Show your Bird Portraits

Here some still alive! These are from today, tomorrow I will try another location - in search for something more rare. Not much chances!

DSC_4827_DxO.jpgDSC_4911_DxO.jpgDSC_4917_DxO.jpgDSC_4956_DxO.jpgDSC_4957_DxO.jpgDSC_4976_DxO.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 10 users
Upvote 0
Nuthatch. One shot by my wife on the R7 + RF100-400mm at iso 16K, the other by me at iso 4k + 1ev in post with R5 + RF100-500mm. Both cropped. Why worry about iso nowadays?

3R3A3906-DxO_Nuthatch+seed_16k-hl.jpg309A9138-DxO_Nuthatch+seed_iso4k+1.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users
Upvote 0
Nuthatch. One shot by my wife on the R7 + RF100-400mm at iso 16K, the other by me at iso 4k + 1ev in post with R5 + RF100-500mm. Both cropped. Why worry about iso nowadays?

View attachment 212101View attachment 212102
I really can't notice any obvious difference in regards to how the noise software delt with the noise. You and your wife really do make it look easy! What was the difference in settings in regard to the white balance?
 
Upvote 0
I really can't notice any obvious difference in regards to how the noise software delt with the noise. You and your wife really do make it look easy! What was the difference in settings in regard to the white balance?
They are both on default WB. The different lenses and sensors seem to make a difference in general between the two. The R7/RF100-400mm is warmer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0