Once I have the full specifications I will have to do a comparison to my R3 which already has 24 MP and 30 fps. The only limitation I have had with the R3 was the limited buffer depth at 30 fps. If the R1 provides a small bump in resolution (24 MP to 28-36MP), and slight increase in speed (30 fps to 40 fps) and huge buffer depth (1000+ frames 14 bit RAW) it would still be a win in my book.I remain amazed that readers of the numerous rumour sites take to heart any of the long-distance rumours. Canon is notoriously tight-lipped about the development of their pro bodies. The R1 has been rumoured at 100+MP, then 85MP, then 45MP... I suspect and hope for something around 30MP, in the form factor of the 1DXIII, with dramatically improved AF and FPS. Basically, a chunkier R3+++. No GS, no super-high MP, no magical pixie-horses, just an 'incremental' development (allowing for the huge developmental change from SLR to mirrorless) of the 1DXIII. It will cost what it costs, and in the UK it will cost more than anywhere else in the world.
I only make photo books of my photos and for a 300 dpi 8x10 photo one only needs 7.2 MP.
Fun times ahead!!
Upvote
0