with this. Cheers
I need to stop getting ahead of myself and overexcited as although I pre ordered the R5 and am told I am 5th on the list, I'm not that lucky and I probably won't get a unit in the 1st delivery.
I care if it's weather-sealed.who cares if it was a little bigger,
You put a fan on yours. Mine is better without.just put a fan in!
It's my definition of a jerk. I no longer view anything of his.Oh my lord. Anyone watching this should have no doubts left that Tony is being paid to be negative about Canon:
Honestly - poo-pooed 8K said it wouldn't happen. Then said it would be timelapse, then promoted doubt around it, then focused on the overheat.
And now this - comparing these leaked specs in every way, even using coded language, to make the Sony sound superior. This is the definition of paid shilling.
thank you but you have not answered my question. please be specific.:
++++ canon even made clear that the video specs were not limited in anyway before the official release.
A.M.: Could you please please advise the source of this intel? I do not believe that Canon ever stated that the video specs were not limited in anyway.
further to you recent statement:
++++ We were all shocked because 8k just seemed almost impossible without a catch.....
A.M.: We? who we?
++++The thermal issues seem to be the rate limiting step
and
++++I didn’t suggest the overheating is on purpose
A.M.: so was it a rate limiting step (as in on purpose) or not on purpose? A Cripple hummer or a technolgical limitation?
im sorry to hear you just realized that now.It's my definition of a jerk. I no longer view anything of his.
Jack
Same, so at least 2Dont care! I'm a stills photographer, feels like I'm the last one, this will be used for still photography, nothing more. Moving to next article.
who cares if it was a little bigger, just put a fan in!