I can imagine that most upcoming bodies will have CFe, Canon can make the buffer a lot smaller and hand wave complaints away with "get a faster CFe card".I just can't fathom a camera without weather sealing having CF Express
Upvote
0
I can imagine that most upcoming bodies will have CFe, Canon can make the buffer a lot smaller and hand wave complaints away with "get a faster CFe card".I just can't fathom a camera without weather sealing having CF Express
Given development of CFexpress B, it would be logical to have atleast 1x Type B card slot(Z6II and equivalent Panasonic seem to carry type B slots) plus SD for legacy support. If this "wishlist" of specs is true (hopefully the sensor get upgraded to BSI) then EOS R replacement will be a great general purpose camera leaving R6 replacement a specialist tool for sports/wildlife shooter(not a bad direction)Right, double SD would be far more logical.
Like even more overheating and max 5 min clips?Maybe video features?
Well...Like even more overheating and max 5 min clips?
To get below the R6 in specs and price, they will need to dump at least the IBIS and 2nd card slot.
Even then, they might risk cannibalizing R6 sales as photographers will buy the R8 instead of the R6 for the 30mpix sensor.
I thought so as well. The 4k 60p crop could well be a 1.1 (or less) crop like the R6 rather than a 1.6 crop. If priced $2-300 above the R6 launch price, that would leave room for a R replacement to be around $1.8-2k, giving a better spread of the RF camera bodies pricing.This is more of an R6 replacement than the R replacement... I would be very happy with this!
Unlikely. Canon has never and will never release a cheaper model that outclasses a more expensive one.
My periodic plea: can we please stop using this term? 1. It's inaccurate and 2. it's gross.- R8 will be crippled in features like no IBIS, no dual card slots, but cheaper than R6. (IMO this is also very likely).